um excuse mechargers21 wrote:"Public Ivy"
To me, there's only 3 or 4 that really count. Michigan, UVA, Berkeley, and maybe William and Mary. My UG is technically listed as one on wikipedia, though
My school was kings once upon a time
um excuse mechargers21 wrote:"Public Ivy"
To me, there's only 3 or 4 that really count. Michigan, UVA, Berkeley, and maybe William and Mary. My UG is technically listed as one on wikipedia, though
3.2ish, but likely lower by LSAC standards if my hunch is correct. Transferred to a pretty good UG (read: mine) from a terrible one where he had like sub 3.chewinggum wrote:What's his gpa?chargers21 wrote:and now I'm officially an amateur law school admissions advisor A friend who is probably not the smartest is asking for LSAT help and application help. Low gpa. Not sure how great of results I can help him get, but I would bet by the end of it he ends up going to the local state school for full price. Not great, but probably saving him from a complete junk school like he's considering
edit: actually, after looking at myLSN, a 160 (which may very well be his max) could get him in at half price
This is accurate and I'll be using it in my layspeak to mess with peopleAlexandros wrote:My UG has been GULC-ing. our campus is the ruins of former grandeur.dj9i27 wrote:um excuse mechargers21 wrote:"Public Ivy"
To me, there's only 3 or 4 that really count. Michigan, UVA, Berkeley, and maybe William and Mary. My UG is technically listed as one on wikipedia, though
My school was kings once upon a time
(GULC is now a verb)
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Not sub 3.0 he's finechargers21 wrote:3.2ish, but likely lower by LSAC standards if my hunch is correct. Transferred to a pretty good UG (read: mine) from a terrible one where he had like sub 3.chewinggum wrote:What's his gpa?chargers21 wrote:and now I'm officially an amateur law school admissions advisor A friend who is probably not the smartest is asking for LSAT help and application help. Low gpa. Not sure how great of results I can help him get, but I would bet by the end of it he ends up going to the local state school for full price. Not great, but probably saving him from a complete junk school like he's considering
edit: actually, after looking at myLSN, a 160 (which may very well be his max) could get him in at half price
Thanks! I'm really happy! And I took like 15 full PTs over the course of my whole marathon, but I did a lot of section drilling because that's what I had time forngogirl12 wrote:Ohhh!!! How many PTs overall did you take?chargers21 wrote:Oh no! Take lots of PTs if you want! I took 2 less-than-prepared-for real LSATs because I wanted to go to school this fall, instead of calming down and taking my time studying more before taking them. That's what I was referring to. I scored realllllly low on my first take and because of the old restriction it kept me from taking the extra LSAT I needed to get where I could.ngogirl12 wrote:What do you suggest the best way to study is? I'm worried that I won't have too many PTs to get in if I do 1/week review and revisit problem areas.. that only allows for 15 PTs.. I was thinking of adding in more PTs towards the end, but it sounds from your post that this strategy might be a mistake?chargers21 wrote: Thanks! Good point, but I could have done a little better if I hadn't ripped through taking LSATs instead of putting in extra study time and sitting a year.
I should have put in more time on weird LGs and found out the specific RC questions that tripped me up. I was always pretty good at LR (-2 per section), but I still should have found out what question type was probably tripping me up every time. I also should have taken more 5 sections PTs, instead of doing my PTs a section at a time because I was too busy to set aside enough time for full ones
This month (June) I plan on doing section tests i.e. 1 section per day + review but from July onwards 5 section tests with the break. I took a proctors test at a local uni two weeks ago and found my brain significantly slowed down after my snack so I need to acclimate to that..
LR is unfortunately my worst section so I've been redoing the 7Sage curriculum and drilling.
