SMU Class of 2013/2014 Forum

(housing, friendships, future exams, all things 2013)
Locked
Billy Batts

Silver
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Billy Batts » Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:55 pm

It's pretty shitty of any firm not to at least send a pre-formatted e-mail informing you that you are no longer in consideration. It seems like bad business to alienate a bunch of folks who will be practicing in the communities in which you operate.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by kalvano » Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:37 pm

chrisokc wrote:It's pretty shitty of any firm not to at least send a pre-formatted e-mail informing you that you are no longer in consideration. It seems like bad business to alienate a bunch of folks who will be practicing in the communities in which you operate.

Any particular firm? Most seem to send a letter or an email if you are rejected.

Billy Batts

Silver
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Billy Batts » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:07 pm

kalvano wrote:
chrisokc wrote:It's pretty shitty of any firm not to at least send a pre-formatted e-mail informing you that you are no longer in consideration. It seems like bad business to alienate a bunch of folks who will be practicing in the communities in which you operate.

Any particular firm? Most seem to send a letter or an email if you are rejected.
I've done 15 screeners and received only two ding letters, both via snail mail. Granted, some of those screeners were with smaller firms that haven't decided yet, but others were with really big firms that have already made offers. I would think that once they have started making offers, they are finished doing callbacks. It's not that I'm heartbroken or unable to read silence as a ding, but an act of common courtesy that would take only a few seconds to complete doesn't seem like too much to ask.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by kalvano » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:36 pm

chrisokc wrote:
kalvano wrote:
chrisokc wrote:It's pretty shitty of any firm not to at least send a pre-formatted e-mail informing you that you are no longer in consideration. It seems like bad business to alienate a bunch of folks who will be practicing in the communities in which you operate.

Any particular firm? Most seem to send a letter or an email if you are rejected.
I've done 15 screeners and received only two ding letters, both via snail mail. Granted, some of those screeners were with smaller firms that haven't decided yet, but others were with really big firms that have already made offers. I would think that once they have started making offers, they are finished doing callbacks. It's not that I'm heartbroken or unable to read silence as a ding, but an act of common courtesy that would take only a few seconds to complete doesn't seem like too much to ask.

They aren't finished, though. Not all of those students who got offers will accept, but I think they have 28 days to decide. So you could be a second-round pick and they just haven't to you yet.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by kalvano » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:49 pm

Second round of JW rejections out.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Billy Batts

Silver
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Billy Batts » Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:04 pm

Yeah, I guess it could be cheaper for a firm to do a round of callbacks and then make offers on those callbacks. If its need is met, there would be no need for more callbacks. If not, they could then pay for more callbacks.

User avatar
fathergoose

Silver
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by fathergoose » Tue Sep 06, 2011 3:17 pm

Did anyone hear anything back from Exxon?

Billy Batts

Silver
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Billy Batts » Tue Sep 06, 2011 4:42 pm

fathergoose wrote:Did anyone hear anything back from Exxon?
Nope. I'm glad you mentioned it, though. I was starting to wonder if I dreamt that whole thing up.

User avatar
Thirteen

Diamond
Posts: 25405
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Thirteen » Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:16 pm

chrisokc wrote:
fathergoose wrote:Did anyone hear anything back from Exxon?
Nope. I'm glad you mentioned it, though. I was starting to wonder if I dreamt that whole thing up.
I guess the interviewer wasn't impressed by the fact that I didn't wear socks. Fail.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


tinyone

Bronze
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by tinyone » Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:03 am

It was so quiet this week on the OCI front, has anyone heard anything new? I know Baker Botts sent out offers. Does anyone know if Greenberg Traurig has sent out any offers?

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by kalvano » Sat Sep 10, 2011 5:55 pm

I started emailing people on the small / mid firms list. PM me if you want names of places that I have so far doing a summer program.

User avatar
fathergoose

Silver
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by fathergoose » Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:31 pm

Thirteen wrote:
chrisokc wrote:
fathergoose wrote:Did anyone hear anything back from Exxon?
Nope. I'm glad you mentioned it, though. I was starting to wonder if I dreamt that whole thing up.
I guess the interviewer wasn't impressed by the fact that I didn't wear socks. Fail.
Supposedly some ding letters are out from Exxon

Billy Batts

Silver
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Billy Batts » Sun Sep 11, 2011 3:58 pm

fathergoose wrote:
Thirteen wrote:
chrisokc wrote:
fathergoose wrote:Did anyone hear anything back from Exxon?
Nope. I'm glad you mentioned it, though. I was starting to wonder if I dreamt that whole thing up.
I guess the interviewer wasn't impressed by the fact that I didn't wear socks. Fail.
Supposedly some ding letters are out from Exxon
Yup, I trashed mine yesterday.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Burgstaller04

Silver
Posts: 628
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:45 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Burgstaller04 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:15 pm

Does anyone who has had Mayo, Thornburg, Gaba, Taylor, or Palacios have any old exams I could get a copy of? Or recommendations of places I can get them?

