Click on the assignment and a window with the description of the assignment pops up. Toward the bottom of the window, it lists the target goals for each problem set for the respective topic.californiauser wrote:Probably a dumb question, but where do we see what our target score is for problem sets?
July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:46 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
- WestWingWatcher
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:08 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
They are in the beginning pages of the MBE book. I think there is a PDF of it online as well.californiauser wrote:Probably a dumb question, but where do we see what our target score is for problem sets?
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:41 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Getting really frustrated with Barbri's BS questions. I feel like many of their correct answers turn on questions of fact, not law. For example, in the con law question set 2, question 14 asking whether an employment termination is constitutional, the facts say that a person "cannot be fired except for cause." So the first thing I do when reading the answer choices is cross out the one that says "yes b/c the employer is free to fire employees at will." Lo and behold, the correct answer is yes its constitutional b/c the person is an at-will employee. Like wtf? Then the explanation says "unless prohibited by statute … a person can be fired for any reason." But the facts literally say it was prohibited by statute. Feel like I've encountered many other questions that are equally dumb. Had to rant about it lol
- de minimis
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2015 7:48 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
http://images.barbri.com/email/pardot/M ... tGoals.pdfcaliforniauser wrote:Probably a dumb question, but where do we see what our target score is for problem sets?
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:46 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
If I remember correctly, that was the lottery question and I think it turned on whether administration of the lottery was a government function, such that would make the employees of the organization running the lottery public employees. If the employees were public employees, then they would fall within the scope of the statute (which I believe prohibited state employees from being fired without cause). But, because the organization was deemed a private company, the employees were private, and could be fired at-will. The only fact issue here was whether the lottery was public or private.FormerChild wrote:Getting really frustrated with Barbri's BS questions. I feel like many of their correct answers turn on questions of fact, not law. For example, in the con law question set 2, question 14 asking whether an employment termination is constitutional, the facts say that a person "cannot be fired except for cause." So the first thing I do when reading the answer choices is cross out the one that says "yes b/c the employer is free to fire employees at will." Lo and behold, the correct answer is yes its constitutional b/c the person is an at-will employee. Like wtf? Then the explanation says "unless prohibited by statute … a person can be fired for any reason." But the facts literally say it was prohibited by statute. Feel like I've encountered many other questions that are equally dumb. Had to rant about it lol
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:45 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
FormerChild wrote:Getting really frustrated with Barbri's BS questions. I feel like many of their correct answers turn on questions of fact, not law. For example, in the con law question set 2, question 14 asking whether an employment termination is constitutional, the facts say that a person "cannot be fired except for cause." So the first thing I do when reading the answer choices is cross out the one that says "yes b/c the employer is free to fire employees at will." Lo and behold, the correct answer is yes its constitutional b/c the person is an at-will employee. Like wtf? Then the explanation says "unless prohibited by statute … a person can be fired for any reason." But the facts literally say it was prohibited by statute. Feel like I've encountered many other questions that are equally dumb. Had to rant about it lol
did the same exact thing,, crossed out the at-will answer because it said except without cause in the facts and nowhere did it say she was an at-will employee,, lol barbri is really insane with some of these questions
- TheWalrus
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Yeah, it was basically this. Because the primary function of the business was not state-run, it was deemed independent. But of course, like everyone else I crossed out at-will.Bobby_Axelrod wrote:If I remember correctly, that was the lottery question and I think it turned on whether administration of the lottery was a government function, such that would make the employees of the organization running the lottery public employees. If the employees were public employees, then they would fall within the scope of the statute (which I believe prohibited state employees from being fired without cause). But, because the organization was deemed a private company, the employees were private, and could be fired at-will. The only fact issue here was whether the lottery was public or private.FormerChild wrote:Getting really frustrated with Barbri's BS questions. I feel like many of their correct answers turn on questions of fact, not law. For example, in the con law question set 2, question 14 asking whether an employment termination is constitutional, the facts say that a person "cannot be fired except for cause." So the first thing I do when reading the answer choices is cross out the one that says "yes b/c the employer is free to fire employees at will." Lo and behold, the correct answer is yes its constitutional b/c the person is an at-will employee. Like wtf? Then the explanation says "unless prohibited by statute … a person can be fired for any reason." But the facts literally say it was prohibited by statute. Feel like I've encountered many other questions that are equally dumb. Had to rant about it lol
- vivala
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:34 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Is anyone else feeling really frustrated at this point? I'm constantly missing the MPQs by about 1-2 questions, especially in Contracts and Property, and I'm getting worried.
