Agreed, with one exception. I would only consider cancelling if some bona-fide disaster - forgetting to bubble in answers for an entire section, getting sick and having to leave midway through the test, etc., caused me to miss a dozen questions or more. If I were 100% certain that some kind of problem like that is going to tank my score into the 140s, I would cancel, because it'll make the inevitable addendum about whatever happened more believable and because the sitting is now thoroughly useless as a diagnostic tool.saf18hornet wrote:Even if your goals are Yale or bust, there is no reason to cancel a score.
-11 Curve, September 2017 Waiter's Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:09 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 5:35 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I had 2 26q LR sections and one 1 25 q LR Ssection though .... now im paranoid if i bubbled wrongImpressionist wrote:I remember reading somewhere that someone who closely follows LSATs said that there was evidence that they switched the LR experimental location between versions of the 3 LR test. IIRC he said it would be a first.
I think it's worth noting that across multiple sites people seem to agree that one of the 25q sections was super easy and the other pretty tough. However they are split on whether section 1 or 3 was easy. Given how standardized LR is i think it is more likely that they swapped the sections than the community being split down the middle and pretty far apart about the difficulty of the sections.
At least I hope so since if there is only 1 version I could be in trouble.
- sabraph
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:55 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I had a cancel for June but that was because I had a panic attack in the middle of the reading comp section. I think there are legitimate reasons to cancel however I definitely don't think you should make that decision based on how you feel afterwards. Hang in there! 20 more days!saf18hornet wrote:There is no way I am cancelling, because I have never seen a valid argument for it anywhere. I expect a 164 to 168 on this exam, but if I got lucky on some guesses it could be 170+. Even if you have a 170 on record, get a 160 on this one, and then retake in December, that's certainly no reason to cancel thus score. Even if your goals are Yale or bust, there is no reason to cancel a score.tiffany_1234 wrote:I have exactly the same feelings as you, and I believe I have the same sections as you too. I think the 1st (25Q) and 3rd(26) LR is of median difficulty, and the 2nd one is relatively easy. But LG is kinda weird for me, maybe they are too short, and I worry about this part the most, while people are all saying that LG this time is very easy.saf18hornet wrote:I had a single RC section as my 5th section. The first 2 passages were okay but I took too long on the first passage. Then when that 3rd passage (judges candor), showed up I hated all of it. I didn't like any of the AC and sunk allllll my remaining time into it. I didn't even try to read the last passage, just did the fee questions on specific line and word references then penciled in guesses. I'm gonna guess I got the same score as June.
I had 3 RC, the 1st one seemed very difficult (25Q). The other two not so bad.
LG seemed fine to me, but one question tripped me off. I would guess that folks will worse on this LG than they are expecting.
Can I know your score range of your last exam? Because I am thinking whether to cancel the score this time.
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
An addendum for a cancel is the same as an addendum for, my score is 140 because I had a panic attack / misbubbled / shat myself during section 2. None are valid reasons to cancel.icechicken wrote:Agreed, with one exception. I would only consider cancelling if some bona-fide disaster - forgetting to bubble in answers for an entire section, getting sick and having to leave midway through the test, etc., caused me to miss a dozen questions or more. If I were 100% certain that some kind of problem like that is going to tank my score into the 140s, I would cancel, because it'll make the inevitable addendum about whatever happened more believable and because the sitting is now thoroughly useless as a diagnostic tool.saf18hornet wrote:Even if your goals are Yale or bust, there is no reason to cancel a score.
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:09 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
If you cancel, there's no chance of someone thinking that your explanation is post-hoc damage control. Heck, if you just cancel once and then get your target score on the 2nd take, you probably don't need an addendum at all -- the cancellation speaks for itself. Even if there's a only small possibility of a 140 hurting one's application it'd be nice not to have to worry, at all, about the optics of it during the emotionally-taxing process of retaking the LSAT and then writing a bunch of applications.saf18hornet wrote:An addendum for a cancel is the same as an addendum for, my score is 140 because I had a panic attack / misbubbled / shat myself during section 2. None are valid reasons to cancel.
Meanwhile, there are no downsides I can think of to cancelling iff one is confident they scored terribly. Which ones are you concerned about?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sabraph
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:55 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Yes to all of this ^. Generally applicants don't (and I won't) write an addendum for a single cancel. An addendum and a cancel are two completely different things. I would much prefer a cancel and a 170 than a 140 and a 170.icechicken wrote:If you cancel, there's no chance of someone thinking that your explanation is post-hoc damage control. Heck, if you just cancel once and then get your target score on the 2nd take, you probably don't need an addendum at all -- the cancellation speaks for itself. Even if there's a only small possibility of a 140 hurting one's application it'd be nice not to have to worry, at all, about the optics of it during the emotionally-taxing process of retaking the LSAT and then writing a bunch of applications.saf18hornet wrote:An addendum for a cancel is the same as an addendum for, my score is 140 because I had a panic attack / misbubbled / shat myself during section 2. None are valid reasons to cancel.
