The Official September 2017 Study Group Forum
- chargers21
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Canadians using the metric system in here...
- tofuspeedstar
- Posts: 8121
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:54 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
ngogirl12 wrote:Haha, yeah I kept postponing the test so I wasn't too active on the threads, but I feel prepared this time around so fingers crossed it works out!tofuspeedstar wrote:ngogirl12 wrote:Are you talking to me or Alex? If me, then hi, and yeah aiming at this test *fingers crossed*!!tofuspeedstar wrote:Ah! I was wondering where you went from our waiters thread. Hello!ngogirl12 wrote:Noo, you can't leave!!Alexandros wrote:(side note, the amount of excel sheets that come up when I search "LSAT" on my desktop is absolutely horrifying.)
(Eta: also truly sorry for hijacking y'all's thread already gosh I should see myself out now.)
Also, re: excel spreadsheets is it just LSAT preptests or something else?
Yes. You. Lol
Congrats on finishing the LSAT though! Have you decided on a school?
Thank SB and nope
- galeatus
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 5:53 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
You should still remember a fair bit of the techniques, though you'll probably feel a bit rusty on LG. As for the test material itself, you should have probably forgotten most of it so you can treat a lot of the old PTs as fresh ones.littlewing67 wrote:Guyz you post too much for me to keep up
I haven't touched anything LSAT since Sept. I'm looking to start up in June. Do you think I have forgotten everything or it is like ingrained in my brain?
Also for Cambridge packets, I know they have PTs 1-40 by type. Do you think they're still relevant to newer RC sections? I feel like RC used to be more straight forward and now it has more to do with inferences you make. I already have the packets but wondering if they will be useful for someone who wants to make RC their bitch.
As for the Cambridge packets, despite the questions being slightly different from the newer ones I think they're still great tools for just drilling reading for structure and, once you find an RC strategy that works for you, perfecting that strategy.
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:08 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by littlewing67 on Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Agreed with the above.littlewing67 wrote:The first time I went over my Sept. test to review it, I barely remembered any of the questions so that's good for me to be able to reuse material. I still have a fair amount of virgin tests left to prep with.galeatus wrote:You should still remember a fair bit of the techniques, though you'll probably feel a bit rusty on LG. As for the test material itself, you should have probably forgotten most of it so you can treat a lot of the old PTs as fresh ones.littlewing67 wrote:Guyz you post too much for me to keep up
I haven't touched anything LSAT since Sept. I'm looking to start up in June. Do you think I have forgotten everything or it is like ingrained in my brain?
Also for Cambridge packets, I know they have PTs 1-40 by type. Do you think they're still relevant to newer RC sections? I feel like RC used to be more straight forward and now it has more to do with inferences you make. I already have the packets but wondering if they will be useful for someone who wants to make RC their bitch.
As for the Cambridge packets, despite the questions being slightly different from the newer ones I think they're still great tools for just drilling reading for structure and, once you find an RC strategy that works for you, perfecting that strategy.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Same, which is a pity because they're usually interesting and writing is a good skill to have. But if you end up with that TA that gives out one A per paper in 60-70 students, with a C average, aka my political theory class last year, you're basically fucked.oopsu812 wrote:I'm a big proponent of language classes if you need an easy A+. The marking is objective and the content is brutally easy. I wouldn't touch anything requiring essays with a 100m pole.Alexandros wrote:formal logic had some overlap but also had the lowest average of any course I've taken in UG, so, y'know.Mikey wrote:I took one and didnt think it helped tbh lolproteinshake wrote:CottonHarvest wrote:If you are still in UG and have wiggle room in your schedule, take some introductory philosophy courses. I'm not even kidding this will help your LSAT score.
then again, I did half-ass my way through it so.. lol
Last edited by Alexandros on Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
how many cm tall r u Chargerschargers21 wrote:Canadians using the metric system in here...
