Law School Rankings Forum
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:44 pm
Law School Rankings
What is the difference between http://www.lawschool100.com/ and U.S. News rankings? Some schools that are not top tier in U.S. News are considered top tier on lawschool100. Which site is more reliable? Sorry if this question has already been asked. Thanks.
- webbylu87
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:07 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
+1
I've never seen this before. I'd be interested to hear what people think too.
I've never seen this before. I'd be interested to hear what people think too.
- holydonkey
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
Definitely lawschool100.Fef619 wrote:What is the difference between http://www.lawschool100.com/ and U.S. News rankings? Some schools that are not top tier in U.S. News are considered top tier on lawschool100. Which site is more reliable? Sorry if this question has already been asked. Thanks.
- webbylu87
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:07 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
Clearly USNWR is more legit, I'm just wondering if anyone has ever looked at lawschool100's methodology. I would by no means make a decision based on that. Just curious.holydonkey wrote:Definitely lawschool100.Fef619 wrote:What is the difference between http://www.lawschool100.com/ and U.S. News rankings? Some schools that are not top tier in U.S. News are considered top tier on lawschool100. Which site is more reliable? Sorry if this question has already been asked. Thanks.
- legalease9
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
Anyone know what the Law School 100 is actually based on?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:44 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
It seems this is a contentious issue. One person says lawschool100 is more legit while another argues in favor of U.S. news. Do employers consider both rankings before hiring? ...or do employers prefer one over the other..
- webbylu87
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 9:07 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
Go with USNWR. HolyDonkey was being sarcastic.Fef619 wrote:It seems this is a contentious issue. One person says lawschool100 is more legit while another argues in favor of U.S. news. Do employers consider both rankings before hiring? ...or do employers prefer one over the other..
-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 11:57 am
Re: Law School Rankings
LOL @ GeorgeTTTown ranked above Duke.
- jlnoa0915
- Posts: 428
- Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:25 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
Lets be serious, this is the most legit ranking system out there:
--LinkRemoved--
--LinkRemoved--
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:44 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
jlnoa0915 wrote:Lets be serious, this is the most legit ranking system out there:
--LinkRemoved--
LOL...I have seen this....Thomas Cooley is not biased or anything.
-
- Posts: 7921
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:01 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
Thomas M. Cooley Law School... better than Fordham since 2008.
- Rand M.
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:24 am
Re: Law School Rankings
That's one of the main knocks on this ranking system. Its methodology is not at all clear and they don't really do anything to clear that up. Its pretty useless for that and a number of other reasons.legalease9 wrote:Anyone know what the Law School 100 is actually based on?
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:51 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
that's pretty unethical. i had never seen those cooley ranks before.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: Law School Rankings
I don't think employers actively look at either. The relevant question is which has a larger effect on the reputation of a law school over an extended period of time. In other words, which rankings have move of a footprint in the public mind. That's clearly US News. You can get into the entire lay v. professional opinion thing, but I think thats a red herring with regards to ranking. I do not think professionals pay attention to rankings per se. The only way they would pay attention is if the rankings led public opinion, and then that public opinion seeped into their perceptions.Fef619 wrote:It seems this is a contentious issue. One person says lawschool100 is more legit while another argues in favor of U.S. news. Do employers consider both rankings before hiring? ...or do employers prefer one over the other..
To the extent that they might pay attention, its probably more as a "horse race." More entertainment than anything else.
- holydonkey
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
You think this isn't legit?Fef619 wrote:LOL...I have seen this....Thomas Cooley is not biased or anything.jlnoa0915 wrote:Lets be serious, this is the most legit ranking system out there:
--LinkRemoved--
Everyone in the legal world knows American University is a far better school than Penn! US News is just scared of the Southstreet Ganglords.
- kissy
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:08 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
jlnoa0915 wrote:Lets be serious, this is the most legit ranking system out there:
--LinkRemoved--
-
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am
Re: Law School Rankings
From what I have heard... employers do not look or even care in most cases, they have certain schools in mind from the region that they hire from. They also may hire from their alma mater, know a schools reputation, and obviously they know the T14. Then there are family connections, which in most parts, give someone edge or anyone else.
For instance a firm in Cleveland will hire from OSU over Minnesota or Indiana, even though both are higher ranked. Then comes the T14, which have an upper hand on almost everyone else.
I have heard this from partners in biglaw, medium, and small. I was interested in this question. I also saw anonymous answering on here say this also.
