168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me? Forum
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:51 pm
168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Hey guys, I'm going right out of undergrad and into law school. I have a 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. I'm really involved on my campus and I've had four internships, including in my region's US Attorney's office. What do you think of my chances are at T14?
- stego
- Posts: 5301
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:23 am
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
You'll get into some T14s but you should probably retake
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:35 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
There are a lot of factors #'s don't convey, but for what it is worth:
168, 3.87 and i'm into UVA, Duke, and Gtown.
168, 3.87 and i'm into UVA, Duke, and Gtown.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:51 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Yeah it was my second time though and I'm applying this cycle.
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Agree with myronbolitar that there are other important factors besides numbers, but I'm at 168/3.99 and I've gotten into every T14 except Harvard and Yale. I applied way back in September though, so if you haven't applied yet you're going to have a different ballgame. I also have 2 years of WE between undergrad and law school, which I highly recommend you get.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11413
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Getting in to a few T-14 law schools is almost certain based on your numbers. Equally important is paying for law school.
@katthegreat11: Did you receive any scholarship offers ? And, if so, in what amounts to which schools ? Thanks in advance.
@katthegreat11: Did you receive any scholarship offers ? And, if so, in what amounts to which schools ? Thanks in advance.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
I would really recommend not applying this cycle. Your LSAT is not ideal for a large chunk of the T14, and you're applying too late in the game, especially when it comes to scholarship consideration.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Definitely retake June, that might be the no brainiest no brainer in the history of no brainers. It's a freeroll with literally no downside.
-
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 9:42 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
.
Last edited by zeglo on Thu Jul 13, 2017 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Yup I've received a few but most schools have not sent them out. All my stuff is on LSN for anyone curious.CanadianWolf wrote:Getting in to a few T-14 law schools is almost certain based on your numbers. Equally important is paying for law school.
@katthegreat11: Did you receive any scholarship offers ? And, if so, in what amounts to which schools ? Thanks in advance.
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:13 am
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Great usernamemyronbolitar wrote:There are a lot of factors #'s don't convey, but for what it is worth:
168, 3.87 and i'm into UVA, Duke, and Gtown.
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
OP, you do not need to retake. Sure if you want to, go for it. If you scored way below your PTs, you didn't feel like you gave it your all studying, or there are other legitimate reasons why you feel that 168 doesn't represent your true ability on the LSAT, then yes, retake. But if you gave it your all and scored at or above your PT average, then I think there are more important things you can do to improve your application. #1, if you haven't applied already, consider sitting this cycle out- you are incredibly incredibly late to the game. #2, consider getting some work experience to round out your application and make you an all-around more interesting candidate.
168 is a fucking great score and you can get into plenty of T14s with money with it... if you make sure every other aspect of your application is as strong as possible.
168 is a fucking great score and you can get into plenty of T14s with money with it... if you make sure every other aspect of your application is as strong as possible.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
This is wrong, retaking the LSAT is imperative. Just one more point could make a huge difference.katthegreat11 wrote:OP, you do not need to retake. Sure if you want to, go for it. If you scored way below your PTs, you didn't feel like you gave it your all studying, or there are other legitimate reasons why you feel that 168 doesn't represent your true ability on the LSAT, then yes, retake. But if you gave it your all and scored at or above your PT average, then I think there are more important things you can do to improve your application. #1, if you haven't applied already, consider sitting this cycle out- you are incredibly incredibly late to the game. #2, consider getting some work experience to round out your application and make you an all-around more interesting candidate.
168 is a fucking great score and you can get into plenty of T14s with money with it... if you make sure every other aspect of your application is as strong as possible.
It's a freeroll, there's no reason not to. This advice is 100% wrong, and dangerous. Please do not do this.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:06 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
As a brief sanity check, the downside to retaking is:
Spending more money on registration + also study materials if you decide to sign up for a class
Studying again, which is huge time suck, and can interfere with work/life performance
The fact that a significant amount of people don't do considerably better on a retake, especially when you're trying to get from a top 160s to a 170.
