The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

How do you feel about getting your score?

GIVE ME MY DAMN SCORE!
11
15%
No seriously.. GIVE ME MY FUCKING SCORE!!
17
24%
KEEP MY SCORE, I don't want to be disappointed
5
7%
I want my score but I'm not tripping about it. The wait is what it is
3
4%
I don't care at all at this point
5
7%
All of the above. I don't know how to feel and I think I'm losing my mind
16
22%
gucci gang v2
15
21%
 
Total votes: 72

User avatar
Mikey
Posts: 7751
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mikey » Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:59 pm

rosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?

I had the same as you, my 4th LR was real. not too sure on the 1st/3rd though

User avatar
PrezRand
Posts: 1590
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby PrezRand » Sat Dec 02, 2017 4:59 pm

How can you guys tell what was real?

Had

LR LC LR LR LG.


I'm gonna assume I didn't hit my score and start preparing for feb in about 2 weeks

User avatar
littlewing67
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby littlewing67 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:00 pm

.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:50 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Mikey
Posts: 7751
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mikey » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:01 pm

saffles wrote:“Waiting for the end to come. Wishing I had strength to stand...”

oh hey! how'd it go?

some of us in NYC are meeting up tonight and I remember you saying you were here too and wanted to go to a meet up?

well we are! if you're still down to meet us inbox me!

rosieposie12
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:49 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby rosieposie12 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:02 pm

georgeNY wrote:So, I had an experimental LR, and my test had the following configuration: LR (25), RC, LR (26), LR (26), LG.

For me, 2 LRs were very easy and one was pretty hard. I remember the T Rex Q, but not which section it was in. I really hope that it was my third LR that was the experimental! For people with the same test configuration, was the third LR (26) the experimental?

Come to think of it, I *think* my second LR had a question in it about a company creating exercise classes for employees. Was this real or experimental? I hope real! That 26 section wasn't bad.



I’m also hoping the third LR was experimental! I remember it having a lot of the same *type* of questions in a row, and it feeling harder/ different than the first two AND it having some oddly worded questions. So maybe it was the exprimental?

User avatar
Mikey
Posts: 7751
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mikey » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:03 pm

UPDATE: sorry I didn't include it in the poll but I left out the option of "it went well but still give me a damn drink"

JamesBlahDeBlah
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:35 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby JamesBlahDeBlah » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:04 pm

littlewing67 wrote:but for some reason I messed up rules in both LG. IDK WHY!!!!??? I couldnt have 2 pages on my desk to refer to the rules...............


LG is my best section (like I've missed maybe four questions over all the PTs) and I missed two definitely (last question on third and fourth game). Maybe it was trickier than we think because the games themselves seemed straight forward, but the questions were actually somewhat difficult?

georgeNY
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:34 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby georgeNY » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:04 pm

I remember a question from my second LR section, LR2, (they went LR1 (25), RC, LR2 (26), LR3 (26), LG) that was about a company making exercise classes for its employees to reduce stress and improve productivity. I know LR1 couldn't have been experimental, since it was only 25 questions, so it was either LR2 or LR3. Was the exercise question real?

Mecheman
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 5:49 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mecheman » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:04 pm

rosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?


I believe T Rex was in the third so I eliminated that one. I think the weird argument question was in the first but I'm not sure if the 1st or 2nd was experimental

rosieposie12
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 10:49 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby rosieposie12 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:05 pm

Mikey wrote:
rosieposie12 wrote:For those who had LR RC LR LR LG, do we know which section was the experimental, I remember the questions that are real, but not what section they were in. If it’s the same format, is the test exactly the same?

I had the same as you, my 4th LR was real. not too sure on the 1st/3rd though



Do you remember if it had two “which arguement is similar” questions towards the end?/ am I allowed to ask that

georgeNY
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:34 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby georgeNY » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:06 pm

also, does anyone remember the bubble answers for ? I got a bunch of BANS

User avatar
PhiladelphiaCollins
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby PhiladelphiaCollins » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:07 pm

Did not go badly IMO. Had RC-LR-LG-LG-LR. Nice big room and big desks. That Chinese passage was weird and I rushed through the Darwin passage but otherwise I feel OK about the whole thing. The first LR I thought was much easier than 80 & 81.

Inb4 156

User avatar
Mikey
Posts: 7751
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mikey » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:07 pm

ANYONE from NYC who wants to meet up tonight at a bar with some of us from in here PM ME (or you can PM lilwing as well)!

