3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances) Forum
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:26 pm
3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Brief Background:
I attended a top 10 school straight out of high school, and then subsequently failed out with a 0.2 GPA. I also had a drunk and disorderly misdemeanor conviction during this time. I thought I was going crazy and then found out I had brain cancer in my frontal lobe (the reasoning and higher functioning portion of the brain). The cancer was the sole reason for my grades and misconduct, as evident from doctor letters and subsequent academic performance. After the tumor was removed, I resumed classes at my local community college and then transferred to my state school, UVA. Could you please chance me for a T14 School with these stats:
School: UVA
Major: Math, Economics, and Philosophy
URM: No
Class: Junior
LSAT: 180
GPA: 3.2 with last 110 credits being a 4.0
Extracurriculars: Worked at Mathnasium for 3+ Years, 1000+ Volunteering Hours, Podium in major ultra marathon races
I attended a top 10 school straight out of high school, and then subsequently failed out with a 0.2 GPA. I also had a drunk and disorderly misdemeanor conviction during this time. I thought I was going crazy and then found out I had brain cancer in my frontal lobe (the reasoning and higher functioning portion of the brain). The cancer was the sole reason for my grades and misconduct, as evident from doctor letters and subsequent academic performance. After the tumor was removed, I resumed classes at my local community college and then transferred to my state school, UVA. Could you please chance me for a T14 School with these stats:
School: UVA
Major: Math, Economics, and Philosophy
URM: No
Class: Junior
LSAT: 180
GPA: 3.2 with last 110 credits being a 4.0
Extracurriculars: Worked at Mathnasium for 3+ Years, 1000+ Volunteering Hours, Podium in major ultra marathon races
- UVA2B
- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
With a solid addendum explaining your condition and distancing your first GPA from the rest of your academics, you'll get some of the T13, although which ones are unpredictable. Northwestern, Michigan, and UVA are probably your best bets, but you should apply everywhere and see what happens. I would be shocked if you didn't get one or more T13 acceptances, and you might even get some decent scholarships. Where those will come are, as I said from the start, unpredictable. It's unlikely HYS are in play (never say never, but unlikely), and CCN will be an uphill battle, but not impossible considering the reasons for your GPA and clear demonstration of actual academic ability (once you're below a 25th %, it matters much less how far below you are within reason).
Congrats on getting clear of a very serious condition, and hopefully you get some good results in your applications! Now is the sweet spot of timeframe, so I hope the rest of your application is ready to go, because the next few weeks are when you need to get your applications submitted.
Good luck!
ETA: Sorry, just reread and saw you're only a junior. Keep your grades up, but you need to still spend some time between college and applying to law school. So it's absolutely no rush to apply.
Congrats on getting clear of a very serious condition, and hopefully you get some good results in your applications! Now is the sweet spot of timeframe, so I hope the rest of your application is ready to go, because the next few weeks are when you need to get your applications submitted.
Good luck!
ETA: Sorry, just reread and saw you're only a junior. Keep your grades up, but you need to still spend some time between college and applying to law school. So it's absolutely no rush to apply.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
In addition to what was already said, have you tried getting in touch with the original school about retroactive medical withdrawals from your coursework there?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:26 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
I have looked into that. Unfortunately, you have 12 months from the date of your final class to retroactively withdraw. I did not find out about my tumor until 21 months after my last class. At this point the tumor was so big, I was having seizures and couldn't properly do basic arithmetic.cavalier1138 wrote:In addition to what was already said, have you tried getting in touch with the original school about retroactive medical withdrawals from your coursework there?
- Platopus
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:20 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
.
Last edited by Platopus on Sun Dec 17, 2017 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
It sounds like you have a strong basis for asking for an exception to the 12-month rule. If everything you say is true, and if you have medical evidence of your condition, I wouldn't give up on the retroactive medical withdrawal. Don't take the first (or second) no for an answer.teichmuller wrote:I have looked into that. Unfortunately, you have 12 months from the date of your final class to retroactively withdraw. I did not find out about my tumor until 21 months after my last class. At this point the tumor was so big, I was having seizures and couldn't properly do basic arithmetic.cavalier1138 wrote:In addition to what was already said, have you tried getting in touch with the original school about retroactive medical withdrawals from your coursework there?
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:09 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
I'm a bit more optimistic than the other posters here, although I might be biased because I have a somewhat similar background.
