The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum

[Alexandros]

.

what was this, reveal it bitch

Deleting stuff and pressed the wrong button.

Good ole fashion post purge

Are you done your drive.

I was abducted by Mormons and am currently in a situation alike the one in the film Buried. Needless to say I am making good use of my cellular device

The arabic didn't work this time? Dammit.

[dj9i27]

.

what was this, reveal it bitch

Deleting stuff and pressed the wrong button.

Good ole fashion post purge

Are you done your drive.

I was abducted by Mormons and am currently in a situation alike the one in the film Buried. Needless to say I am making good use of my cellular device

The arabic didn't work this time? Dammit.

They done found me out.

[Alexandros]

what was this, reveal it bitch

Deleting stuff and pressed the wrong button.

Good ole fashion post purge

Are you done your drive.

I was abducted by Mormons and am currently in a situation alike the one in the film Buried. Needless to say I am making good use of my cellular device

The arabic didn't work this time? Dammit.

They done found me out.

Are you locked in an underground vault in the wilds of Salt Lake City?

[dj9i27]

Are you locked in an underground vault in the wilds of Salt Lake City?

Yes, apparently if I find tablets left by joseph smith I have won.

[oopsu812]

.

[Alexandros]

Are you locked in an underground vault in the wilds of Salt Lake City?

Yes, apparently if I find tablets left by joseph smith I have won.

I've heard if you start singing Book of Mormon it's basically the same thing.

[oopsu812]

Are you locked in an underground vault in the wilds of Salt Lake City?

Yes, apparently if I find tablets left by joseph smith I have won.

I've heard if you start singing Book of Mormon it's basically the same thing.

Cause a Mormon just BEELIEEEEEEEEVES.

[PrezRand]

I hate life

y

Cuz i suk at lsat

[Alexandros]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

[presidentspivey]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

Yeah, while these are important decisions in peoples' lives and they should be seriously debated, the tone of that thread just got hostile. I've camped out pretty much exclusively in the LSAT prep forum the last few days.

[oopsu812]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

[presidentspivey]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

Agreed. Perfect time to note that I've really enjoyed being part of this thread!

[presidentspivey]

Just noticed we already have more pages than the June thread. Lol.

[Alexandros]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

Yeah, while these are important decisions in peoples' lives and they should be seriously debated, the tone of that thread just got hostile. I've camped out pretty much exclusively in the LSAT prep forum the last few days.

Hostile? I think you mean poetic as fuck. That there is some of the finest writing I've read in all my years of lurking internet forums.

[presidentspivey]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

Yeah, while these are important decisions in peoples' lives and they should be seriously debated, the tone of that thread just got hostile. I've camped out pretty much exclusively in the LSAT prep forum the last few days.

Hostile? I think you mean poetic as fuck. That there is some of the finest writing I've read in all my years of lurking internet forums.

I must confess that I greatly enjoyed "a Mary Shellyian mating of the two"

[Alexandros]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

Yeah, while these are important decisions in peoples' lives and they should be seriously debated, the tone of that thread just got hostile. I've camped out pretty much exclusively in the LSAT prep forum the last few days.

Hostile? I think you mean poetic as fuck. That there is some of the finest writing I've read in all my years of lurking internet forums.

I must confess that I greatly enjoyed "a Mary Shellyian mating of the two"

I am supremely impressed.

[Alexandros]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

TCR is reapply, imo. With those numbers you should have much better options on the table.

On another note, cycles like that are quite worrying. Definitely not the first subpar cycle I've seen blamed on a TTT undergrad, interesting.
(That said - If their LSN is legit, they have 105k at Chi, which seems like the easy choice, after reapply.)

[presidentspivey]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

TCR is reapply, imo. With those numbers you should have much better options on the table.

On another note, cycles like that are quite worrying. Definitely not the first subpar cycle I've seen blamed on a TTT undergrad, interesting.
(That said - If their LSN is legit, they have 105k at Chi, which seems like the easy choice, after reapply.)

Well that'll be me, so crossing my fingers it's not a trend. I think most people from TTT UGs freak out about it way too much on these forums, which has swung the pendulum too far the other way. i'm hesitant to believe it doesn't matter at all, as many on TLS claim This under-performance was a little extreme for just that, though. I think there may be a killer combo going on here of TTT UG+ bad softs+ no WE. Hence why I'm strongly leaning towards taking a year off.

[Alexandros]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

TCR is reapply, imo. With those numbers you should have much better options on the table.

