Top Law Schools

scoobers wrote:

Attax wrote:

chingwoo wrote:Would it be possible to make a WUSTL spreadsheet? I'm sorry if this has already been brought up. WUSTL has one of the largest if not the largest non t-14 presence during application season.

I agree. Maybe add Texas, WUSTL, UCLA, and USC?

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 222640#top

lawschool22 wrote:

scoobers wrote:

Attax wrote:

chingwoo wrote:Would it be possible to make a WUSTL spreadsheet? I'm sorry if this has already been brought up. WUSTL has one of the largest if not the largest non t-14 presence during application season.

I agree. Maybe add Texas, WUSTL, UCLA, and USC?

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 222640#top

.

I have no problem copying over sheets for those other schools, but I don't know if I'll have time to maintain. If someone wants to volunteer to maintain them I will add them.

scoobers wrote:

bbkk wrote:How hard could it be, people???? Just stop sorting/filtering the spreadsheets!!!!!!!!!!

KatyMarie wrote:

bbkk wrote:How hard could it be, people???? Just stop sorting/filtering the spreadsheets!!!!!!!!!!

Please!! It's so frustrating because the information is really valuable. The Duke one is so jacked up right now. I wish I knew how to help you all fix these

alinor wrote:

KatyMarie wrote:

bbkk wrote:How hard could it be, people???? Just stop sorting/filtering the spreadsheets!!!!!!!!!!

Please!! It's so frustrating because the information is really valuable. The Duke one is so jacked up right now. I wish I knew how to help you all fix these

Fixed it! That was insanely messed up.

scoobers wrote:

alinor wrote:

KatyMarie wrote:

bbkk wrote:How hard could it be, people???? Just stop sorting/filtering the spreadsheets!!!!!!!!!!

Please!! It's so frustrating because the information is really valuable. The Duke one is so jacked up right now. I wish I knew how to help you all fix these

Fixed it! That was insanely messed up.

It's still messed up. LSAT scores are matching up with the right users.

scoobers wrote:lol by right i mean LSAT scores are matching up with the wrong users.

alinor wrote:

scoobers wrote:lol by right i mean LSAT scores are matching up with the wrong users.

After almost an hour of trying to figure this out, I've come to the conclusion that Specs and wowhio mistyped their LSAT scores... I didn't see a bad sort by LSAT and I checked back through mid-December. Are there other users that are off? I can try going back further...

scoobers wrote:

alinor wrote:

scoobers wrote:lol by right i mean LSAT scores are matching up with the wrong users.

After almost an hour of trying to figure this out, I've come to the conclusion that Specs and wowhio mistyped their LSAT scores... I didn't see a bad sort by LSAT and I checked back through mid-December. Are there other users that are off? I can try going back further...

it looks fixed! at least for those scores I know.

Nonconsecutive wrote:What if its really ls22 who is messing up the spreadsheets.

statception

scoobers wrote:berk is messed up. I mean, I'd love to have a 176 and all...but I don't.

for the love of all that is holy people, I don't understand what this obsession is with filtering the spreadsheets. when you filter the spreadsheets, you are looking at incorrect data. also I won't like you anymore.

LS22, you should put my message or some other message before the spreadsheets. Or maybe turn the links to be like:

Berkeley - EVERY TIME YOU FILTER A SPREADSHEET GOD KILLS A KITTEN ONE OF YOUR ORGANS.

scoobers wrote:berk is messed up. I mean, I'd love to have a 176 and all...but I don't.

for the love of all that is holy people, I don't understand what this obsession is with filtering the spreadsheets. when you filter the spreadsheets, you are looking at incorrect data. also I won't like you anymore.

LS22, you should put my message or some other message before the spreadsheets. Or maybe turn the links to be like:

Berkeley - EVERY TIME YOU FILTER A SPREADSHEET GOD KILLS A KITTEN.

lawschool22 wrote:

scoobers wrote:berk is messed up. I mean, I'd love to have a 176 and all...but I don't.

for the love of all that is holy people, I don't understand what this obsession is with filtering the spreadsheets. when you filter the spreadsheets, you are looking at incorrect data. also I won't like you anymore.

LS22, you should put my message or some other message before the spreadsheets. Or maybe turn the links to be like:

Berkeley - EVERY TIME YOU FILTER A SPREADSHEET GOD KILLS A KITTEN.

Done. I had a small warning along these lines already, but apparently for a bunch of future lawyers TLS has a lot of trouble reading fine print. I have made the message larger and more colorful, and changed the links per your request.

kershka wrote:The new warnings are awesome LS22! I don't even use Ctrl F on these spreadsheets for fear of messing them up

Nonconsecutive wrote:

kershka wrote:The new warnings are awesome LS22! I don't even use Ctrl F on these spreadsheets for fear of messing them up

Yeah, every time I open them I feel like this:

midwest17 wrote:Harvard "most recent complete to get JS1" seems broken. It says 1/21/2014, which surprised me. But there are only two 1/21/2014 completes in the data that I can see (using search, not filter! ) and neither of them have JS1s yet.

bbkk wrote:

midwest17 wrote:Harvard "most recent complete to get JS1" seems broken. It says 1/21/2014, which surprised me. But there are only two 1/21/2014 completes in the data that I can see (using search, not filter! ) and neither of them have JS1s yet.

Some Cycle Timing and JS1 Analytics are broken too.