Meanwhile, there are no downsides I can think of to cancelling iff one is confident they scored terribly. Which ones are you concerned about?
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
+1 imo a cancel is typically better than a low score as it shows self-awareness unless you are unsure how bad/good you did.sabraph wrote:Yes to all of this ^. Generally applicants don't (and I won't) write an addendum for a single cancel. An addendum and a cancel are two completely different things. I would much prefer a cancel and a 170 than a 140 and a 170.icechicken wrote:If you cancel, there's no chance of someone thinking that your explanation is post-hoc damage control. Heck, if you just cancel once and then get your target score on the 2nd take, you probably don't need an addendum at all -- the cancellation speaks for itself. Even if there's a only small possibility of a 140 hurting one's application it'd be nice not to have to worry, at all, about the optics of it during the emotionally-taxing process of retaking the LSAT and then writing a bunch of applications.saf18hornet wrote:An addendum for a cancel is the same as an addendum for, my score is 140 because I had a panic attack / misbubbled / shat myself during section 2. None are valid reasons to cancel.
Meanwhile, there are no downsides I can think of to cancelling iff one is confident they scored terribly. Which ones are you concerned about?
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
'twas a plurality. I'd say we need a runoff*.Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
*not a serious poll suggestion.
- sodomojo
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:17 am
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Aren't y'all overthinking it a little bit?appind wrote:+1 imo a cancel is typically better than a low score as it shows self-awareness unless you are unsure how bad/good you did.sabraph wrote:Yes to all of this ^. Generally applicants don't (and I won't) write an addendum for a single cancel. An addendum and a cancel are two completely different things. I would much prefer a cancel and a 170 than a 140 and a 170.icechicken wrote:If you cancel, there's no chance of someone thinking that your explanation is post-hoc damage control. Heck, if you just cancel once and then get your target score on the 2nd take, you probably don't need an addendum at all -- the cancellation speaks for itself. Even if there's a only small possibility of a 140 hurting one's application it'd be nice not to have to worry, at all, about the optics of it during the emotionally-taxing process of retaking the LSAT and then writing a bunch of applications.saf18hornet wrote:An addendum for a cancel is the same as an addendum for, my score is 140 because I had a panic attack / misbubbled / shat myself during section 2. None are valid reasons to cancel.
Meanwhile, there are no downsides I can think of to cancelling iff one is confident they scored terribly. Which ones are you concerned about?
I mean yeah, technically speaking, you're probably right.
But what are the odds an admission decision comes down to between solely your 140/170 and another dude's cancel/170?
I suppose 140 is a little extreme, but I imagine the point is valid if there's a minute chance you did well and then end up with say a 150 or 160.
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:23 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Checking in over here..
This was my 4th take. I've been wondering if I have the energy for a 5th one if I still don't make it. With that being said, I felt better about this test than any other one
This was my 4th take. I've been wondering if I have the energy for a 5th one if I still don't make it. With that being said, I felt better about this test than any other one
- Walliums
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I was gonna suggest favorite halloween candy, but since it's still september, maybe your guilty pleasure "basic" fall item (e.g. Pumpkin Spice Latte, pumpkin bagel, caramel apple on a stick)Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
- chewinggum
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:00 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I second this!Walliums wrote:I was gonna suggest favorite halloween candy, but since it's still september, maybe your guilty pleasure "basic" fall item (e.g. Pumpkin Spice Latte, pumpkin bagel, caramel apple on a stick)Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wmbuff
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:26 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Oktoberfest beer....chewinggum wrote:I second this!Walliums wrote:I was gonna suggest favorite halloween candy, but since it's still september, maybe your guilty pleasure "basic" fall item (e.g. Pumpkin Spice Latte, pumpkin bagel, caramel apple on a stick)Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
Last edited by wmbuff on Sun Jan 28, 2018 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I'm thinking:wmbuff wrote:Oktoberfest beer....chewinggum wrote:I second this!Walliums wrote:I was gonna suggest favorite halloween candy, but since it's still september, maybe your guilty pleasure "basic" fall item (e.g. Pumpkin Spice Latte, pumpkin bagel, caramel apple on a stick)Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
Oktoberfest
pumpkin spice
candy apples
that girl scout popcorn
cinnamon apple cider
