The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread Forum
- Zero Hedge
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Alright thanks littlewing for remembering more LR than me So I had the LR-RC-LR-LR-LG combo and it looks like the second LR (right before the break) was the experimental.
- Incrementalist
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:48 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Does anyone know which game section was real? And Kate Li should definitely self publish lol.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
- Zero Hedge
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
The LG with the last game having the 8 floors was real.Incrementalist wrote:Does anyone know which game section was real? And Kate Li should definitely self publish lol.
PS: Team Li should send that tip to the big hitters
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:34 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Do people with then same test structures have the same experimental in the same slots? eg, if me and another person had LR RC LR LR LG, are our experimentals in the same place?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Zero Hedge
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:20 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
About 9 minutes. If you double-layer sequenced it felt pretty straight forward to me.thatcandoromg wrote:How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I think I had like 15-18 mins for it and still got kind confused for a good chunk of itthatcandoromg wrote:How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Mikey wrote:I think I had like 15-18 mins for it and still got kind confused for a good chunk of itthatcandoromg wrote:How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
I felt it was easy before. Now I’m worried if I seriously messed up with the rules...after seeing so many people complaining about it.
Do people think it’s hard because of time-pressure or because the rules were hard?? (Am I allow to ask that.?
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I had the time, I was just really confused by a rule and am just hoping I didn't screw upthatcandoromg wrote:Mikey wrote:I think I had like 15-18 mins for it and still got kind confused for a good chunk of itthatcandoromg wrote:How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
I felt it was easy before. Now I’m worried if I seriously messed up with the rules...after seeing so many people complaining about it.
Do people think it’s hard because of time-pressure or because the rules were hard?? (Am I allow to ask that.?
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:01 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
So I had to be at work within an hour of finishing the test, so f*ck that.
VITALLY IMPORTANT QUESTION:
When I get home, do I go for the Bombay Sapphire or the Wild Turkey American Honey first?
VITALLY IMPORTANT QUESTION:
When I get home, do I go for the Bombay Sapphire or the Wild Turkey American Honey first?
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I'll post it again in case some of you didn't see it but:
ANYONE from NYC who wants to meet up tonight at a bar with some of us from in here PM ME (or you can PM littlewing as well)!
ANYONE is welcome, we just want to celebrate that this shit is over! Come through!
ANYONE from NYC who wants to meet up tonight at a bar with some of us from in here PM ME (or you can PM littlewing as well)!
ANYONE is welcome, we just want to celebrate that this shit is over! Come through!
- Eleven
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:46 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I was thinking, That Tyrant Caligula gives no 180sExperiment626 wrote:I would like to recommend the end of the OP topic be- Translating to 180.Mikey wrote:UPDATE: sorry I didn't include it in the poll but I left out the option of "it went well but still give me a damn drink"
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PhiladelphiaCollins
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I thought it was ok but I may have messed up a couple. I just used the floors as pieces?thatcandoromg wrote:Mikey wrote:I think I had like 15-18 mins for it and still got kind confused for a good chunk of itthatcandoromg wrote:How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
I felt it was easy before. Now I’m worried if I seriously messed up with the rules...after seeing so many people complaining about it.
Do people think it’s hard because of time-pressure or because the rules were hard?? (Am I allow to ask that.?
- MercW07
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Ok here is my breakdown (cause I know you guys care so much)
LR RC LR LR LG
LR1 (25): Wasn't bad but because it was my first section I was a little slow out of the gate. I had a pretty solid warm up, but filling everything out before the test was pretty distracting. But, once I got going on it I got into a decent rhythm. This one will definitely be scored so hopefully I did as well as I think I did, but there is some uncertainty there
RC: Surprisingly easy. I was actually shocked when I got to the last passage and it was something understandable. With that being said Ill probably end up going like -10 lol
LR (26): Seems like the consensus is this is the experimental, but I so hope it isn't. I absolutely crushed it and hardly had to do any skipping. I can honestly say Ive never felt as good about an LR section as I did when I finished this one.
LR (26): I went in feeling pretty good after the break and was slapped down by question #2. It wasn't hard, and Im pretty sure I ended up getting it right when I came back to it but it did shake my confidence a bit. Ended up skipping more questions than normal, and in my mind I would classify it as a medium to hard difficulty section.
LG: First 2 games were easy, the wording of game 3 made it more difficult than it should have been, and game 4 ended up being pretty easy. I skipped game 3 cause I knew I didn't have a firm grasp of it going into the questions and that ended up being a good idea. The 4th game (buildings) was actually pretty easy if you had the correct set up. Also, I anticipated both correct answers for the 2 substitution equivalence questions so that felt good and saved a lot of time. Don't think I went -0 on it, but I felt good about LG in general.
The test in general did not seem overly difficult. On one hand that makes me feel good about my performance, but on the other Im worried the curve will be similar to PT81. Idk how Im going to make it through the next month waiting for my score, but hey at least we all get to suffer together.
