Letter of Rec from former Supreme Court Clerk Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about clerkship applications and clerkship hiring. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Letter of Rec from former Supreme Court Clerk
So one of my profs clerked for a (now retired) SC justice. He also did an Art III clerkship. He agreed to write a letter of rec for me, but here's the thing - I am pretty sure he doesn't like me. I did well in his class, and sent him my resume so I am sure he will produce a pretty generic letter at best. He kinda just made a general announcement to the class and I took him up on the offer. I attend a T2 have "good" grades and I am on law review. I wonder if his letter will carry any strength, based on his clerkship record, or would it be better for me to get a "stronger" letter of rec from a prof with less clout but knows me better?
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Letter of Rec from former Supreme Court Clerk
First of all, I think students worry too much that profs who write letters for them don't "like" them. It's not about whether they like you, it's about whether you did good work. If the prof didn't think they could write a strong letter for you, they wouldn't agree to do so (or they shouldn't, anyway - can't say it never happens, but generally it doesn't).
Now, whether the letter is generic is totally different from whether the prof dislikes you. A generic letter isn't very helpful. If he's willing to call judges for you based on his connections from being a SCOTUS clerk, or if he can write you a letter that says, this student is easily equal to my colleagues at SCOTUS, that would be helpful. It doesn't sound like those are the case here, though. The general rule is a really good strong letter from someone who knows you really well is better than a generic letter from a big name. (Of course, unless you're swimming in LORs, you could always use both...)
Now, whether the letter is generic is totally different from whether the prof dislikes you. A generic letter isn't very helpful. If he's willing to call judges for you based on his connections from being a SCOTUS clerk, or if he can write you a letter that says, this student is easily equal to my colleagues at SCOTUS, that would be helpful. It doesn't sound like those are the case here, though. The general rule is a really good strong letter from someone who knows you really well is better than a generic letter from a big name. (Of course, unless you're swimming in LORs, you could always use both...)
-
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 2:30 pm
Re: Letter of Rec from former Supreme Court Clerk
I basically agree with everything already said.
That said, one of my more well-written recommendations is from a professor that I took a single class with and spoke to maybe twice outside of class (and once to ask if he would be willing to write me a rec). There's just no real way to know, although it's certainly safer to have someone that knows you really well write strong recs for you.
That said, one of my more well-written recommendations is from a professor that I took a single class with and spoke to maybe twice outside of class (and once to ask if he would be willing to write me a rec). There's just no real way to know, although it's certainly safer to have someone that knows you really well write strong recs for you.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 1:25 am
Re: Letter of Rec from former Supreme Court Clerk
I can't imagine that he's going to mention the clerkship in his letter.
-
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Letter of Rec from former Supreme Court Clerk
Even if the judges know that he clerked for SCOTUS -- is he going to say that in the letter? -- I'm pretty doubtful that'll have much of an impact on judges. Lots and lots of law professors (and thus clerkship recommenders) clerked for SCOTUS, and lots and lots of clerkship applicants are not meaningfully helped by that fact.
-
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:08 pm
Re: Letter of Rec from former Supreme Court Clerk
If I were a judge, I would probably have not memorized every previous SCOTUS clerk's name. A. Nony Mouse's advice is on point.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login