What is more legit? No ida. Overall rankings are pointless. NLJ rankings of the go-to schools and what not are much better. If you want public interest, biglaw, etc, those rankings can tell you where to go..
If the best school you get into is FU, or ASU, and you want to practice tin LA, you are stupid for gauging your decision just because they are ranked higher than Loyola LA, Pepperdine, etc.
For instance a firm in Cleveland will hire from OSU over Minnesota or Indiana, even though both are higher ranked. Then comes the T14, which have an upper hand on almost everyone else.
I have heard this from partners in biglaw, medium, and small. I was interested in this question. I also saw anonymous answering on here say this also.
What is more legit? No ida. Overall rankings are pointless. NLJ rankings of the go-to schools and what not are much better. If you want public interest, biglaw, etc, those rankings can tell you where to go..
If the best school you get into is FU, or ASU, and you want to practice tin LA, you are stupid for gauging your decision just because they are ranked higher than Loyola LA, Pepperdine, etc.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- KibblesAndVick
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:29 am
Re: Law School Rankings
If you switch Yale with Harvard and Duke with Georgetown, you get the common TLS tiers of Y > HS > CCN > BMVP DNC > G and the rest of the TTT.
- gdane
- Posts: 14023
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:41 pm
Re: Law School Rankings
Employers dont care about rankings. They do not care whatsoever. employers do not consult USNWR when hiring people.
"Hmm... You went to University of Florida? Its ranked 51... I have a George Mason grad here too. GMU is ranked 38. I think ill go with him". This scenario is very unlikely to happen solely because of the rankings.
I base my opinion off of conversations ive had with professors that are very close to actual attorney's and a family member that works as an administrative assistant at Holland and Knight here in Miami. She tells me that the hiring partner hires from all types of schools regardless of rankings. Of course on thing she stressed was that the "less prestigious" your school was, the more impeccable your grades had to be. She gave me an example of an NYU student that was hired with decent grades, while an FIU grad that was hired was one of the top 10 people in her class, on moot court and all that stuff.
I personally believe that rankings should be used loosely. After the top 25 or so, they go out the window. What makes number 28 GW better than number 30 Fordham? What makes number 26 BC better than number 28 GW? These rankings are very detrimental to the study of law and force students to base their decisions off of what a magazine says.
When it comes down to making a decision a student should ask "Will I get a good education? Will I be able to pass the Bar exam? Will i be able to secure meaningful employment after graduation?", not "What rank is my school according to USNWR?".
"Hmm... You went to University of Florida? Its ranked 51... I have a George Mason grad here too. GMU is ranked 38. I think ill go with him". This scenario is very unlikely to happen solely because of the rankings.
I base my opinion off of conversations ive had with professors that are very close to actual attorney's and a family member that works as an administrative assistant at Holland and Knight here in Miami. She tells me that the hiring partner hires from all types of schools regardless of rankings. Of course on thing she stressed was that the "less prestigious" your school was, the more impeccable your grades had to be. She gave me an example of an NYU student that was hired with decent grades, while an FIU grad that was hired was one of the top 10 people in her class, on moot court and all that stuff.
I personally believe that rankings should be used loosely. After the top 25 or so, they go out the window. What makes number 28 GW better than number 30 Fordham? What makes number 26 BC better than number 28 GW? These rankings are very detrimental to the study of law and force students to base their decisions off of what a magazine says.
When it comes down to making a decision a student should ask "Will I get a good education? Will I be able to pass the Bar exam? Will i be able to secure meaningful employment after graduation?", not "What rank is my school according to USNWR?".
- nealric
- Posts: 4279
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Law School Rankings
The idea that GULC exists in a different (and lower) tier then Cornell is absurd.If you switch Yale with Harvard and Duke with Georgetown, you get the common TLS tiers of Y > HS > CCN > BMVP DNC > G and the rest of the TTT.
-
- Posts: 1433
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:50 am
Re: Law School Rankings
gdane5 wrote: I personally believe that rankings should be used loosely. After the top 25 or so, they go out the window. What makes number 28 GW better than number 30 Fordham? What makes number 26 BC better than number 28 GW? These rankings are very detrimental to the study of law and force students to base their decisions off of what a magazine says.