It sounds like you got some awesome offers with $$ so your prep had to have paid off in some ways
Also, thank you for your feedback!! For your timed PTs was it just 60s and 70s or a diverse array of 50s-70s? The timed sections I'm assuming was from more recent tests?chargers21 wrote:Thanks! I'm really happy! And I took like 15 full PTs over the course of my whole marathon, but I did a lot of section drilling because that's what I had time forngogirl12 wrote:Ohhh!!! How many PTs overall did you take?chargers21 wrote:Oh no! Take lots of PTs if you want! I took 2 less-than-prepared-for real LSATs because I wanted to go to school this fall, instead of calming down and taking my time studying more before taking them. That's what I was referring to. I scored realllllly low on my first take and because of the old restriction it kept me from taking the extra LSAT I needed to get where I could.ngogirl12 wrote:What do you suggest the best way to study is? I'm worried that I won't have too many PTs to get in if I do 1/week review and revisit problem areas.. that only allows for 15 PTs.. I was thinking of adding in more PTs towards the end, but it sounds from your post that this strategy might be a mistake?chargers21 wrote: Thanks! Good point, but I could have done a little better if I hadn't ripped through taking LSATs instead of putting in extra study time and sitting a year.
I should have put in more time on weird LGs and found out the specific RC questions that tripped me up. I was always pretty good at LR (-2 per section), but I still should have found out what question type was probably tripping me up every time. I also should have taken more 5 sections PTs, instead of doing my PTs a section at a time because I was too busy to set aside enough time for full ones
This month (June) I plan on doing section tests i.e. 1 section per day + review but from July onwards 5 section tests with the break. I took a proctors test at a local uni two weeks ago and found my brain significantly slowed down after my snack so I need to acclimate to that..
LR is unfortunately my worst section so I've been redoing the 7Sage curriculum and drilling.
It sounds like you got some awesome offers with $$ so your prep had to have paid off in some ways
It could be sub 3 by LSAC calculations.dj9i27 wrote:Not sub 3.0 he's finechargers21 wrote:3.2ish, but likely lower by LSAC standards if my hunch is correct. Transferred to a pretty good UG (read: mine) from a terrible one where he had like sub 3.chewinggum wrote:What's his gpa?chargers21 wrote:and now I'm officially an amateur law school admissions advisor A friend who is probably not the smartest is asking for LSAT help and application help. Low gpa. Not sure how great of results I can help him get, but I would bet by the end of it he ends up going to the local state school for full price. Not great, but probably saving him from a complete junk school like he's considering
edit: actually, after looking at myLSN, a 160 (which may very well be his max) could get him in at half price
work experience is bae
175 or bust and he will see really good money
ex http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
No problem! I timed every PT and section I drilled after I got done figuring out how to get -0 on each individual logic game timed when giving myself 8 minutes to do them. I drilled sections on older tests, but my complete ones were the 60s and 70s.ngogirl12 wrote: Also, thank you for your feedback!! For your timed PTs was it just 60s and 70s or a diverse array of 50s-70s? The timed sections I'm assuming was from more recent tests?
different story...chargers21 wrote:It could be sub 3 by LSAC calculations.dj9i27 wrote:Not sub 3.0 he's finechargers21 wrote:3.2ish, but likely lower by LSAC standards if my hunch is correct. Transferred to a pretty good UG (read: mine) from a terrible one where he had like sub 3.chewinggum wrote:What's his gpa?chargers21 wrote:and now I'm officially an amateur law school admissions advisor A friend who is probably not the smartest is asking for LSAT help and application help. Low gpa. Not sure how great of results I can help him get, but I would bet by the end of it he ends up going to the local state school for full price. Not great, but probably saving him from a complete junk school like he's considering
edit: actually, after looking at myLSN, a 160 (which may very well be his max) could get him in at half price
work experience is bae
175 or bust and he will see really good money
ex http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
And not to be mean to my friend, but he is not smart. Not even a little. As a nice guy I should recommend he go into some other career path, but he wants to be in law. He only wants like local PD/prosecutor stuff so he should be fine. He scored something like a 1200 out of 2400 on the SAT, and I'm not sure he could beat 160 by much. Just honestly speaking. If he gets a 160 he can go to the local ttt for free, and he has some ties to the local lawyers in my area so that's probably fine.
