Let's talk 2nd Circuit! Forum

(Seek and share information about clerkship applications, clerkship hiring timelines, and post-clerkship employment opportunities)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 10, 2024 7:50 pm

It’s Perez, not Lee. Lee isn’t someone who instinctively rocks the boat. Same for Nathan and Robinson. Calabresi is in the same bucket as Perez but of a different generation, and he might be the most liberal judge on the court. Chin also can be very liberal depending on the case.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:51 pm

What is this based on?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:54 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:51 pm
What is this based on?
Not the commenter and idk if we're using woke as a negative or a positive (I guess it's both depending on who you ask) but I assume they're just sort of theorizing based on things like clerk hiring, pre-judge/post-judge writings/work, involvment or whatever. This being the case, I guess Lee and Perez are the "woke" ones, but truthfully at this point I dont actually know what distinguishes someone who is far left on the judge scale and someone who is "woke."

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:55 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:51 pm
What is this based on?
Not the commenter and idk if we're using woke as a negative or a positive (I guess it's both depending on who you ask) but I assume they're just sort of theorizing based on things like clerk hiring, pre-judge/post-judge writings/work, involvment or whatever. This being the case, I guess Lee and Perez are the "woke" ones, but truthfully at this point I dont actually know what distinguishes someone who is far left on the judge scale and someone who is "woke."
I would say "woke" is more about the window trimmings of the job: hiring, the judge's off-bench activities (speeches, causes supported, writings), and chambers culture. None of that necessarily carries over to being a philosophically liberal jurist, but obviously, a "woke" judge will usually be quite liberal. The opposite isn't always true, there are some judges out there who rule quite liberally but run a more formal/traditional workplace.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Apr 12, 2024 10:17 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:55 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:51 pm
What is this based on?
Not the commenter and idk if we're using woke as a negative or a positive (I guess it's both depending on who you ask) but I assume they're just sort of theorizing based on things like clerk hiring, pre-judge/post-judge writings/work, involvment or whatever. This being the case, I guess Lee and Perez are the "woke" ones, but truthfully at this point I dont actually know what distinguishes someone who is far left on the judge scale and someone who is "woke."
I would say "woke" is more about the window trimmings of the job: hiring, the judge's off-bench activities (speeches, causes supported, writings), and chambers culture. None of that necessarily carries over to being a philosophically liberal jurist, but obviously, a "woke" judge will usually be quite liberal. The opposite isn't always true, there are some judges out there who rule quite liberally but run a more formal/traditional workplace.
So a better question would be: which judge has the wokest chambers?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


lavarman84

Platinum
Posts: 8505
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by lavarman84 » Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:02 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri Apr 12, 2024 10:17 am
Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:55 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2024 8:51 pm
What is this based on?
Not the commenter and idk if we're using woke as a negative or a positive (I guess it's both depending on who you ask) but I assume they're just sort of theorizing based on things like clerk hiring, pre-judge/post-judge writings/work, involvment or whatever. This being the case, I guess Lee and Perez are the "woke" ones, but truthfully at this point I dont actually know what distinguishes someone who is far left on the judge scale and someone who is "woke."
I would say "woke" is more about the window trimmings of the job: hiring, the judge's off-bench activities (speeches, causes supported, writings), and chambers culture. None of that necessarily carries over to being a philosophically liberal jurist, but obviously, a "woke" judge will usually be quite liberal. The opposite isn't always true, there are some judges out there who rule quite liberally but run a more formal/traditional workplace.
So a better question would be: which judge has the wokest chambers?
Can't be Perez. I hear her chambers needs a lot of naps due to the brutal hours. :wink:

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 24, 2024 8:47 pm

Anyone know anything about Gardephe?

Edit: also heard he works a lot, but anyone know what effect going senior has had on that?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:31 pm

Gardephe works clerks really, really hard. I know someone who had a good experience with him and someone else who did not.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:20 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:31 pm
Gardephe works clerks really, really hard. I know someone who had a good experience with him and someone else who did not.
Worse or better or equal to that Cogan/Koeltl/similar ones?

Edit: What I'm basically asking is how much harder these clerks work than the median SDNY judge. I'm in biglaw so I can handle it, but I also am not the type of person who can do mentally grueling tasks (as I assume clerks are probably not doing any braindead work) from 9-9 M-F

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Apr 25, 2024 11:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:20 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:31 pm
Gardephe works clerks really, really hard. I know someone who had a good experience with him and someone else who did not.
Worse or better or equal to that Cogan/Koeltl/similar ones?

