Which SF firm should I go to? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Which SF firm should I go to?
Going to be lateraling to SF market as a midlevel. End goal is AUSA or some other SEC/Big Fed related job in SF area.
No real desire to make partner unless it helps my bigfed dreams. Which firm should I go to? alternatively, if there's another firm I should look at, please let me know too (other than Keker, already rejected).
No real desire to make partner unless it helps my bigfed dreams. Which firm should I go to? alternatively, if there's another firm I should look at, please let me know too (other than Keker, already rejected).
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
SF-based litigator here. Kirkland/Sidley are fine, but if you don't look hard at these four firms, you're not doing your diligence.
http://www.kblfirm.com/careers/
https://www.taylorpatchen.com/
http://lewisllewellyn.com/
https://durietangri.com/
SF has a great boutique culture. You'll get much better experience at these firms than you will at Kirkland/Sidley.
Also, MTO has an SF office. It's absurdly selective, but also likely a better experience than Kirkland/Sidley.
Edit: Also, if you're looking AUSA/BigFed, why aren't Covington/Gibson/Latham/Orrick on your list? All have large SF offices with strong reputations in white collar.
http://www.kblfirm.com/careers/
https://www.taylorpatchen.com/
http://lewisllewellyn.com/
https://durietangri.com/
SF has a great boutique culture. You'll get much better experience at these firms than you will at Kirkland/Sidley.
Also, MTO has an SF office. It's absurdly selective, but also likely a better experience than Kirkland/Sidley.
Edit: Also, if you're looking AUSA/BigFed, why aren't Covington/Gibson/Latham/Orrick on your list? All have large SF offices with strong reputations in white collar.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Quinn should be near the top of the list too no?Anonymous User wrote:SF-based litigator here. Kirkland/Sidley are fine, but if you don't look hard at these four firms, you're not doing your diligence.
http://www.kblfirm.com/careers/
https://www.taylorpatchen.com/
http://lewisllewellyn.com/
https://durietangri.com/
SF has a great boutique culture. You'll get much better experience at these firms than you will at Kirkland/Sidley.
Also, MTO has an SF office. It's absurdly selective, but also likely a better experience than Kirkland/Sidley.
Edit: Also, if you're looking AUSA/BigFed, why aren't Covington/Gibson/Latham/Orrick on your list? All have large SF offices with strong reputations in white collar.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
This was crazy helpful thanks. I had not heard of any these boutiques you listed. I'm going to look into them. With regards to Cov/Gibson/Latham, I was under the impression that the SF offices did mostly IP work and the white collar or commercial lit practices were in LA. I could be wrong.Anonymous User wrote:SF-based litigator here. Kirkland/Sidley are fine, but if you don't look hard at these four firms, you're not doing your diligence.
http://www.kblfirm.com/careers/
https://www.taylorpatchen.com/
http://lewisllewellyn.com/
https://durietangri.com/
SF has a great boutique culture. You'll get much better experience at these firms than you will at Kirkland/Sidley.
Also, MTO has an SF office. It's absurdly selective, but also likely a better experience than Kirkland/Sidley.
Edit: Also, if you're looking AUSA/BigFed, why aren't Covington/Gibson/Latham/Orrick on your list? All have large SF offices with strong reputations in white collar.
Given my bigfed ambitions, I was thinking that whit ecollar practice would be most preferable, then commercial lit. As for Orrick, I just forgot about it... and will be applying if I can find an opening that fits.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:37 pm
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Keker, Van Nest & Peters should be at or near the very top of your list. It's arguably the best litigation boutique in SF.
EDIT: Just saw OP's mention that he was dinged from Keker. Comment withdrawn
EDIT: Just saw OP's mention that he was dinged from Keker. Comment withdrawn
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Give Saveri a look if you're interested in p-side antitrust at all. They sent a pretty compelling recruitment letter to law clerks on the 9th Cir. https://saverilawfirm.com/
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Same SF-based anon above. This is credited.Anonymous User wrote:Give Saveri a look if you're interested in p-side antitrust at all. They sent a pretty compelling recruitment letter to law clerks on the 9th Cir. https://saverilawfirm.com/
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
first anon: interesting, thanks. Anything particularly noteworthy on the recruitment letter? I can't find any info about this firm.Anonymous User wrote:Same SF-based anon above. This is credited.Anonymous User wrote:Give Saveri a look if you're interested in p-side antitrust at all. They sent a pretty compelling recruitment letter to law clerks on the 9th Cir. https://saverilawfirm.com/
second anon: Appreciate you chiming in again -- certainly adds credibility.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Surprised by the lack of love for Farella Braun and the favor for Kobre Kim. Anyone have any insight on this?