- oopsu812
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
It's so frustrating. One of my majors is PoliSci, so I unfortunately can't avoid it, and nothing stresses me out more than when the prof straight up says, "I don't give A+s." This is a reason why I always argue with my STEM friends about the difficulty of arts/social science programs. Sure it's easier to not fail than in STEM, but it's harder to get those A+s.Alexandros wrote:Same, which is a pity because they're usually interesting and writing is a good skill to have. But if you end up with that TA that gives out one A per paper in 60-70 students, with a C average, aka my political theory class last year, you're basically fucked.oopsu812 wrote:I'm a big proponent of language classes if you need an easy A+. The marking is objective and the content is brutally easy. I wouldn't touch anything requiring essays with a 100m pole.Alexandros wrote:formal logic had some overlap but also had the lowest average of any course I've taken in UG, so, y'know.Mikey wrote:I took one and didnt think it helped tbh lolproteinshake wrote:CottonHarvest wrote:If you are still in UG and have wiggle room in your schedule, take some introductory philosophy courses. I'm not even kidding this will help your LSAT score.
then again, I did half-ass my way through it so.. lol
- chargers21
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Uhhhh 2?Alexandros wrote:how many cm tall r u Chargerschargers21 wrote:Canadians using the metric system in here...
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
The thing about STEM is that it often takes more work but the grades are much more in your control. I love Poli Sci (and arts/humanities/ss courses) but if it's mostly or totally paper based it's just so shot in the dark grades-wise. I'd almost rather take a brutally dense neurology class, spend hours memorizing the textbook, and be relatively confident I'll do well, than an "easier" arts course where who the fuck knows.oopsu812 wrote:It's so frustrating. One of my majors is PoliSci, so I unfortunately can't avoid it, and nothing stresses me out more than when the prof straight up says, "I don't give A+s." This is a reason why I always argue with my STEM friends about the difficulty of arts/social science programs. Sure it's easier to not fail than in STEM, but it's harder to get those A+s.Alexandros wrote:Same, which is a pity because they're usually interesting and writing is a good skill to have. But if you end up with that TA that gives out one A per paper in 60-70 students, with a C average, aka my political theory class last year, you're basically fucked.oopsu812 wrote:I'm a big proponent of language classes if you need an easy A+. The marking is objective and the content is brutally easy. I wouldn't touch anything requiring essays with a 100m pole.Alexandros wrote:formal logic had some overlap but also had the lowest average of any course I've taken in UG, so, y'know.Mikey wrote:I took one and didnt think it helped tbh lolproteinshake wrote:CottonHarvest wrote:If you are still in UG and have wiggle room in your schedule, take some introductory philosophy courses. I'm not even kidding this will help your LSAT score.
then again, I did half-ass my way through it so.. lol
- oopsu812
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Exactly. I'd rather have the best 2 of 3 midterms I took count for 50% of my grade than a single research essay, thank you very much.Alexandros wrote:The thing about STEM is that it often takes more work but the grades are much more in your control. I love Poli Sci (and arts/humanities/ss courses) but if it's mostly or totally paper based it's just so shot in the dark grades-wise. I'd almost rather take a brutally dense neurology class, spend hours memorizing the textbook, and be relatively confident I'll do well, than an "easier" arts course where who the fuck knows.oopsu812 wrote:It's so frustrating. One of my majors is PoliSci, so I unfortunately can't avoid it, and nothing stresses me out more than when the prof straight up says, "I don't give A+s." This is a reason why I always argue with my STEM friends about the difficulty of arts/social science programs. Sure it's easier to not fail than in STEM, but it's harder to get those A+s.Alexandros wrote:Same, which is a pity because they're usually interesting and writing is a good skill to have. But if you end up with that TA that gives out one A per paper in 60-70 students, with a C average, aka my political theory class last year, you're basically fucked.oopsu812 wrote:
I'm a big proponent of language classes if you need an easy A+. The marking is objective and the content is brutally easy. I wouldn't touch anything requiring essays with a 100m pole.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Side note, man I just want >3 hours of sleep, plz.