Completely agree with this. Employeers are aware of the T25, because thats usually a different tier of firms looking at such schools. Basing a decision on that is still silly though, as even in the T14, region and career goals should motive your decision.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KibblesAndVick
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:29 am
Re: Law School Rankings
I completely agree that these are the important underlying concerns. But, would you agree that the favorability of the answers to these questions highly correlates to the rank of your school in the USNWR rankings? Harvard will get you a superb education, the vast majority of their graduates pass the bar on their first try, and their job prospects are top notch. The fact that they are ranked #2 doesn't cause this but there is a strong correlation. I suppose this becomes much less meaningful when looking at schools comparable to each other in the rankings (T10 vs T10 or T50 vs T50).gdane5 wrote:When it comes down to making a decision a student should ask "Will I get a good education? Will I be able to pass the Bar exam? Will i be able to secure meaningful employment after graduation?", not "What rank is my school according to USNWR?".
- KibblesAndVick
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:29 am
Re: Law School Rankings
I agree. I'm just saying that these rankings could have been made by a subtle Georgetown troll posing as a Harvard troll to throw everyone off their tracks.nealric wrote:The idea that GULC exists in a different (and lower) tier then Cornell is absurd.If you switch Yale with Harvard and Duke with Georgetown, you get the common TLS tiers of Y > HS > CCN > BMVP DNC > G and the rest of the TTT.
- OperaSoprano
- Posts: 3417
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:54 am
Re: Law School Rankings
Rankings seem to matter in relative groupings after the T14, plus Vandy/UCLA/UT. Within the 20-30 range, for instance, employers are likely to pick candidates attending the school in their home region. There is not some magic cutoff at #25, and GW is probably going to beat BC in DC, if the students are otherwise similar.gdane5 wrote:Employers dont care about rankings. They do not care whatsoever. employers do not consult USNWR when hiring people.
"Hmm... You went to University of Florida? Its ranked 51... I have a George Mason grad here too. GMU is ranked 38. I think ill go with him". This scenario is very unlikely to happen solely because of the rankings.
I base my opinion off of conversations ive had with professors that are very close to actual attorney's and a family member that works as an administrative assistant at Holland and Knight here in Miami. She tells me that the hiring partner hires from all types of schools regardless of rankings. Of course on thing she stressed was that the "less prestigious" your school was, the more impeccable your grades had to be. She gave me an example of an NYU student that was hired with decent grades, while an FIU grad that was hired was one of the top 10 people in her class, on moot court and all that stuff.
I personally believe that rankings should be used loosely. After the top 25 or so, they go out the window. What makes number 28 GW better than number 30 Fordham? What makes number 26 BC better than number 28 GW? These rankings are very detrimental to the study of law and force students to base their decisions off of what a magazine says.
When it comes down to making a decision a student should ask "Will I get a good education? Will I be able to pass the Bar exam? Will i be able to secure meaningful employment after graduation?", not "What rank is my school according to USNWR?".
Big differences in rankings still matter. The BC grad is going to have a much better shot at employment than someone attending, say, Catholic or UDC, grades and experience being equal. There is a tendency for some to believe that they will be able to guarantee high rank if they attend a lesser school, and the problem with this is that the correlation between entering numbers and first year performance is modest at best. People go to higher ranked schools to buy themselves some margin for error. I would love to be in the top 10 people in my class, but I'm glad I picked a school that will hopefully make me employable even though I'm not. I recognize, however, that I'll still need to be toward the top of my class.
- baboon309
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:21 am
Re: Law School Rankings
Why top 25?gdane5 wrote:Employers dont care about rankings. They do not care whatsoever. employers do not consult USNWR when hiring people.
"Hmm... You went to University of Florida? Its ranked 51... I have a George Mason grad here too. GMU is ranked 38. I think ill go with him". This scenario is very unlikely to happen solely because of the rankings.
I base my opinion off of conversations ive had with professors that are very close to actual attorney's and a family member that works as an administrative assistant at Holland and Knight here in Miami. She tells me that the hiring partner hires from all types of schools regardless of rankings. Of course on thing she stressed was that the "less prestigious" your school was, the more impeccable your grades had to be. She gave me an example of an NYU student that was hired with decent grades, while an FIU grad that was hired was one of the top 10 people in her class, on moot court and all that stuff.
I personally believe that rankings should be used loosely. After the top 25 or so, they go out the window. What makes number 28 GW better than number 30 Fordham? What makes number 26 BC better than number 28 GW? These rankings are very detrimental to the study of law and force students to base their decisions off of what a magazine says.
When it comes down to making a decision a student should ask "Will I get a good education? Will I be able to pass the Bar exam? Will i be able to secure meaningful employment after graduation?", not "What rank is my school according to USNWR?".
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login