AA male URM 151(cannot retake) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
OP, have you sent out your apps to Vandy, GW and William & Mary yet?? If not, get on it!
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
It's reality. T3s, T4s and unaccredited law schools exist because there are students willing to attend these schools, whether with or without fully schollys. Moreover, not all circumstances are the same.rad lulz wrote:That's retarded.BlaqBella wrote:No need to be insulting, Nova. Not all of us are gunners like most of TLS. Some are completely satisfied with getting full scholarships to attend any law school, job prospects be damned.Nova wrote:mrbrock wrote: I'd rather go where I won't collect debt and have a strong shot at finishing in the top 10%.
Guess what... your logic is ttterrible.
Odds are you wont renew your scholarship after the first year. Much less be in the top 10%.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Just calling it how it is.BlaqBella wrote:It's reality. T3s, T4s and unaccredited law schools exist because there are students willing to attend these schools, whether with or without fully schollys. Moreover, not all circumstances are the same.rad lulz wrote:That's retarded.BlaqBella wrote:No need to be insulting, Nova. Not all of us are gunners like most of TLS. Some are completely satisfied with getting full scholarships to attend any law school, job prospects be damned.Nova wrote:
Guess what... your logic is ttterrible.
Odds are you wont renew your scholarship after the first year. Much less be in the top 10%.
Im taking exams right now and I have studied my ass off all year, and I have no idea if I will finish above median. To go in assuming youll retain a TTT scholarship (usually harsher than above median to maintain) is a terrible idea.
Granted, youre right, I could defintely have been nice about it, and written a longer answer... but im on a short fuse at the moment.
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Hey, its almost over. Best wishes and thanks for your contributions. Always greatly appreciated!Nova wrote:Just calling it how it is.
Im taking exams right now and I have studied my ass off all year, and I have no idea if I will finish above median. To go in assuming youll retain a TTT scholarship (usually harsher than above median to maintain) is a terrible idea.
Granted, youre right, I could defintely have been nice about it, and written a longer answer... but im on a short fuse at the moment.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Sorry for not being active on my own thread. Was really busy and for some reason TLS didn't send me an email there were responses on the thread.BlaqBella wrote:OP, have you sent out your apps to Vandy, GW and William & Mary yet?? If not, get on it!
re: GW/Vandy/W&M: I plan to. I working really hard to send ALL my (20 some...) apps by tonight (i.e prob around 5am or an hour before adcomms get to the office )
My list is super long.
Re: the guy who said I should apply to TTT or TTTT schools: I appreciate your help but I have no interest in going to a school in an area I have no desire to live in. I am not saying by any means that schools in the 30s or below or even some schools in the 20s are not regional, but they are in areas I wouldnt mind working and living in (for example, I would gladly spend years in Chapel Hill or the Raleigh area if I go to UNC and can't find biglaw in NYC/DC etc.)
re. your comment about going somewhere as a pity party (paraphrasing on that): dude, it's my future, this is no time for ego or for some pride over what will a random adcomm would think about me when they hit or stamp "ADMIT". I truly don't care. does that make me pride-less? maybe. but I'd rather suck it up and graduated from a better ranked school (amid more debt, but that's a different story/debate) than stay with my pride or ego.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Update:
Started sending my apps today.
So far to:
BU, BC, WashU, W&L, Vandy, Cardozo, Tulane, UCLA, Cornell, UMin, UMich, Georgetown and GW.
Most are already received, W&L went complete in 5 hrs or so.
A pretty random list I know. I also know that ill 99.99(999) percent get rejected from all the higher ranked schools but since I have an LSAC fee waiver I decided to blanket schools from all over the rankings. I assume I'll throw in more applications. I rather loose $200 in report fees for the complete off chance some adcomm would really like me. Believing never hurt anyone
Started sending my apps today.
So far to:
BU, BC, WashU, W&L, Vandy, Cardozo, Tulane, UCLA, Cornell, UMin, UMich, Georgetown and GW.
