6 LSAT Scores what are my chances for CCN? Forum

[$1.99]

i am not a troll

[Jack Smirks]

Have you considered one last retake? It might just give you that bump that you need.

[Bildungsroman]

They're probably not going to be crazy about your LSAT score range getting objectively worse than one that already got you waitlisted. I'd say WL/out at all 3; your numbers got worse and have established one hell of a pattern, as well as whatever assumptions the schools will draw from a file when someone took the LSAT 6 times.

[minnesotasam]

retake

[$1.99]

lsac changed their policy so i can't retake anymore

[Bildungsroman]

lsac changed their policy so i can't retake anymore

Yeah, cause otherwise that would be a great idea.

[$1.99]

hey dont be a douche man im trying to do the best i can with my collection of scores

[Danteshek]

This is exhibit A for why RETAKE is NOT always TCR

[Bobeo]

No way this is real.

[flexityflex86]

This is exhibit A for why RETAKE is NOT always TCR

i can understand the appeal to retake with the gpa though as literally 2 points would have worked for columbia, and maybe one of HYS. i agree rretaking a 171 would be dumb with a 3.5, but here it makes sense.

[paulinaporizkova]

lsac changed their policy so i can't retake anymore

Yeah, cause otherwise that would be a great idea.

ok, i loled

[paulinaporizkova]

i applied in a previous cycle with just a 171 and a 3.88 and got nyu and chicago. this cycle i got waitlisted at all three.

this might explain the drop in LSAT points

[$1.99]

yeah i took a huge gamble and lost, but the best i can do now is maximize my odds by EDing. this is not a troll i promise.

[thelawschoolproject]

Have you considered taking 1-2 years off, retaking the LSAT for a final time, and trying again?

Having either increased work experience or a graduate degree may help you, and it will show commitment to improving your status as a law applicant.

Honestly, the declination in your LSAT scores does not work in your favor, even with the 171.

An alternative would also be to not aim for a T-14, maybe T-30 and you'd get scholarship money?

I don't know what the best thing is to do, but I would opt for taking some time away from the cycle.

[weejonbu]

This is so retarded. You got into Chicago and NYU and still weren't satisfied? Geez, what a prestige whore...

[Flips88]

So you got two of the T-6 and thought taking the LSAT 4 more times was the answer?

[glewz]

Have you considered taking 1-2 years off, retaking the LSAT for a final time, and trying again?

I'm not sure if this is the best idea...6 scores is more than enough IMO.

OP, ED to one of CCN, that doesn't have a reputation for averaging LSAT scores, only if you're willing to pay sticker; I was under the impression that NYU still averages... could be wrong.

[$1.99]

i was not prestige whoring, i had a significant other that attended harvard so i wanted to stay with her.

[$1.99]

so should i ED to NYU or Columbia?

[tyro]

One of the better pretend situation threads for giggles I've seen.

[westinghouse60]

i was not prestige whoring, i had a significant other that attended harvard so i wanted to stay with her.

That is as bad as, if not worse of than, turning down 2 T-6s in hopes of moar prestige elsewhere.

[Verity]

Utter flame, or total douche?

[DonnaDraper]

If this is not a flame.....seriously? how lucky did you think you were going to get? Especially once you get into the 170's, it starts to become more and more of a situational/luck thing unless you are a really great test taker/studied your ass off. Which brings me to ask...what did you do the first time that you didn't do all the other times? I hope you and that gf are still together.....

[20121109]

lsac changed their policy so i can't retake anymore

Yeah, cause otherwise that would be a great idea.

ok, i loled

[tng11]

...