Re: The Official June 2018 Study Thread
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:43 pm
Whats everyone's opinion regarding whether you should drill LG question by question, or all together with all question types mixed?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=284088
Start by type and drill by the 7sage fool proof. Then when you know the types and have done plenty of games by type you can just drill how you wantNotLawDog wrote:Whats everyone's opinion regarding whether you should drill LG question by question, or all together with all question types mixed?
Drill by type using the 7sage fool proof method, and then when you get plenty of experience you can just drill hard games or whichever ones you want.NotLawDog wrote:Whats everyone's opinion regarding whether you should drill LG question by question, or all together with all question types mixed?
I noticed that too! so frustrating!olympia wrote:Is there a specific reason why we aren’t able to PM people anymore?
LGs is definitely the most fun place to start because the marginal returns are the highest. However, I would recommend a more synthesized approach to the test and maybe work on two sections at a time? If you only focus on one section at a time by the time you return to it after finishing the last section you will be out of shape!Logic wrote:Hi guys,
Since there's a lot of time left before the test date, I'm considering taking a tunneled vision approach to studying. The aim is to focus on mastering a section before moving on to the next. For example, my best and favorite section of the test is the logic games. I see a lot of potential for improvement here, so I've decided to focus solely on the logic games section for the next few weeks. I plan on reading through the entire logic games bible so as to learn the fundamentals before taking on drills. I have a pretty solid logic background and I think it would help me cement the foundation before moving on to the next sections.
I chose to take this approach because I noticed that whenever I take a LG section untimed, I usually get no more than 3 wrong. This led me to conclude that, the time constraint is what I am struggling with. If I can train myself to increase my speed without giving up my accuracy, I am confident that I would do really well on LG.
What are everyone's thought on this approach? Could this lead to burnout? Any suggestions on how to do this efficiently?
For sure, I ended up synthesizing it when I became bored with LG. I've been much better since then.blueprint-nick wrote:LGs is definitely the most fun place to start because the marginal returns are the highest. However, I would recommend a more synthesized approach to the test and maybe work on two sections at a time? If you only focus on one section at a time by the time you return to it after finishing the last section you will be out of shape!Logic wrote:Hi guys,
Since there's a lot of time left before the test date, I'm considering taking a tunneled vision approach to studying. The aim is to focus on mastering a section before moving on to the next. For example, my best and favorite section of the test is the logic games. I see a lot of potential for improvement here, so I've decided to focus solely on the logic games section for the next few weeks. I plan on reading through the entire logic games bible so as to learn the fundamentals before taking on drills. I have a pretty solid logic background and I think it would help me cement the foundation before moving on to the next sections.
I chose to take this approach because I noticed that whenever I take a LG section untimed, I usually get no more than 3 wrong. This led me to conclude that, the time constraint is what I am struggling with. If I can train myself to increase my speed without giving up my accuracy, I am confident that I would do really well on LG.
What are everyone's thought on this approach? Could this lead to burnout? Any suggestions on how to do this efficiently?
I'm in the exact same situation. Bay Area, and have been stalking these forums forever and finally decided to get an account.lukeob wrote:Hi everyone! Just created a TLS account but been reading forums here for a while. I'm signed up for the June test, located in the Bay Area. Hope your studying is going well.
My recommendation would be 7Sage but I’m sure there are equally great options. My LG scores were way worse than yours when I started but through foolproofing I’ve gotten down to -0.Baylor28 wrote:What's the Best in class/online prep course to take starting now until to the june lsat?
The order of sections im good at: LG, LR, RC. However "good" is probably not as good as yalls. I get about 18-20/23 LG; about 30/50 LR, 12/27 RC.
I know my RC is horrific, LR is mediocre, and LG needs to be perfect.
What can I do? I'm consistently PTing at 153, I want to jump at least to a 158...
Any thoughts? REALLY Want to do this by June TEST.
Looking for a daily schedule that, if i follow to the exact schedule, Should help me get there.
cracking 160 would be nice too tho.
Any advice for June LSAT?