The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:21 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Cue being sick to my stomach for the next month Anyone else with two RC's think the section with arbitration was so easy? I'm so mad that's not the real one.
- urmlaw17
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:25 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Wish that was The experimentalZero Hedge wrote:The LG with the last game having the 8 floors was real.Incrementalist wrote:Does anyone know which game section was real? And Kate Li should definitely self publish lol.
PS: Team Li should send that tip to the big hitters
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:14 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Regardless of games feeling easier I have no doubt to was my worse section this time around as some choch caused a distraction by exclaiming 8 minutes into the section for a time update across the room to the proctor. Admittedly, it distracted me more than it should have haha so probably going to sit a cycle and retake. Obnoxious punk...
Last edited by Skadidas on Sat Dec 02, 2017 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 2:51 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Hey guys long time lurker! The test felt really easy but I still think I messed up anyway I'm not retaking (this is my third round) and I'm excited to think of something else besides this test!
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I definitely gave up 3 or 4 points on this test that I absolutely should not have. Very disappointed b/c I probably wont hit my target
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JamesBlahDeBlah
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:35 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Same, I see a lot of people saying it felt easy but then saying they made a lot of mistakes. So I feel like it was more difficult than we want to give it credit for (but still probably -10/11)Samonebby wrote:Hey guys long time lurker! The test felt really easy but I still think I messed up anyway I'm not retaking (this is my third round) and I'm excited to think of something else besides this test!
Last edited by JamesBlahDeBlah on Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:33 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Man, I felt pretty good about the test while I was taking it and after but Reddit confirmed I got one wrong on LR already l o l (The Chester misinterpret question). I felt RC was pretty decent. 25 LR was not bad but 26 LR was much harder to me. Really worried about LG. I didn’t feel bad about the first three games when I did it but that last LG... whelp. Can’t tell how I did unless I know whether this assumption I may or may not have made would have changed all the answers. I remember lit. all the conditions and I diagrammed it so easily post-test but dun goofed.
I go from thinking I killed it to feeling like I should kms every ten minutes.
I go from thinking I killed it to feeling like I should kms every ten minutes.
- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
cubswin16 wrote: Kate Li should definitely self publish
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:33 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Also my test center was like... awful. Tiny desks so they had us push desks together to have more space. A Vietnam war vet saying pretty awful things about his wife who was also proctoring. Their son helped administer and his squeaky shoes were shuffling around all the time. The PA system going off in the fourth section.
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by etramak on Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- PhiladelphiaCollins
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
LOL what is this, a family run testing facility?dietcoked wrote:Also my test center was like... awful. Tiny desks so they had us push desks together to have more space. A Vietnam war vet saying pretty awful things about his wife who was also proctoring. Their son helped administer and his squeaky shoes were shuffling around all the time. The PA system going off in the fourth section.
-
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:33 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Seriously like smallest business Saturday.PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:LOL what is this, a family run testing facility?dietcoked wrote:Also my test center was like... awful. Tiny desks so they had us push desks together to have more space. A Vietnam war vet saying pretty awful things about his wife who was also proctoring. Their son helped administer and his squeaky shoes were shuffling around all the time. The PA system going off in the fourth section.
- Eleven
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:46 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
That question did not gave a correct answer. I stared at it for 7 minutes I think.etramak wrote:Caligula can go to hell
Knights was ridiculous also.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Texted my study buddy panicking and he called me back and we had a nice debrief. It seemed like LG was good if you didn't focus on the upfront - much easier to just brute force for a lot of the questions
LR wasn't difficult if you focused on why wrong answers are wrong - we're both convinced some of the "right" answers were just not wrong.
RC was weird because there were obvious right answers for some of the questions.
We both think there will be a -11/-12 curve. Those LG were rough for him (he's kinda my gauge for LG difficulty) and some LR questions were just weird as fuck.
LR wasn't difficult if you focused on why wrong answers are wrong - we're both convinced some of the "right" answers were just not wrong.
RC was weird because there were obvious right answers for some of the questions.
We both think there will be a -11/-12 curve. Those LG were rough for him (he's kinda my gauge for LG difficulty) and some LR questions were just weird as fuck.
- PhiladelphiaCollins
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Too tired to get fucked up tonight. Drinking beers and watching hockey
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by kiklavan on Fri Dec 29, 2017 7:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I read that Q like twice and ended up choosing a random answer because I had no idea what I was doingkiklavan wrote:What the fuck even was that questionEleven wrote:That question did not gave a correct answer. I stared at it for 7 minutes I think.etramak wrote:Caligula can go to hell
Knights was ridiculous also.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by kiklavan on Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:14 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
There's a pretty controversial erotic movie about Caligula who was apparently into incest and was also a blood-thirsty sadist. I was traumatized by it and all the feelings came back as I read the question.kiklavan wrote:What the fuck even was that questionEleven wrote:That question did not gave a correct answer. I stared at it for 7 minutes I think.etramak wrote:Caligula can go to hell
Knights was ridiculous also.
-
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Again, what the actual fuck was that questionJamesBlahDeBlah wrote:Definitely trickyetramak wrote:I cant be the only one who thought black and white question was hard?
- S0L0
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:01 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Agree with this. Switched my LR strategy leading up to December to read the question stems first with a rigorous elimination process. This made the LR seem fairly easy. Definitely remember some weird questions (Caligula, fish, etc.) but was mostly able to uncover LSAC's tricks.lemonlacroix wrote:
LR wasn't difficult if you focused on why wrong answers are wrong - we're both convinced some of the "right" answers were just not wrong.
Definitely remember a Least Strengthens question where all five conceivably could have strengthened but one took a lot of mental gymnastics.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Yes exactly! That question I actually had to change my answer.S0L0 wrote:Agree with this. Switched my LR strategy leading up to December to read the question stems first with a rigorous elimination process. This made the LR seem fairly easy. Definitely remember some weird questions (Caligula, fish, etc.) but was mostly able to uncover LSAC's tricks.lemonlacroix wrote:
LR wasn't difficult if you focused on why wrong answers are wrong - we're both convinced some of the "right" answers were just not wrong.
Definitely remember a Least Strengthens question where all five conceivably could have strengthened but one took a lot of mental gymnastics.
We started studying together to switch to an elimination focused strategy. It tripped us both up in September having so many questions where the right answer does not seem right at all.
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by etramak on Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- GnarMarBinx
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 3:21 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
6 questionsetramak wrote:How many questions were on game 4?
- Oneanddone?
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 8:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I felt so confident on so many of the LR questions you all are rehashing - but who knows. Definitely not my strongest performance, even though I got to look at all the LG questions (which doesn’t always happen). LR and RC are my strengths, but I have no clue how I did on either. I’ve done great on PTs but who knows what that tells.
I got an exp LG section and it was SO EASY. I crushed it - I mean, probably -0 (a miracle - I once squeaked by on a PT with +9). So the “exp” factor absolutely breaks my heart.
I’m guessing I’ll end up between 150 and 171.
I got an exp LG section and it was SO EASY. I crushed it - I mean, probably -0 (a miracle - I once squeaked by on a PT with +9). So the “exp” factor absolutely breaks my heart.
I’m guessing I’ll end up between 150 and 171.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login