Lifestyle Firms? Forum

A forum for applicants and admitted students to ask law students and graduates about law school and the practice of law.
Post Reply
Intro-gamer

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:20 am

Lifestyle Firms?

Post by Intro-gamer » Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:34 am

Hi all,

So after lurking for quite a bit in the legal employment section of this nifty site, I came across the term “lifestyle firm” repeatedly. I think I remember seeing that these big firms support a healthier work-life balance, whilst also paying market, or near market. But my big question is what does that “healthier work-life balance” look like in reality? I understand that it’s healthier relative to more traditionally soul-crushing big firms, but is the difference so significant that you could actually enjoy working at these firms for several years? Or is it just that the misery is slightly more bearable and your soul is more pounded rather than crushed? :lol:

I was under the impression that only workaholics could enjoy working in big law, but I’m getting the impression that these firms create working conditions that are more pleasant for a broader band of lawyer types. I’m not thinking these firms are on a 40 hour work-week level of comfortability, but something that the typical hard-working Law student/lawyer would be able to handle without being burned out and exiting ASAP.

Also do these sorts of firms exist in NYC? Or are they just on the west coast/secondary markets?

User avatar
jthel08

New
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 6:00 pm

Re: Lifestyle Firms?

Post by jthel08 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:38 am

.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Lifestyle Firms?

Post by rpupkin » Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:51 am

Intro-gamer wrote:Hi all,

So after lurking for quite a bit in the legal employment section of this nifty site, I came across the term “lifestyle firm” repeatedly.
You have? I rarely see that term on TLS. When I have, it's usually in the context of a sentence along the lines of "Firm {X] is not a lifestyle firm."

To the extent there's a TLS hivemind position on this topic, it's that "lifestyle firms" don't really exist in the realm of market-paying big law.

User avatar
cavalier1138

Moderator
Posts: 8007
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm

Re: Lifestyle Firms?

Post by cavalier1138 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:53 am

rpupkin wrote:
Intro-gamer wrote:Hi all,

So after lurking for quite a bit in the legal employment section of this nifty site, I came across the term “lifestyle firm” repeatedly.
You have? I rarely see that term on TLS. When I have, it's usually in the context of a sentence along the lines of "Firm {X] is not a lifestyle firm."

To the extent there's a TLS hivemind position on this topic, it's that "lifestyle firms" don't really exist in the realm of market-paying big law.
This.

I'd also say that it might be used to refer to any firm where I don't work, because those guys totally have it easy.

Intro-gamer

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:20 am

Re: Lifestyle Firms?

Post by Intro-gamer » Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:19 pm

rpupkin wrote:
Intro-gamer wrote:Hi all,

So after lurking for quite a bit in the legal employment section of this nifty site, I came across the term “lifestyle firm” repeatedly.
You have? I rarely see that term on TLS. When I have, it's usually in the context of a sentence along the lines of "Firm {X] is not a lifestyle firm."

To the extent there's a TLS hivemind position on this topic, it's that "lifestyle firms" don't really exist in the realm of market-paying big law.
Well that dream was short-lived :cry: :lol:

But seriously I’ve seen a few posts that specifically state that firms that don’t have billable hour requirements, produced a more “humane” big law experience. Is that not true? Or am I maybe overestimating how “humane” these work environments are?

I also have seen quite a few posters emphasize targeting lower ranked firms over higher ranked ones for “fit”. I thought that might factor into these “lifestyle firms” but that might just be something else entirely.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Person1111

Bronze
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:10 pm

Re: Lifestyle Firms?

Post by Person1111 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:25 pm

There are likely no big law firms that offer consistent 40-hour weeks (or at least not 9-5 type weeks). It is a client service industry, and that translates into times when you will need to work late, work on weekends, work on holidays, etc. But there are some firms where the actual expectation of hours billed is 1800-2000, as opposed to other firms where there is an expectation (explicit or otherwise) that everyone will bill 2400+ hours.

Intro-gamer

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:20 am

Re: Lifestyle Firms?

Post by Intro-gamer » Fri Sep 29, 2017 12:32 pm

hlsperson1111 wrote:There are likely no big law firms that offer consistent 40-hour weeks (or at least not 9-5 type weeks). It is a client service industry, and that translates into times when you will need to work late, work on weekends, work on holidays, etc. But there are some firms where the actual expectation of hours billed is 1800-2000, as opposed to other firms where there is an expectation (explicit or otherwise) that everyone will bill 2400+ hours.
Ahh see that’s interesting! The firms that expect 1800-2000 hours were my focus for this thread. I guess it was hard for me to specify because I didn’t have a range to refer to. I’m under no illusions of working in a cushy job in big law (they don’t exist), and I fully expect pulling all- nighters/working weekends if I do get a chance to work in big law, but to the extent that there is a lesser evil/ more humane alternative selection of firms within market paying big law, I definitely want to learn more about them!! If you have any more info/ wisdom to impart I would greatly appreciate it!!

Person1111

Bronze
Posts: 496
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:10 pm

Re: Lifestyle Firms?

Post by Person1111 » Fri Sep 29, 2017 6:19 pm

Experiences vary widely, even within the same firm. But, in general:

--Markets outside NYC are better for work-life balance than markets in NYC.

--Certain practices (employee benefits/executive comp, tax, some other niche transactional and regulatory practices) are often very good for work-life balance. Others are especially bad: M&A and investigations are two that come to mind.

--Firms toward the top of the V100 are generally worse than firms in the bottom half of the V100.

--West Coast and Midwest-based firms (with some exceptions, e.g. Kirkland) are generally more humane/better culturally than East Coast based firms.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Ask a Law Student / Graduate”