is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat Forum
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:55 pm
is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
a lot of people here say things like "well my gpa is 3.4 but my lsat is 173 - should i retake the lsat and try to get a 175?' and this causes me to ask - do law schools really view your gpa and your lsat equally??? that is to say, wouldnt a rational person give a bit more weight to a number that reflects 4 years of work as oppossed to 4 hours?
this is a very general question, and im sure its been asked before, so i apologize, but im new here.
i guess my real question is - isnt low gpa high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa low lsat?
how do these people think?
this is a very general question, and im sure its been asked before, so i apologize, but im new here.
i guess my real question is - isnt low gpa high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa low lsat?
how do these people think?
- ari20dal7
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:15 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
Here are the reasons LSAT is generally valued more:
1) It's curved, and high numbers are quite rare. There are a lot more high GPAs than high LSATs. There are way more GPAs of a 3.5+ (or whatever you want to call a good GPA) than there are LSATs of 170 or more. This means there's more demand for the high LSAT, and also speaks to the relative difficulty of getting a high score.
2) GPAs are so contextual. Institution, major, courseload, workload, professors, family stuff, extracurriculars.....you can't just say a 3.6 is better than a 3.5 without considering all of that, and there's basically no way to consider all of that. The LSAT - well, there are obviously differing levels of preparation and all that, but it's a much more even playing field.
3) LSAT, frankly, is designed to measure an applicant's ceiling. It doesn't do it all that well, but it does it better than GPA, which can be easily attained by students who set out to maximize it. Anybody can get a 3.5, but not everybody can get a 170 LSAT.
Here's how I look at it: LSAT measures capabilities, GPA measures work ethic. You'll need both to get into the very best schools.
1) It's curved, and high numbers are quite rare. There are a lot more high GPAs than high LSATs. There are way more GPAs of a 3.5+ (or whatever you want to call a good GPA) than there are LSATs of 170 or more. This means there's more demand for the high LSAT, and also speaks to the relative difficulty of getting a high score.
2) GPAs are so contextual. Institution, major, courseload, workload, professors, family stuff, extracurriculars.....you can't just say a 3.6 is better than a 3.5 without considering all of that, and there's basically no way to consider all of that. The LSAT - well, there are obviously differing levels of preparation and all that, but it's a much more even playing field.
3) LSAT, frankly, is designed to measure an applicant's ceiling. It doesn't do it all that well, but it does it better than GPA, which can be easily attained by students who set out to maximize it. Anybody can get a 3.5, but not everybody can get a 170 LSAT.
Here's how I look at it: LSAT measures capabilities, GPA measures work ethic. You'll need both to get into the very best schools.
- danielfgator
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:02 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
The lsat is the most important of the two. But it is also the only changeable variable. You can retake the lsat and get a considerable higher score but we all know that bringing your GPA up in your senior year from 3.4 to 3.9 is almost impossible. I would definitely prefer to have a high Lsat and a lower gpa than the other way around.
You have to remember that all schools are different, and the GPA not only reflects how hard you worked but also the respectability of your institution. With all the grade inflation going around, a 3.4 in one school is not the same as a 3.4 from another school. That's why the LSAT is more important, because it places everybody in a "level" playing field. ("level" = because not everybody does well on standardized tests)
You have to remember that all schools are different, and the GPA not only reflects how hard you worked but also the respectability of your institution. With all the grade inflation going around, a 3.4 in one school is not the same as a 3.4 from another school. That's why the LSAT is more important, because it places everybody in a "level" playing field. ("level" = because not everybody does well on standardized tests)
- dudeman101
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:28 am
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
i think the answer is... no
most people i think will tell you they'd much rather have a high LSAT and low GPA
plz correct me if i am wrong...
most people i think will tell you they'd much rather have a high LSAT and low GPA
plz correct me if i am wrong...
- danielfgator
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:02 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
dudeman101 wrote:i think the answer is... no
most people i think will tell you they'd much rather have a high LSAT and low GPA
plz correct me if i am wrong...
