Re: Let's Talk 7th Circuit!
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:02 am
Hamilton done for 2022, per a polite form email (and it's definitely a form email because it called even me impressive)
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=206075
Wood moved on the first day and has already extended at least one offer.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 4:02 pmLooks like Durkin, Kennelly, Pacold, Pallmeyer, Seeger, and Wood are left for this cycle. Any tea on whether they've interviewed yet? Or whether any others are going to post late like a couple judges did last year?
That's Diane, of course. I realized belatedly you meant AndreaAnonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 4:36 pmWood moved on the first day and has already extended at least one offer.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 4:02 pmLooks like Durkin, Kennelly, Pacold, Pallmeyer, Seeger, and Wood are left for this cycle. Any tea on whether they've interviewed yet? Or whether any others are going to post late like a couple judges did last year?
Durkin will likely take his time. I don't think he's started interviewing yet. Same with Seeger.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 4:02 pmLooks like Durkin, Kennelly, Pacold, Pallmeyer, Seeger, and Wood are left for this cycle. Any tea on whether they've interviewed yet? Or whether any others are going to post late like a couple judges did last year?
Yes, I'm assuming that was a rejection email with a mail merge glitch. The position is already listed as "filled" on OSCAR, and I'd imagine that if it were an interview request, the subject line would say so.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 4:41 pmDid anyone just receive an email from Judge Pallmeyer without any content in it besides their name and email?
Ok thank you, so just to confirm, you also received it?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:47 pmYes, I'm assuming that was a rejection email with a mail merge glitch. The position is already listed as "filled" on OSCAR, and I'd imagine that if it were an interview request, the subject line would say so.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 4:41 pmDid anyone just receive an email from Judge Pallmeyer without any content in it besides their name and email?
Not the anon you replied to, but my friend and I also got this email.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:53 pmOk thank you, so just to confirm, you also received it?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:47 pmYes, I'm assuming that was a rejection email with a mail merge glitch. The position is already listed as "filled" on OSCAR, and I'd imagine that if it were an interview request, the subject line would say so.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 4:41 pmDid anyone just receive an email from Judge Pallmeyer without any content in it besides their name and email?
Durkin just reached out to applicants to complete his writing exercise.
Any updates on this, have interviews gone out?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 10:41 amDurkin just reached out to applicants to complete his writing exercise.
OP here. Not that I know of.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 10:54 pmAny updates on this, have interviews gone out?Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 10:41 amDurkin just reached out to applicants to complete his writing exercise.
Ideology isn't much of a thing for district judges, but Kness and Pacold are Fed Soc-y, and Tharp and Seeger are kind-of-sort-of-maybe.Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 7:07 pmDoes anyone know how the NDIL judges compare ideologically? With Illinois' whole deal where the president's party and senators' party each gets a few picks, it seems like appointing president is not always a good reflection of ideology. Which of the NDIL judges would you all say are more solidly liberal versus centrist (or just not ideological) versus conservative/Fed Soc-y?