You will hear back by April 1 if your application went complete before February 1. If it went complete after, the timeline is late April.HarvardHopeful95 wrote:+1bartlettadmin wrote:Is it for sure the responses are gonna be April 1? Since technically the website timeline says "late April"?
Just trying to hold on to my senseless JSnone hope over here.
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 12:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2016 1:21 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by defunct on Sun Apr 09, 2017 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yes, lots of folks in today's wave had their JS1 before the 2/22 wave.bearspac12champs wrote:Is it possible to get a JS2 even if there was a JS2 wave you were not a part of after you had your JS1?
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
If I had a JS1 in late-November, is WL most likely at this point?
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:46 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Pozzo wrote:Yes, lots of folks in today's wave had their JS1 before the 2/22 wave.bearspac12champs wrote:Is it possible to get a JS2 even if there was a JS2 wave you were not a part of after you had your JS1?
Were there any noticeable trends with those folks? (Numbers, URM, interviewer, etc.) Or is it fairly random?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Almost all of today's JS2s were above median for LSAT, and those that weren't tended to be URM.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:46 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Above median LSAT, non-URM, wasn't part of the wave. Kill me now LOLLegalAAA wrote:Almost all of today's JS2s were above median for LSAT, and those that weren't tended to be URM.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:33 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by whatislife on Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:41 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Went complete 2/14. JS1 Monday 3/20. Interview Tuesday 3/21.
FWIW, for those JS1 wondering how long the wait will be: my interviewer DID say decision by April 1st.
FWIW, for those JS1 wondering how long the wait will be: my interviewer DID say decision by April 1st.
- Kinch08
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
No one's quite sure. Maybe "most likely," but definitely not overwhelmingly probable.jd20 wrote:If I had a JS1 in late-November, is WL most likely at this point?
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:42 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Settembrini wrote:Went complete 2/14. JS1 Monday 3/20. Interview Tuesday 3/21.
FWIW, for those JS1 wondering how long the wait will be: my interviewer DID say decision by April 1st.
Also had js1 monday and interview on tuesday. stats?
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Thoughts on an afternoon wave? do they have interviews scheduled for this afternoon? I know they have a few for tomorrow...
- Smc1994
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Odds of a two day wave?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 12:30 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Any non-urm with a 173 or below get a js2 today. Please say no. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Not MeCPA-->JD wrote:Any non-urm with a 173 or below get a js2 today. Please say no. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:51 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Me neither. [Dies inside]Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Not MeCPA-->JD wrote:Any non-urm with a 173 or below get a js2 today. Please say no. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:26 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Unlikely, simply because it doesn't make sense to have a second day wave when they can just put the calls they would have made tomorrow in the inevitable final wave next week.Smc1994 wrote:Odds of a two day wave?
Of course, it was a similar rationale that made me and Kinch08 say there wouldn't be a wave today, so who knows?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Smc1994
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It looks like today's wave was the size of last month's...pretty sure today was the final wave.harmcharm wrote:Unlikely, simply because it doesn't make sense to have a second day wave when they can just put the calls they would have made tomorrow in the inevitable final wave next week.Smc1994 wrote:Odds of a two day wave?
Of course, it was a similar rationale that made me and Kinch08 say there wouldn't be a wave today, so who knows?
- WordsworthIsBae
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 4:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Solidaritytartan2016 wrote:Me neither. [Dies inside]Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Not MeCPA-->JD wrote:Any non-urm with a 173 or below get a js2 today. Please say no. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 11:03 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
They aren't done conducting interviews.Smc1994 wrote:It looks like today's wave was the size of last month's...pretty sure today was the final wave.harmcharm wrote:Unlikely, simply because it doesn't make sense to have a second day wave when they can just put the calls they would have made tomorrow in the inevitable final wave next week.Smc1994 wrote:Odds of a two day wave?
Of course, it was a similar rationale that made me and Kinch08 say there wouldn't be a wave today, so who knows?
-
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
WordsworthIsBae wrote:Solidaritytartan2016 wrote:Me neither. [Dies inside]Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Not MeCPA-->JD wrote:Any non-urm with a 173 or below get a js2 today. Please say no. Thanks.
Yes I've used this dead meme twice in a week, what of it
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Smc1994
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Final wave for pre-February apps*chasima wrote:They aren't done conducting interviews.Smc1994 wrote:It looks like today's wave was the size of last month's...pretty sure today was the final wave.harmcharm wrote:Unlikely, simply because it doesn't make sense to have a second day wave when they can just put the calls they would have made tomorrow in the inevitable final wave next week.Smc1994 wrote:Odds of a two day wave?
Of course, it was a similar rationale that made me and Kinch08 say there wouldn't be a wave today, so who knows?
-
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah, I disagree. It looks like there's typically a sizable wave in March before the final wave before the April 1st decision deadline. I think there is still a wave of admits coming next week, but I'm not sure whether it will be mostly recent interviewees or more inclusive of people who interviewed at any point.chasima wrote:They aren't done conducting interviews.Smc1994 wrote:It looks like today's wave was the size of last month's...pretty sure today was the final wave.harmcharm wrote:Unlikely, simply because it doesn't make sense to have a second day wave when they can just put the calls they would have made tomorrow in the inevitable final wave next week.Smc1994 wrote:Odds of a two day wave?
Of course, it was a similar rationale that made me and Kinch08 say there wouldn't be a wave today, so who knows?
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:51 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
But if today was final what about all the JS1s that just happened today? Wouldn't there need to be another wave after that round of interviews.Smc1994 wrote:It looks like today's wave was the size of last month's...pretty sure today was the final wave.harmcharm wrote:Unlikely, simply because it doesn't make sense to have a second day wave when they can just put the calls they would have made tomorrow in the inevitable final wave next week.Smc1994 wrote:Odds of a two day wave?
Of course, it was a similar rationale that made me and Kinch08 say there wouldn't be a wave today, so who knows?
- KateMcKitten
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Me, sorry to burst your bubble. 173, non-URM.CPA-->JD wrote:Any non-urm with a 173 or below get a js2 today. Please say no. Thanks.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login