Nop, I can't say you are wrong...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TTT-LS
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
-
Last edited by TTT-LS on Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 2:34 am
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
To the OP: You have it all mixed up. The LSAT, in my opinion, is the most important factor in the admission process because it is the most objective measurement of applicants' logical and analytical skills. GPA is an important factor but highly subjective, even after the LSDAS has tried to sort of 'even things out.' That said, most splitter-friendly schools are more impressed with high lsat/low gpa than vice versa. Make the LSAT your b**** and doors will open up for you. Good luck
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
This is one of the myths I've found popping up among new users on TLS.markakis wrote:To the OP: You have it all mixed up. The LSAT, in my opinion, is the most important factor in the admission process because it is the most objective measurement of applicants' logical and analytical skills. GPA is an important factor but highly subjective, even after the LSDAS has tried to sort of 'even things out.' That said, most splitter-friendly schools are more impressed with high lsat/low gpa than vice versa. Make the LSAT your b**** and doors will open up for you. Good luck
LSDAS does not "even things out" according to the strength of one's institution or program. It merely adds every college course you've ever taken and spits out an average. 4.0 at Princeton still equals 4.0 at Big State U.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:55 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
ari20dal7 wrote:Here are the reasons LSAT is generally valued more:
1) It's curved, and high numbers are quite rare. There are a lot more high GPAs than high LSATs. There are way more GPAs of a 3.5+ (or whatever you want to call a good GPA) than there are LSATs of 170 or more. This means there's more demand for the high LSAT, and also speaks to the relative difficulty of getting a high score.
2) GPAs are so contextual. Institution, major, courseload, workload, professors, family stuff, extracurriculars.....you can't just say a 3.6 is better than a 3.5 without considering all of that, and there's basically no way to consider all of that. The LSAT - well, there are obviously differing levels of preparation and all that, but it's a much more even playing field.
3) LSAT, frankly, is designed to measure an applicant's ceiling. It doesn't do it all that well, but it does it better than GPA, which can be easily attained by students who set out to maximize it. Anybody can get a 3.5, but not everybody can get a 170 LSAT.
Here's how I look at it: LSAT measures capabilities, GPA measures work ethic. You'll need both to get into the very best schools.
I guess I should have made my Q more specific - take this hypothetical - assume its a one-to-one comparison of two applicants in front of the adcomm. they went to the same school, same major, same courseload, neither wrote an addedum explaining their deficiencies etc. All factors are dead equal, except that applicant A has a high gpa and a low lsat score and applicant B has a low gpa and a high lsat score...you are the adcomm what do you say?
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
How high and how low (for both)? Who helps our reportable numbers more?bne2103 wrote:ari20dal7 wrote:Here are the reasons LSAT is generally valued more:
1) It's curved, and high numbers are quite rare. There are a lot more high GPAs than high LSATs. There are way more GPAs of a 3.5+ (or whatever you want to call a good GPA) than there are LSATs of 170 or more. This means there's more demand for the high LSAT, and also speaks to the relative difficulty of getting a high score.
2) GPAs are so contextual. Institution, major, courseload, workload, professors, family stuff, extracurriculars.....you can't just say a 3.6 is better than a 3.5 without considering all of that, and there's basically no way to consider all of that. The LSAT - well, there are obviously differing levels of preparation and all that, but it's a much more even playing field.
3) LSAT, frankly, is designed to measure an applicant's ceiling. It doesn't do it all that well, but it does it better than GPA, which can be easily attained by students who set out to maximize it. Anybody can get a 3.5, but not everybody can get a 170 LSAT.
Here's how I look at it: LSAT measures capabilities, GPA measures work ethic. You'll need both to get into the very best schools.
I guess I should have made my Q more specific - take this hypothetical - assume its a one-to-one comparison of two applicants in front of the adcomm. they went to the same school, same major, same courseload, neither wrote an addedum explaining their deficiencies etc. All factors are dead equal, except that applicant A has a high gpa and a low lsat score and applicant B has a low gpa and a high lsat score...you are the adcomm what do you say?
