Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Jfc, I genuinely wonder how some TLSers can function irl. They must be absolutely paralyzed with fear about what others think about them.
-
- Posts: 428534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-
- Posts: 428534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
I won't say, but I know people from both groups who were happy (as happy as could be). None ever mentioned the abuse shared by people here.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:49 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
You wrote an anon post about other people’s good experiences working for a judge you didn’t name. It’s ok, you can tell us you’re a straight guy.Anonymous User wrote:I won't say, but I know people from both groups who were happy (as happy as could be).Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
I'm clever enough to avoid outting myself by speaking from first person experience, if I were in any of those groups.Thesaurus wrote:You wrote an anon post about other people’s good experiences working for a judge you didn’t name. It’s ok, you can tell us you’re a straight guy.Anonymous User wrote:I won't say, but I know people from both groups who were happy (as happy as could be).Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Oh well, if they never told you, their BFF with whom they'd share even their darkest experiences, then you must be qualified to speak on their behalf. My bad buddyAnonymous User wrote:I won't say, but I know people from both groups who were happy (as happy as could be). None ever mentioned the abuse shared by people here.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-
- Posts: 428534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
You learn a lot by spending 17 hours a day together.Nebby wrote:Oh well, if they never told you, their BFF with whom they'd share even their darkest experiences, then you must be qualified to speak on their behalf. My bad buddyAnonymous User wrote:I won't say, but I know people from both groups who were happy (as happy as could be). None ever mentioned the abuse shared by people here.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-signing off
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Ah, yes. The unassailable "but you're not high enough on the victim totem pole to have an opinion that counts" argument.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:49 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
The argument Nebby was making is that if you’re not a member of XYZ group you don’t necessarily know if members of said group are being mistreated because you’re not necessarily around or paying attention when it happens.ExBiglawAssociate wrote:Ah, yes. The unassailable "but you're not high enough on the victim totem pole to have an opinion that counts" argument.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
To be fair, that anon could be oblivious, but you'd have to be really oblivious working in chambers with people. It's pretty small and it would be hard to miss if a co-clerk was being mistreated.
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
You obviously haven't clerked. Every clerk ends up being close with his/her co-clerks, so it's highly unlikely that a clerk would "not be around or paying attention." Also, we're talking about judges who supposedly make their work environment so caustic that people in certain groups cannot function in the workplace. I find it hard to believe that such an environment could or would be isolated to just one person without anyone else noticing. It's a bit ridiculous to just write off what someone who has actually clerked for a judge knows about his/her judge, because of how close-knit every chambers is.Thesaurus wrote:The argument Nebby was making is that if you’re not a member of XYZ group you don’t necessarily know if members of said group are being mistreated because you’re not necessarily around or paying attention when it happens.ExBiglawAssociate wrote:Ah, yes. The unassailable "but you're not high enough on the victim totem pole to have an opinion that counts" argument.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
I didn't know one could successfully fish for red herring in that bulky, white armor--but you did it!ExBiglawAssociate wrote:Ah, yes. The unassailable "but you're not high enough on the victim totem pole to have an opinion that counts" argument.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
I asked that question because, in a thread about judges' mistreatment of women or LGBT clerks, whether someone is of those groups will tend to influence how much weight to give such an anecdotal opinion. Anon was giving an anecdotal opinion, and therefore it's valid to probe the extent that anecdote is representative of the topic (anti-lgbt and anti-woman mistreatment). Anon appears to be a straight white male, therefore it's only reasonable to give their anecdotal experience less weight in a thread specifically asking about experiences anon could never experience first-hand.
One wouldn't go asking for white people's anecdotal opinions when looking for anecdotal experiences of anti-black discrimination.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Anon said they know people from both groups, not that they co-clerked with people from both groups. Even then, aren't you folks who did clerkships always stressing how different every chamber is? How can you square that with a principle that "it would be hard to miss if a co-clerk was being mistreated?" Are all chambers different except that it would be difficult to know when another clerk is mistreated?A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be fair, that anon could be oblivious, but you'd have to be really oblivious working in chambers with people. It's pretty small and it would be hard to miss if a co-clerk was being mistreated.