If you can keep clearing straight As through graduation, and you can get to a 3.4 or so, I think you might be one of the rare sub-3.5 candidates to have a shot at HYS and extremely likely to get at least one of CCN. Your GPA will make it tough to get big scholarships in the T13, because schools use that money to enhance their reportable numbers, but unless the folks at Yale are lying to us and not actually reading transcripts you should be a competitive candidate for admission anywhere.
In any case, the above advice (focus on your GPA for now, push hard to replace those Fs on your transcript with Ws, and get a job doing something you like in between college and law school) is excellent. Good luck!
If you can keep clearing straight As through graduation, and you can get to a 3.4 or so, I think you might be one of the rare sub-3.5 candidates to have a shot at HYS and extremely likely to get at least one of CCN. Your GPA will make it tough to get big scholarships in the T13, because schools use that money to enhance their reportable numbers, but unless the folks at Yale are lying to us and not actually reading transcripts you should be a competitive candidate for admission anywhere.
In any case, the above advice (focus on your GPA for now, push hard to replace those Fs on your transcript with Ws, and get a job doing something you like in between college and law school) is excellent. Good luck!
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:26 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
I have applied for a retroactive withdraw twice now to no avail. Their stance is that if they let me get my withdraw late, then they will have to let anybody with a compelling medical reason get a withdraw. I guess it is time to get some outside counsel to attempt a final retroactive withdraw application before next years law school application cycle.rpupkin wrote:It sounds like you have a strong basis for asking for an exception to the 12-month rule. If everything you say is true, and if you have medical evidence of your condition, I wouldn't give up on the retroactive medical withdrawal. Don't take the first (or second) no for an answer.teichmuller wrote:I have looked into that. Unfortunately, you have 12 months from the date of your final class to retroactively withdraw. I did not find out about my tumor until 21 months after my last class. At this point the tumor was so big, I was having seizures and couldn't properly do basic arithmetic.cavalier1138 wrote:In addition to what was already said, have you tried getting in touch with the original school about retroactive medical withdrawals from your coursework there?
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:09 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
God forbid, lol.teichmuller wrote:Their stance is that if they let me get my withdraw late, then they will have to let anybody with a compelling medical reason get a withdraw.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:26 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
I can understnd them not wanting to open the gates for anybody to receive a late retroactive withdraw, but I think my medical history is a compelling reason. It is unfortunate that a tertiary educational institute would put politics over helping a student in need. I'm sure if I was a major donors child, then this would have been resolved long ago.icechicken wrote:God forbid, lol.teichmuller wrote:Their stance is that if they let me get my withdraw late, then they will have to let anybody with a compelling medical reason get a withdraw.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 3:53 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
.
Last edited by rk42 on Fri Dec 08, 2017 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Pneumonia
- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Yours is the best case I've ever seen for an institution to overlook an LSAC GPA. You should apply to the entire T14, even if you can't get a withdrawal granted. However, I agree with rpupkin that you should keep trying. The 12-month rule seems especially dumb when the factor that makes it necessary also prevented you from requesting it in time.
If you don't get the withdrawal, please update in this thread. I think you can help yourself by explaining to adcoms the steps you've taken to obtain it and the reasons your UG has given for denying it.
If you don't get the withdrawal, please update in this thread. I think you can help yourself by explaining to adcoms the steps you've taken to obtain it and the reasons your UG has given for denying it.
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 2:53 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Do you guys think this story is real???
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 9:09 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
OP's story is plausible, and I think it's prudent to give people the benefit of the doubt absent any red flags (rudeness, railroading the discussion, internal inconsistency).jgloster wrote:Do you guys think this story is real???
Even if it's a troll (maybe someone salty about how LSAC evaluates transcripts?), it'd be kind of a lame one, and the discussion that resulted might be useful to other people with analogous backgrounds who don't want to post about it for fear of IDing themselves.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Agreed. For what it's worth, I was at a party over the weekend where an HR person and a college administrator were discussing how it's become increasingly common for employees and students to lie about having brain tumors in order to explain various behaviors. Seriously. For that reason, OP may want to err on the side of over-disclosure when it comes to providing documentation for his or her medical condition.icechicken wrote:OP's story is plausible, and I think it's prudent to give people the benefit of the doubt absent any red flags (rudeness, railroading the discussion, internal inconsistency).jgloster wrote:Do you guys think this story is real???