What I did was apply to the schools I really wanted to get into to see if I could get in this cycle. If i don't succeed, I'll retake, but I don't think it's necessarily crucial - I think a lot of people are going to apply to law school next year due to Trump - might as well beat that wave if you can.
Spending more money on registration + also study materials if you decide to sign up for a class
Studying again, which is huge time suck, and can interfere with work/life performance
The fact that a significant amount of people don't do considerably better on a retake, especially when you're trying to get from a top 160s to a 170.
What I did was apply to the schools I really wanted to get into to see if I could get in this cycle. If i don't succeed, I'll retake, but I don't think it's necessarily crucial - I think a lot of people are going to apply to law school next year due to Trump - might as well beat that wave if you can.
- BruiseWillis
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 2:34 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
I don't think the downsides you listed come anywhere close to negating the potential upside of a higher score. I think OP would have some great opportunities next cycle with his current score, but with that being said, I don't see a reason not to retake in June when the worst outcome is net zero and the best outcome is better schools/more $$$.tinycatfriend wrote:As a brief sanity check, the downside to retaking is:
Spending more money on registration + also study materials if you decide to sign up for a class
Studying again, which is huge time suck, and can interfere with work/life performance
The fact that a significant amount of people don't do considerably better on a retake, especially when you're trying to get from a top 160s to a 170.
What I did was apply to the schools I really wanted to get into to see if I could get in this cycle. If i don't succeed, I'll retake, but I don't think it's necessarily crucial - I think a lot of people are going to apply to law school next year due to Trump - might as well beat that wave if you can.
Why do you think Trump would cause a larger wave next year?
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
None of those are really downsides brosephtinycatfriend wrote:As a brief sanity check, the downside to retaking is:
Spending more money on registration + also study materials if you decide to sign up for a class
Studying again, which is huge time suck, and can interfere with work/life performance
The fact that a significant amount of people don't do considerably better on a retake, especially when you're trying to get from a top 160s to a 170.
What I did was apply to the schools I really wanted to get into to see if I could get in this cycle. If i don't succeed, I'll retake, but I don't think it's necessarily crucial - I think a lot of people are going to apply to law school next year due to Trump - might as well beat that wave if you can.
Also we're talking about a 30+ year career that you're setting yourself up for so suck it up buttercup.
It's not that much money
You'll have plenty of time to work or drink/play video games or whatever it is you want to do while studying
Other people not doing significantly better shouldn't be a factor at all. Plus, literally one point. One. ONE. Can make an enormous difference.
I mean, if you don't even want to do any more prep you should still roll the dice on a retake. You'll be out whatever ungodly amount they charge you to take the test now, and you'll waste about 8 hours of your life. Bink a higher score- sweet! Bink a 159- no biggie, no one cares. Just proceed with the plan as is.
- Future Ex-Engineer
- Posts: 1430
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Lol. Citing Trump as the reason to not retake and rush this application cycle has got to be the most absurd rationale I've seen on here. 1) That's completely baseless. 2) Why should we care if more people apply next year because of Trump? More poor-performing, poor-scoring people applying just makes a 168+ score look even more appealing. You surely can't be trying to say that there are loads of smart/LSAT-proficient people that have just been chomping at the bit to apply to law school, and Trump is what is going to push them over the edge to actually go for it.tinycatfriend wrote:As a brief sanity check, the downside to retaking is:
Spending more money on registration + also study materials if you decide to sign up for a class
Studying again, which is huge time suck, and can interfere with work/life performance
The fact that a significant amount of people don't do considerably better on a retake, especially when you're trying to get from a top 160s to a 170.
What I did was apply to the schools I really wanted to get into to see if I could get in this cycle. If i don't succeed, I'll retake, but I don't think it's necessarily crucial - I think a lot of people are going to apply to law school next year due to Trump - might as well beat that wave if you can.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:06 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
So, the Trump thing is due to a lot of people who I know - who are very brilliant - who have now seen the value of a legal education and are planning to apply. Assuming I don't have a completely unrepresentative base (which is a large assumption), we could end up seeing more competition.
