Top Law Schools

rosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?

I had the same as you, my 4th LR was real. not too sure on the 1st/3rd though

How can you guys tell what was real?

Had

LR LC LR LR LG.


I'm gonna assume I didn't hit my score and start preparing for feb in about 2 weeks

.

saffles wrote:“Waiting for the end to come. Wishing I had strength to stand...”

oh hey! how'd it go?

some of us in NYC are meeting up tonight and I remember you saying you were here too and wanted to go to a meet up?

well we are! if you're still down to meet us inbox me!

georgeNY wrote:So, I had an experimental LR, and my test had the following configuration: LR (25), RC, LR (26), LR (26), LG.

For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?

Come to think of it, I *think* my second LR had a question in it about a company creating exercise classes for employees. Was this real or experimental? I hope real! That 26 section wasn't bad.

I’m also hoping the third LR was experimental! I remember it having a lot of the same *type* of questions in a row, and it feeling harder/ different than the first two AND it having some oddly worded questions. So maybe it was the exprimental?

UPDATE: sorry I didn't include it in the poll but I left out the option of "it went well but still give me a damn drink"

littlewing67 wrote:but for some reason I messed up rules in both LG. IDK WHY!!!!??? I couldnt have 2 pages on my desk to refer to the rules...............

LG is my best section (like I've missed maybe four questions over all the PTs) and I missed two definitely (last question on third and fourth game). Maybe it was trickier than we think because the games themselves seemed straight forward, but the questions were actually somewhat difficult?

I remember a question from my second LR section, LR2, (they went LR1 (25), RC, LR2 (26), LR3 (26), LG) that was about a company making exercise classes for its employees to reduce stress and improve productivity. I know LR1 couldn't have been experimental, since it was only 25 questions, so it was either LR2 or LR3. Was the exercise question real?

rosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?

I believe T Rex was in the third so I eliminated that one. I think the weird argument question was in the first but I'm not sure if the 1st or 2nd was experimental

Mikey wrote:

rosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?

I had the same as you, my 4th LR was real. not too sure on the 1st/3rd though

Do you remember if it had two “which arguement is similar” questions towards the end?/ am I allowed to ask that

also, does anyone remember the bubble answers for ? I got a bunch of BANS

Did not go badly IMO. Had RC-LR-LG-LG-LR. Nice big room and big desks. That Chinese passage was weird and I rushed through the Darwin passage but otherwise I feel OK about the whole thing. The first LR I thought was much easier than 80 & 81.

Inb4 156

ANYONE from NYC who wants to meet up tonight at a bar with some of us from in here PM ME (or you can PM lilwing as well)!

ANYONE is welcome, we just want to celebrate that this shit is over! Come through!

.

I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. Felt like the third LR was the hardest one of the 3 and was super bummed to have that be real. The 3rd one had the T Rex, Black and White, prehistoric finger fish, etc. Otherwise everything else was pretty straightforward. Wasn't a fan of the Chinese RC but not too bad. Games were pretty standard flew through the first 2, last 2 were trickier but not bad

georgeNY wrote:also, does anyone remember the bubble answers for the BAN

BAN

littlewing67 wrote:LURKERS COME SAY HELLO!!! MAKE AN ACCOUNT!!! WE DON'T BITE UNLESS U R A T. REX

LR RC LR LR LG...seems like a common one

Felt good about RC until the social Darwinism passage, still probably didn't bomb it. That was all I was really worried about. All 3 LR's went pretty well and almost felt too easy, but I guess that's from being prepared (I'm guessing one of the 3rd/4th ones were the exp section, since both had 26 questions). LG was pretty easy and I'm glad it was last. I definitely relaxed when I saw LR after the break and knew I didn't have a 2nd RC coming.

How sensitive is LSAC's scoring hardware on answers that are erased but still have some light haze behind? That's the only thing that could get me on a few answers.

Also, report the tip.

Mikey wrote:

saffles wrote:“Waiting for the end to come. Wishing I had strength to stand...”

oh hey! how'd it go?

some of us in NYC are meeting up tonight and I remember you saying you were here too and wanted to go to a meet up?

well we are! if you're still down to meet us inbox me!

The fomo is real...haha, yes, littlewing dm’ed me. You guys have fun! I need to release frustration by killing some raiders in F4. It went horribly. I literally guessed on at least six questions per section D:

I had two RCs (apparently the Emmy Noether and Arbitration Clause one was experimental). Very easy (much easier than on the June administration); I had about 10 minutes left on both. Not sure about the LRs; I had a few minutes left to check my answers, and I felt good about them, but some questions were definitely tricky.

As to LG... Well, hopefully I didn't bomb quite as badly as in June. Felt good about the first three games, but filled out the last one with uneducated guesses. Oh well. I only did this for funsies (admitted through early decision, but asked Admissions if I could use a score boost to renegotiate scholarship; they said YES.)

And Kate Li should obviously pass the tip on to the newspaper of record.

LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

I'm pissed at myself because I flubbed a rule in the 2nd game and caught it but the time I spent correcting it prevented me from answering the last 2 questions so there goes my -0 LG.

LR was normal. RC, comparatively, felt easier than Sept or June. I'm really unsure about the curve, I really hate saying it it but I feel like it's not going to be -11, I just pray it's not a -8.

I felt like I was on fire today, finished with time to spare in all sections but LG. Even caught some mistakes on questions I went back to. I'm calling a 165-170+ for me because of my flub in LG. If I corrected properly and I performed to my averages for everything else I'm at the cusp for 170 based on whatever the 170 curve is. I'm hoping I performed better than my averages for LR/RC to offset an issues from my goof in LG.

Hoping my second 26 question LG was the experimental, I was slower on that one....

So robots LG was experimental? Thank god

Blougram wrote:I had two RCs (apparently the Emmy Noether and Arbitration Clause one was experimental). Very easy (much easier than on the June administration); I had about 10 minutes left on both. Not sure about the LRs; I had a few minutes left to check my answers, and I felt good about them, but some questions were definitely tricky.

As to LG... Well, hopefully I didn't bomb quite as badly as in June. Felt good about the first three games, but filled out the last one with uneducated guesses. Oh well. I only did this for funsies (admitted through early decision, but asked Admissions if I could use a score boost to renegotiate scholarship; they said YES.)

And Kate Li should obviously pass the tip on to the newspaper of record.

Kate Li should definitely self publish

Guys, reminder before the mods see and start handing out bans, don't discuss ACs and order like YYY.

Mikey wrote:UPDATE: sorry I didn't include it in the poll but I left out the option of "it went well but still give me a damn drink"

I would like to recommend the end of the OP topic be- Translating to 180.