Class of 2012 Employment Data Forum

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Tiago Splitter » Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:46 pm

As schools begin to update their sites with c/o 2012 employment stats, I figured we'd start one thread to compile the key information. When more schools publish their numbers, let me know and I'll update the OP.

EDIT: All information is now available at http://employmentsummary.abaquestionnaire.org/

School: Employed in firms of 100+ attorneys + federal clerkships = Total. Numbers in parentheses indicate change from 2011.

Penn: 66.7(+7.3) + 10.4(+1.3) = 77.1(+8.6)
Stanford: 47(-2.5) + 28.2(+4.8) = 75.2(+2.3)
Columbia: 64.2(+2.8) + 7.9(-.2) = 72.1(+2.6)
Chicago: 56.3(+11.5) + 14.4(+5) = 70.7(+16.5)
Harvard: 53.6(+4.5) + 17.8(+1.5) = 71.4(+6)
Yale: 32(-1.2) + 34.7(+1.5) = 66.7(+.3)
NYU: 59.5(+16.4) + 5.6(-5.3) = 65.1(+11.1)
Cornell: 57.9(+19) + 6.8(-1.2) = 64.7(+17.9)
Duke: 51.1(+6.2) + 12.9(+1.8) = 64(+8)
UVA: 47.8(+9.6) + 14.3(+3.7) = 62.1(+13.3)
Berkeley: 53.8(+12.2) + 6.7(-3) = 60.5(+9.2)
Northwestern: 49.2(-4.1) + 6.4(-1.6) = 55.6(-5.7)
Mich: 43.3(+9.3) + 8.5(+2.1) = 51.8(+11.4)
UCI: 23.2 + 28.6 = 51.8*
GULC: 39.1(+5.6) + 3.7(-.2) = 42.8(+5.4)
Vandy: 28.5(-3.7) + 12.1(+1.3) = 40.6(-2.4)
UCLA: 34.2(+11.7) + 4.8(+.4) = 39(+12.1)
USC: 30.8(+3.5) + 6.7(-2.4) = 37.5(+1.1)
Texas: 26.9(+3.9) + 8.3(+1.2) = 35.2(+5.1)
Notre Dame: 24(+4) + 8.7(-3.4) = 32.7(+.6)
BU: 27.1(+7.3) + 4.8(+3) = 31.9(+10.3)
Fordham: 30.5 + 3.1 = 33.6
WUSTL: 23(+5.3) + 3.3(+.5) = 26.3(+5.8)
Illinois: 22.1(+7.4) + 2.3(-2.5) = 24.4(+4.9)
UGA: 16.6(+7.8) + 7.4(-.1) = 24(+7.7)
UNC: 16.4(+3.4) + 5.1(+.6) = 21.5(+4)
Wake: 14.7(+3.9) + 5.8(+3.3) = 20.5(+7.2)
W & M: 12.7(+5.8) + 5.9(-1.5) = 18.6(+4.3)
Alabama: 8.1(+1.7) + 9.3(+.8) = 17.4(-.9)
SMU: 14.3(+.3) + 3(-1.2) = 17.3(-.9)
Hastings: 13.3(+2.4) + 2(+.1) = 15.3(+2.5)
Wisconsin: 9.9 (+.01) + 1.0 (-.06) = 10.9 (-.05)

*: Don't kid yourself
Last edited by Tiago Splitter on Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:47 pm, edited 25 times in total.

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:58 pm

USC: http://weblaw.usc.edu/careers/statistics/

100+ Firms: 30.8%
Federal Clerks: 6.7%

= 37.5%

School-funded = 4.5% (10 people)
Last edited by Rahviveh on Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:04 pm

NYU likes to post its stats in the most confusing way possible. Someone may want to double check my math but it looks right:

http://www.law.nyu.edu/careerservices/e ... /index.htm

100+ firms: 59.5%
Federal clerks: 5.6%

= 65.1%

School funded = 12.9%
Last edited by Rahviveh on Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
TheThriller

Gold
Posts: 2282
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by TheThriller » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:09 pm

We should probably sticky this in the near future

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:16 pm

Illinois:

100+: 22.1%
Fed Clerks: 2.3%

= 24.4%

School-funded = 10.3%

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:17 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:As schools begin to update their sites with c/o 2012 employment stats, I figured we'd start one thread to compile the key information. When more schools publish their numbers, let me know and I'll update the OP.