Also, OP's GPA is really, really good, assuming they went to a decent school, so the LSAT, while important, isn't bad at all and could easily be mitigated with said GPA.
As for work/time balance, I don't know about you, but I have a full-time NYC job. I often don't have any free time after work anyway, and adding in the LSAT is a really big ask, which is why it's important to keep in mind - if someone's at an easy job, that's one thing, but if you're a GS banker or some shit like that, the extra time could actually consume your life.
More relevant: http://www.lsac.org/docs/default-source ... erdata.pdf
You will, hopefully, gain one extra point, on average. If you're ready to apply this cycle, might as well roll the dice and see where you get into, rather than likely doing the exact same application next year.
This also depends on your place in life - if you're a junior in college, I'd say retake, you have to do something for the next year anyway. But if you're already working, go for it.
It also depends on what T14 you want. With those numbers you're fine on the lower T14, and if that's what you want, go for it. For HYS, it's a crapshoot anyway. A higher LSAT will help, but its obviously not a guarantee.
Also, OP's GPA is really, really good, assuming they went to a decent school, so the LSAT, while important, isn't bad at all and could easily be mitigated with said GPA.
As for work/time balance, I don't know about you, but I have a full-time NYC job. I often don't have any free time after work anyway, and adding in the LSAT is a really big ask, which is why it's important to keep in mind - if someone's at an easy job, that's one thing, but if you're a GS banker or some shit like that, the extra time could actually consume your life.
More relevant: http://www.lsac.org/docs/default-source ... erdata.pdf
You will, hopefully, gain one extra point, on average. If you're ready to apply this cycle, might as well roll the dice and see where you get into, rather than likely doing the exact same application next year.
This also depends on your place in life - if you're a junior in college, I'd say retake, you have to do something for the next year anyway. But if you're already working, go for it.
It also depends on what T14 you want. With those numbers you're fine on the lower T14, and if that's what you want, go for it. For HYS, it's a crapshoot anyway. A higher LSAT will help, but its obviously not a guarantee.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Where are you seeing the specific point gain? The only thing that chart shows (which completely contradicts your argument, incidentally) is that a retake more often results in a higher score than a lower one. And as mentioned, gaining one point can be worth a metric ton of scholarship money, especially since that one point would be added to not applying stupidly late in the cycle.tinycatfriend wrote: More relevant: http://www.lsac.org/docs/default-source ... erdata.pdf
You will, hopefully, gain one extra point, on average. If you're ready to apply this cycle, might as well roll the dice and see where you get into, rather than likely doing the exact same application next year.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Just to be clear: Even if you were committed to attending this cycle NO MATTER WHAT and even if you were committed to not spending one more second or one more dollar studying for the LSAT NO MATTER WHAT, retaking in June would 100% be a no brainer. Try and squeeze out an extra point at least. See if that will get you more scholarship money. It's clearly the right thing to do.
Of course you should also dedicate yourself to a retake and consider applying early next cycle. But even if you do neither of those things you should retake the LSAT.
Of course you should also dedicate yourself to a retake and consider applying early next cycle. But even if you do neither of those things you should retake the LSAT.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
get some irl work experience
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Don't tell me my advice is 100% wrong and dangerous when I have the results to back it up. All I said is that OP shouldn't feel like they HAVE to retake just because the score is 168. That number is not enough info to give us the whole story. Why would OP retake if they studied for months, got 100% on LG, and scored at or above their practice tests?BigZuck wrote:This is wrong, retaking the LSAT is imperative. Just one more point could make a huge difference.katthegreat11 wrote:OP, you do not need to retake. Sure if you want to, go for it. If you scored way below your PTs, you didn't feel like you gave it your all studying, or there are other legitimate reasons why you feel that 168 doesn't represent your true ability on the LSAT, then yes, retake. But if you gave it your all and scored at or above your PT average, then I think there are more important things you can do to improve your application. #1, if you haven't applied already, consider sitting this cycle out- you are incredibly incredibly late to the game. #2, consider getting some work experience to round out your application and make you an all-around more interesting candidate.