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:26 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
I’m not going to sit here and defend myself but I can understand the worry that this could be a troll. Personally anybody who jokes about cancer are scum. I had a low grade ependymoma. Treatment was surgical removal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.jgloster wrote:Do you guys think this story is real???
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2017 9:26 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Thank you for the advice and I already have letters from my neurologist, neuro-oncologist, and radiation oncologist documenting the progression/treatment/location of the tumor. Again I don’t understand why people would make this up in order to look favorably upon adcoms. Medical history would obviously need to be documentedrpupkin wrote:Agreed. For what it's worth, I was at a party over the weekend where an HR person and a college administrator were discussing how it's become increasingly common for employees and students to lie about having brain tumors in order to explain various behaviors. Seriously. For that reason, OP may want to err on the side of over-disclosure when it comes to providing documentation for his or her medical condition.icechicken wrote:OP's story is plausible, and I think it's prudent to give people the benefit of the doubt absent any red flags (rudeness, railroading the discussion, internal inconsistency).jgloster wrote:Do you guys think this story is real???
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 12:31 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
I find it hard to believe someone took the LSAT at the beginning of their junior year of undergrad (or earlier?) and got a 180. That's ambitious to say the least, especially considering everything else that's going on in this person's life. When did they find the time to study?icechicken wrote:OP's story is plausible, and I think it's prudent to give people the benefit of the doubt absent any red flags (rudeness, railroading the discussion, internal inconsistency).jgloster wrote:Do you guys think this story is real???
Even if it's a troll (maybe someone salty about how LSAC evaluates transcripts?), it'd be kind of a lame one, and the discussion that resulted might be useful to other people with analogous backgrounds who don't want to post about it for fear of IDing themselves.
But yeah, agree w/r/t giving the benefit of the doubt.
- RCSOB657
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:50 am
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
I sincerely wish you the best of luck. However, even if you think this statement is 100% true, don't put this on your applications. If you're trolling then GG.
The cancer was the sole reason for my grades and misconduct, as evident from doctor letters and subsequent academic performance
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
???RCSOB657 wrote:I sincerely wish you the best of luck. However, even if you think this statement is 100% true, don't put this on your applications.
- RCSOB657
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:50 am
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Aside from the fact that people straight out of highschool are still young enough in their cranial bio-chemistry development to use the amygdala in judgement not their pre-frontal cortex like fully developed adults, it smacks of refusing to take any accountability for one's actions.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Jesus, what is with people on this thread?RCSOB657 wrote:Aside from the fact that people straight out of highschool are still young enough in their cranial bio-chemistry development to use the amygdala in judgement not their pre-frontal cortex like fully developed adults, it smacks of refusing to take any accountability for one's actions.
This is literally the perfect situation for an addendum. The OP had fucking brain cancer. Cancer. That affects the brain. And shockingly, when the tumor was removed, his brain got better.
Claiming poor performance because you were "getting used to college" or because your great-aunt Sarah died two months before one of your midterms is refusing to take accountability. Claiming poor performance due to a diagnosed medical condition--especially one that directly impacted the OP's brain--is not.
- RCSOB657
- Posts: 3346
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2014 2:50 am
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Please go back and read what was quoted. The only advice I gave was to not use 'sole reason' when speaking about his relationship between his tumor and actions while a freshman college. The advice was simply because of how it would be interpreted during a cold reading of his file by ad coms. Again OP, I hope you get into the school of your dreams.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
And please read what I said: that's bullshit. Anyone with half a brain will understand that the extreme difference in performance pre- and post-treatment can absolutely be explained entirely by the tumor. This isn't rocket science. It is neuroscience, but if Ben Carson can figure it out...RCSOB657 wrote:Please go back and read what was quoted. The only advice I gave was to not use 'sole reason' when speaking about his relationship between his tumor and actions while a freshman college. The advice was simply because of how it would be interpreted during a cold reading of his file by ad coms. Again OP, I hope you get into the school of your dreams.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: 3.2 GPA/180 LSAT (Extraordinary Circumstances)
Good point. OP--in your addendum, be sure to take responsibility for generating the brain tumor, explaining that you were young and that you didn't fully appreciate how careless it was to grow a tumor in the frontal lobe of your brain. Describe the steps you've taken to ensure that you won't grow damaging brain tumors in the future.RCSOB657 wrote:Please go back and read what was quoted. The only advice I gave was to not use 'sole reason' when speaking about his relationship between his tumor and actions while a freshman college. The advice was simply because of how it would be interpreted during a cold reading of his file by ad coms.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login