School: Employed in firms of 100+ attorneys + federal clerkships = Total

Harvard: 53.6 + 17.8 = 71.4
UVA: 47.8 + ??=?? (UVA does not break out Federal from other clerks)
UCLA: 34.2 + 4.8 = 39
USC: 30.8 + 6.7 = 37.5
WUSTL: 23 + 3.3 = 26.3
Alabama: 8.1 + 9.3 = 17.4
Notre Dame: 24 + 8.7 = 32.7
W & M: 12.7 + 5.9 = 18.6
Wake: 14.7 + 5.8 = 20.5
Hey man, I think it'd be cool to show percent changes from c/o 2011 as well.

HLS = +4.5% & +1.5% = +6%
UVA = +9.6% & +3.7% = +13.3%

Look at the ABA sheet for UVA's federal clerkship numbers: 52/364 or 14.3%, bringing its total to 62.1%

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:18 pm

UVA: 15.1% School-funded

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:19 pm

Bronck wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:As schools begin to update their sites with c/o 2012 employment stats, I figured we'd start one thread to compile the key information. When more schools publish their numbers, let me know and I'll update the OP.

School: Employed in firms of 100+ attorneys + federal clerkships = Total

Harvard: 53.6 + 17.8 = 71.4
UVA: 47.8 + ??=?? (UVA does not break out Federal from other clerks)
UCLA: 34.2 + 4.8 = 39
USC: 30.8 + 6.7 = 37.5
WUSTL: 23 + 3.3 = 26.3
Alabama: 8.1 + 9.3 = 17.4
Notre Dame: 24 + 8.7 = 32.7
W & M: 12.7 + 5.9 = 18.6
Wake: 14.7 + 5.8 = 20.5
Hey man, I think it'd be cool to show percent changes from c/o 2011 as well.

HLS = +4.5% & +1.5% = +6%
UVA = +9.6% & +3.7% = +13.3%

Look at the ABA sheet for UVA's federal clerkship numbers: 52/364 or 14.3%, bringing its total to 62.1%
Those are good numbers for UVA

User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:22 pm

ChampagnePapi wrote:NYU likes to post its stats in the most confusing way possible. Someone may want to double check my math but it looks right:

http://www.law.nyu.edu/careerservices/e ... /index.htm

100+ firms: 59.5%
Federal clerks: 5.6%

= 65.1%

School funded = 12.9%
ETA: Scratch that. Glanced at the data too quickly.
Last edited by Bronck on Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:26 pm

Michigan = 43.3% (+9.3%) and 8.5% (-2.1%) = 51.8% (+7.2%)

http://www.law.umich.edu/careers/classs ... of2012.pdf

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:27 pm

edit
Last edited by Rahviveh on Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Tiago Splitter » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:27 pm

Bronck wrote:
ChampagnePapi wrote:NYU likes to post its stats in the most confusing way possible. Someone may want to double check my math but it looks right:

http://www.law.nyu.edu/careerservices/e ... /index.htm

100+ firms: 59.5%
Federal clerks: 5.6%

= 65.1%

School funded = 12.9%
I got 61.5% for 100+ firms (.6381*[.0705+.1074+.7852] and 5.8% for federal clerks (.0792*.7297) = 67.3%

Which is a 16.4% increase in firms and a 5.6% decrease in federal clerkships, or a 10.8% increase overall.
You have to make sure to first subtract out the 15 people who are pursuing a grad degree or are unemployed.

User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:31 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
Bronck wrote:
ChampagnePapi wrote:NYU likes to post its stats in the most confusing way possible. Someone may want to double check my math but it looks right:

http://www.law.nyu.edu/careerservices/e ... /index.htm

100+ firms: 59.5%
Federal clerks: 5.6%

= 65.1%

School funded = 12.9%
I got 61.5% for 100+ firms (.6381*[.0705+.1074+.7852] and 5.8% for federal clerks (.0792*.7297) = 67.3%

Which is a 16.4% increase in firms and a 5.6% decrease in federal clerkships, or a 10.8% increase overall.
You have to make sure to first subtract out the 15 people who are pursuing a grad degree or are unemployed.
Yeah, my bad. ChampagnePapi was right via the ABA sheet:

