I've read everywhere that Chicago interviews tend to be that way (impersonal), but mine was the opposite. I would rank my Chicago interview as the most personal, followed by UVA (which was also very personal), followed by Columbia (which was not) (then Cornell and Northwestern recorded interviews which obviously are the opposite of personal). I haven't had a Harvard interview ( ) or Georgetown interview.lawlzschool wrote:I agree with this completely and feel the same way. I also didn't get asked any political questions, just really normal interview Qs.canafsa wrote:Had my interview earlier this week. Was definitely more straight to the point than my Harvard, Columbia, Georgetown, or Northwestern interviews - not much fluff or smalltalk to speak of, comparatively. Quite conventional overall and no curveballs to speak of. I think it went okay.
My interviewer talked to me about mostly about insignificant interest stuff I had on my resume that she was apparently also interested in. I had a current event question too (an important issue facing society today or something like that) along with the usual why law/why Chicago but the whole thing was very conversational.