- okaygo
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Yea, for whatever reason I'm doing horribly in con law - I was 3 questions off from the target MPQ today. pretty sure this whole bar thing isn't going to work out.vivala wrote:Is anyone else feeling really frustrated at this point? I'm constantly missing the MPQs by about 1-2 questions, especially in Contracts and Property, and I'm getting worried.
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:52 am
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Yeah, me too. It seems like the MPQ questions cover a lot that the lectures don't. So I feel like I'm having to learn a lot of new law while doing the MPQs, as opposed to reviewing what I had learned from the lectures.okaygo wrote:Yea, for whatever reason I'm doing horribly in con law - I was 3 questions off from the target MPQ today. pretty sure this whole bar thing isn't going to work out.vivala wrote:Is anyone else feeling really frustrated at this point? I'm constantly missing the MPQs by about 1-2 questions, especially in Contracts and Property, and I'm getting worried.
The weird thing is, my law school offered an MBE class, and the questions given out were from another MBE prep book, and the questions were way different than the ones in Barbri.
I'm trying to keep in mind what Antonio Martinez wrote in Chaos Monkeys: “Truth in the world resides only in mathematical proofs and physics labs. Everywhere else it's really matter of opinion, and if it manages to become group opinion, it's undeservedly crowned as capital-T truth. And so you need to determine whatever the local version of truth is you're inhabiting.”
-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Were they harder or easier than the Barbri questions?Subban_Fan wrote:Yeah, me too. It seems like the MPQ questions cover a lot that the lectures don't. So I feel like I'm having to learn a lot of new law while doing the MPQs, as opposed to reviewing what I had learned from the lectures.okaygo wrote:Yea, for whatever reason I'm doing horribly in con law - I was 3 questions off from the target MPQ today. pretty sure this whole bar thing isn't going to work out.vivala wrote:Is anyone else feeling really frustrated at this point? I'm constantly missing the MPQs by about 1-2 questions, especially in Contracts and Property, and I'm getting worried.
The weird thing is, my law school offered an MBE class, and the questions given out were from another MBE prep book, and the questions were way different than the ones in Barbri.
I'm trying to keep in mind what Antonio Martinez wrote in Chaos Monkeys: “Truth in the world resides only in mathematical proofs and physics labs. Everywhere else it's really matter of opinion, and if it manages to become group opinion, it's undeservedly crowned as capital-T truth. And so you need to determine whatever the local version of truth is you're inhabiting.”
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:45 am
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Anyone here using an app called Quizlet to make flashcards?
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:41 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
I am, but not making them, I used Quizlet during 1l so was using those ones. But then I searched "critical pass" in the search bar and found numerous sets of both MBE and MEE topics w/ critical pass flashcards already made and accessible. Obviously have to check the accuracy of the material w/ your outlines, but from my experience with them thus far they've been accurate and sufficiently descriptive.Cantab10 wrote:Anyone here using an app called Quizlet to make flashcards?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- acijku2
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:19 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Anyone want to explain question 13 from 1st contract problem set.
I don't really understand the rational that (1) the concert pianist is a merchant and (2) even if so, how storage of a piano for 6 months in an A/Ced warehouse is not a material addition to the contract under 2-207 (this is not even adressed in the answer explanation)
I don't really understand the rational that (1) the concert pianist is a merchant and (2) even if so, how storage of a piano for 6 months in an A/Ced warehouse is not a material addition to the contract under 2-207 (this is not even adressed in the answer explanation)
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:52 am
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
The questions from the book were easier. Way less nuanced and tested on what the book discussed. The book also included some real MBE questions, which were harder than the ones written by the book's authors but still easier than Barbri questions.Were they harder or easier than the Barbri questions?