--LinkRemoved--

The actual percent changes are: +16.4% and -5.3% or 11.1% increase

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
Ruxin1

Silver
Posts: 1275
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:12 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Ruxin1 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:32 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
Bronck wrote:
ChampagnePapi wrote:NYU likes to post its stats in the most confusing way possible. Someone may want to double check my math but it looks right:

http://www.law.nyu.edu/careerservices/e ... /index.htm

100+ firms: 59.5%
Federal clerks: 5.6%

= 65.1%

School funded = 12.9%
I got 61.5% for 100+ firms (.6381*[.0705+.1074+.7852] and 5.8% for federal clerks (.0792*.7297) = 67.3%

Which is a 16.4% increase in firms and a 5.6% decrease in federal clerkships, or a 10.8% increase overall.
You have to make sure to first subtract out the 15 people who are pursuing a grad degree or are unemployed.
Why would you subtract them?

User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Bronck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:43 pm

A terribly incomplete chart:

Image

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Tiago Splitter » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:47 pm

Ruxin1 wrote: Why would you subtract them?
Because NYU does. The percentages they list on their site are the percentage of employed grads only within each subsection.

Real Madrid

Silver
Posts: 835
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:21 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Real Madrid » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:56 pm

If only UVA could set up a law firm to employ all its school-funded graduates its "students in 100+ firms" number would be through the roof.

Anyway, what's the deal with these numbers? Are schools required to release them? And (if so) when?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


table3

New
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 12:21 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by table3 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:42 pm

ChampagnePapi wrote:Illinois:

100+: 22.1%
Fed Clerks: 2.3%

= 24.4%

School-funded = 10.3%
That's a big jump from 2011:

University of Illinois:
100+: 13.7%
Fed Clerks: 4.7%

=18.4%

http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=illinois

User avatar
02889

Bronze
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by 02889 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:47 pm

Only 5.6% placed in federal clerkships for NYU? What happened there?

User avatar
jackattack17

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:38 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by jackattack17 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:17 pm

UNC:

42/256 16.4% 100+
13/256 5.1% Art. III
55/256 21.5% Total

http://www.law.unc.edu/documents/career ... rt2012.pdf

User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by star fox » Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:29 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:As schools begin to update their sites with c/o 2012 employment stats, I figured we'd start one thread to compile the key information. When more schools publish their numbers, let me know and I'll update the OP.

School: Employed in firms of 100+ attorneys + federal clerkships = Total

Mich: 43.3 + 8.5 = 51.8
Notre Dame: 24 + 8.7 = 32.7
Illinois: 22.1 + 2.3 = 24.4
2011 large firm scores:
Mich: 34 %
Notre Dame: 20 %
Illinois: 13.7 %

Crossing my fingers here, does this mean that Chicago big firm hiring is starting to pick up a bit after being particularly slow to recover post-recession?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:35 pm

john7234797 wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:As schools begin to update their sites with c/o 2012 employment stats, I figured we'd start one thread to compile the key information. When more schools publish their numbers, let me know and I'll update the OP.

School: Employed in firms of 100+ attorneys + federal clerkships = Total

Mich: 43.3 + 8.5 = 51.8
Notre Dame: 24 + 8.7 = 32.7
Illinois: 22.1 + 2.3 = 24.4
2011 large firm scores:
Mich: 34 %
Notre Dame: 20 %
Illinois: 13.7 %

Crossing my fingers here, does this mean that Chicago big firm hiring is starting to pick up a bit after being particularly slow to recover post-recession?
Hiring for c/o 2012 seems to be up across the board RELATIVE to c/o 2011, which makes sense since the CW is that c/o 2011 was rock bottom.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by BigZuck » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:23 pm

02889 wrote:Only 5.6% placed in federal clerkships for NYU? What happened there?

User avatar
Dmini7

Silver
Posts: 724
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:20 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Dmini7 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:28 pm

Posting UCI :) (I am sure Dre will come in here soon to remind us it is TTT trash)

firm 100+ = 23.2%
Fed clerkships= 28.6%

23.2 + 28.6 = 51.8%

http://www.law.uci.edu/career_dev/emplo ... stics.html

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Class of 2012 Employment Data

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:30 pm

Dmini7 wrote:Posting UCI :) (I am sure Dre will come in here soon to remind us it is TTT trash)

firm 100+ = 23.2%
Fed clerkships= 28.6%

23.2 + 28.6 = 51.8%

http://www.law.uci.edu/career_dev/emplo ... stics.html
Well it confirms earlier estimates. Worth noting that 23.2% in this case means only 13 people.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Choosing a Law School”