User avatar
Thirteen

Diamond
Posts: 25405
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Thirteen » Tue Sep 13, 2011 5:20 pm

chrisokc wrote:
fathergoose wrote: Supposedly some ding letters are out from Exxon
Yup, I trashed mine yesterday.
I also got my rejection letter yesterday.

User avatar
mbusch22

Bronze
Posts: 255
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by mbusch22 » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:45 pm

Burgstaller04 wrote:Does anyone who has had Mayo, Thornburg, Gaba, Taylor, or Palacios have any old exams I could get a copy of? Or recommendations of places I can get them?
I'm assuming you already browsed the lame exam index they keep on the main floor of the library?

You can also try to go to your professors office and ask them. This didn't work for me but you might as well try. If they say no, just ask them ways they would recommend getting some early complex hypo practice or ask them the general nature of their exams so you can maybe try to find similar ones.

I used to browse this thread for some other school's exams. Not super helpful, but if you really can't find your professor's old exams and/or he won't make any available right now, its worth browsing. Most of them are PWP, but a few aren't.

also maybe this thread too: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... =3&t=12526

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by kalvano » Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:54 pm

The library will not make the newer exams available until November. I asked, and bitched. They refuse.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by kalvano » Thu Sep 15, 2011 2:38 pm

Nothing like looking at the bio of the guy who does the hiring at a firm and seeing Yale undergrad, Stanford law (Order of the Coif and EIC of Law Review), LLM from NYU, and two federal appellate clerkships.

Might as well just go ahead and auto-reply with "You suck".

User avatar
fathergoose

Silver
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by fathergoose » Thu Sep 15, 2011 2:53 pm

kalvano wrote:Nothing like looking at the bio of the guy who does the hiring at a firm and seeing Yale undergrad, Stanford law (Order of the Coif and EIC of Law Review), LLM from NYU, and two federal appellate clerkships.

Might as well just go ahead and auto-reply with "You suck".
That guy is weak sauce, none of his schools have 3 Fortune 50 CEOs.

User avatar
Thirteen

Diamond
Posts: 25405
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Thirteen » Thu Sep 15, 2011 2:58 pm

fathergoose wrote:
kalvano wrote:Nothing like looking at the bio of the guy who does the hiring at a firm and seeing Yale undergrad, Stanford law (Order of the Coif and EIC of Law Review), LLM from NYU, and two federal appellate clerkships.

Might as well just go ahead and auto-reply with "You suck".
That guy is weak sauce, none of his schools have 3 Fortune 50 CEOs.
Or 5 billionaires.

Billy Batts

Silver
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:43 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by Billy Batts » Thu Sep 15, 2011 3:00 pm

kalvano wrote:Nothing like looking at the bio of the guy who does the hiring at a firm and seeing Yale undergrad, Stanford law (Order of the Coif and EIC of Law Review), LLM from NYU, and two federal appellate clerkships.

Might as well just go ahead and auto-reply with "You suck".
That's like having Crespi doing the hiring.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
JMBrown32

New
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:59 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by JMBrown32 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:56 pm

fathergoose wrote:
kalvano wrote:Nothing like looking at the bio of the guy who does the hiring at a firm and seeing Yale undergrad, Stanford law (Order of the Coif and EIC of Law Review), LLM from NYU, and two federal appellate clerkships.

Might as well just go ahead and auto-reply with "You suck".
That guy is weak sauce, none of his schools have 3 Fortune 50 CEOs.
When SMU law started bragging so much at orientation about all of their alumni who had become so successful in business, it should have been a sign that those of us looking for lawyer jobs might be in trouble lol

rckchlk

New
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:14 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by rckchlk » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:22 pm

Burgstaller04 wrote:Does anyone who has had Mayo, Thornburg, Gaba, Taylor, or Palacios have any old exams I could get a copy of? Or recommendations of places I can get them?
I have old Palacios exams somewhere that I can try to dig up. Her multiple choice questions are verbatim the questions she asks in class. Don't be a wimp, write them down. Trust me, a lot of people had them last year.

I think I also have old Gaba exams, but his exams are really straight forward.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by kalvano » Wed Sep 28, 2011 3:20 pm

Attention potential employers:

If you want me to write a cover letter for your job, then don't include the warning that the job will not lead to permanent employment.

User avatar
fathergoose

Silver
Posts: 852
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm

Re: SMU Class of 2013/2014

Post by fathergoose » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:07 pm

I don't really understand what the point of them posting a job if it isn't for future employment. Is it so they feel better about themselves because they had "summer associates?" Is it because they have a crap load of just awful menial work that they don't want to touch with a ten foot pole? Is it really for long term employment, but they don't want to get yelled at when the summer is over and they no hire almost everyone?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Locked

Return to “TLS Class of 2013 Forum”