candy apples
peanut brittle
campfire smores
ahh, fu$# I'm at a loss. I'm open to suggestions/revisions of this list
- Walliums
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Swapped out one of the duplicate candy apples for pecan pieBarry grandpapy wrote:I'm thinking:wmbuff wrote:Oktoberfest beer....chewinggum wrote:I second this!Walliums wrote:I was gonna suggest favorite halloween candy, but since it's still september, maybe your guilty pleasure "basic" fall item (e.g. Pumpkin Spice Latte, pumpkin bagel, caramel apple on a stick)Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
Oktoberfest beer
pumpkin spice
candy apples
that girl scout popcorn
cinnamon apple cider
pecan pie
peanut brittle
campfire smores
ahh, fu$# I'm at a loss. I'm open to suggestions/revisions of this list
- april_ludgate
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:28 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Walliums wrote:Swapped out one of the duplicate candy apples for pecan pieBarry grandpapy wrote:I'm thinking:wmbuff wrote:Oktoberfest beer....chewinggum wrote:I second this!Walliums wrote:I was gonna suggest favorite halloween candy, but since it's still september, maybe your guilty pleasure "basic" fall item (e.g. Pumpkin Spice Latte, pumpkin bagel, caramel apple on a stick)Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
Oktoberfest beer
pumpkin spice
candy apples
that girl scout popcorn
cinnamon apple cider
pecan pie
peanut brittle
campfire smores
ahh, fu$# I'm at a loss. I'm open to suggestions/revisions of this list
halloween/halloween stuff maybe?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
drunk updateapril_ludgate wrote:Walliums wrote:Swapped out one of the duplicate candy apples for pecan pieBarry grandpapy wrote:I'm thinking:wmbuff wrote:Oktoberfest beer....chewinggum wrote:I second this!Walliums wrote:I was gonna suggest favorite halloween candy, but since it's still september, maybe your guilty pleasure "basic" fall item (e.g. Pumpkin Spice Latte, pumpkin bagel, caramel apple on a stick)Barry grandpapy wrote:Looks like we have a winner. I'll change the poll to the next poll suggestion
Oktoberfest beer
pumpkin spice
candy apples
that girl scout popcorn
cinnamon apple cider
pecan pie
peanut brittle
campfire smores
ahh, fu$# I'm at a loss. I'm open to suggestions/revisions of this list
halloween/halloween stuff maybe?
- wmbuff
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:26 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Well, I had my first disappointing score dream. Probably had something to do with my wife, cat, and dog conspiring to twist me into a pretzel while I slept.
Last edited by wmbuff on Sun Jan 28, 2018 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: September 2017 Waiter's Thread
This is what I'm saying as the OP. Admissions officers on this site and elsewhere in their publishing's have said they treat them no differently. Cancel or low score.sodomojo wrote:Aren't y'all overthinking it a little bit?appind wrote:+1 imo a cancel is typically better than a low score as it shows self-awareness unless you are unsure how bad/good you did.sabraph wrote:Yes to all of this ^. Generally applicants don't (and I won't) write an addendum for a single cancel. An addendum and a cancel are two completely different things. I would much prefer a cancel and a 170 than a 140 and a 170.icechicken wrote:If you cancel, there's no chance of someone thinking that your explanation is post-hoc damage control. Heck, if you just cancel once and then get your target score on the 2nd take, you probably don't need an addendum at all -- the cancellation speaks for itself. Even if there's a only small possibility of a 140 hurting one's application it'd be nice not to have to worry, at all, about the optics of it during the emotionally-taxing process of retaking the LSAT and then writing a bunch of applications.saf18hornet wrote:An addendum for a cancel is the same as an addendum for, my score is 140 because I had a panic attack / misbubbled / shat myself during section 2. None are valid reasons to cancel.
Meanwhile, there are no downsides I can think of to cancelling iff one is confident they scored terribly. Which ones are you concerned about?
I mean yeah, technically speaking, you're probably right.
But what are the odds an admission decision comes down to between solely your 140/170 and another dude's cancel/170?
I suppose 140 is a little extreme, but I imagine the point is valid if there's a minute chance you did well and then end up with say a 150 or 160.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Pumpkin spice is overrated
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:53 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Mikey. Take it back.Mikey wrote:Pumpkin spice is overrated
Last edited by Ntp73821 on Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
noNtp73821 wrote:Mikey. Take it back.Mikey wrote:Pumpkin spice is overrated
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:47 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
Fall is overratedMikey wrote:Pumpkin spice is overrated
- wmbuff
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:26 pm
Re: Dive-bombing for Judges, September 2017 Waiter's Thread
I bet you have air conditioning.OldSpeedoGuy wrote: Fall is overrated
Last edited by wmbuff on Sun Jan 28, 2018 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login