Most are already received, W&L went complete in 5 hrs or so.
A pretty random list I know. I also know that ill 99.99(999) percent get rejected from all the higher ranked schools but since I have an LSAC fee waiver I decided to blanket schools from all over the rankings. I assume I'll throw in more applications. I rather loose $200 in report fees for the complete off chance some adcomm would really like me. Believing never hurt anyone
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Update #2JayJones78 wrote:Update:
Started sending my apps today.
So far to:
BU, BC, WashU, W&L, Vandy, Cardozo, Tulane, UCLA, Cornell, UMin, UMich, Georgetown and GW.
Most are already received, W&L went complete in 5 hrs or so.
A pretty random list I know. I also know that ill 99.99(999) percent get rejected from all the higher ranked schools but since I have an LSAC fee waiver I decided to blanket schools from all over the rankings. I assume I'll throw in more applications. I rather loose $200 in report fees for the complete off chance some adcomm would really like me. Believing never hurt anyone
Also applied to a few more schools, I can post the list if it is of interest o anyone. Most of my apps (18 now) are received and some are complete.
I am wondering if to send apps to ND and W&M?
(Just to remind, I have an LSAC fee waiver so I'm just casting a hugely wide net since doing so $ wise is relatively small).
Thanks for all the great help I got here!!
- somewhatwayward
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Wow, even though on TLS we are constantly deluged with people proposing to pay sticker at T3/4s with bad placement and we hear a lot of 'I'm not worried about finding a job bc I will hustle and be in the top 10% of the class,' I think this is the first time I have actually seen someone baldly say 'job prospects be damned' (ignoring the independent wealthy). I don't know whether to commend you for finally saying what everyone is secretly thinking or to smack you over the proverbial head.BlaqBella wrote:No need to be insulting, Nova. Not all of us are gunners like most of TLS. Some are completely satisfied with getting full scholarships to attend any law school, job prospects be damned.
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
This is idiotic because it's not only TTT logic but also something that runs the risk of negatively influencing readers to the extent that they get screwed by shitty employability in this shitty market. Don't listen to his/her advice; the bolded is factually completely false.mrbrock wrote:Honestly, I find your initial statement ironic. First, I have 3.6 gpa and 151 LSAT. I applied to exactly 12 schools this fall and heard back from 10 so far. And all were acceptances. Full tuition scholarship offers from Akron, Toledo, FAMU, JM Atl, Ave Maria, Charlotte...OKC law=$20k/yr, Mercer unv= $20k/yr., Full tuition plus room and board @ Southwestern. Full tuition plus 15k/yr with option to start in Jan @ J.M chi. only two outstanding apps are my top 2 choices: Howard and Rutgers Newark...I believe you're applying to the wrong tier schools, plus you've taken the lsat too many times, with 2 they'll usually take the higher but with three or more or test taken in consecutive dates, they'll average them! this is why I stuck with the low lsat and wrote a letter of explanation. As for the tier of schools, why beg and cry your way just to be treated as some sort of affirmative action candidate? I'd rather go where I won't collect debt and have a strong shot at finishing in the top 10%.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Thanks for this. I wrote a few posts back what I think about the TTT advice. It doesn't work for me. I am not going to judge others who will take full tuition in a TTT or TTTT school if that's what they think they should do. I have conviction in my app and my ability to preform well.Suralin wrote:This is idiotic because it's not only TTT logic but also something that runs the risk of negatively influencing readers to the extent that they get screwed by shitty employability in this shitty market. Don't listen to his/her advice; the bolded is factually completely false.mrbrock wrote:Honestly, I find your initial statement ironic. First, I have 3.6 gpa and 151 LSAT. I applied to exactly 12 schools this fall and heard back from 10 so far. And all were acceptances. Full tuition scholarship offers from Akron, Toledo, FAMU, JM Atl, Ave Maria, Charlotte...OKC law=$20k/yr, Mercer unv= $20k/yr., Full tuition plus room and board @ Southwestern. Full tuition plus 15k/yr with option to start in Jan @ J.M chi. only two outstanding apps are my top 2 choices: Howard and Rutgers Newark...I believe you're applying to the wrong tier schools, plus you've taken the lsat too many times, with 2 they'll usually take the higher but with three or more or test taken in consecutive dates, they'll average them! this is why I stuck with the low lsat and wrote a letter of explanation. As for the tier of schools, why beg and cry your way just to be treated as some sort of affirmative action candidate? I'd rather go where I won't collect debt and have a strong shot at finishing in the top 10%.
