Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- dddddd90
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
A ding just popped up on LSN
-
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Eh, looks like someone who was updating all their schools at once.dddddd90 wrote:A ding just popped up on LSN
- texteach
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It was someone updating all their apps (I think)dddddd90 wrote:A ding just popped up on LSN
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:06 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Do we have any idea how many dings have already gone out/are left?texteach wrote:It was someone updating all their apps (I think)dddddd90 wrote:A ding just popped up on LSN
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Just got a random 617 call.....it was a stupid telemarketer for some stupid survey on car insurance. Ughhhhhh fml
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:38 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
All phones at Harvard are 617-495-XXXX numbers. So don't get a heart attack for no reason!suitsandpotions wrote:Just got a random 617 call.....it was a stupid telemarketer for some stupid survey on car insurance. Ughhhhhh fml
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It was a 617-430 so I saw the 4 and got too excited.AllHailKingMao wrote:All phones at Harvard are 617-495-XXXX numbers. So don't get a heart attack for no reason!suitsandpotions wrote:Just got a random 617 call.....it was a stupid telemarketer for some stupid survey on car insurance. Ughhhhhh fml
- OnlyHumean
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:06 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think there's a bit of confusion.bloomsday wrote:You'd think, but if you look at Harvard's breakdown of the indebtedness of its graduates (presented at ASW, not sure if it's online somewhere), only 12% of its class have debt loads over $220,000. If you look at the published "average debt load" (US News has this, I think), only 12% paying close to sticker makes sense.OnlyHumean wrote:Harvard says that about 42% of JDs qualify for grants, which leaves 58% left. Of that 58% I'm sure it's a mix of people who are just above the grant cutoff but couldn't afford sticker without loans, people who have substantial assets but not enough liquid cash to pay sticker, people whose parents could pay sticker for them but won't (meaning the student would need to take loans), and people who can pay sticker and do.goldenbear2020 wrote:+1. Not commenting on whether it's a good idea, but the fact is a lot (perhaps majority?) of HYS students are in a position to pay sticker without taking out loans.warmcherrysoda wrote:Most H admits do not receive a full, named scholarship. Although TLS pretty unanimously advises the opposite, a strong majority of full scholarship recipients on LawSchoolNumbers choose H (or Y/S) over the money.69waystodie wrote:Anyone have info on how quickly aid info comes? Also do most admits turn down serious money at T14s? I've been reading a lot of past threads on H/S vs Ruby/Darrow/Hamilton etc. and the majority of people seem to advise for the $.
The number of people who actually have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans is probably quite high, but I doubt it's anywhere near a majority.
So of that 58% getting no grant aid, yes, the vast majority do have access to enough money not to pay sticker.
I agree with the bolded - but I was never arguing against that.
The claim as I understood it was that some substantial number of HYS students (and perhaps even the majority) have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans. This would mean that they would graduate with $0 in loans. I don't know what the number of students who graduate with $0 in loans is, but I imagine it's a far cry from a majority of the class. That's all I'm claiming.
The claim that most students at HYS do not have sticker debt is an entirely different one, and one that I would agree with.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:45 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Those of you who received financial aid, was it about in line with what you were expecting? I just received my award at NYU, which is exactly what I expected it to be, and I'm hoping Harvard will be at least as generous.
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:28 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?
- dddddd90
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Naw but it sounds like something that would be sent out to folks that are gonna be WL rather than dinged.keviiiiiiiiiiiin wrote:Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
When did you get this? Also did you get a JS1? Thanks in advance!keviiiiiiiiiiiin wrote:Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
keviiiiiiiiiiiin wrote:Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?
When did you receive this?
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Stuck thinking about this. money or HYS?OnlyHumean wrote:I think there's a bit of confusion.bloomsday wrote:You'd think, but if you look at Harvard's breakdown of the indebtedness of its graduates (presented at ASW, not sure if it's online somewhere), only 12% of its class have debt loads over $220,000. If you look at the published "average debt load" (US News has this, I think), only 12% paying close to sticker makes sense.OnlyHumean wrote:Harvard says that about 42% of JDs qualify for grants, which leaves 58% left. Of that 58% I'm sure it's a mix of people who are just above the grant cutoff but couldn't afford sticker without loans, people who have substantial assets but not enough liquid cash to pay sticker, people whose parents could pay sticker for them but won't (meaning the student would need to take loans), and people who can pay sticker and do.goldenbear2020 wrote:+1. Not commenting on whether it's a good idea, but the fact is a lot (perhaps majority?) of HYS students are in a position to pay sticker without taking out loans.warmcherrysoda wrote:Most H admits do not receive a full, named scholarship. Although TLS pretty unanimously advises the opposite, a strong majority of full scholarship recipients on LawSchoolNumbers choose H (or Y/S) over the money.69waystodie wrote:Anyone have info on how quickly aid info comes? Also do most admits turn down serious money at T14s? I've been reading a lot of past threads on H/S vs Ruby/Darrow/Hamilton etc. and the majority of people seem to advise for the $.
The number of people who actually have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans is probably quite high, but I doubt it's anywhere near a majority.
So of that 58% getting no grant aid, yes, the vast majority do have access to enough money not to pay sticker.
I agree with the bolded - but I was never arguing against that.
The claim as I understood it was that some substantial number of HYS students (and perhaps even the majority) have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans. This would mean that they would graduate with $0 in loans. I don't know what the number of students who graduate with $0 in loans is, but I imagine it's a far cry from a majority of the class. That's all I'm claiming.
