Thank you! This will come in very useful.

this thread should really be stickied somewhere

Done.

thanks brother

Thanks man! This will be very useful to me.

If I already have all the 10 actual books, what would one recommend for how I should group questions?

By each subsequent chapter in the Logic Reasoning and Logic Games bibles. They usually go from most concrete to most abstract question types.

Many thanks for the post, it is an inspiration.

Single most useful LSAT prep information after Powerscore and Manhattan

How do you use this?

Read a Logical Reasoning book such as Powerscore LR Bible or Manhattan LR guide, they break down question types by chapter, this breaks down the question types by Preptests and you use this for drilling individual question types or figuring what type is being used on certain preptests. Easily one of the best studying tools.

If you need classifications for PrepTests 60 and beyond, our new PrepTest Classifications page has LR, LG, and RC categorized for all the numbered tests. Be patient for the page to load, as it's a lot of information. You can filter by test number, section type, and question type or subtype.

What is the best way to actually organize the LR questions by type... Like do you cut individual questions out of the pages and group them with other "Weaken" questions for example. I am trying to study for December LSAT on very tight schedule, and I can only dedicate about an hour in the monring, at lunch, and after work. I was thinking in one of those hours I would just do a LR section and review, but how much more beneficial is it to do them by type? I don't know how the heck I would arrange all the questions by type in any kind of organized fasion! let me know thanks!

I have the same question Jdn. Please post if you got this answered elsewhere. Thanks so much!

If you have the books of tests 19-28, 29-38 (or any official lsac test book) OR you have printed off tests and have them organized in chronological order ( PT 10, PT 11, PT 12 ...) then it is easy to do it by question type. It was easy enough to follow the list above.

For example if I was working on flaw questions: I would bring PTs 20-30 with me to my study session (or for you bring it to work). I would pull up the categorized question list up to reference what problems I was working on (not I copied them into a word document). Then I would do all questions on flaw from PT 20 and then check the answers and think about why I missed them, strategies, etc. Then I would go on to all flaw questions for PT 21 and repeat. Doesn't take anymore time, just a matter of being organized. It definitely helps with nailing down specific question types and is IMHO is very worthwhile.


Extra note, you can comment a Y or N next to each question on your word document to track which problems you got correct and even include time. I am am and expect this to be helpful for review and material exhaustion. I.e. if I have already done all flaw questions from PTs 1-40 and am only using PTs 41 on for full length practice tests, I have problems that I struggled on (classified by both Y/N and by time) for each question type. That way if I on a specific full length test, I do poorly on flaw questions, I have a personalized set of best question to redo/review.

No expert, just my 2cents.

anyone who says all lawyers are scumbags needs to visit this forum. this is just too much. thanks.

When I use the Ctrl + F feature to find a question, I can't seem to get the following:

PT 53, S3, #10


It looks like a Role of Statement question, and it isnt there under that category.