At the end of the day, I am willing to make some sacrifices but some are out of the question.
I'll happily go to UNC or to UMin or to W&L or another 20s mid 40s school in a market where I'd be happy to work in if I don't find a better job outside of it. But I won't go to a TTT/T school just in order to go to law school. That makes no sense to me. If all fails and I don't get onto ANY of the 20 some schools I applied to, I'll just take it as a sign and sit out, study (again....) for the LSAT and retake it in dec 2013 (something that at this point I truly don't have any desire to do).
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Agree with the bolded, it makes sense. Good luck!JayJones78 wrote:Thanks for this. I wrote a few posts back what I think about the TTT advice. It doesn't work for me. I am not going to judge others who will take full tuition in a TTT or TTTT school if that's what they think they should do. I have conviction in my app and my ability to preform well.
At the end of the day, I am willing to make some sacrifices but some are out of the question.
I'll happily go to UNC or to UMin or to W&L or another 20s mid 40s school in a market where I'd be happy to work in if I don't find a better job outside of it. But I won't go to a TTT/T school just in order to go to law school. That makes no sense to me. If all fails and I don't get onto ANY of the 20 some schools I applied to, I'll just take it as a sign and sit out, study (again....) for the LSAT and retake it in dec 2013 (something that at this point I truly don't have any desire to do).
- spleenworship
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Good luck to you OP!
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
spleenworship wrote:Good luck to you OP!
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Thank you!!spleenworship wrote:Good luck to you OP!
I intentionally applied to schools from across a really wide range. The only t14 I applied to are NW ( to their AJD prog), UMich summer start, Cornell and GULC. The last 3 are huge long short but NW may work because I have 8 plus years of WE, had a good on campus interview and that prog has very limited number of applicants and the numbers are way lower.
Other than that, I am just hoping for the best
I can give the full list of schools I'm applying to (22...) if that is of interest to anyone here.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Have you considered making an LSN account?JayJones78 wrote: I can give the full list of schools I'm applying to (22...) if that is of interest to anyone here.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
I have oneNova wrote:Have you considered making an LSN account?JayJones78 wrote: I can give the full list of schools I'm applying to (22...) if that is of interest to anyone here.
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/OutWest81
I already got a few nasty (trolly) comments there that I deleted so I was hasitent if to give it out here
- spleenworship
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
NW could be a possibility for you. Keep us updated.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Thanks. It's by far my biggest reach school but my profile perfectly fits their criteria. I'm hopefull because of the prog's relatively lower numbers and amount of applicants (they had around 100 applicants last year)spleenworship wrote:NW could be a possibility for you. Keep us updated.
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
LOL what? This is one of the worst posts I've seen on TLS.mrbrock wrote:Honestly, I find your initial statement ironic. First, I have 3.6 gpa and 151 LSAT. I applied to exactly 12 schools this fall and heard back from 10 so far. And all were acceptances. Full tuition scholarship offers from Akron, Toledo, FAMU, JM Atl, Ave Maria, Charlotte...OKC law=$20k/yr, Mercer unv= $20k/yr., Full tuition plus room and board @ Southwestern. Full tuition plus 15k/yr with option to start in Jan @ J.M chi. only two outstanding apps are my top 2 choices: Howard and Rutgers Newark...I believe you're applying to the wrong tier schools, plus you've taken the lsat too many times, with 2 they'll usually take the higher but with three or more or test taken in consecutive dates, they'll average them! this is why I stuck with the low lsat and wrote a letter of explanation. As for the tier of schools, why beg and cry your way just to be treated as some sort of affirmative action candidate? I'd rather go where I won't collect debt and have a strong shot at finishing in the top 10%.