On another note, cycles like that are quite worrying. Definitely not the first subpar cycle I've seen blamed on a TTT undergrad, interesting.
(That said - If their LSN is legit, they have 105k at Chi, which seems like the easy choice, after reapply.)

Well that'll be me, so crossing my fingers it's not a trend. I think most people from TTT UGs freak out about it way too much on these forums, which has swung the pendulum too far the other way. i'm hesitant to believe it doesn't matter at all, as many on TLS claim This under-performance was a little extreme for just that, though. I think there may be a killer combo going on here of TTT UG+ bad softs+ no WE. Hence why I'm strongly leaning towards taking a year off.

Year off is absolutely the best plan.

I think this is why taking care of your softs and making sure you show interest is important.

[presidentspivey]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

TCR is reapply, imo. With those numbers you should have much better options on the table.

On another note, cycles like that are quite worrying. Definitely not the first subpar cycle I've seen blamed on a TTT undergrad, interesting.
(That said - If their LSN is legit, they have 105k at Chi, which seems like the easy choice, after reapply.)

Well that'll be me, so crossing my fingers it's not a trend. I think most people from TTT UGs freak out about it way too much on these forums, which has swung the pendulum too far the other way. i'm hesitant to believe it doesn't matter at all, as many on TLS claim This under-performance was a little extreme for just that, though. I think there may be a killer combo going on here of TTT UG+ bad softs+ no WE. Hence why I'm strongly leaning towards taking a year off.

Year off is absolutely the best plan.

I think this is why taking care of your softs and making sure you show interest is important.

Convincing Why Xs are underrated imo.

[Alexandros]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

TCR is reapply, imo. With those numbers you should have much better options on the table.

On another note, cycles like that are quite worrying. Definitely not the first subpar cycle I've seen blamed on a TTT undergrad, interesting.
(That said - If their LSN is legit, they have 105k at Chi, which seems like the easy choice, after reapply.)

Well that'll be me, so crossing my fingers it's not a trend. I think most people from TTT UGs freak out about it way too much on these forums, which has swung the pendulum too far the other way. i'm hesitant to believe it doesn't matter at all, as many on TLS claim This under-performance was a little extreme for just that, though. I think there may be a killer combo going on here of TTT UG+ bad softs+ no WE. Hence why I'm strongly leaning towards taking a year off.

Year off is absolutely the best plan.

I think this is why taking care of your softs and making sure you show interest is important.

Convincing Why Xs are underrated imo.

Some more than others, but I'm convinced every non-HYS t14 does some degree of YP. Not writing Why Xs for certain schools you want to be options is just a serious lack of due diligence, imo.

[presidentspivey]

Alright, I have to push through and finish a paper and I'm going to eliminate at least one internet distraction. If I comment again before I declare said paper finished, please mercilessly shame me and tell me to get back to work.

[Rupert Pupkin]

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1#p9963881
That got... quite intense.

With only a ~60k difference in COA, I see no reason why the question is unreasonable. Weird.

TCR is reapply, imo. With those numbers you should have much better options on the table.

On another note, cycles like that are quite worrying. Definitely not the first subpar cycle I've seen blamed on a TTT undergrad, interesting.
(That said - If their LSN is legit, they have 105k at Chi, which seems like the easy choice, after reapply.)

Well that'll be me, so crossing my fingers it's not a trend. I think most people from TTT UGs freak out about it way too much on these forums, which has swung the pendulum too far the other way. i'm hesitant to believe it doesn't matter at all, as many on TLS claim This under-performance was a little extreme for just that, though. I think there may be a killer combo going on here of TTT UG+ bad softs+ no WE. Hence why I'm strongly leaning towards taking a year off.

Year off is absolutely the best plan.

I think this is why taking care of your softs and making sure you show interest is important.

Convincing Why Xs are underrated imo.

Some more than others, but I'm convinced every non-HYS t14 does some degree of YP. Not writing Why Xs for certain schools you want to be options is just a serious lack of due diligence, imo.

At the end of the day, that person still has two absolutely incredible options on the table lol. I agree. I feel like people don't value Why Xs or even visits enough with schools. A Lasting impression and standing out goes a long way especially if you believe your resume doesnt capture the best representation of who you are.

[Mikey]

HEY! We're up to the page number that is going to be my resulting LSAT score! HAHAHAhaha..

[dj9i27]

HEY! We're up to the page number that is going to be my resulting LSAT score! HAHAHAhaha..

that was me 10 pages ago lol