Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Next JS2 wave(s) will be...

Monday 3/27
2
2%
Tuesday 3/28
18
17%
Wednesday 3/29
35
32%
Thursday 3/30
13
12%
Friday 3/31
30
28%
Saturday 4/1
10
9%
 
Total votes: 108

User avatar
dddddd90

Bronze
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dddddd90 » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:26 am

A ding just popped up on LSN

Anon.y.mousse.

Silver
Posts: 599
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Anon.y.mousse. » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:28 am

dddddd90 wrote:A ding just popped up on LSN
Eh, looks like someone who was updating all their schools at once.

User avatar
texteach

Bronze
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:49 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by texteach » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:29 am

dddddd90 wrote:A ding just popped up on LSN
It was someone updating all their apps (I think)

jhc14

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 11:06 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by jhc14 » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:37 am

texteach wrote:
dddddd90 wrote:A ding just popped up on LSN
It was someone updating all their apps (I think)
Do we have any idea how many dings have already gone out/are left?

suitsandpotions

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by suitsandpotions » Mon Mar 27, 2017 12:56 pm

Just got a random 617 call.....it was a stupid telemarketer for some stupid survey on car insurance. Ughhhhhh fml

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


AllHailKingMao

Bronze
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:38 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by AllHailKingMao » Mon Mar 27, 2017 12:58 pm

suitsandpotions wrote:Just got a random 617 call.....it was a stupid telemarketer for some stupid survey on car insurance. Ughhhhhh fml
All phones at Harvard are 617-495-XXXX numbers. So don't get a heart attack for no reason!

suitsandpotions

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by suitsandpotions » Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:10 pm

AllHailKingMao wrote:
suitsandpotions wrote:Just got a random 617 call.....it was a stupid telemarketer for some stupid survey on car insurance. Ughhhhhh fml
All phones at Harvard are 617-495-XXXX numbers. So don't get a heart attack for no reason!
It was a 617-430 so I saw the 4 and got too excited.

bloomsday

Bronze
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:56 pm

.

Post by bloomsday » Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:43 pm

.
Last edited by bloomsday on Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
OnlyHumean

New
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:06 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by OnlyHumean » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:02 pm

bloomsday wrote:
OnlyHumean wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
warmcherrysoda wrote:
69waystodie wrote:Anyone have info on how quickly aid info comes? Also do most admits turn down serious money at T14s? I've been reading a lot of past threads on H/S vs Ruby/Darrow/Hamilton etc. and the majority of people seem to advise for the $.
Most H admits do not receive a full, named scholarship. Although TLS pretty unanimously advises the opposite, a strong majority of full scholarship recipients on LawSchoolNumbers choose H (or Y/S) over the money.
+1. Not commenting on whether it's a good idea, but the fact is a lot (perhaps majority?) of HYS students are in a position to pay sticker without taking out loans.
Harvard says that about 42% of JDs qualify for grants, which leaves 58% left. Of that 58% I'm sure it's a mix of people who are just above the grant cutoff but couldn't afford sticker without loans, people who have substantial assets but not enough liquid cash to pay sticker, people whose parents could pay sticker for them but won't (meaning the student would need to take loans), and people who can pay sticker and do.

The number of people who actually have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans is probably quite high, but I doubt it's anywhere near a majority.
You'd think, but if you look at Harvard's breakdown of the indebtedness of its graduates (presented at ASW, not sure if it's online somewhere), only 12% of its class have debt loads over $220,000. If you look at the published "average debt load" (US News has this, I think), only 12% paying close to sticker makes sense.

So of that 58% getting no grant aid, yes, the vast majority do have access to enough money not to pay sticker.
I think there's a bit of confusion.

I agree with the bolded - but I was never arguing against that.

The claim as I understood it was that some substantial number of HYS students (and perhaps even the majority) have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans. This would mean that they would graduate with $0 in loans. I don't know what the number of students who graduate with $0 in loans is, but I imagine it's a far cry from a majority of the class. That's all I'm claiming.

The claim that most students at HYS do not have sticker debt is an entirely different one, and one that I would agree with.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


69waystodie

New
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 5:45 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by 69waystodie » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:05 pm

Those of you who received financial aid, was it about in line with what you were expecting? I just received my award at NYU, which is exactly what I expected it to be, and I'm hoping Harvard will be at least as generous.

keviiiiiiiiiiiin

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:28 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by keviiiiiiiiiiiin » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:17 pm

Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?