Edit: What I'm basically asking is how much harder these clerks work than the median SDNY judge. I'm in biglaw so I can handle it, but I also am not the type of person who can do mentally grueling tasks (as I assume clerks are probably not doing any braindead work) from 9-9 M-F
9-9 is not unusual for the harder-working judges on SDNY, of whom Gardephe is definitely one. I’ve heard not good things fwiw but through a game of telephone I wouldn’t trust if you have better info.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Apr 28, 2024 2:07 pm

This information is from four years ago - so no idea if his going senior has changed anything (genuinely curious to hear if anyone has updated info) - but I’m told Gardephe’s clerks usually left somewhere between 8 and 9 (I.e. same time as him).

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 29, 2024 6:31 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Sun Apr 28, 2024 2:07 pm
This information is from four years ago - so no idea if his going senior has changed anything (genuinely curious to hear if anyone has updated info) - but I’m told Gardephe’s clerks usually left somewhere between 8 and 9 (I.e. same time as him).

Is that considered bad for SDNY?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Wed May 01, 2024 2:56 pm

Have also heard firsthand bad things about Gardephe. In addition to the unpleasantness and hard work, it's a very poorly run chambers.

Koeltl works his clerks the hardest that I know of (9-9 Mon-Sat, no vacation, no holidays), but the work product he puts out is of an incredibly high quality and they're very efficient.

Anecdotally, have also heard that Berman has clerks quit basically every term.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Thu May 02, 2024 11:04 am

Is Judge Gary Brown on EDNY retiring?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 03, 2024 1:11 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 2:56 pm
Have also heard firsthand bad things about Gardephe. In addition to the unpleasantness and hard work, it's a very poorly run chambers.

Koeltl works his clerks the hardest that I know of (9-9 Mon-Sat, no vacation, no holidays), but the work product he puts out is of an incredibly high quality and they're very efficient.

Anecdotally, have also heard that Berman has clerks quit basically every term.
That's unfortunate, i had heard mixed things but it could be less "mixed" and more just reflexive that some are hesitant to speak honestly.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 03, 2024 4:00 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Thu May 02, 2024 11:04 am
Is Judge Gary Brown on EDNY retiring?
Why would he be

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 03, 2024 4:21 pm

Three interviews, three nos. FML

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 03, 2024 6:39 pm

Berman requires clerks to ask permission to use the bathroom I am told. He also grades clerks' work product and fires clerks every term. Biggest "avoid" judge in NYC.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 03, 2024 6:42 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri May 03, 2024 4:21 pm
Three interviews, three nos. FML
Happens! I had something like 11 interviews before my first offer. Judicial hiring is extremely idiosyncratic and it's less likely that you're doing something wrong than you probably think.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 03, 2024 8:03 pm

11 interviews is abnormal. Are you that bizarre?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Fri May 03, 2024 8:52 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Fri May 03, 2024 8:03 pm
11 interviews is abnormal. Are you that bizarre?
Eh, I doubt it. I was off-plan, which def hurt, but presumably so is the person I responded to. I also withdrew from a bunch of those post-interview so who knows.

Edit: Looked back at my notes. 10 interviews, 1 yes, 5 nos, 4 withdrawn before response. Then about another 7-8 interviews offered that I turned down.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat May 04, 2024 12:50 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Wed May 01, 2024 2:56 pm
Have also heard firsthand bad things about Gardephe. In addition to the unpleasantness and hard work, it's a very poorly run chambers.

Koeltl works his clerks the hardest that I know of (9-9 Mon-Sat, no vacation, no holidays), but the work product he puts out is of an incredibly high quality and they're very efficient.

Anecdotally, have also heard that Berman has clerks quit basically every term.
Like others about Gardephe, I've heard about the long hours and the responses are mixed, but I've never heard about about it being "bad" overall. To be honest, I've heard at least one bad story about many judges in SDNY. There are really nice, really great bosses in SDNY, but many of the previous generation judges can be unpleasant or difficult to work for.

And I believe the issue is that Berman regularly fires his clerks, but that's well-known and well-documented.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428697
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Let's talk 2nd Circuit!

Post by Anonymous User » Sat May 04, 2024 8:59 pm

There aren't that many "avoids" in SDNY, but there are a few in EDNY. To be sure, SDNY has insane hours but that's the price you pay for the prestige.

Berman is a definite avoid and maybe Caproni too.

Failla, Koeltl, Daniels and Gardephe have crazy hours.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Judicial Clerkships”