I still think high LSAT wins the battle at most schools. USNWR assigns higher value to LSAT percentiles, I believe. Like 15% to LSAT and only 10-12% to GPA.
- kkhtlk
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:34 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
you can always retake the lsat.
you cant retake that first semester in college where you registered for the 7am class and ended up with a D.
i would trade a high gpa for a high lsat any day.
you cant retake that first semester in college where you registered for the 7am class and ended up with a D.
i would trade a high gpa for a high lsat any day.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:43 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
Most adcomms take the high lsat splitter. LSAC has sold the schools on the LSAT as a predictor of law school success, and the schools have bought into it. Take a glance at the LSAC research page, and you will find numerous statistical studies that back this up.
- TTT-LS
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
-
Last edited by TTT-LS on Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ari20dal7
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:15 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
Yeah, the LSAT generally wins, but it depends on how high and how low, and on the school. If the high GPA splitter's LSAT is above the 25th, then that's an OK position (4.0/164 at UCLA or something like that). But there seems to be a big difference between a 3.2/172 and a 2.5/172......
Short answer, LSAT generally means more than GPA. TTTLS is one hundred percent right, though: all about the school and the specific numbers in question.
TTTLS, I wouldn't go that far on Penn - I think we've got a couple 3.1/17X types going there. But yeah, you generally need both to crack T6.
Short answer, LSAT generally means more than GPA. TTTLS is one hundred percent right, though: all about the school and the specific numbers in question.
TTTLS, I wouldn't go that far on Penn - I think we've got a couple 3.1/17X types going there. But yeah, you generally need both to crack T6.
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
Just to nitpick, I think high GPA wins out at Vanderbilt and high LSAT at Texas, though neither of them are of the totally dedicated to one factor over the other like Boalt.TTT-LS wrote:Yale through Penn - no shot. You need high GPA and LSAT.bne2103 wrote:I guess I should have made my Q more specific - take this hypothetical - assume its a one-to-one comparison of two applicants in front of the adcomm. they went to the same school, same major, same courseload, neither wrote an addedum explaining their deficiencies etc. All factors are dead equal, except that applicant A has a high gpa and a low lsat score and applicant B has a low gpa and a high lsat score...you are the adcomm what do you say?[/color]
Boalt: high GPA wins.
Michigan: too close to call.
Virginia: high LSAT wins.
NU: same
Duke: high GPA
Cornell: high LSAT
GULC: same
Vanderbilt: same
UCLA: high GPA
Texas: same
USC: ???
GW: high LSAT
Wash. U: same
The point is, there is no single answer. The answer to your question is school-specific.
Probably high GPA at USC though they are not totally unfriendly to splitters. Their admissions graphs seem kinda similar to Cornell's or Vanderbilt's, though kinder all around.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 11:46 am
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
is there a reason that some schools like over the other?TTT-LS wrote:Yale through Penn - no shot. You need high GPA and LSAT.bne2103 wrote:I guess I should have made my Q more specific - take this hypothetical - assume its a one-to-one comparison of two applicants in front of the adcomm. they went to the same school, same major, same courseload, neither wrote an addedum explaining their deficiencies etc. All factors are dead equal, except that applicant A has a high gpa and a low lsat score and applicant B has a low gpa and a high lsat score...you are the adcomm what do you say?[/color]
Boalt: high GPA wins.
Michigan: too close to call.
Virginia: high LSAT wins.
NU: same
Duke: high GPA
Cornell: high LSAT
GULC: same
Vanderbilt: same
UCLA: high GPA
Texas: same
USC: ???
GW: high LSAT
Wash. U: same
The point is, there is no single answer. The answer to your question is school-specific.
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
`
Last edited by los blancos on Sun Aug 08, 2010 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:23 am
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
...
Last edited by KLOVEIT on Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:51 pm
Re: is low gpa/high lsat a bigger problem than high gpa/low lsat
definitely a matter of relative scarcity. since usnews forces schools to emphasize both, they naturally go hard after the scarce one (lsat) while kinda sorta pushing the one that's incredibly easy to build up, all while trying to get a class of people they actually like.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login