vikingrunner wrote:So I had to be at work within an hour of finishing the test, so f*ck that.
VITALLY IMPORTANT QUESTION:
When I get home, do I go for the Bombay Sapphire or the Wild Turkey American Honey first?
WE HAVE A WINNER.
vikingrunner wrote:So I had to be at work within an hour of finishing the test, so f*ck that.
VITALLY IMPORTANT QUESTION:
When I get home, do I go for the Bombay Sapphire or the Wild Turkey American Honey first?
+1JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:Honestly, I don't care about my score (I mean, ok, maybe a little), but there were quite a number of LR questions I'd love to know the answers to right now. Knights, Poem Paraphrase, Atom Fusion Energy just to name a few
jagerbom, is it you? you are unrecognizable with the new name.Rupert Pupkin wrote:11 and 12 would be clutch!JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:I'm leaning 11 I think. 12 seems like a stretch.PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:Dave Killoran says -11 or -12 which would be huuuuge. It seems familiar to me and I had an LG exp, so I’m gonna say no.Skadidas wrote:This thread is too quiet haha. Any predictions for curve? -9? -10? Also, does anybody know if the LR question on software developers is experimental?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Pretty sure it is, I only had 2 LR and I don't recall any of them....Ceetee17 wrote:Anybody remember a question about duck hunting, hunting licenses, and conservation? I think this was experimental, but wanted to check.
That was a weird one. I believe the correct answer APPARENTLY INCLUDED A BAN.stuff
It is people saying the lr sections were trickier than usual that worrries me because I usually have the most trouble with lr and thought these were easy in comparison. I finished both lr sections wth time to spare and I usually end up having to speed through or guess on a few questions. Doesn’t really mean anything though. Time to wait.strawberryrhubarb wrote:LG wasn't bad. The simple sequencing game had a few not so simple rules IMO. Game 4 was rushed but I've seen worse.
Had two RCs, not bad - both of em.
LR was a bit trickier than usual? Most worried about this section.
Hoping for that 168
I'd say this is a good sign. don't obsess over it.KylawRen wrote:It is people saying the lr sections were trickier than usual that worrries me because I usually have the most trouble with lr and thought these were easy in comparison. I finished both lr sections wth time to spare and I usually end up having to speed through or guess on a few questions. Doesn’t really mean anything though. Time to wait.strawberryrhubarb wrote:LG wasn't bad. The simple sequencing game had a few not so simple rules IMO. Game 4 was rushed but I've seen worse.
Had two RCs, not bad - both of em.
LR was a bit trickier than usual? Most worried about this section.
Hoping for that 168
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Retake old material and take the test again! You made progress studying and your score can only go up if you add some more effort.littlewing67 wrote:Ugh I’m feeling really depressed right now. Almost certain I did horribly and did not reach my goal. Not going to cancel just in case. Sad that I wasted so many months studying for nothing. Not retaking because I have no new material. :/
Haha yes it is me. Sorry felt like switching it up a little while ago.appind wrote:jagerbom, is it you? you are unrecognizable with the new name.Rupert Pupkin wrote:11 and 12 would be clutch!JamesBlahDeBlah wrote:I'm leaning 11 I think. 12 seems like a stretch.PhiladelphiaCollins wrote:Dave Killoran says -11 or -12 which would be huuuuge. It seems familiar to me and I had an LG exp, so I’m gonna say no.Skadidas wrote:This thread is too quiet haha. Any predictions for curve? -9? -10? Also, does anybody know if the LR question on software developers is experimental?
how'd it go?
eating pretzels (cc: Pretzel) was key during the break btwsomethingElse wrote:CONGRATS on being done with the test guys!! Now comes the fun part These threads are the best on TLS
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Well said. Definitely some weird LRs and I focused more on POE when i went back to approach questions I was uncertain of. Im hoping in my last LR i still had clarity and being a bit drained didn't cause me to overlook something in my evaluations but i FEEL like i was able to catch myself in these tough questionsS0L0 wrote:I can't remember specifically.JessiCAL wrote:What was the topic of the don't say what kind of question question? I had 3 LRs but don't remember that one.S0L0 wrote:Agree with this. Switched my LR strategy leading up to December to read the question stems first with a rigorous elimination process. This made the LR seem fairly easy. Definitely remember some weird questions (Caligula, fish, etc.) but was mostly able to uncover LSAC's tricks.lemonlacroix wrote:
LR wasn't difficult if you focused on why wrong answers are wrong - we're both convinced some of the "right" answers were just not wrong.
Definitely remember a don't say what kind of question question where all five conceivably could have strengthened but one took a lot of mental gymnastics.
On the other hand, I do remember a weird don't say what kind of question question about temp differences and diff heating bills.
I could also be thinking of the don't say what kind of question questions - I remember it being weird. Could also have been something else. Brain is mush right now.
DAMN RIGHT!Rupert Pupkin wrote:eating pretzels (cc: Pretzel) was key during the break btwsomethingElse wrote:CONGRATS on being done with the test guys!! Now comes the fun part These threads are the best on TLS
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Yeah I definitely didn’t have any duck hunting questionsCeetee17 wrote:Anybody remember a question about duck hunting, hunting licenses, and conservation? I think this was experimental, but wanted to check.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login