CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
TItle says it. I've heard that generally a clerkship for a state supreme court is as positive on your resume as a district court. My question is: Is having a CA SC clerkship, if I am trying to work in LA post-clerkship, as beneficial as a CD CA clerkship? Quick background: Hope to do litigation work for larger firm post-clerkship.
- Tanicius
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
The California Supreme Court is one of the few state courts where I would say this is true. It's a court that oversees a population of 50 million people.KD35 wrote:TItle says it. I've heard that generally a clerkship for a state supreme court is as positive on your resume as a district court. My question is: Is having a CA SC clerkship, if I am trying to work in LA post-clerkship, as beneficial as a CD CA clerkship? Quick background: Hope to do litigation work for larger firm post-clerkship.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
I thought the CA Supreme Court generally didn't hire term clerks? (That may be out of date information, though.)
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Goodwin Liu hires term clerks.
I suspect the new appointee will as well.
I suspect the new appointee will as well.
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Anyone have any idea on the level of competition for getting such a position? Guessing it is very high since there are very few openings for the court.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Tanicius
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
It's high. Fairly above average grades from B don't automatically make the cut.KD35 wrote:Anyone have any idea on the level of competition for getting such a position? Guessing it is very high since there are very few openings for the court.
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Competitiveness: Several friends who graduated magna cum laude from HLS applied to clerk for Liu and did not get it. Two got interviews and did not get it, and a few did not even get interviews. So it appears to be at least as competitive as most desirable COA clerkships.
- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Agreed. CA is an exception to the general rule. Plus, because only Liu hires term clerks, and because he's widely admired, it's sweet if you can get a Liu clerkship. He's becoming a SCOTUS feeder. I, like the poster above, imagine Cuellar will take term clerks too.
To be clear, though, I'm not saying Cal Supreme is the obvious better choice. I think a lot of employers and practitioners still think of it as "federal>state." Also, I think Liu has a strong preference (if not an outright requirement) for prior federal clerkship experience. Some of his recent clerks came from the 9th Circuit and the DC Circuit.
To be clear, though, I'm not saying Cal Supreme is the obvious better choice. I think a lot of employers and practitioners still think of it as "federal>state." Also, I think Liu has a strong preference (if not an outright requirement) for prior federal clerkship experience. Some of his recent clerks came from the 9th Circuit and the DC Circuit.
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
To explicate, I'm at a T50-60, top 5%.Tanicius wrote:It's high. Fairly above average grades from B don't automatically make the cut.KD35 wrote:Anyone have any idea on the level of competition for getting such a position? Guessing it is very high since there are very few openings for the court.
But all great info on Liu, super informative.
- Tanicius
- Posts: 2984
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:54 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
If you have ties to California (as in, you grew up there, you got a job offer there, or you went to law school there) then I think you could certainly have a shot.KD35 wrote:To explicate, I'm at a T50-60, top 5%.Tanicius wrote:It's high. Fairly above average grades from B don't automatically make the cut.KD35 wrote:Anyone have any idea on the level of competition for getting such a position? Guessing it is very high since there are very few openings for the court.
But all great info on Liu, super informative.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
There's certainly no harm in applying, but based on what I know about the qualifications of Liu's recent hires, the poster does not have a realistic shot with those credentials.Tanicius wrote:If you have ties to California (as in, you grew up there, you got a job offer there, or you went to law school there) then I think you could certainly have a shot.KD35 wrote: To explicate, I'm at a T50-60, top 5%.
But all great info on Liu, super informative.
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
The "top 5%" poster, unless #1 in his/her class at Hastings/Davis with a prior clerkship (N.D. Cal, S.D.N.Y., or D.D.C., maybe, otherwise COA), has what effectively amounts to a 0% chance with Justice Liu, and will have a near-zero chance with Justice Cuellar, if/when he is confirmed (and word on the street is that he will be also taking term clerks).Tanicius wrote:If you have ties to California (as in, you grew up there, you got a job offer there, or you went to law school there) then I think you could certainly have a shot.KD35 wrote:To explicate, I'm at a T50-60, top 5%.Tanicius wrote:It's high. Fairly above average grades from B don't automatically make the cut.KD35 wrote:Anyone have any idea on the level of competition for getting such a position? Guessing it is very high since there are very few openings for the court.
But all great info on Liu, super informative.
Feeder level performance with at least one prior clerkship is a requirement to get into that chambers, but word on the street is that Justice Liu is a fabulous boss.
[source: I and several friends interviewed with Justice Liu in the past couple of years.]
-
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:26 pm
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Rumor is his current clerk is SCOTUS-bound. I think. So, keep that in mind.Anonymous User wrote:Goodwin Liu hires term clerks.
I suspect the new appointee will as well.
Also, correct, he is the only Justice who hires term clerks. The rest have staff attorneys and a central civil/criminal staff.
As to OP, it depends on what you want to do. The overwhelming bulk of the CASC's docket is criminal.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:41 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
I think CA, Del. and Del. Chancery, and NY Court of Appeals are unique.
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Yeah several Liu clerks have snagged SCOTUS clerkships at this point.
