there is no rush. it's better to take it slow first than to rush things and deal with a mess later.
for example, i have learned that there are 1000s of questions from the actual LSAT tests available. thus, there is no obvious need to start reading prep books until one has done many genuine tests. the books could actually be harmful.

I wouldn't use the books yet either.. just spend a few more days thinking about the LSAT in an abstract way.. maybe make a few more posts about your experience.

I enjoyed this.

Op wtf plz tell me if this does not parallel your logic.

I've done well as a street racer so I'm aiming to be the next champ at formula1. I've never seen an F1 race but I've heard it involves driving. I think the best approach to achieve this goal is to formulate a plan, invest time and effort, before I watch film of the cars or before I test drive a F1 style car.

OP, your idea makes no logical sense whatsoever.

The idiom "putting the cart before the horse" comes to mind regarding your plan and order of operations.

Perhaps you should pause and think , take some time to look at, analyze and work some LSAT questions, get familiar with the test and determine/improve your aptitude before even considering trying to teach others how to perform well. Does that sound fair and reasonable?

I think you either have it all mentally reversed and discombobulated if you are sincere or otherwise are just a lame troll/flame poster.

Great effort on behalf of both of you; I extend my sincerest thanks for the hilarity.

Op wtf plz tell me if this does not parallel your logic.

I've done well as a street racer so I'm aiming to be the next champ at formula1. I've never seen an F1 race but I've heard it involves driving. I think the best approach to achieve this goal is to formulate a plan, invest time and effort, before I watch film of the cars or before I test drive a F1 style car.

your analogy is flawed.

GRE and LSAT are not that different from each other. both highly correlate with IQ.

If you truly want to be a professional LSAT tutor, why on earth would you dream of scoring 173? If you don't feel like scoring 180 is within your reach, you should probably rethink being a tutor.

FWIW, I teach a class with a 169 haha.

How's Kaplan treating you?

your analogy is flawed.

GRE and LSAT are not that different from each other. both highly correlate with IQ.

your analogy is flawed.

GRE and LSAT are not that different from each other. both highly correlate with IQ.

In my analogy both "correlate" with high driving skills. Good luck with parallel and flaw questions. And strengthen/weakening.

Medium score of LSAT takers is 150. In other words, an average person scores ~150. Thus, OP question can be simplified to ~ this: "How long does it take to improve from 150 to 170 or by 20 points?"

LMAO, TLS is basically a forum for hating on people and trying to pick at people's arguements and what not.

OP, if you think the GRE and LSAT scored have basis from IQ, so be it. Just study hard (or don't, depending on your IQ) and give it your best.

the medium and the average should be very close for LSAT curve BTW.
http://www.zenof180.com/2009/08/lsat-statistics-week-scale-scores-and.html

medium is not a statistical word, btw. it is median.

medium is not a statistical word, btw. it is median.

oh, OK.

I guess I am not going to ace the spelling part of LSAT