You're fine. There are 32 days left (not counting July 4th or the day before the bar). If you do 1.5% per day, you hit 82%. Right now, I am around the same percentage (36% complete). Themis generally gives me about 2% per day to do. And that's very doable.Slytherpuff wrote:34% complete - I'm going to have to hustle to hit that 75% completion at this point.
Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 8504
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
- foundingfather
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:31 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
I actually though Schott's FL family law lecture was pretty good. He was on point with the handout and fairly clear about everything.
The FL Wills and Trusts lecturer was really hard to follow, though. Like, really hard. I had to rewind several times per video. It seemed like she wasn't following the handout, but making up her own thing as she went.
The FL Wills and Trusts lecturer was really hard to follow, though. Like, really hard. I had to rewind several times per video. It seemed like she wasn't following the handout, but making up her own thing as she went.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:09 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
some of these mbe pqs are utter bullshit.
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
lolchamploo wrote:some of these mbe pqs are utter bullshit.
I had one where it says the third party sues Partnership, Partner A and Partner B in question 1.
In question 2 it asks if the partners are personablly liable.
In sample answer, it says it's implied in the question above that third party only brought suit against the Partnership and so can't recover from the Partners personally.
Like wtf. Read your own questions.
-
- Posts: 8504
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Yea, Schott was fine. Wills and Trusts fucked me up too. I'm going to have to go HAM on that outline. Because I retained very little from the lectures.foundingfather wrote:I actually though Schott's FL family law lecture was pretty good. He was on point with the handout and fairly clear about everything.
The FL Wills and Trusts lecturer was really hard to follow, though. Like, really hard. I had to rewind several times per video. It seemed like she wasn't following the handout, but making up her own thing as she went.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 1:17 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Does Themis make any effort to normalize the difficulty of their question sets? I'm getting pretty sick of randomly getting destroyed by a set when I'm averaging 70-75% across the other sets/extra quiz builder sets. Why not spread out the questions that <15% of people are getting right?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
I completely agree!!!! It's really frustrating to be doing just fine and hitting the goal or exceeding it and then suddenly theres a set that's like.... WTF just happened!!!! I'm learning to just take it for what it is and move on to the next one. At the end of the day not all the questions on the exam are going to be like that.Fireworks2016 wrote:Does Themis make any effort to normalize the difficulty of their question sets? I'm getting pretty sick of randomly getting destroyed by a set when I'm averaging 70-75% across the other sets/extra quiz builder sets. Why not spread out the questions that <15% of people are getting right?
- azditamo
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:45 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Hi,
I had a question regarding Question 4243 on the Practice: Criminal Law Introductory PQs Session 1 (17). Due to the copyright information I will just summarize the relevant facts. Two colleagues decide to steal money from their boss, the plan was as follows: for one of the colleagues to steal the money and hand it off to the other colleague. The plan was executed, however, one of the colleagues took some of the money from the other thief, and now the question says what can the colleague who took money from the other thief be charged with.
I picked one charge of larceny, however, the answer is two counts of larceny (stealing from the boss and the other thief). Thus, my question is how can he be charged with two counts when the money is not the personal property of the thief?
I had a question regarding Question 4243 on the Practice: Criminal Law Introductory PQs Session 1 (17). Due to the copyright information I will just summarize the relevant facts. Two colleagues decide to steal money from their boss, the plan was as follows: for one of the colleagues to steal the money and hand it off to the other colleague. The plan was executed, however, one of the colleagues took some of the money from the other thief, and now the question says what can the colleague who took money from the other thief be charged with.
I picked one charge of larceny, however, the answer is two counts of larceny (stealing from the boss and the other thief). Thus, my question is how can he be charged with two counts when the money is not the personal property of the thief?
-
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 1:17 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
I said the same thing. Apparently you can be charged with larceny for stealing another thief's stolen property. I sort of get it from a policy perspective -- it shouldn't matter if you know the property is stolen or not, but still a counterintuitive lesson to learn.azditamo wrote:Hi,
I had a question regarding Question 4243 on the Practice: Criminal Law Introductory PQs Session 1 (17). Due to the copyright information I will just summarize the relevant facts. Two colleagues decide to steal money from their boss, the plan was as follows: for one of the colleagues to steal the money and hand it off to the other colleague. The plan was executed, however, one of the colleagues took some of the money from the other thief, and now the question says what can the colleague who took money from the other thief be charged with.
I picked one charge of larceny, however, the answer is two counts of larceny (stealing from the boss and the other thief). Thus, my question is how can he be charged with two counts when the money is not the personal property of the thief?