User avatar
dddddd90

Bronze
Posts: 142
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dddddd90 » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:18 pm

keviiiiiiiiiiiin wrote:Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?
Naw but it sounds like something that would be sent out to folks that are gonna be WL rather than dinged.

curry1

Silver
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by curry1 » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:20 pm

keviiiiiiiiiiiin wrote:Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?
When did you get this? Also did you get a JS1? Thanks in advance!

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


suitsandpotions

New
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by suitsandpotions » Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:47 pm

keviiiiiiiiiiiin wrote:Did anyone else get an email asking for fall grades and spring course registration? And whether you're exploring other opportunities besides law school?

When did you receive this?

HonestlyThough

Bronze
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:17 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by HonestlyThough » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:00 pm

OnlyHumean wrote:
bloomsday wrote:
OnlyHumean wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
warmcherrysoda wrote:
69waystodie wrote:Anyone have info on how quickly aid info comes? Also do most admits turn down serious money at T14s? I've been reading a lot of past threads on H/S vs Ruby/Darrow/Hamilton etc. and the majority of people seem to advise for the $.
Most H admits do not receive a full, named scholarship. Although TLS pretty unanimously advises the opposite, a strong majority of full scholarship recipients on LawSchoolNumbers choose H (or Y/S) over the money.
+1. Not commenting on whether it's a good idea, but the fact is a lot (perhaps majority?) of HYS students are in a position to pay sticker without taking out loans.
Harvard says that about 42% of JDs qualify for grants, which leaves 58% left. Of that 58% I'm sure it's a mix of people who are just above the grant cutoff but couldn't afford sticker without loans, people who have substantial assets but not enough liquid cash to pay sticker, people whose parents could pay sticker for them but won't (meaning the student would need to take loans), and people who can pay sticker and do.

The number of people who actually have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans is probably quite high, but I doubt it's anywhere near a majority.
You'd think, but if you look at Harvard's breakdown of the indebtedness of its graduates (presented at ASW, not sure if it's online somewhere), only 12% of its class have debt loads over $220,000. If you look at the published "average debt load" (US News has this, I think), only 12% paying close to sticker makes sense.

So of that 58% getting no grant aid, yes, the vast majority do have access to enough money not to pay sticker.
I think there's a bit of confusion.

I agree with the bolded - but I was never arguing against that.

The claim as I understood it was that some substantial number of HYS students (and perhaps even the majority) have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans. This would mean that they would graduate with $0 in loans. I don't know what the number of students who graduate with $0 in loans is, but I imagine it's a far cry from a majority of the class. That's all I'm claiming.

The claim that most students at HYS do not have sticker debt is an entirely different one, and one that I would agree with.
Stuck thinking about this. :( money or HYS?

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:00 pm

Really thought we would see a WL wave today. They've been around this time the last few years

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:03 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Really thought we would see a WL wave today. They've been around this time the last few years
I think we likely have one more JS2 wave left before we see WLs or another ding wave.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Mikey » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:04 pm

.

ad34964n

Bronze
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by ad34964n » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:17 pm

Last year the Monday of judgment week was a wave of JS2s followed by dings. That Tuesday was WL beginning at 3:00pm. Only time will tell...

User avatar
lawschool2016nyc

Bronze
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by lawschool2016nyc » Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:27 pm

I just want this to be done.

seeprybyrun

Bronze
Posts: 371
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:18 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by seeprybyrun » Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:08 pm

HonestlyThough wrote:
OnlyHumean wrote:
bloomsday wrote:
OnlyHumean wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
warmcherrysoda wrote:
69waystodie wrote:Anyone have info on how quickly aid info comes? Also do most admits turn down serious money at T14s? I've been reading a lot of past threads on H/S vs Ruby/Darrow/Hamilton etc. and the majority of people seem to advise for the $.
Most H admits do not receive a full, named scholarship. Although TLS pretty unanimously advises the opposite, a strong majority of full scholarship recipients on LawSchoolNumbers choose H (or Y/S) over the money.
+1. Not commenting on whether it's a good idea, but the fact is a lot (perhaps majority?) of HYS students are in a position to pay sticker without taking out loans.
Harvard says that about 42% of JDs qualify for grants, which leaves 58% left. Of that 58% I'm sure it's a mix of people who are just above the grant cutoff but couldn't afford sticker without loans, people who have substantial assets but not enough liquid cash to pay sticker, people whose parents could pay sticker for them but won't (meaning the student would need to take loans), and people who can pay sticker and do.

