I just wanna knowwwwdrawstring wrote:Me too. I feel like the Faye hammer will drop on us soon.Jessasaurus wrote:UGH me too. this is the worst!t-14orbust wrote:
still submitted for review. Complete mid-october. yay
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- 2x2Matrix
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:37 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
- Jessasaurus
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Hey on the flip side we finally hit 200 pages
- almondjoy
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:35 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
DLS! DLS! Thank god almighty, we are DLS!
waitlisted!
waitlisted!
- Jessasaurus
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Just now or could have been from earlier? (Testing my theory that this morning was the last of the waitlist)almondjoy wrote:DLS! DLS! Thank god almighty, we are DLS!
waitlisted!
- jaesonko
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:22 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think they've forgotten about us
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- fleurdelis2
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:22 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
jaesonko wrote:I think they've forgotten about us
yuppp
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think Stanford got tired of us.
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Contemplating calling and saying my thing says DLS and can they tell me what it is [still not DLS].
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by chizzy on Thu May 01, 2014 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
When I called they said they had sent the letter yesterday....soooo this could technically workbarrelofmonkeys wrote:Contemplating calling and saying my thing says DLS and can they tell me what it is [still not DLS].
Edit: I wouldn't recommend doing this though...
Last edited by andapieceoftoast on Thu May 01, 2014 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:53 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Agree!goldenflash19 wrote:Congrats, and best of luck!! Woo away!hellomellow wrote:Omg you guys!! I was waitlisted!! One more chance to woo them!!!!! #lovemebackfaye
- goldenflash19
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Just enrolled at H. As absolutely awesome as their admissions have been throughout the whole process and as TTT as Stanford's have been, I'm still really dreaming of seeing my phone light up 650. Getting a decision of any kind at the moment would be nice, though :/
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
caved, called, waitlisted.
GOTTA CATCH EM ALL AMIRITE?
#t3waitlisthero #blessed #futurebiglawya
GOTTA CATCH EM ALL AMIRITE?
#t3waitlisthero #blessed #futurebiglawya
Last edited by Kimikho on Thu May 01, 2014 4:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- applicantx
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I feel ya. Just need closure at this point! Congrats on Hgoldenflash19 wrote:Just enrolled at H. As absolutely awesome as their admissions have been throughout the whole process and as TTT as Stanford's have been, I'm still really dreaming of seeing my phone light up 650. Getting a decision of any kind at the moment would be nice, though :/
- almondjoy
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:35 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Sometime between 10and 1 pacificJessasaurus wrote:Just now or could have been from earlier? (Testing my theory that this morning was the last of the waitlist)almondjoy wrote:DLS! DLS! Thank god almighty, we are DLS!
waitlisted!
Last edited by almondjoy on Thu May 01, 2014 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This whole ordeal with Stanford has made me very glad that I abstained from applying to Yale.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
HECK YAS!!!!!!!!!scoobers wrote:caved, called, waitlisted.
GOTTA CATCH EM ALL AMIRITE?
#t3waitlisthero #blessed #futurebiglawya
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yale was much faster than Stanford, and I was one of the stragglers who heard from them later than almost everyone else. Also, they utilize this groundbreaking technology called "email," which Stanford does not appear to be familiar with.t-14orbust wrote:This whole ordeal with Stanford has made me very glad that I abstained from applying to Yale.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
What I meant was that if SLS is taking this long to decide whether or not to WL/Reject me, Yale would likely reject me ASAP lol.koalacity wrote:Yale was much faster than Stanford, and I was one of the stragglers who heard from them later than almost everyone else. Also, they utilize this groundbreaking technology called "email," which Stanford does not appear to be familiar with.t-14orbust wrote:This whole ordeal with Stanford has made me very glad that I abstained from applying to Yale.
Please don't try to convince me otherwise
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This. In my opinion, Yale had one of the best admissions process this cycle. I really appreciated how clear and open they were about the process. Even notifying us when dings would come knocking on my door.koalacity wrote:Yale was much faster than Stanford, and I was one of the stragglers who heard from them later than almost everyone else. Also, they utilize this groundbreaking technology called "email," which Stanford does not appear to be familiar with.t-14orbust wrote:This whole ordeal with Stanford has made me very glad that I abstained from applying to Yale.
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by EirinnGoBrach on Fri Oct 07, 2016 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
first things first, did you take any acid?EirinnGoBrach wrote:Guys I just logged into my status checker and it was blank for like five seconds and then it changed to a bunch of deep red numbers that began cycling really fast and then it just said [unintelligible rune] and my cell phone lit up and Google Now spoke to me in fluent Aramaic and then exploded guys is this a ding or WL?
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
.
Last edited by Mack.Hambleton on Wed May 07, 2014 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Submitted for review
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login