The claim that most students at HYS do not have sticker debt is an entirely different one, and one that I would agree with.
-
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Really thought we would see a WL wave today. They've been around this time the last few years
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I think we likely have one more JS2 wave left before we see WLs or another ding wave.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Really thought we would see a WL wave today. They've been around this time the last few years
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Last year the Monday of judgment week was a wave of JS2s followed by dings. That Tuesday was WL beginning at 3:00pm. Only time will tell...
- lawschool2016nyc
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I just want this to be done.
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:18 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.HonestlyThough wrote:Stuck thinking about this. money or HYS?OnlyHumean wrote:I think there's a bit of confusion.bloomsday wrote:You'd think, but if you look at Harvard's breakdown of the indebtedness of its graduates (presented at ASW, not sure if it's online somewhere), only 12% of its class have debt loads over $220,000. If you look at the published "average debt load" (US News has this, I think), only 12% paying close to sticker makes sense.OnlyHumean wrote:Harvard says that about 42% of JDs qualify for grants, which leaves 58% left. Of that 58% I'm sure it's a mix of people who are just above the grant cutoff but couldn't afford sticker without loans, people who have substantial assets but not enough liquid cash to pay sticker, people whose parents could pay sticker for them but won't (meaning the student would need to take loans), and people who can pay sticker and do.goldenbear2020 wrote:+1. Not commenting on whether it's a good idea, but the fact is a lot (perhaps majority?) of HYS students are in a position to pay sticker without taking out loans.warmcherrysoda wrote:Most H admits do not receive a full, named scholarship. Although TLS pretty unanimously advises the opposite, a strong majority of full scholarship recipients on LawSchoolNumbers choose H (or Y/S) over the money.69waystodie wrote:Anyone have info on how quickly aid info comes? Also do most admits turn down serious money at T14s? I've been reading a lot of past threads on H/S vs Ruby/Darrow/Hamilton etc. and the majority of people seem to advise for the $.
The number of people who actually have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans is probably quite high, but I doubt it's anywhere near a majority.
So of that 58% getting no grant aid, yes, the vast majority do have access to enough money not to pay sticker.
I agree with the bolded - but I was never arguing against that.
The claim as I understood it was that some substantial number of HYS students (and perhaps even the majority) have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans. This would mean that they would graduate with $0 in loans. I don't know what the number of students who graduate with $0 in loans is, but I imagine it's a far cry from a majority of the class. That's all I'm claiming.
The claim that most students at HYS do not have sticker debt is an entirely different one, and one that I would agree with.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 11:46 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.[/quote]
I have a family member that is in a NYC V20 firm. The firm's NYC office is not there headquarters, but he told me for the NYC office, for OCI they will interview anyone from Harvard, but for Columbia you need to be top 50 percent, duke/ cornell/ uva/ northwestern 40 percent. Not sure about the other t-14 schools but thats what he told me, so there is a difference although he said he thinks his firm has stricter limitations than many other NYC Big law firms.
I have a family member that is in a NYC V20 firm. The firm's NYC office is not there headquarters, but he told me for the NYC office, for OCI they will interview anyone from Harvard, but for Columbia you need to be top 50 percent, duke/ cornell/ uva/ northwestern 40 percent. Not sure about the other t-14 schools but thats what he told me, so there is a difference although he said he thinks his firm has stricter limitations than many other NYC Big law firms.
-
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:04 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I have a family member that is in a NYC V20 firm. The firm's NYC office is not there headquarters, but he told me for the NYC office, for OCI they will interview anyone from Harvard, but for Columbia you need to be top 50 percent, duke/ cornell/ uva/ northwestern 40 percent. Not sure about the other t-14 schools but thats what he told me, so there is a difference although he said he thinks his firm has stricter limitations than many other NYC Big law firms.[/quote]baseballfan660 wrote:I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.
Lol this definitely has to be preference from firm to firm..
I spoke to a named partner from a V25 firm (and former judge), who said his "favorite" students to hire are Cornell grads - because they might feel like they have more to prove and (in his mind) work harder than NYU/Columbia, etc. He said HY are their least favorite, because they can't handle clients without running and reading a book after.
Although maybe I'm just taking his word and being a little salty, because I only have t14s and no word from HYS
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Lol this definitely has to be preference from firm to firm..lilitiger99 wrote:I have a family member that is in a NYC V20 firm. The firm's NYC office is not there headquarters, but he told me for the NYC office, for OCI they will interview anyone from Harvard, but for Columbia you need to be top 50 percent, duke/ cornell/ uva/ northwestern 40 percent. Not sure about the other t-14 schools but thats what he told me, so there is a difference although he said he thinks his firm has stricter limitations than many other NYC Big law firms.baseballfan660 wrote:I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.
I spoke to a named partner from a V25 firm (and former judge), who said his "favorite" students to hire are Cornell grads - because they might feel like they have more to prove and (in his mind) work harder than NYU/Columbia, etc. He said HY are their least favorite, because they can't handle clients without running and reading a book after.
Although maybe I'm just taking his word and being a little salty, because I only have t14s and no word from HYS [/quote]
Does anyone have any insight on how this plays out in the PI field? Do non-profits and legal aid orgs have weird perceptions about HYS vs other T14 schools?
- taxman14
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:04 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Anyone else attending an ASW this week and hoping that the JS2 happens during it? I have the Columbia ASW tomorrow/thurs and hoping it happens during
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login