I mean, I'm going to push him to get high enough to get into my UG's LS with good money, which is very good for his goals. That or full at the TTT seem doable. The TTT is not the worst in the world by any means, just not worth paying for. There is a decent school nearby, but with his GPA it will cost too much money either way with his likely LSAT outcomes. I mean, I barely got into that range, and I not to toot my own horn or anything, but I'm definitely more intelligent than him by a longshot in about every way possible. He's a nice guy, though, so I'm trying to keep him out of paying full price to the ttt which he'd be willing to dodj9i27 wrote:different story...chargers21 wrote:It could be sub 3 by LSAC calculations.dj9i27 wrote:Not sub 3.0 he's finechargers21 wrote:3.2ish, but likely lower by LSAC standards if my hunch is correct. Transferred to a pretty good UG (read: mine) from a terrible one where he had like sub 3.chewinggum wrote:What's his gpa?chargers21 wrote:and now I'm officially an amateur law school admissions advisor A friend who is probably not the smartest is asking for LSAT help and application help. Low gpa. Not sure how great of results I can help him get, but I would bet by the end of it he ends up going to the local state school for full price. Not great, but probably saving him from a complete junk school like he's considering
edit: actually, after looking at myLSN, a 160 (which may very well be his max) could get him in at half price
work experience is bae
175 or bust and he will see really good money
ex http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Dxgriffin
And not to be mean to my friend, but he is not smart. Not even a little. As a nice guy I should recommend he go into some other career path, but he wants to be in law. He only wants like local PD/prosecutor stuff so he should be fine. He scored something like a 1200 out of 2400 on the SAT, and I'm not sure he could beat 160 by much. Just honestly speaking. If he gets a 160 he can go to the local ttt for free, and he has some ties to the local lawyers in my area so that's probably fine.
If that is his career goal maybe the state he wants to be in and a 166+(?) for a lot of money and 170 for a lock. TTT and state powerhouse are different, busting your ass can equal a little more prestige
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Thanks again!!chargers21 wrote:No problem! I timed every PT and section I drilled after I got done figuring out how to get -0 on each individual logic game timed when giving myself 8 minutes to do them. I drilled sections on older tests, but my complete ones were the 60s and 70s.ngogirl12 wrote: Also, thank you for your feedback!! For your timed PTs was it just 60s and 70s or a diverse array of 50s-70s? The timed sections I'm assuming was from more recent tests?
I tend to disagree with the term. As someone about to graduate from a "public ivy" (Berkeley, obviously ), I think that the experience and culture at a large public school is so different than that of an Ivy as to render the term meaningless. I imagine that the experience of an average Berkeley student is more comparable to that of a UC Irvine student than it is to a Stanford student.Alexandros wrote:Agree.chargers21 wrote:"Public Ivy"
To me, there's only 3 or 4 that really count. Michigan, UVA, Berkeley, and maybe William and Mary. My UG is technically listed as one on wikipedia, though
Mikey wrote:Got my departmental graduation ceremony in a little bit
I've always hated graduation because I hate walking across a stage like that but it is what it is! Hopefully they don't talk too much because I can't be bothered sitting there for a very long time listening to them.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
<3 thanksngogirl12 wrote:Mikey wrote:Got my departmental graduation ceremony in a little bit
I've always hated graduation because I hate walking across a stage like that but it is what it is! Hopefully they don't talk too much because I can't be bothered sitting there for a very long time listening to them.
CONGRATS!!!
Thanks!Alexandros wrote:Congrats!Mikey wrote:Got my departmental graduation ceremony in a little bit
I've always hated graduation because I hate walking across a stage like that but it is what it is! Hopefully they don't talk too much because I can't be bothered sitting there for a very long time listening to them.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
It's about damn time... Congrats!Mikey wrote:Got my departmental graduation ceremony in a little bit
I've always hated graduation because I hate walking across a stage like that but it is what it is! Hopefully they don't talk too much because I can't be bothered sitting there for a very long time listening to them.
I'm from one.. (one that you didn't mention) and you best believe I play that shit up as much as possible.chargers21 wrote:"Public Ivy"
To me, there's only 3 or 4 that really count. Michigan, UVA, Berkeley, and maybe William and Mary. My UG is technically listed as one on wikipedia, though
I mean, if wikipedia says it, it must be trueTWiiX wrote:I'm from one.. (one that you didn't mention) and you best believe I play that shit up as much as possible.chargers21 wrote:"Public Ivy"
To me, there's only 3 or 4 that really count. Michigan, UVA, Berkeley, and maybe William and Mary. My UG is technically listed as one on wikipedia, though
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login