The number of people who actually have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans is probably quite high, but I doubt it's anywhere near a majority.
You'd think, but if you look at Harvard's breakdown of the indebtedness of its graduates (presented at ASW, not sure if it's online somewhere), only 12% of its class have debt loads over $220,000. If you look at the published "average debt load" (US News has this, I think), only 12% paying close to sticker makes sense.

So of that 58% getting no grant aid, yes, the vast majority do have access to enough money not to pay sticker.
I think there's a bit of confusion.

I agree with the bolded - but I was never arguing against that.

The claim as I understood it was that some substantial number of HYS students (and perhaps even the majority) have access to enough money to pay sticker without taking loans. This would mean that they would graduate with $0 in loans. I don't know what the number of students who graduate with $0 in loans is, but I imagine it's a far cry from a majority of the class. That's all I'm claiming.

The claim that most students at HYS do not have sticker debt is an entirely different one, and one that I would agree with.
Stuck thinking about this. :( money or HYS?
I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


baseballfan660

Bronze
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 11:46 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by baseballfan660 » Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:14 pm

I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.[/quote]

I have a family member that is in a NYC V20 firm. The firm's NYC office is not there headquarters, but he told me for the NYC office, for OCI they will interview anyone from Harvard, but for Columbia you need to be top 50 percent, duke/ cornell/ uva/ northwestern 40 percent. Not sure about the other t-14 schools but thats what he told me, so there is a difference although he said he thinks his firm has stricter limitations than many other NYC Big law firms.

lilitiger99

Bronze
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:04 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by lilitiger99 » Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:23 pm

baseballfan660 wrote:I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.
I have a family member that is in a NYC V20 firm. The firm's NYC office is not there headquarters, but he told me for the NYC office, for OCI they will interview anyone from Harvard, but for Columbia you need to be top 50 percent, duke/ cornell/ uva/ northwestern 40 percent. Not sure about the other t-14 schools but thats what he told me, so there is a difference although he said he thinks his firm has stricter limitations than many other NYC Big law firms.[/quote]

Lol this definitely has to be preference from firm to firm..

I spoke to a named partner from a V25 firm (and former judge), who said his "favorite" students to hire are Cornell grads - because they might feel like they have more to prove and (in his mind) work harder than NYU/Columbia, etc. He said HY are their least favorite, because they can't handle clients without running and reading a book after.

Although maybe I'm just taking his word and being a little salty, because I only have t14s and no word from HYS :(

HonestlyThough

Bronze
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:17 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by HonestlyThough » Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:28 am

lilitiger99 wrote:
baseballfan660 wrote:I feel like HYS is the better deal in terms of long-term opportunity, but maybe I'm wrong about this.
I have a family member that is in a NYC V20 firm. The firm's NYC office is not there headquarters, but he told me for the NYC office, for OCI they will interview anyone from Harvard, but for Columbia you need to be top 50 percent, duke/ cornell/ uva/ northwestern 40 percent. Not sure about the other t-14 schools but thats what he told me, so there is a difference although he said he thinks his firm has stricter limitations than many other NYC Big law firms.
Lol this definitely has to be preference from firm to firm..

I spoke to a named partner from a V25 firm (and former judge), who said his "favorite" students to hire are Cornell grads - because they might feel like they have more to prove and (in his mind) work harder than NYU/Columbia, etc. He said HY are their least favorite, because they can't handle clients without running and reading a book after.

Although maybe I'm just taking his word and being a little salty, because I only have t14s and no word from HYS :([/quote]

Does anyone have any insight on how this plays out in the PI field? Do non-profits and legal aid orgs have weird perceptions about HYS vs other T14 schools?

User avatar
taxman14

Silver
Posts: 504
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:04 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by taxman14 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:31 am

Anyone else attending an ASW this week and hoping that the JS2 happens during it? I have the Columbia ASW tomorrow/thurs and hoping it happens during :P

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”