- dowu
- Posts: 8298
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
You incorrectly spelled the word 'private' on your LSN profile.JayJones78 wrote:Thanks. It's by far my biggest reach school but my profile perfectly fits their criteria. I'm hopefull because of the prog's relatively lower numbers and amount of applicants (they had around 100 applicants last year)spleenworship wrote:NW could be a possibility for you. Keep us updated.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Corrected. Thanks!nmop_apisdn wrote:You incorrectly spelled the word 'private' on your LSN profile.JayJones78 wrote:Thanks. It's by far my biggest reach school but my profile perfectly fits their criteria. I'm hopefull because of the prog's relatively lower numbers and amount of applicants (they had around 100 applicants last year)spleenworship wrote:NW could be a possibility for you. Keep us updated.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
I gave my opinion for this a few posts back. It's def not how I see my admission cycle. But to each their own and good luck to him/herndirish2010 wrote:LOL what? This is one of the worst posts I've seen on TLS.mrbrock wrote:Honestly, I find your initial statement ironic. First, I have 3.6 gpa and 151 LSAT. I applied to exactly 12 schools this fall and heard back from 10 so far. And all were acceptances. Full tuition scholarship offers from Akron, Toledo, FAMU, JM Atl, Ave Maria, Charlotte...OKC law=$20k/yr, Mercer unv= $20k/yr., Full tuition plus room and board @ Southwestern. Full tuition plus 15k/yr with option to start in Jan @ J.M chi. only two outstanding apps are my top 2 choices: Howard and Rutgers Newark...I believe you're applying to the wrong tier schools, plus you've taken the lsat too many times, with 2 they'll usually take the higher but with three or more or test taken in consecutive dates, they'll average them! this is why I stuck with the low lsat and wrote a letter of explanation. As for the tier of schools, why beg and cry your way just to be treated as some sort of affirmative action candidate? I'd rather go where I won't collect debt and have a strong shot at finishing in the top 10%.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Update:
First rejection this morning from UMin over email. I wrote this on my LSN page:
Although kind of sad, it was never a school I really desired to go to and I applied there as an option and since I did not send money on app fee. I do believe however, that I will receive similar rejections along these lines from other schools in similar ranking since even with a URM 'boost' my LSAT is still very low. Well, onward and upwards. Let's see how it continues...
First rejection this morning from UMin over email. I wrote this on my LSN page:
Although kind of sad, it was never a school I really desired to go to and I applied there as an option and since I did not send money on app fee. I do believe however, that I will receive similar rejections along these lines from other schools in similar ranking since even with a URM 'boost' my LSAT is still very low. Well, onward and upwards. Let's see how it continues...
- BlaqBella
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Brush that dirt off your shoulder and keep it moving. Thanks for the update.JayJones78 wrote:Update:
First rejection this morning from UMin over email. I wrote this on my LSN page:
Although kind of sad, it was never a school I really desired to go to and I applied there as an option and since I did not send money on app fee. I do believe however, that I will receive similar rejections along these lines from other schools in similar ranking since even with a URM 'boost' my LSAT is still very low. Well, onward and upwards. Let's see how it continues...
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: AA male URM 151(cannot retake)
Thank you! It was still a little upsetting getting a rejection as the first response from a schoolBlaqBella wrote:Brush that dirt off your shoulder and keep it moving. Thanks for the update.JayJones78 wrote:Update:
First rejection this morning from UMin over email. I wrote this on my LSN page:
Although kind of sad, it was never a school I really desired to go to and I applied there as an option and since I did not send money on app fee. I do believe however, that I will receive similar rejections along these lines from other schools in similar ranking since even with a URM 'boost' my LSAT is still very low. Well, onward and upwards. Let's see how it continues...