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Anon never said he/she was a straight white male, but don't let that get in the way of your overly reductive narrative.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
In this instance, refusal to answer the question is pretty good circumstantial evidence. Particularly in an anonymous setting.ExBiglawAssociate wrote:Anon never said he/she was a straight white male, but don't let that get in the way of your overly reductive narrative.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
I (and the anon) was talking about clerks working for his/her judge in his/her chambers, not in other chambers.Nebby wrote:Anon said they know people from both groups, not that they co-clerked with people from both groups. Even then, aren't you folks who did clerkships always stressing how different every chamber is? How can you square that with a principle that "it would be hard to miss if a co-clerk was being mistreated?" Are all chambers different except that it would be difficult to know when another clerk is mistreated?A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be fair, that anon could be oblivious, but you'd have to be really oblivious working in chambers with people. It's pretty small and it would be hard to miss if a co-clerk was being mistreated.
Also just because chambers approach things differently doesn't mean you can't actually find out about what goes on in those chambers. I have a pretty good sense of how other judges in my district treated their clerks even though I didn't clerk for them. I have no idea how random Judge X across the country treats their clerks, of course. (Not that it matters since anon was talking about their own judge.)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Nebby, this probably isn't the hill to die on.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
What is dead may never die.
-
- Posts: 428534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Is the claim here that somehow clerkships are so unique that clerks will always tell their co-clerks about sexual, racial, or other harassment by their supervisor? Have none of the ongoing #metoo reveals taught us that victims do not always tell their coworkers (because that's what you are, coworkers first, friends second) about inappropriate behavior from their boss, especially not right when it happens? Is it not safe to say that a powerful judge, let's use Kozinski for the sake of argument, might wield the same level of control over your future career that, say, Louis CK might wield over that of a budding young comic?Anonymous User wrote:You learn a lot by spending 17 hours a day together.Nebby wrote:Oh well, if they never told you, their BFF with whom they'd share even their darkest experiences, then you must be qualified to speak on their behalf. My bad buddyAnonymous User wrote:I won't say, but I know people from both groups who were happy (as happy as could be). None ever mentioned the abuse shared by people here.Nebby wrote:Were you a female or LGBT law clerk?Anonymous User wrote:I worked with a judge whose name has been mentioned ITT. (Mods: PM me privately for proof, if you must.) The rumors here are garbage, in my own experience.
I'm all for sharing horror stories you know are true from your own experience, but it's another thing to play a tormented game of telephone when it comes to reputations.
-signing off
Edit: didn't mean to post anonymously. -thebrownnote
- Mr. Blackacre
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 11:48 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Unfortunately the kind of people who would most need to learn from #metoo are also the kind who are least likely to listen. Probably also the type to say that working 17 hours a day (Kozinski clerk confirmed?) with someone necessarily means you'll know everything about them.Anonymous User wrote:
Is the claim here that somehow clerkships are so unique that clerks will always tell their co-clerks about sexual, racial, or other harassment by their supervisor? Have none of the ongoing #metoo reveals taught us that victims do not always tell their coworkers (because that's what you are, coworkers first, friends second) about inappropriate behavior from their boss, especially not right when it happens? Is it not safe to say that a powerful judge, let's use Kozinski for the sake of argument, might wield the same level of control over your future career that, say, Louis CK might wield over that of a budding young comic?
Edit: didn't mean to post anonymously. -thebrownnote
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
the claim is that they are a small, tight-knit group that work tons of hours together in close quarters.
the #metoo movement doesn't shine light on the fact that victims aren't telling their coworkers but rather a movement of victims blowing the whistle in a more public forum. weinstein et. al. is shocking to the public at large but it's not as shocking to people in the industry - and the same is going on here. the public (people who haven't worked in various chambers) are oblivious but people "in the industry" are more in the know.
so, like, chill...
the #metoo movement doesn't shine light on the fact that victims aren't telling their coworkers but rather a movement of victims blowing the whistle in a more public forum. weinstein et. al. is shocking to the public at large but it's not as shocking to people in the industry - and the same is going on here. the public (people who haven't worked in various chambers) are oblivious but people "in the industry" are more in the know.
so, like, chill...
- Mr. Blackacre
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 11:48 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Except here it's used in reverse. This is someone using the one person they know to whom it hasn't happened to argue that the judge has never done it. At any rate, IMO part of the thing with the Hollywood sexual misconduct scandals (which btw are kind of separate from the #metoo hashtag) is that even some in the industry were unaware (Weinstein may be a bad example, but it's not like he's the only one. And also some women who had worked with him didn't know).pancakes3 wrote:the claim is that they are a small, tight-knit group that work tons of hours together in close quarters.
the #metoo movement doesn't shine light on the fact that victims aren't telling their coworkers but rather a movement of victims blowing the whistle in a more public forum. weinstein et. al. is shocking to the public at large but it's not as shocking to people in the industry - and the same is going on here. the public (people who haven't worked in various chambers) are oblivious but people "in the industry" are more in the know.
so, like, chill...
-
- Posts: 428534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
No, I've argued that the dozen or so people who I know, including those who proceeded me, worked alongside me, and succeeded me, represented a diverse background and none of those with whom I worked ever complained about treatment outside of the norm. Nor did I ever see such treatment with my own eyes.Mr. Blackacre wrote:Except here it's used in reverse. This is someone using the one person they know to whom it hasn't happened to argue that the judge has never done it. At any rate, IMO part of the thing with the Hollywood sexual misconduct scandals (which btw are kind of separate from the #metoo hashtag) is that even some in the industry were unaware (Weinstein may be a bad example, but it's not like he's the only one. And also some women who had worked with him didn't know).pancakes3 wrote:the claim is that they are a small, tight-knit group that work tons of hours together in close quarters.
the #metoo movement doesn't shine light on the fact that victims aren't telling their coworkers but rather a movement of victims blowing the whistle in a more public forum. weinstein et. al. is shocking to the public at large but it's not as shocking to people in the industry - and the same is going on here. the public (people who haven't worked in various chambers) are oblivious but people "in the industry" are more in the know.
so, like, chill...
Is my knowledge and experience dispositive? Of course not. But it's a closer perspective than offered elsewhere in this thread, I believe. And the reputation I've read here isn't something I'd heard before nor after my work. If there's a take away, it's this: read everything you see on message boards with a grain of salt.
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Judges who female or LGBT law clerks should avoid
Here's my shocked face
CC:
CC:
RaceJudicata wrote:Jesus. Brave, brave anon.Anonymous User wrote:I offer advice about the clerkship process to mentees at my T14 law school. A number of classmates and professors have warned me to steer female students, in particular, away from Judge Kozinski. They have told me that while he can be cruel to all of his clerks, he sexually harasses his female clerks, for example, pressuring them to wear revealing outfits and making comments of a sexual nature about their appearances. I have additionally been warned that Judge Kozinski is explicitly homophobic, and so I am urging my LGBT mentees not to apply to him either. (To be clear, these strike me as behaviors that, if true, should deter all of my mentees from applying to clerk for Judge Kozinski, but I understand that these types of behaviors have a more direct effect on some individuals).
Given that the Judge-clerk relationship puts the clerk in such close quarters with a very powerful authority figure, are there other judges who I should be warning my mentees, particularly my female or LGBT mentees, to stay away from because of their reputations for harassing law clerks?
rpupkin wrote:Look, if a poster wants to share a personal story about an experience with a judge, then I think the use of the anonymous feature would be appropriate (though, if the story were a damaging one, I would hope that the mods would make some effort to assess whether the poster was actually in a position to have had the experience).bearsfan23 wrote:So people can only discuss judges and how they treat clerks non-anon? Is that your point here?rpupkin wrote:This strikes me as an excellent use of TLS. Let's all use the anonymous posting feature to spread vicious third-hand rumors about federal judges. What fun!
But I think a damaging third-hand rumor in the passive voice--like "I have been warned that Judge Kozinski is explicitly homophobic"--is a different kettle of fish. It probably shouldn't be posted at all. And if it is to be posted, I don't see the need for anonymity.
grand inquisitor wrote:this is gonna be my new go-to. i had the kozinski clerkship in the bag but my homosexuality kept me from accepting.
lavarman84 wrote:How can a guy who seems like such a zany weird fella (like a class clown in a way) be such a jerk to his clerks? It just doesn't feel like it fits with that personality. I've read the horror stories, so I'm not doubting y'all. It's just so weird.jbagelboy wrote:no doubt Kozinski's chambers have a bad rap and he's done some weird shit (http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-kozi ... story.html), but the last statement is simply ridiculous. No way to discern a feeder pattern, especially not because of his practices in chambers.Anonymous User wrote:To be fair, OP is correct that Kozinski's chambers are full of horrors (he yells at his clerks all the time; they are required to be there until 1 AM most days even when there isn't work for them to do; he intentionally instills competition amongst them over who he will recommend to SCOTUS; and sexual harassment allegations have been repeated by enough people that I'd think it more than reasonable to be wary). I get that TLS is a tricky spot to go for for this kind of information, but given the culture of silence about judge behavior that exists in most circles (especially for judges less high profile than the Koz), there aren't many other sources besides anonymous internet messaging.
Koz's feeding power seems to be waning a lot incidentally. Probably because there's been enough whispering to cause people with options to look elsewhere.
Last edited by Nebby on Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login