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Can't speak to the SF office, but in NY/DC Kobre & Kim is on the level of KVN/MTO/W&C etc. Super selective - all or nearly all of the associates are former clerks, lots of HYS types, etc. Farella Braun isn't like that. Should that matter to OP? IDKAnonymous User wrote:Surprised by the lack of love for Farella Braun and the favor for Kobre Kim. Anyone have any insight on this?
Edit: Just went on K&K website and filtered by SF. Looks small, and they don't even split by associate/partner, but it's the same sort of thing. All but one senior partner-type clerked, PhDs from Yale, etc
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Thanks for hte clarification re: Kobre Kim.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
sf litigator here. never heard of Kobre Kim, but not sure that means anything. Wouldn't recommend QE for AUSA hopes in the bay area -- they have former AUSAs, but none from NDCal, and no history of sending people into the USAO. When I think of good firms for that, I think Gibson and Orrick -- but that's just a guess, I didn't work at either of them.
I'd recommend interning with NDCal at some point to build connections there, as well as trying to clerk in the district. Former US Attorney of NdCal, Melinda Haag, works at Orrick now, so I assume working with and impressing her would be a good leg up.
I'd recommend interning with NDCal at some point to build connections there, as well as trying to clerk in the district. Former US Attorney of NdCal, Melinda Haag, works at Orrick now, so I assume working with and impressing her would be a good leg up.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Agreed that Munger should be on your list if you want to be an AUSA. The firm is crazy connected in California. They rarely hire laterals, though. And those who do come from NYC firms like Wachtell or Cravath.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
maybe I'm missing something, but OP is gonna be a midlevel associate. are you suggesting he quit and apply for like, a summer internship with a bunch of 1Ls lolAnonymous User wrote:I'd recommend interning with NDCal at some point to build connections there, as well as trying to clerk in the district. Former US Attorney of NdCal, Melinda Haag, works at Orrick now, so I assume working with and impressing her would be a good leg up.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
That was my original thought as well. I was under the impression that Munger did not hire laterals so I didn't apply..Anonymous User wrote:Agreed that Munger should be on your list if you want to be an AUSA. The firm is crazy connected in California. They rarely hire laterals, though. And those who do come from NYC firms like Wachtell or Cravath.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Thanks for this. Question for you: how important do you think it is to be at a firm doing white collar work as opposed to Commercial lit. Obv, white collar is beter if I want to go bigfed/usao but I'm wondering if that outweighs the value of another firm with a more reputable/stronger litigation practice where I'd be doing more commercial lit.Anonymous User wrote:sf litigator here. never heard of Kobre Kim, but not sure that means anything. Wouldn't recommend QE for AUSA hopes in the bay area -- they have former AUSAs, but none from NDCal, and no history of sending people into the USAO. When I think of good firms for that, I think Gibson and Orrick -- but that's just a guess, I didn't work at either of them.
I'd recommend interning with NDCal at some point to build connections there, as well as trying to clerk in the district. Former US Attorney of NdCal, Melinda Haag, works at Orrick now, so I assume working with and impressing her would be a good leg up.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Wow. very very surprised at all the Kobre Kim votes. Is this based on their actual strength in SF or just on what people know of DC/NY offices?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Anon SF litigator from above. My guess is NY/DC reputation. I've never heard reference to, nor seen on any of my cases, Kobre & Kim.
- Toni V
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:42 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
I have a friend at K&S, she loves the firm. You should add them to your "check them out" list.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Thnaks. What's K&S? King and Spalding?Anonymous User wrote:I have a friend at K&S, she loves the firm. You should add them to your "check them out" list.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Sorry to side track, but what do you know/think about Jones Day SF for litigation?Anonymous User wrote:Anon SF litigator from above. My guess is NY/DC reputation. I've never heard reference to, nor seen on any of my cases, Kobre & Kim.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:10 pm
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
I don't work in SF, but K&S is a very good firm for white-collar work. You probably already knew that, though.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
what's k and s?Anonymous User wrote:I don't work in SF, but K&S is a very good firm for white-collar work. You probably already knew that, though.
-
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:01 pm
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Unless there's another K&S I don't know about, anon above means King & Spalding.gaddockteeg wrote:what's k and s?Anonymous User wrote:I don't work in SF, but K&S is a very good firm for white-collar work. You probably already knew that, though.
-
- Posts: 428561
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which SF firm should I go to?
Thakns, that's what I figured, but I wasn't sure.SFSpartan wrote:Unless there's another K&S I don't know about, anon above means King & Spalding.gaddockteeg wrote:what's k and s?Anonymous User wrote:I don't work in SF, but K&S is a very good firm for white-collar work. You probably already knew that, though.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login