June 2017 Waiters Thread- Grayday! -9 curve. GL all Forum
- Mint-Berry_Crunch
- Posts: 5816
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:20 am
June 2017 Waiters Thread- Grayday! -9 curve. GL all
Hello everyone!
Welcome to your June 2017 Waiters Thread!
I'm your host, Mint Berry Crunch!
We have an action packed month of waiting, shitpoasting, baseless speculation, and alcoholism planned for you!
RC: jazz, inference of thought, dowsing, independent judicial research
LR1: the 26 q one is real
LG: Teaching assistants, obstacles, magazines with rural or urban, people going to Asia
LR2: heavy metal isotopes, orangutans, chlorophyll, (and lots of one specific AC).
Welcome to your June 2017 Waiters Thread!
I'm your host, Mint Berry Crunch!
We have an action packed month of waiting, shitpoasting, baseless speculation, and alcoholism planned for you!
RC: jazz, inference of thought, dowsing, independent judicial research
LR1: the 26 q one is real
LG: Teaching assistants, obstacles, magazines with rural or urban, people going to Asia
LR2: heavy metal isotopes, orangutans, chlorophyll, (and lots of one specific AC).
Last edited by Mint-Berry_Crunch on Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:55 pm, edited 36 times in total.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
checking in for shit post contributing purposes.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 9:18 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Just posted this in the other thread but ill post it here too:
Hello! Fellow lurker here. Just took the test, had an LR experimental... but all the LRs seemed.. easy? Is that just me? Also RC was ridiculously hard. I think i just stared at it for 5 seconds being like "WTF". Also thank you baby jesus there were no weird games. Hope you all did well!
Hello! Fellow lurker here. Just took the test, had an LR experimental... but all the LRs seemed.. easy? Is that just me? Also RC was ridiculously hard. I think i just stared at it for 5 seconds being like "WTF". Also thank you baby jesus there were no weird games. Hope you all did well!
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
+1Mikey wrote:checking in for shit post contributing purposes.
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
After 100%. Easiest LG ever. RC was nuts. All the LR were consistently mild.BOSStongrl wrote:Just posted this in the other thread but ill post it here too:
Hello! Fellow lurker here. Just took the test, had an LR experimental... but all the LRs seemed.. easy? Is that just me? Also RC was ridiculously hard. I think i just stared at it for 5 seconds being like "WTF". Also thank you baby jesus there were no weird games. Hope you all did well!
LG only had 1 small new twist.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Jack_Kelly
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:52 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
I thought one of the LRs was hardish. Didn't find RC that bad. Huh.
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
The mod edit: do NOT post the nature of a question; topic is okay, logical principle/kind of game is not question seemed strange to me. And I did not like the primates with a screwdriver.Jack_Kelly wrote:I thought one of the LRs was hardish. Didn't find RC that bad. Huh.
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Was there an 'agree' question on both of the real LR sections. Please yes.
They are rare and I had 1 on two diff sections!
They are rare and I had 1 on two diff sections!
- amta
- Posts: 9459
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
in. which waiters would you MFK?
-
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:04 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by Barry grandpapy on Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- tuna_wasabi
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Fuck that heavy isotopes. Pretty sure I have to retake to get my desired score. Either that or cancel.saf18hornet wrote:The edited out seemed strange to me. And I did not like the primates with a screwdriver.Jack_Kelly wrote:I thought one of the LRs was hardish. Didn't find RC that bad. Huh.
- Incrementalist
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:48 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Check in hope well all did well
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:21 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Ugh yes, heavy isotopes was one of the tough oneslynn.wibi wrote:Fuck that heavy isotopes. Pretty sure I have to retake to get my desired score. Either that or cancel.saf18hornet wrote:The edited out question seemed strange to me. And I did not like the primates with a screwdriver.Jack_Kelly wrote:I thought one of the LRs was hardish. Didn't find RC that bad. Huh.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tuna_wasabi
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Actually that entire LR section didn't go well for me. Left 2 blanks and was uncertain about at least 2 more questions. The comparative passage is kinda insane.saf18hornet wrote:Ugh yes, heavy isotopes was one of the tough oneslynn.wibi wrote:Fuck that heavy isotopes. Pretty sure I have to retake to get my desired score. Either that or cancel.saf18hornet wrote:The edited out question seemed strange to me. And I did not like the primates with a screwdriver.Jack_Kelly wrote:I thought one of the LRs was hardish. Didn't find RC that bad. Huh.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2014 11:15 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Thought it was kind of easy, which makes me nervous because I've never thought that so the curve is probably going to wreck me
had like 12 mins left going into the last LG and thought it was going to be something crazy, then it was just a grouping game? wtf?
had like 12 mins left going into the last LG and thought it was going to be something crazy, then it was just a grouping game? wtf?
- Future Ex-Engineer
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Easiest LG section ever.
RC was difficult but not impossible.
26Q LR section was pretty normal.
25Q LR section was quite difficult (assuming the section with heavy isotopes was real)
RC was difficult but not impossible.
26Q LR section was pretty normal.
25Q LR section was quite difficult (assuming the section with heavy isotopes was real)
- Walliums
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:39 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by Walliums on Thu Jul 06, 2017 9:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- augustyyy
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:36 am
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
long time lurker checking in
the RC was like hell, I panic the whole LR section after the RC
the RC was like hell, I panic the whole LR section after the RC
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mmorrell94 wrote:Thought it was kind of easy, which makes me nervous because I've never thought that so the curve is probably going to wreck me
had like 12 mins left going into the last LG and thought it was going to be something crazy, then it was just a grouping game? wtf?
Exactly my thoughts. I feel like I owned that shit but it just seemed like an easier test overall. Only super tough LR question was one about anti-auto theft devices. Was that real or experimental? Either way it was incomprehensible. RC was challenging but not crazy. Easier LG than I could have dreamed of.
Predicting -9 curve. I'm almost certain I beat my PT average though.
- tuna_wasabi
- Posts: 292
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:16 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
God no. Not a -9 curve. That would destroy me.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
BTW guys I am not allowed to talk about answers I gave. This freak anyone else out?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
RC I actually felt wasn't difficult at all, the subject matter was complex but the structure was simple.
LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal
LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.
Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT
Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.
LR1 was real easy, LR2 was brutal
LG games 1-3 were a breeze, pretty sure those were perfect. 4th I think I missed an inference and had trouble on 3 questions, so I think I went between -0 and -3.
Had a 2nd LG but it seems to be the experimental per /r/LSAT
Really have no idea how I did, if I drop points on LG I may be in trouble. I could see anywhere between 167-173 depending upon curve and some tough questions.
-
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 10:56 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 9:18 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
mod edit: don't talk about what answers you gave/had in a row
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2017 7:53 pm
Re: June 2017 Waiters Thread
Longtime lurker checking in...
LG was so easy I thought I had really messed something up RC was not fun... no longer a Jazz fan lol
LG was so easy I thought I had really messed something up RC was not fun... no longer a Jazz fan lol
Last edited by Ntp73821 on Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login