-
- Posts: 702
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 10:23 pm
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
I understand that you need to accept once given the position....
but if you don't have the option yet for either what is the point of asking? It seems to me like you haven't applied nor have you thought about this.
It is difficult to get CDCA without work experience 1, and 2, even top 5% from a top 50 will be a hard sell for either of those.
So apply and then see what happens. Accept who gives you the offer.
Thinking about it beforehand is silly.
but if you don't have the option yet for either what is the point of asking? It seems to me like you haven't applied nor have you thought about this.
It is difficult to get CDCA without work experience 1, and 2, even top 5% from a top 50 will be a hard sell for either of those.
So apply and then see what happens. Accept who gives you the offer.
Thinking about it beforehand is silly.
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Asking questions about it isn't silly. Trying to do my research behind it and get a sense of each.crossingforHYS wrote:I understand that you need to accept once given the position....
but if you don't have the option yet for either what is the point of asking? It seems to me like you haven't applied nor have you thought about this.
It is difficult to get CDCA without work experience 1, and 2, even top 5% from a top 50 will be a hard sell for either of those.
So apply and then see what happens. Accept who gives you the offer.
Thinking about it beforehand is silly.
Also current school places well in CDCA, 2 recent appointments to CDCA went to my LS and are very involved in alumni relations stuff.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
[Current Cal. District Court clerk here]KD35 wrote:Asking questions about it isn't silly. Trying to do my research behind it and get a sense of each.crossingforHYS wrote:I understand that you need to accept once given the position....
but if you don't have the option yet for either what is the point of asking? It seems to me like you haven't applied nor have you thought about this.
It is difficult to get CDCA without work experience 1, and 2, even top 5% from a top 50 will be a hard sell for either of those.
So apply and then see what happens. Accept who gives you the offer.
Thinking about it beforehand is silly.
Also current school places well in CDCA, 2 recent appointments to CDCA went to my LS and are very involved in alumni relations stuff.
If at Pepperdine, I'd say absolutely no chance at Justice Liu (unless #1 or 2, EIC of PLR, and prior COA). Though I agree that C.D. Cal. is not out of reach for a someone there in the top 5% and LR with a good application.
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
This is fascinating stuff--I wasn't aware that any CA justices took term clerks.
Not OP, but would like to build off this thread. What are timelines like for applying to CA S. Ct.? When would be the right time to apply coming off a '15/'16 9th Circuit clerkship?
Not SCOTUS feeder type stats, but MVP top 5% w/LR board. Am I competitive, or is a California law school/HY essentially required? California born and raised, FWIW.
Not OP, but would like to build off this thread. What are timelines like for applying to CA S. Ct.? When would be the right time to apply coming off a '15/'16 9th Circuit clerkship?
Not SCOTUS feeder type stats, but MVP top 5% w/LR board. Am I competitive, or is a California law school/HY essentially required? California born and raised, FWIW.
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
I mean, basically it's the Liu timeline and soon to be the Cuellar timeline. Liu has hired at least two years in advance from the people I know who have done it.
- KD35
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
So it definitely sounds like needing SCOTUS feeder-like stats to be able to get CA SC. But thank you for that feedback!Anonymous User wrote:
[Current Cal. District Court clerk here]
If at Pepperdine, I'd say absolutely no chance at Justice Liu (unless #1 or 2, EIC of PLR, and prior COA). Though I agree that C.D. Cal. is not out of reach for a someone there in the top 5% and LR with a good application.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 12:51 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
From what I understand, Liu is almost as hard to get as SCOTUS. I have a friend who clerked on the 9th Circuit, was top 5% from T10, and whose judge personally recommended them to Liu, and she didn't even get an interview with him. He is about as selective as it gets from everything I hear.
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
"Almost as hard as SCOTUS" seems a bit of an overstatement. I'd say it's more like applying to a feeder COA judge (which is exactly what he'd be if republicans hadn't blocked his nomination).
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
Not to nitpick here, but isn't applying to a feeder COA judge "almost as hard as SCOTUS"? I mean, feeders get their clerks onto SCOTUS so that necessarily means they (many, not all) have the stats for SCOTUS.Anonymous User wrote:"Almost as hard as SCOTUS" seems a bit of an overstatement. I'd say it's more like applying to a feeder COA judge (which is exactly what he'd be if republicans hadn't blocked his nomination).
I'll echo other sentiments regarding Justice Liu: Great reputation, but extremely difficult to get. He really only hires clerks who have CoA experience. And not just anyone, either. For example, one of his SCOTUS clerks for the upcoming term was a Rakoff/Katzmann clerk first. The other was a Reinhardt/Tatel clerk.
-
- Posts: 428543
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CA Supreme Court vs. CD CA
I think some of this is attributable to being a new judge--many COA judges similarly like to hire experienced clerks in their first term or two. At least one of his 2015-'16 clerks will be coming straight from law school.Anonymous User wrote:I'll echo other sentiments regarding Justice Liu: Great reputation, but extremely difficult to get. He really only hires clerks who have CoA experience. And not just anyone, either. For example, one of his SCOTUS clerks for the upcoming term was a Rakoff/Katzmann clerk first. The other was a Reinhardt/Tatel clerk.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login