LR RC LR LR LG
LR1 (25): Wasn't bad but because it was my first section I was a little slow out of the gate. I had a pretty solid warm up, but filling everything out before the test was pretty distracting. But, once I got going on it I got into a decent rhythm. This one will definitely be scored so hopefully I did as well as I think I did, but there is some uncertainty there
RC: Surprisingly easy. I was actually shocked when I got to the last passage and it was something understandable. With that being said Ill probably end up going like -10 lol
LR (26): Seems like the consensus is this is the experimental, but I so hope it isn't. I absolutely crushed it and hardly had to do any skipping. I can honestly say Ive never felt as good about an LR section as I did when I finished this one.
LR (26): I went in feeling pretty good after the break and was slapped down by question #2. It wasn't hard, and Im pretty sure I ended up getting it right when I came back to it but it did shake my confidence a bit. Ended up skipping more questions than normal, and in my mind I would classify it as a medium to hard difficulty section.
LG: First 2 games were easy, the wording of game 3 made it more difficult than it should have been, and game 4 ended up being pretty easy. I skipped game 3 cause I knew I didn't have a firm grasp of it going into the questions and that ended up being a good idea. The 4th game (buildings) was actually pretty easy if you had the correct set up. Also, I anticipated both correct answers for the 2 substitution equivalence questions so that felt good and saved a lot of time. Don't think I went -0 on it, but I felt good about LG in general.
The test in general did not seem overly difficult. On one hand that makes me feel good about my performance, but on the other Im worried the curve will be similar to PT81. Idk how Im going to make it through the next month waiting for my score, but hey at least we all get to suffer together.
- MercW07
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:25 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Floors as pieces, and a double layer sequencing game did the trick for me. (If Im saying too much about the game I apologize)PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:I thought it was ok but I may have messed up a couple. I just used the floors as pieces?thatcandoromg wrote:Mikey wrote:I think I had like 15-18 mins for it and still got kind confused for a good chunk of itthatcandoromg wrote:How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
I felt it was easy before. Now I’m worried if I seriously messed up with the rules...after seeing so many people complaining about it.
Do people think it’s hard because of time-pressure or because the rules were hard?? (Am I allow to ask that.?
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:14 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I spent the first 35 minutes worrying about my watch LOL I think I self-sabotaged myself.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:13 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Are a lot of people not doing that?MercW07 wrote:Floors as pieces, and a double layer sequencing game did the trick for me. (If Im saying too much about the game I apologize)PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:I thought it was ok but I may have messed up a couple. I just used the floors as pieces?thatcandoromg wrote:Mikey wrote:I think I had like 15-18 mins for it and still got kind confused for a good chunk of itthatcandoromg wrote:How many time you guys got to spend on the 8 floors game??
I felt it was easy before. Now I’m worried if I seriously messed up with the rules...after seeing so many people complaining about it.
Do people think it’s hard because of time-pressure or because the rules were hard?? (Am I allow to ask that.?
-
- Posts: 747
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:58 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
.
Last edited by etramak on Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:14 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I had an experimental LR too. Does anybody know if the section with the software developer is real or experimental?
Games felt relatively easy but the last game could be perceived as tricky. The hardest part was time constraint, in my case. All 3 LR seemed not too bad but I think the 2nd one was my best so I am hoping that section is real. The third section seemed odd in the way it worded a few questions but otherwise not much more difficult, if at all. RC was easy with no surprises and decent topics but I still feel like I could've had room for error there. Overall a fairly standard if not easier test imo. Hopefully the curve is at least -11 though!
Games felt relatively easy but the last game could be perceived as tricky. The hardest part was time constraint, in my case. All 3 LR seemed not too bad but I think the 2nd one was my best so I am hoping that section is real. The third section seemed odd in the way it worded a few questions but otherwise not much more difficult, if at all. RC was easy with no surprises and decent topics but I still feel like I could've had room for error there. Overall a fairly standard if not easier test imo. Hopefully the curve is at least -11 though!
Last edited by Skadidas on Sat Dec 02, 2017 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- caramelizedgod
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 3:17 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Was going amazingly well until LG. F me. Not gonna cancel tho, think i did great on the other sections.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:12 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
Do anyone remember what are the answers for the last LG (floor)?...i guessed on half of them...
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
What do you guys anticipate the curve being? This is my first time officially taking the test, but it felt harder to me than June and Sept 2017 (both of which seemed unusually straightforward, at least on LG). Hoping that's not just because I freaked out on the LG section today.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:05 am
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
For LR(25) RC LR(26) LR(26) LG, which one is experimental?
I didn't remember any questions so I can't really tell from whole T. rex is real thing.
(not that matters anymore cuz I was in ED yesterday but I still took the test this morning and I don't why I did that)
I didn't remember any questions so I can't really tell from whole T. rex is real thing.
(not that matters anymore cuz I was in ED yesterday but I still took the test this morning and I don't why I did that)
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 9:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread
I left feeling super confident (LR RC LR LR LG) but now I'm super worried I fucked up the last rule of the 2nd logic game. I honestly thought LG was super super easy - involved a bit of brute forcing but not too bad (except the 3rd game substitution that was rough).
Anyone who knows they messed up the 2nd game - did it make finding answers difficult? I felt like I got through them all in no time at all.
Anyone who knows they messed up the 2nd game - did it make finding answers difficult? I felt like I got through them all in no time at all.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login