ANYONE is welcome, we just want to celebrate that this shit is over! Come through! :mrgreen:

User avatar
littlewing67
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby littlewing67 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:12 pm

.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

cubswin16
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:11 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby cubswin16 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:14 pm

I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. Felt like the third LR was the hardest one of the 3 and was super bummed to have that be real. The 3rd one had the T Rex, Black and White, prehistoric finger fish, etc. Otherwise everything else was pretty straightforward. Wasn't a fan of the Chinese RC but not too bad. Games were pretty standard flew through the first 2, last 2 were trickier but not bad
Last edited by cubswin16 on Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

LittleCrab
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:12 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby LittleCrab » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:15 pm

georgeNY wrote:also, does anyone remember the bubble answers for the BAN


BAN

Mecheman
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 5:49 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Mecheman » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:16 pm

littlewing67 wrote:LURKERS COME SAY HELLO!!! MAKE AN ACCOUNT!!! WE DON'T BITE UNLESS U R A T. REX :mrgreen:


:mrgreen:

vikingrunner
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:01 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby vikingrunner » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:21 pm

LR RC LR LR LG...seems like a common one

Felt good about RC until the social Darwinism passage, still probably didn't bomb it. That was all I was really worried about. All 3 LR's went pretty well and almost felt too easy, but I guess that's from being prepared (I'm guessing one of the 3rd/4th ones were the exp section, since both had 26 questions). LG was pretty easy and I'm glad it was last. I definitely relaxed when I saw LR after the break and knew I didn't have a 2nd RC coming.

How sensitive is LSAC's scoring hardware on answers that are erased but still have some light haze behind? That's the only thing that could get me on a few answers.

Also, report the tip.

User avatar
saffles
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 5:46 pm

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby saffles » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:22 pm

Mikey wrote:
saffles wrote:“Waiting for the end to come. Wishing I had strength to stand...”

oh hey! how'd it go?

some of us in NYC are meeting up tonight and I remember you saying you were here too and wanted to go to a meet up?

well we are! if you're still down to meet us inbox me!


The fomo is real...haha, yes, littlewing dm’ed me. You guys have fun! I need to release frustration by killing some raiders in F4. It went horribly. I literally guessed on at least six questions per section D:

Blougram
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:49 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Blougram » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:28 pm

I had two RCs (apparently the Emmy Noether and Arbitration Clause one was experimental). Very easy (much easier than on the June administration); I had about 10 minutes left on both. Not sure about the LRs; I had a few minutes left to check my answers, and I felt good about them, but some questions were definitely tricky.

As to LG... Well, hopefully I didn't bomb quite as badly as in June. Felt good about the first three games, but filled out the last one with uneducated guesses. Oh well. I only did this for funsies (admitted through early decision, but asked Admissions if I could use a score boost to renegotiate scholarship; they said YES.)

And Kate Li should obviously pass the tip on to the newspaper of record.

User avatar
Experiment626
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Experiment626 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:33 pm

LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

I'm pissed at myself because I flubbed a rule in the 2nd game and caught it but the time I spent correcting it prevented me from answering the last 2 questions so there goes my -0 LG.

LR was normal. RC, comparatively, felt easier than Sept or June. I'm really unsure about the curve, I really hate saying it it but I feel like it's not going to be -11, I just pray it's not a -8.

I felt like I was on fire today, finished with time to spare in all sections but LG. Even caught some mistakes on questions I went back to. I'm calling a 165-170+ for me because of my flub in LG. If I corrected properly and I performed to my averages for everything else I'm at the cusp for 170 based on whatever the 170 curve is. I'm hoping I performed better than my averages for LR/RC to offset an issues from my goof in LG.

Hoping my second 26 question LG was the experimental, I was slower on that one....

User avatar
PhiladelphiaCollins
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:31 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby PhiladelphiaCollins » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:34 pm

So robots LG was experimental? Thank god

cubswin16
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:11 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby cubswin16 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:34 pm

Blougram wrote:I had two RCs (apparently the Emmy Noether and Arbitration Clause one was experimental). Very easy (much easier than on the June administration); I had about 10 minutes left on both. Not sure about the LRs; I had a few minutes left to check my answers, and I felt good about them, but some questions were definitely tricky.

As to LG... Well, hopefully I didn't bomb quite as badly as in June. Felt good about the first three games, but filled out the last one with uneducated guesses. Oh well. I only did this for funsies (admitted through early decision, but asked Admissions if I could use a score boost to renegotiate scholarship; they said YES.)

And Kate Li should obviously pass the tip on to the newspaper of record.

Kate Li should definitely self publish

User avatar
Experiment626
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Experiment626 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:35 pm

Guys, reminder before the mods see and start handing out bans, don't discuss ACs and order like YYY.

User avatar
Experiment626
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:43 am

Re: The Official December 2017 Waiters Thread

Postby Experiment626 » Sat Dec 02, 2017 5:37 pm

Mikey wrote:UPDATE: sorry I didn't include it in the poll but I left out the option of "it went well but still give me a damn drink"


I would like to recommend the end of the OP topic be- Translating to 180.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests