Well, whatever you do, I wouldn't try to convince your interviewer that your "true talent" GPA is higher than the GPA you have. I don't think I would be surprised to learn who is at the top of the class. But beyond that IDK.JaysonNix1aDay wrote:I'm curious to get the opinions of others in the class, at what point do you think that a difference in GPA is either: A) A useful indicator of a difference in current skill, ability or intelligence (or potential for those, the goal for a firm is after all to hire people who will be good lawyers in 5 years, not good law students now), or B) Robust statistical measures if the tests were given repeatedly, ie what's the signal to noise ratio on exam grades?
As we all try to figure out what GPA ranges mean, I'm curious what people feel like the error bars around our GPA's look like. For me, I can't imagine anything less than a .1 difference is really either going to hold up under repeated testing or indicative or a real difference in skill. For example a person with a 3.5 could be a true talent 3.6 who got unlucky/had a bad day, or a true talent 3.4 who got lucky/had a good day, or anywhere in between.
Thoughts?
Cornell Class of 2017 Forum
- tyrant_flycatcher
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:05 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 4:29 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
who do you get to fill out a dean's certification for transfer apps (out of Cornell)?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Maybe the registrar?clsclscls wrote:who do you get to fill out a dean's certification for transfer apps (out of Cornell)?
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
clsclscls wrote:who do you get to fill out a dean's certification for transfer apps (out of Cornell)?
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
In my opinion:JaysonNix1aDay wrote:I'm curious to get the opinions of others in the class, at what point do you think that a difference in GPA is either: A) A useful indicator of a difference in current skill, ability or intelligence (or potential for those, the goal for a firm is after all to hire people who will be good lawyers in 5 years, not good law students now), or B) Robust statistical measures if the tests were given repeatedly, ie what's the signal to noise ratio on exam grades?
As we all try to figure out what GPA ranges mean, I'm curious what people feel like the error bars around our GPA's look like. For me, I can't imagine anything less than a .1 difference is really either going to hold up under repeated testing or indicative or a real difference in skill. For example a person with a 3.5 could be a true talent 3.6 who got unlucky/had a bad day, or a true talent 3.4 who got lucky/had a good day, or anywhere in between.
Thoughts?
GPA is a great indicator of typing speed, reading speed (with "grasp of the English language" attached to this) and memory skills.
GPA is an okay indicator of critical thinking skills.
GPA is a rather poor indicator of raw intelligence, though. Slow typers and some foreigners get pwned by the curve but many are undoubtedly as smart (or smarter) than people with higher GPAs.
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:04 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
This is definitely an over exaggerated factor in my experience.runinthefront wrote:
GPA is a great indicator of typing speed.
- Ron Howard
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 8:01 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
I go back and forth with the importance of reading speed, so I would like to hear your reasoning for its importance along with the idea of "grasp of the English language". Actually interestedruninthefront wrote:In my opinion:JaysonNix1aDay wrote:I'm curious to get the opinions of others in the class, at what point do you think that a difference in GPA is either: A) A useful indicator of a difference in current skill, ability or intelligence (or potential for those, the goal for a firm is after all to hire people who will be good lawyers in 5 years, not good law students now), or B) Robust statistical measures if the tests were given repeatedly, ie what's the signal to noise ratio on exam grades?
As we all try to figure out what GPA ranges mean, I'm curious what people feel like the error bars around our GPA's look like. For me, I can't imagine anything less than a .1 difference is really either going to hold up under repeated testing or indicative or a real difference in skill. For example a person with a 3.5 could be a true talent 3.6 who got unlucky/had a bad day, or a true talent 3.4 who got lucky/had a good day, or anywhere in between.
Thoughts?
GPA is a great indicator of typing speed, reading speed (with "grasp of the English language" attached to this) and memory skills.
GPA is an okay indicator of critical thinking skills.
GPA is a rather poor indicator of raw intelligence, though. Slow typers and some foreigners get pwned by the curve but many are undoubtedly as smart (or smarter) than people with higher GPAs.
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
*great indicator of not being a person that types with two fingers* You don't need to type even 60 wpm to get an A/A+, but for Ohlin/Johnson and others, no way someone's getting an A typing like 2,000 words. It's just not happening.redsoxfan1989 wrote:This is definitely an over exaggerated factor in my experience.runinthefront wrote:
GPA is a great indicator of typing speed.
The faster you can read/digest material, the more time you have to brainstorm > outline > write and/or revise > spellcheck (though many professors don't care about this at all) > type more > revise more. This is sorta intuitive.Ron Howard wrote: I go back and forth with the importance of reading speed, so I would like to hear your reasoning for its importance along with the idea of "grasp of the English language". Actually interested
This is just what I think
Last edited by runinthefront on Sat Jan 27, 2018 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
- runthetrap1990
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 5:38 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
can confirm this. or at least so long as you didn't inadvertently write in another language through misspellings and typos.runinthefront wrote: spellcheck (though many professors don't care about this at all) >
- Yea All Right
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Any updates on when journal results may come out?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Your notes were so bad that we decided nobody's making a journal this year.Yea All Right wrote:Any updates on when journal results may come out?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
But seriously, still on schedule for the 15th, as far as I know.
- runthetrap1990
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 5:38 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
This means that ILJ and JPP results would follow the day after, correct? or have all three come out on the same day at any point in the past?Lavitz wrote:But seriously, still on schedule for the 15th, as far as I know.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Likely the day or two days after. Last year, LR calls went out at like 7pm. Also, some people were on a waitlist for a week before finding out that they made LR.runthetrap1990 wrote:This means that ILJ and JPP results would follow the day after, correct? or have all three come out on the same day at any point in the past?Lavitz wrote:But seriously, still on schedule for the 15th, as far as I know.
- Yea All Right
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Ok thanks Lavitz! Hoping I make a journal.
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:21 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Couple of question, hope you don't mind helping me out:
1) Having spoken to some upper classmen, I've been getting the general impression that 12 credits is a reasonable goal for first semester, given that there's a strong chance I'll be on some journal. Does that sound about right? I'm looking at taking something like two exam classes and trying for one of the six credit internships. Do I need more substantive classes/are internships worth the time? Which am I more likely to get out of in a 'lawyer in the best sense' sense?
2) I'm also interested in fed clerking and would like to try to avoid screwing myself out of that. I assume I'm going to want to do Admin, Bus Orgs, Sec reg, evidence, tax, crim pro, fed courts, etc. Should I try to have some done by the time that I'm applying or wait till later?
1) Having spoken to some upper classmen, I've been getting the general impression that 12 credits is a reasonable goal for first semester, given that there's a strong chance I'll be on some journal. Does that sound about right? I'm looking at taking something like two exam classes and trying for one of the six credit internships. Do I need more substantive classes/are internships worth the time? Which am I more likely to get out of in a 'lawyer in the best sense' sense?
2) I'm also interested in fed clerking and would like to try to avoid screwing myself out of that. I assume I'm going to want to do Admin, Bus Orgs, Sec reg, evidence, tax, crim pro, fed courts, etc. Should I try to have some done by the time that I'm applying or wait till later?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
1) I took 12 credits 2L Fall, but remember you need to take an average of 13 credits per semester so you'll need to make it up eventually. One of the 6 credit internships (AG?) + 2 exam classes sounds fine. Ideally, one should be a seminar so you can use the seminar paper as your note, unless you think you can handle two separate papers. Maybe sign up for oral presentation skills or intro to depositions if you want to increase your credit count this semester without committing to too much work. No idea what you want to get out of the internship, and I haven't done one, so not sure if it's worth the time.ughbugchugplug wrote:Couple of question, hope you don't mind helping me out:
1) Having spoken to some upper classmen, I've been getting the general impression that 12 credits is a reasonable goal for first semester, given that there's a strong chance I'll be on some journal. Does that sound about right? I'm looking at taking something like two exam classes and trying for one of the six credit internships. Do I need more substantive classes/are internships worth the time? Which am I more likely to get out of in a 'lawyer in the best sense' sense?
2) I'm also interested in fed clerking and would like to try to avoid screwing myself out of that. I assume I'm going to want to do Admin, Bus Orgs, Sec reg, evidence, tax, crim pro, fed courts, etc. Should I try to have some done by the time that I'm applying or wait till later?
2) This is just my opinion, but imo tax and even sec reg are completely unnecessary. Main classes judges like to see are fed courts, evidence and admin. Of course some judges differ depending on their docket. I know one district court judge that wanted clerks to take employment law because 25% of his cases involved employment claims. Another district judge thought every lawyer should take an accounting class. And a circuit judge didn't care at all as long as you took Fed Courts. Definitely take one of Evidence / Admin / CrimPro this semester because the registrar scheduled them all at the same time, and so who knows whether they'll pull the same dumb schedule in the future. Probably CrimPro since that's the only one that you can't take in the Spring with a different prof if the registrar keeps screwing up. You don't need all your classes to be clerkship-oriented, but probably avoid things like lawyers in the movies.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:21 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Cool, thanks. I'm planning on AG. I don't know how competitive it is to get into, so things might change. I wish I'd budgeted time to apply for the USAO in April but that's much easier to say when 1L is a distant memory. Honestly, my minimal exposure to real lawyer things this summer has made me bit by the practice bug, and I want to do something that isn't just outlining and reading cases this next year. Glad to hear Tax is not necessary ^_^Lavitz wrote: 1) I took 12 credits 2L Fall, but remember you need to take an average of 13 credits per semester so you'll need to make it up eventually. One of the 6 credit internships (AG?) + 2 exam classes sounds fine. Ideally, one should be a seminar so you can use the seminar paper as your note, unless you think you can handle two separate papers. Maybe sign up for oral presentation skills or intro to depositions if you want to increase your credit count this semester without committing to too much work. No idea what you want to get out of the internship, and I haven't done one, so not sure if it's worth the time.
2) This is just my opinion, but imo tax and even sec reg are completely unnecessary. Main classes judges like to see are fed courts, evidence and admin. Of course some judges differ depending on their docket. I know one district court judge that wanted clerks to take employment law because 25% of his cases involved employment claims. Another district judge thought every lawyer should take an accounting class. And a circuit judge didn't care at all as long as you took Fed Courts. Definitely take one of Evidence / Admin / CrimPro this semester because the registrar scheduled them all at the same time, and so who knows whether they'll pull the same dumb schedule in the future. Probably CrimPro since that's the only one that you can't take in the Spring with a different prof if the registrar keeps screwing up. You don't need all your classes to be clerkship-oriented, but probably avoid things like lawyers in the movies.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Not sure about AG, but USAO was very competitive. I didn't even get an interview. AG's likely less competitive.ughbugchugplug wrote:Cool, thanks. I'm planning on AG. I don't know how competitive it is to get into, so things might change. I wish I'd budgeted time to apply for the USAO in April but that's much easier to say when 1L is a distant memory.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 4:29 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
for AG or USAO we need to have a car?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 12:21 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
LR calls have begun.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- runthetrap1990
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 5:38 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
I have a general curiosity question. With regard to research assistant positions, how does one generally apply for one? Is it a case where professor reaches out, or do you solely rely on Scoops to fill you in on the open spots? Would reaching out to express interest be a credited move?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
Yes.runthetrap1990 wrote:Would reaching out to express interest be a credited move?
- Yea All Right
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
I've heard that it's good for people on journals to take a writing seminar so they can use that paper as their Note. If you want to do this, do you have to take the writing seminar during fall semester or would spring semester be ok? I'm not even clear about how many Notes people on journals have to write, is it one per semester or one per year?
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell Class of 2017
You're required to write one note for your journal, and it will be due around the beginning of the Spring semester, so the the seminar has to be in Fall.Yea All Right wrote:I've heard that it's good for people on journals to take a writing seminar so they can use that paper as their Note. If you want to do this, do you have to take the writing seminar during fall semester or would spring semester be ok? I'm not even clear about how many Notes people on journals have to write, is it one per semester or one per year?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login