![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
Don't stress too much. You've been doing the readings! You'll do great!!!!!!!!!!!! I predict at least top 50% for 1/2 of you!
I know these can be stressful and confusing times...I'm a recent (fairly successful
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Practical advice: ignore it! I didn't know it at all and I got a B+ in property and passed the bar 1st try!Mal Reynolds wrote:I'm having major trouble with the rule against perpetuities. Can you provide an explanation of the rule in addition to an example or two? Really lost here, thanks a lot.
lol we actually had a case that said this thoscrowell wrote:Practical advice: ignore it! I didn't know it at all and I got a B+ in property and passed the bar 1st try!Mal Reynolds wrote:I'm having major trouble with the rule against perpetuities. Can you provide an explanation of the rule in addition to an example or two? Really lost here, thanks a lot.
Just get all the other stuff down: mortgages, property interests, easements, LL/T and you'll do well.
Also good to know: ducking up a will/trust because of RAP will NOT be grounds for a malpractice claim. If it's an essay question you could mention that and maybe get a point or two.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
diescrowell wrote:[words]
I heard somewhere he passed the bar on his first try.anyriotgirl wrote:can you please educate me about jurisdiction scrowell?
what kind of jurisdiction? personal?anyriotgirl wrote:wtf man
Please please do not listen to this advice. Do not ignore the rule of perpetuities. Try to get a good outline that describes the rule...don't spend forever trying to learn it, but at least be able to get some points in an exam should the rule come up. Getting a "B+" and "passing the bar 1st try" should not be your aspirations.scrowell wrote:Practical advice: ignore it! I didn't know it at all and I got a B+ in property and passed the bar 1st try!Mal Reynolds wrote:I'm having major trouble with the rule against perpetuities. Can you provide an explanation of the rule in addition to an example or two? Really lost here, thanks a lot.
Just get all the other stuff down: mortgages, property interests, easements, LL/T and you'll do well.
Also good to know: ducking up a will/trust because of RAP will NOT be grounds for a malpractice claim. If it's an essay question you could mention that and maybe get a point or two.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Dude, I'm deadly serious. I've been there and done everything related to LS (finals, finding jobs, MPRE, bar, you name it). What's your beef?Ron Don Volante wrote:But seriously.
This guy is shitting up the on-topics almost as badly as, say, a Greg James, a PepperJack, or a should-i-do-it.
No, he hasn't started threads praising the holocaust (yet), but where is the line?
Those were my goals.skri65 wrote:Please please do not listen to this advice. Do not ignore the rule of perpetuities. Try to get a good outline that describes the rule...don't spend forever trying to learn it, but at least be able to get some points in an exam should the rule come up. Getting a "B+" and "passing the bar 1st try" should not be your aspirations.scrowell wrote:Practical advice: ignore it! I didn't know it at all and I got a B+ in property and passed the bar 1st try!Mal Reynolds wrote:I'm having major trouble with the rule against perpetuities. Can you provide an explanation of the rule in addition to an example or two? Really lost here, thanks a lot.
Just get all the other stuff down: mortgages, property interests, easements, LL/T and you'll do well.
Also good to know: ducking up a will/trust because of RAP will NOT be grounds for a malpractice claim. If it's an essay question you could mention that and maybe get a point or two.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
UFCA....? I was never tested on thisNoDayButToday wrote:Also what happens to the percentage apportionment of damages under 1) UCFA and 2) modified systems when one defendant settles with the plaintiff?
THX
Yes, and those are poor goals for most students.scrowell wrote:Those were my goals.skri65 wrote:Please please do not listen to this advice. Do not ignore the rule of perpetuities. Try to get a good outline that describes the rule...don't spend forever trying to learn it, but at least be able to get some points in an exam should the rule come up. Getting a "B+" and "passing the bar 1st try" should not be your aspirations.scrowell wrote:Practical advice: ignore it! I didn't know it at all and I got a B+ in property and passed the bar 1st try!Mal Reynolds wrote:I'm having major trouble with the rule against perpetuities. Can you provide an explanation of the rule in addition to an example or two? Really lost here, thanks a lot.