If I've been acting weird these past couple of days ~2 hrs of sleep for multiple nights on end iz my excuse, thx.
that and overwhelming grief #RIPSweet
If I've been acting weird these past couple of days ~2 hrs of sleep for multiple nights on end iz my excuse, thx.
that and overwhelming grief #RIPSweet
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chargers21
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
My major had a pretty low gpa at my school, so I'm kind of happy I beat the odds a little and came out with a high gpa. Also, I was looking around and I could probably easily get into a top 5 psych program if I wanted to, maybe even Harvard. I think I'm going to take the GRE this summer. You think whatever school I go to will let me tack on an MA/PhD/MBA at some point? Kind of having those "I'm going to law school next year but I wish I would have explored other things a little first" regrets right now. I was basically guaranteed a PhD position at my UG which is t20 for psych where I would have profited off the fellowship. If they offered an MA I would have done it
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.jagerbom79 wrote:Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'm still super conflicted and somewhat concerned on this. Someone said before that "We aren't in a shortage of law degrees" and the market is still now riding a slow upswing. Why flood it with GRE plebs who didn't want to go to LS in the first place?Alexandros wrote:I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.jagerbom79 wrote:Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
This 100%.dj9i27 wrote:I'm still super conflicted and somewhat concerned on this. Someone said before that "We aren't in a shortage of law degrees" and the market is still now riding a slow upswing. Why flood it with GRE plebs who didn't want to go to LS in the first place?Alexandros wrote:I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.jagerbom79 wrote:Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
Applicants are on the decline, high scores are on the decline, and, at least judging by last cycle's data, GPAs are on the decline - so that might have something to do with it. And individual LS's may or may not care that law is super-oversaturated. Although, imo, being cognizant of this and not flooding the field with people who aren't genuine about law school is in their long-term interest.
-
- Posts: 4366
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
please get desperate LS, please.Alexandros wrote:This 100%.dj9i27 wrote:I'm still super conflicted and somewhat concerned on this. Someone said before that "We aren't in a shortage of law degrees" and the market is still now riding a slow upswing. Why flood it with GRE plebs who didn't want to go to LS in the first place?Alexandros wrote:I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.jagerbom79 wrote:Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
Applicants are on the decline, high scores are on the decline, and, at least judging by last cycle's data, GPAs are on the decline - so that might have something to do with it. And individual LS's may or may not care that law is super-oversaturated. Although, imo, being cognizant of this and not flooding the field with people who aren't genuine about law school is in their long-term interest.
I think we need to have a quantity over quality thought but ls in some way is a business. I am a little curious to see how widespread of knowledge this is. anecdotal as it may be, not many around here have a clue
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Any law school admissions officer can probably be reasonably expected to know the state of the legal field pretty well.dj9i27 wrote:please get desperate LS, please.Alexandros wrote:This 100%.dj9i27 wrote:I'm still super conflicted and somewhat concerned on this. Someone said before that "We aren't in a shortage of law degrees" and the market is still now riding a slow upswing. Why flood it with GRE plebs who didn't want to go to LS in the first place?Alexandros wrote:I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.jagerbom79 wrote:Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
Applicants are on the decline, high scores are on the decline, and, at least judging by last cycle's data, GPAs are on the decline - so that might have something to do with it. And individual LS's may or may not care that law is super-oversaturated. Although, imo, being cognizant of this and not flooding the field with people who aren't genuine about law school is in their long-term interest.
I think we need to have a quantity over quality thought but ls in some way is a business. I am a little curious to see how widespread of knowledge this is. anecdotal as it may be, not many around here have a clue
I just hope some of the other schools will share our reservations and not all just jump on board the "accepting GREs" boat. I also hope my musing earlier that it might take some time to catch on among applicants once it's initiated will have some truth, although tbh probably wishful thinking.
- oopsu812
- Posts: 881
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
I'd imagine schools with huge classes to fill will be jumping at the opportunity to follow suit, while those with smaller class sizes won't be eager.Alexandros wrote:Any law school admissions officer can probably be reasonably expected to know the state of the legal field pretty well.dj9i27 wrote:please get desperate LS, please.Alexandros wrote:This 100%.dj9i27 wrote:I'm still super conflicted and somewhat concerned on this. Someone said before that "We aren't in a shortage of law degrees" and the market is still now riding a slow upswing. Why flood it with GRE plebs who didn't want to go to LS in the first place?Alexandros wrote:I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.jagerbom79 wrote:Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
Applicants are on the decline, high scores are on the decline, and, at least judging by last cycle's data, GPAs are on the decline - so that might have something to do with it. And individual LS's may or may not care that law is super-oversaturated. Although, imo, being cognizant of this and not flooding the field with people who aren't genuine about law school is in their long-term interest.