168 is a fucking great score and you can get into plenty of T14s with money with it... if you make sure every other aspect of your application is as strong as possible.
It's a freeroll, there's no reason not to. This advice is 100% wrong, and dangerous. Please do not do this.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
Because if OP studies for another few months and gets higher practice test scores, then that retake is worth thousands of dollars in scholarships. I don't know why this point hasn't sunk in yet.katthegreat11 wrote:Don't tell me my advice is 100% wrong and dangerous when I have the results to back it up. All I said is that OP shouldn't feel like they HAVE to retake just because the score is 168. That number is not enough info to give us the whole story. Why would OP retake if they studied for months, got 100% on LG, and scored at or above their practice tests?BigZuck wrote:This is wrong, retaking the LSAT is imperative. Just one more point could make a huge difference.katthegreat11 wrote:OP, you do not need to retake. Sure if you want to, go for it. If you scored way below your PTs, you didn't feel like you gave it your all studying, or there are other legitimate reasons why you feel that 168 doesn't represent your true ability on the LSAT, then yes, retake. But if you gave it your all and scored at or above your PT average, then I think there are more important things you can do to improve your application. #1, if you haven't applied already, consider sitting this cycle out- you are incredibly incredibly late to the game. #2, consider getting some work experience to round out your application and make you an all-around more interesting candidate.
168 is a fucking great score and you can get into plenty of T14s with money with it... if you make sure every other aspect of your application is as strong as possible.
It's a freeroll, there's no reason not to. This advice is 100% wrong, and dangerous. Please do not do this.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
At a bare minimum, the potential for thousands of dollarskatthegreat11 wrote:Don't tell me my advice is 100% wrong and dangerous when I have the results to back it up. All I said is that OP shouldn't feel like they HAVE to retake just because the score is 168. That number is not enough info to give us the whole story. Why would OP retake if they studied for months, got 100% on LG, and scored at or above their practice tests?BigZuck wrote:This is wrong, retaking the LSAT is imperative. Just one more point could make a huge difference.katthegreat11 wrote:OP, you do not need to retake. Sure if you want to, go for it. If you scored way below your PTs, you didn't feel like you gave it your all studying, or there are other legitimate reasons why you feel that 168 doesn't represent your true ability on the LSAT, then yes, retake. But if you gave it your all and scored at or above your PT average, then I think there are more important things you can do to improve your application. #1, if you haven't applied already, consider sitting this cycle out- you are incredibly incredibly late to the game. #2, consider getting some work experience to round out your application and make you an all-around more interesting candidate.
168 is a fucking great score and you can get into plenty of T14s with money with it... if you make sure every other aspect of your application is as strong as possible.
It's a freeroll, there's no reason not to. This advice is 100% wrong, and dangerous. Please do not do this.
This isn't rocket surgery, this is easy stuff guys
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:06 pm
Re: 168 LSAT, 3.96 GPA. Chance me?
the AVERAGE column is the percent change.And yes, sure, you may score better, but if you score better by 1 point, or 1 question, there's a trade-off there that should at least be acknowledged versus "there is no downside to retaking"cavalier1138 wrote:Where are you seeing the specific point gain? The only thing that chart shows (which completely contradicts your argument, incidentally) is that a retake more often results in a higher score than a lower one. And as mentioned, gaining one point can be worth a metric ton of scholarship money, especially since that one point would be added to not applying stupidly late in the cycle.tinycatfriend wrote: More relevant: http://www.lsac.org/docs/default-source ... erdata.pdf
You will, hopefully, gain one extra point, on average. If you're ready to apply this cycle, might as well roll the dice and see where you get into, rather than likely doing the exact same application next year.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login