Just get all the other stuff down: mortgages, property interests, easements, LL/T and you'll do well.
Also good to know: ducking up a will/trust because of RAP will NOT be grounds for a malpractice claim. If it's an essay question you could mention that and maybe get a point or two.
Pretty much all of itscrowell wrote:what kind of jurisdiction? personal?anyriotgirl wrote:wtf man
I'm very busy, ya know what I mean?
I am a ray of hope my man. I hustled and got a good job. I feel sorry for people that are too afraid to stray from the status quo. I read TLS prior to LS. I knew myself and believed in myself. It worked out. Granted, I had to work nearly full time while going to school, but nonetheless, it worked out. Fear is the enemy.skri65 wrote:
Yes, and those are poor goals for most students.
For the vast majority of students in law school, those goals will not get students a job sufficient to pay off their debt. It is shocking that you are unable to understand that what worked for you is a minor miracle, and to give the advice you give to students as if what worked for you will work for them is not only statistically wrong, but flat out irresponsible of you. You should hate yourself for what you are doing. I worry for your company if you apply the kind of awareness that you display on this board to your legal responsibilities.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I feel u. Civ pro (or civ bro, as I used to call it) can be a bitch. I can email you my bar outlines if you'd like em. They're pretty clear/straightforward. Hit me with a PM if you're interested.anyriotgirl wrote:Pretty much all of itscrowell wrote:what kind of jurisdiction? personal?anyriotgirl wrote:wtf man
I'm very busy, ya know what I mean?
You really don't get it.scrowell wrote:I am a ray of hope my man. I hustled and got a good job. I feel sorry for people that are too afraid to stray from the status quo. I read TLS prior to LS. I knew myself and believed in myself. It worked out. Granted, I had to work nearly full time while going to school, but nonetheless, it worked out. Fear is the enemy.skri65 wrote:
Yes, and those are poor goals for most students.
For the vast majority of students in law school, those goals will not get students a job sufficient to pay off their debt. It is shocking that you are unable to understand that what worked for you is a minor miracle, and to give the advice you give to students as if what worked for you will work for them is not only statistically wrong, but flat out irresponsible of you. You should hate yourself for what you are doing. I worry for your company if you apply the kind of awareness that you display on this board to your legal responsibilities.
actually you don't really get itskri65 wrote:You really don't get it.scrowell wrote:I am a ray of hope my man. I hustled and got a good job. I feel sorry for people that are too afraid to stray from the status quo. I read TLS prior to LS. I knew myself and believed in myself. It worked out. Granted, I had to work nearly full time while going to school, but nonetheless, it worked out. Fear is the enemy.skri65 wrote:
Yes, and those are poor goals for most students.
For the vast majority of students in law school, those goals will not get students a job sufficient to pay off their debt. It is shocking that you are unable to understand that what worked for you is a minor miracle, and to give the advice you give to students as if what worked for you will work for them is not only statistically wrong, but flat out irresponsible of you. You should hate yourself for what you are doing. I worry for your company if you apply the kind of awareness that you display on this board to your legal responsibilities.
Also, none of what you just said responds in any intelligent or comprehensible way to what I said before. Again, I worry for your company.scrowell wrote:I am a ray of hope my man. I hustled and got a good job. I feel sorry for people that are too afraid to stray from the status quo. I read TLS prior to LS. I knew myself and believed in myself. It worked out. Granted, I had to work nearly full time while going to school, but nonetheless, it worked out. Fear is the enemy.skri65 wrote:
Yes, and those are poor goals for most students.
For the vast majority of students in law school, those goals will not get students a job sufficient to pay off their debt. It is shocking that you are unable to understand that what worked for you is a minor miracle, and to give the advice you give to students as if what worked for you will work for them is not only statistically wrong, but flat out irresponsible of you. You should hate yourself for what you are doing. I worry for your company if you apply the kind of awareness that you display on this board to your legal responsibilities.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login