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:25 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Secondedshaynislegend wrote:The questions on the practice exam #2 are laughable. I hope these are all themis questions. Half of them don't even supply enough information to give an answer.
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:25 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Question on MBE Practice Exam #2
Kudos to anyone who can explain what the hell is going on here.
Kudos to anyone who can explain what the hell is going on here.
- SeewhathappensLarry
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:25 am
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
I wish the MBE questions at least used names for people. It gets so confusing when "one man sold Blackacre to a second man, and a third man had a lien on the property."
-
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
evidence MBE pq session #2 spoiler:
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:34 am
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Yeah seriously WTFSplitMyPants wrote:evidence MBE pq session #2 spoiler:
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:16 am
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Yeah I have to re-read the questions a lot of the time, especially when there's like 5 mortgages and they're using "owner" "seller" buyer" and shit as their "names." I found one question super annoying that used both "father" and "the man" to refer to the same "elderly man" while using other terms like "buyer" and "son."SeewhathappensLarry wrote:I wish the MBE questions at least used names for people. It gets so confusing when "one man sold Blackacre to a second man, and a third man had a lien on the property."
If these questions just used variables like X Y Z or A B C I legitimately think my speed would go up a good 30%
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Yeah this pissed me off a lot. Don't give me tips like that and intentionally throw me off.SplitMyPants wrote:evidence MBE pq session #2 spoiler:
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Well I just read in The family law outline the blurb that provides the information for that question but I hadn't known that yet so I got it wrong on the practice exam.gotsomequestions wrote:Question on MBE Practice Exam #2
Kudos to anyone who can explain what the hell is going on here.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8504
- Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
It's just a brutally tough question, amigo. I think the explanation gives decent reasoning for why. If you read why answer choice C is correct in conjunction with why answer choice A is incorrect, it makes some sense. Basically, answer choice C argues that it is a rebuttable mandatory presumption. As answer choice A explains, presumptions of those sorts are unconstitutional. Accordingly, if the court accepts your argument, it would make the shifting of the burden in this situation unconstitutional.gotsomequestions wrote:Question on MBE Practice Exam #2
Kudos to anyone who can explain what the hell is going on here.
A is wrong because it's too broad. The same is true with B.
That's just how I made heads or tails of it. But again, I wouldn't sweat it. You don't need to be perfect here, and this seems like one of the more challenging questions you'll find.
As an aside: I'm not sure any of those are arguments I'd actually consider making IRL. I feel like you'd want to use some sort of substantive due process argument drawing on Bearden v. Georgia. But maybe arguing that it was an element of that specific crime would be a means of doing that. I dunno. But it definitely seems like the best answer after reading the explanation.
- shaynislegend
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:40 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
It's like "for the General welfare will never be a correct answer." Yet, every time I've seen it it's been the correct answer. Same thing with "fighting words legislation will always be overbroad and vague."star fox wrote:Yeah this pissed me off a lot. Don't give me tips like that and intentionally throw me off.SplitMyPants wrote:evidence MBE pq session #2 spoiler:
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 3:54 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
If you are sticking to the directed study schedule, what percentage have you completed?
I am at 41% and I am concerned that I am behind.
I am at 41% and I am concerned that I am behind.
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:25 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
I started 5/23 and will be at 52% at the end of today.LSSS wrote:If you are sticking to the directed study schedule, what percentage have you completed?
I am at 41% and I am concerned that I am behind.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MelaPela
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2017 12:41 am
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Has anyone else watched the lectures by Birdthistle (lol @ his name) and find that he speaks super quickly? I don't know if my brain is just slow today or if he is a speed talker - I usually watch the lecture at 1.5x or 2x and can't follow him at 1.5x.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2017 4:49 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
im wondering the same thing... at 39% ughLSSS wrote:If you are sticking to the directed study schedule, what percentage have you completed?
I am at 41% and I am concerned that I am behind.
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Yeah he does a crap load of IL stuff, I actually think he's pretty good. He's succinct and doesn't linger.MelaPela wrote:Has anyone else watched the lectures by Birdthistle (lol @ his name) and find that he speaks super quickly? I don't know if my brain is just slow today or if he is a speed talker - I usually watch the lecture at 1.5x or 2x and can't follow him at 1.5x.
- whats an updog
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:12 am
Re: Themis Bar Review Hangout - July 2017
Will be at 44% a the end of today. This is pretty much as fast as I can go though, so not gonna stress about it.gotsomequestions wrote:I started 5/23 and will be at 52% at the end of today.LSSS wrote:If you are sticking to the directed study schedule, what percentage have you completed?
I am at 41% and I am concerned that I am behind.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login