correct usage of "either...or" Forum
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:58 am
correct usage of "either...or"
Am I understanding "either...or" wrong?
In a logic game question, a rule says: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does either the site visited first or that visited fourth."
What is the implication here?
Do you think it means: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does the sited visited first. Otherwise, the site visited third dates from a more recent century than does that visited fourth. "
Or would you agree it means:' The site visited third dates from a more recent century than both the site visited first, and the site visited fourth."
I've googled correct usage of "either...or", and "both...and". But the answer I get doesn't seem to make sense.
In a logic game question, a rule says: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does either the site visited first or that visited fourth."
What is the implication here?
Do you think it means: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does the sited visited first. Otherwise, the site visited third dates from a more recent century than does that visited fourth. "
Or would you agree it means:' The site visited third dates from a more recent century than both the site visited first, and the site visited fourth."
I've googled correct usage of "either...or", and "both...and". But the answer I get doesn't seem to make sense.
- mwells56
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:08 pm
Re: correct usage of "either...or"
It means that it's more recent than both. You just need to take the context.DragonWell wrote:Am I understanding "either...or" wrong?
In a logic game question, a rule says: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does either the site visited first or that visited fourth."
What is the implication here?
Do you think it means: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does the sited visited first. Otherwise, the site visited third dates from a more recent century than does that visited fourth. "
Or would you agree it means:' The site visited third dates from a more recent century than both the site visited first, and the site visited fourth."
I've googled correct usage of "either...or", and "both...and". But the answer I get doesn't seem to make sense.
-
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am
Re: correct usage of "either...or"
Ambiguous given context. Poorly written. I think it should technically be the first option.
- Deardevil
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: correct usage of "either...or"
I remember this game vividly.
It means the site visited third is either the ninth or 10th century because there's no way eighth century could be earlier.
IIRC, another rule forces only one century (I won't say which) to take third place, resulting in clarity.
Your understanding is spot-on. For example, if I say I want either vanilla or chocolate,
if I get vanilla, I'll be content, but if I get chocolate, that's fine as well. If I get both in this summer heat, HALLELUJAH.
"Either" just means "at least one." However, when you sneak in "but not both," that's when you only have at most one option.
"Both" and "and" indicate two are necessary. Given "if a breakfast were to be good, it requires pancakes and OJ,"
just having solely pancakes/OJ or neither will fail the condition to make the breakfast "good."
Even when you have both, it doesn't guarantee the breakfast will be good, but if you know your breakfast IS good,
you know it has both ingredients.
It means the site visited third is either the ninth or 10th century because there's no way eighth century could be earlier.
IIRC, another rule forces only one century (I won't say which) to take third place, resulting in clarity.
Your understanding is spot-on. For example, if I say I want either vanilla or chocolate,
if I get vanilla, I'll be content, but if I get chocolate, that's fine as well. If I get both in this summer heat, HALLELUJAH.
"Either" just means "at least one." However, when you sneak in "but not both," that's when you only have at most one option.
"Both" and "and" indicate two are necessary. Given "if a breakfast were to be good, it requires pancakes and OJ,"
just having solely pancakes/OJ or neither will fail the condition to make the breakfast "good."
Even when you have both, it doesn't guarantee the breakfast will be good, but if you know your breakfast IS good,
you know it has both ingredients.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:58 am
Re: correct usage of "either...or"
Thanks!mwells56 wrote:It means that it's more recent than both. You just need to take the context.DragonWell wrote:Am I understanding "either...or" wrong?
In a logic game question, a rule says: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does either the site visited first or that visited fourth."
What is the implication here?
Do you think it means: "The site visited third dates from a more recent century than does the sited visited first. Otherwise, the site visited third dates from a more recent century than does that visited fourth. "
Or would you agree it means:' The site visited third dates from a more recent century than both the site visited first, and the site visited fourth."
I've googled correct usage of "either...or", and "both...and". But the answer I get doesn't seem to make sense.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:58 am
Re: correct usage of "either...or"
Thanks!kcdc1 wrote:Ambiguous given context. Poorly written. I think it should technically be the first option.
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:58 am
Re: correct usage of "either...or"
Thanks! You are a real pro!Deardevil wrote:I remember this game vividly.
It means the site visited third is either the ninth or 10th century because there's no way eighth century could be earlier.
IIRC, another rule forces only one century (I won't say which) to take third place, resulting in clarity.
Your understanding is spot-on. For example, if I say I want either vanilla or chocolate,
if I get vanilla, I'll be content, but if I get chocolate, that's fine as well. If I get both in this summer heat, HALLELUJAH.
"Either" just means "at least one." However, when you sneak in "but not both," that's when you only have at most one option.
"Both" and "and" indicate two are necessary. Given "if a breakfast were to be good, it requires pancakes and OJ,"
just having solely pancakes/OJ or neither will fail the condition to make the breakfast "good."
Even when you have both, it doesn't guarantee the breakfast will be good, but if you know your breakfast IS good,
you know it has both ingredients.