I struggle with the Barbri questions because often times I'll go to a 50/50 and choose the wrong one. I think sometimes Barbri questions kind of mislead you like that (they throw in facts that make you think there's an exception you forgot about or they're trying to point at something), whereas I didn't have these issues with the ones out of the book from class we used.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:46 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Is there a way I can go back and review one of the questions from the Contracts set today?
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:45 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
acijku2 wrote:Anyone want to explain question 13 from 1st contract problem set.
I don't really understand the rational that (1) the concert pianist is a merchant and (2) even if so, how storage of a piano for 6 months in an A/Ced warehouse is not a material addition to the contract under 2-207 (this is not even adressed in the answer explanation)
Thought the same thing about the concert pianist not being a merchant.. I knew merchant was someone who routinely dealt in the goods but I always applied it to a seller or buyer or company, etc.. I guess because he plays the piano for a living he routinely deals in the goods.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TheWalrus
- Posts: 1135
- Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
You can look in the book or just re-read through the quiz.Bobby_Axelrod wrote:Is there a way I can go back and review one of the questions from the Contracts set today?
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2017 12:46 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Ah, ty. Didn't realize these Qs are in the book.TheWalrus wrote:You can look in the book or just re-read through the quiz.Bobby_Axelrod wrote:Is there a way I can go back and review one of the questions from the Contracts set today?
- Toubro
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:18 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
I almost exclusively use the book and transfer my answers over later so that I get my percentiles.Bobby_Axelrod wrote:Ah, ty. Didn't realize these Qs are in the book.TheWalrus wrote:You can look in the book or just re-read through the quiz.Bobby_Axelrod wrote:Is there a way I can go back and review one of the questions from the Contracts set today?
Anyone notice that you can basically hit target and still be in the 60th or 70th percentile? Makes me think this whole "target" thing is flame to the extent that it's some pass / fail bright line.
- WestWingWatcher
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:08 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
Soooo, was anyone as thrown off by the Con Law Essay #2 as I was?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 6:53 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
It is beyond annoying that Barbri doesn't have a "report question" function where you can try to clarify some of their terrible explanations.
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:45 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
WestWingWatcher wrote:Soooo, was anyone as thrown off by the Con Law Essay #2 as I was?
yes lol literally thought i was answering a tort question,, but defamation was covered at the end of the barbri lecture and all the libel/invasion of privacy fall under that and the trespass one was basivally a tort answer
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:52 am
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
The lack of functions and the way Barbri's website is designed makes me think they majorly cheaped out on web programmers. It's like something my cousin would have built when he was 16. Or they outsourced it's design to save money.ConfusedL1 wrote:It is beyond annoying that Barbri doesn't have a "report question" function where you can try to clarify some of their terrible explanations.
The online MSQ looks like it's from 1999. Definitely not worth their $3000+ asking price.
Do any of you watch the lecture videos on 1.25x speed or more? I want to but my law school bar prep Professors highly "recommend against it." One told me that everyone she knew that did that flunked the Bar.
- acijku2
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:19 pm
Re: July 2017 -- Barbri UBE Hangout
I watch lectures at 1.25-1.75x depending on the topic (if I took the class and did well) or how the lecturer teaches (is he repeating himself a lot and reading off handout verbatim).Subban_Fan wrote:The lack of functions and the way Barbri's website is designed makes me think they majorly cheaped out on web programmers. It's like something my cousin would have built when he was 16. Or they outsourced it's design to save money.ConfusedL1 wrote:It is beyond annoying that Barbri doesn't have a "report question" function where you can try to clarify some of their terrible explanations.
The online MSQ looks like it's from 1999. Definitely not worth their $3000+ asking price.
Do any of you watch the lecture videos on 1.25x speed or more? I want to but my law school bar prep Professors highly "recommend against it." One told me that everyone she knew that did that flunked the Bar.
While it makes sense that a lot of people who do speed up the videos don't pass I think that's a correlation without causation. I can image those who don't take studying seriously would be likely to speed up the videos and not pay attention. However, it is very possible to actively listen and retain the info at higher speeds. You end up saving up to an hour every day and that extra time can be used to stay up with the completion of assignments and review areas needing improvement.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login