I think we need to have a quantity over quality thought but ls in some way is a business. I am a little curious to see how widespread of knowledge this is. anecdotal as it may be, not many around here have a clue
I just hope some of the other schools will share our reservations and not all just jump on board the "accepting GREs" boat. I also hope my musing earlier that it might take some time to catch on among applicants once it's initiated will have some truth, although tbh probably wishful thinking.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Yeah I agree with all this. I don't understand why they would flood apps with GREs...if anything just lower the LSAT median like has been occuring and that should adjust for what they are trying to achieve.Alexandros wrote:Any law school admissions officer can probably be reasonably expected to know the state of the legal field pretty well.dj9i27 wrote:please get desperate LS, please.Alexandros wrote:This 100%.dj9i27 wrote:I'm still super conflicted and somewhat concerned on this. Someone said before that "We aren't in a shortage of law degrees" and the market is still now riding a slow upswing. Why flood it with GRE plebs who didn't want to go to LS in the first place?Alexandros wrote:I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.jagerbom79 wrote:Alex and DJ- you guys wrecked the GRE thread haha. Definitely agree with all of your points. This is really interesting/concerning
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
Applicants are on the decline, high scores are on the decline, and, at least judging by last cycle's data, GPAs are on the decline - so that might have something to do with it. And individual LS's may or may not care that law is super-oversaturated. Although, imo, being cognizant of this and not flooding the field with people who aren't genuine about law school is in their long-term interest.
I think we need to have a quantity over quality thought but ls in some way is a business. I am a little curious to see how widespread of knowledge this is. anecdotal as it may be, not many around here have a clue
I just hope some of the other schools will share our reservations and not all just jump on board the "accepting GREs" boat. I also hope my musing earlier that it might take some time to catch on among applicants once it's initiated will have some truth, although tbh probably wishful thinking.
Alex, I hope it doesn't...even for HLS sake. Is H doing it next fall for apps or the year after? I might just go bonanza and right after the LSAT crush the GRE in a month or so.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Rupert Pupkin
- Posts: 2170
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:21 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
Yeah thats what I was confused about. 2017-2018 cycle or 2018-2019Alexandros wrote:I thought it was next fall but someone correct me if I'm wrong. Also somewhat confused because Spivey said the ABA approval stuff wouldn't happen until 2018-2019.jagerbom79 wrote:Yeah I agree with all this. I don't understand why they would flood apps with GREs...if anything just lower the LSAT median like has been occuring and that should adjust for what they are trying to achieve.Alexandros wrote:Any law school admissions officer can probably be reasonably expected to know the state of the legal field pretty well.dj9i27 wrote:please get desperate LS, please.Alexandros wrote:This 100%.dj9i27 wrote:I'm still super conflicted and somewhat concerned on this. Someone said before that "We aren't in a shortage of law degrees" and the market is still now riding a slow upswing. Why flood it with GRE plebs who didn't want to go to LS in the first place?Alexandros wrote: I'm just really hoping it won't have a major effect on admissions outcomes anytime in the next few years.
Also, Jager, you'll be fine. The only t14 accepting GREs next fall is H. You have nothing to worry about.
Applicants are on the decline, high scores are on the decline, and, at least judging by last cycle's data, GPAs are on the decline - so that might have something to do with it. And individual LS's may or may not care that law is super-oversaturated. Although, imo, being cognizant of this and not flooding the field with people who aren't genuine about law school is in their long-term interest.
I think we need to have a quantity over quality thought but ls in some way is a business. I am a little curious to see how widespread of knowledge this is. anecdotal as it may be, not many around here have a clue
I just hope some of the other schools will share our reservations and not all just jump on board the "accepting GREs" boat. I also hope my musing earlier that it might take some time to catch on among applicants once it's initiated will have some truth, although tbh probably wishful thinking.
Alex, I hope it doesn't...even for HLS sake. Is H doing it next fall for apps or the year after? I might just go bonanza and right after the LSAT crush the GRE in a month or so.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2017 Study Group
.
Last edited by Alexandros on Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login