Page 26 of 28
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:22 pm
by Anonymous User
Lol…might they possibly mean Sung? If so, again: lol…
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
by Anonymous User
Yeah I don't know anyone who thinks Nguyen is one of the most liberal judges on CA9. The Biden appointees generally seem more liberal than Nguyen or any of the Obama appointees (though Holly Thomas has been more conservative than I would've expected from her background), but it still seems too early to tell who among the Biden appointees will be the most liberal.
Nor have I ever heard anything about Bade being a "lightweight" (and by the way, what does that even mean?). On the other hand, I have heard that Koh is still pretty tough to work for.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:36 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
Yeah I don't know anyone who thinks Nguyen is one of the most liberal judges on CA9. The Biden appointees generally seem more liberal than Nguyen or any of the Obama appointees (though Holly Thomas has been more conservative than I would've expected from her background), but it still seems too early to tell who among the Biden appointees will be the most liberal.
Nor have I ever heard anything about Bade being a "lightweight" (and by the way, what does that even mean?). On the other hand, I have heard that Koh is still pretty tough to work for.
I think the poster means “intellectual lightweight.” It’s an odd choice. I’m starting to wonder if there’s someone posting this same epithet about other judges on here in other threads.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:29 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
Yeah I don't know anyone who thinks Nguyen is one of the most liberal judges on CA9. The Biden appointees generally seem more liberal than Nguyen or any of the Obama appointees (though Holly Thomas has been more conservative than I would've expected from her background), but it still seems too early to tell who among the Biden appointees will be the most liberal.
Nor have I ever heard anything about Bade being a "lightweight" (and by the way, what does that even mean?). On the other hand, I have heard that Koh is still pretty tough to work for.
Original Nguyen comment is wildly off. Is she less of a snob when it comes to grades and credentials than some of the other judges mentioned? Yes, and that's a good thing. More judges should be like that.
Also - most extreme on either political spectrum isn't a bad thing. From the old guard of the 9th circuit, Fletcher and Reinhardt were some of the most left wing judges in the country and also some of the biggest feeders.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 12:50 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 4:36 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
Yeah I don't know anyone who thinks Nguyen is one of the most liberal judges on CA9. The Biden appointees generally seem more liberal than Nguyen or any of the Obama appointees (though Holly Thomas has been more conservative than I would've expected from her background), but it still seems too early to tell who among the Biden appointees will be the most liberal.
Nor have I ever heard anything about Bade being a "lightweight" (and by the way, what does that even mean?). On the other hand, I have heard that Koh is still pretty tough to work for.
I think the poster means “intellectual lightweight.” It’s an odd choice. I’m starting to wonder if there’s someone posting this same epithet about other judges on here in other threads.
In fairness, it was in contrast to "heavy hitters" from a post above, but frankly I'm not sure what "heavy hitters" means either. Like in a certain sense, Bumatay is more of a "heavy hitter" than Bress because Bumatay has a better pulse on the Supreme Court/makes more headlines with his opinions, even though (I gather) most consider Bress to be the sharper judicial mind.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:39 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 5:29 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 1:11 pm
Yeah I don't know anyone who thinks Nguyen is one of the most liberal judges on CA9. The Biden appointees generally seem more liberal than Nguyen or any of the Obama appointees (though Holly Thomas has been more conservative than I would've expected from her background), but it still seems too early to tell who among the Biden appointees will be the most liberal.
Nor have I ever heard anything about Bade being a "lightweight" (and by the way, what does that even mean?). On the other hand, I have heard that Koh is still pretty tough to work for.
Original Nguyen comment is wildly off. Is she less of a snob when it comes to grades and credentials than some of the other judges mentioned? Yes, and that's a good thing. More judges should be like that.
Also - most extreme on either political spectrum isn't a bad thing. From the old guard of the 9th circuit, Fletcher and Reinhardt were some of the most left wing judges in the country and also some of the biggest feeders.
True, the original comment just seemed like a warning to prospective clerks that Nguyen was an aggressive left-winger, which just isn't the truth at all.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 5:00 pm
by Anonymous User
Any news on Judge Nelson? Would top 15-20% at T6 have a shot or na
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:22 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 5:00 pm
Any news on Judge Nelson? Would top 15-20% at T6 have a shot or na
Yes, for both Judge Nelsons.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:26 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:22 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 5:00 pm
Any news on Judge Nelson? Would top 15-20% at T6 have a shot or na
Yes, for both Judge Nelsons.
If it is Ryan Nelson based on his clerk hiring I assume he's very ideologically conscious?
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:27 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm
I'd argue Stras Gruender and Colloton have a lot of cache in the prestige-whore conservative legal circles and that's like 30% of the actives on CA8
Agree with the above, and the prior poster that CA1 has Barron. To bring this back somewhat back on track...who are the current "heavy hitters" on CA9 who aren't senior status? (However you might define that. Obviously there's feeders/semi-feeders, but I'm also thinking in terms of general "prestige" to a typical BigLaw hiring audience.)
Ikuta, Friedland, and Bress are probably the three heaviest hitters on CA9 who are not senior. Collins and Owens are also very well-respected, and Bumatay has a lot of credibility in conservative circles, but those are the ones who come to mind. Many of the senior judges (O'Scannlain, Fletcher, Graber, Thomas, McKeown, Bybee, Hurwitz, and potentially others) are also very well-regarded.
This is a good list. I’d add Koh as a ‘heavy hitter’ contender and Miller to the ‘very well-respected’ list.
Also, ranking non-feeder judges is a little silly, but most of the other active judges are well-respected in the circuit and nationwide. The only active judges I’d think twice about clerking for are VanDyke (because of his far-right ideology), Bade (lightweight), and Nguyen (not as far-left as VanDyke is far-right, but would still give me pause).
I agree that most of the judges in the Ninth Circuit are generally well-respected. I think it's also worth thinking about who would be a good boss. Many of the judges in the Ninth Circuit--including both "heavy hitters" and lesser-known judges--are reported to be very tough bosses with difficult personalities. A few are supposed to be really wonderful bosses (I've heard this about Sidney Thomas, Tallman, Bybee, and Lee, but I'm sure there are others).
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 9:57 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm
I'd argue Stras Gruender and Colloton have a lot of cache in the prestige-whore conservative legal circles and that's like 30% of the actives on CA8
Agree with the above, and the prior poster that CA1 has Barron. To bring this back somewhat back on track...who are the current "heavy hitters" on CA9 who aren't senior status? (However you might define that. Obviously there's feeders/semi-feeders, but I'm also thinking in terms of general "prestige" to a typical BigLaw hiring audience.)
Ikuta, Friedland, and Bress are probably the three heaviest hitters on CA9 who are not senior. Collins and Owens are also very well-respected, and Bumatay has a lot of credibility in conservative circles, but those are the ones who come to mind. Many of the senior judges (O'Scannlain, Fletcher, Graber, Thomas, McKeown, Bybee, Hurwitz, and potentially others) are also very well-regarded.
This is a good list. I’d add Koh as a ‘heavy hitter’ contender and Miller to the ‘very well-respected’ list.
Also, ranking non-feeder judges is a little silly, but most of the other active judges are well-respected in the circuit and nationwide. The only active judges I’d think twice about clerking for are VanDyke (because of his far-right ideology), Bade (lightweight), and Nguyen (not as far-left as VanDyke is far-right, but would still give me pause).
I agree that most of the judges in the Ninth Circuit are generally well-respected. I think it's also worth thinking about who would be a good boss. Many of the judges in the Ninth Circuit--including both "heavy hitters" and lesser-known judges--are reported to be very tough bosses with difficult personalities. A few are supposed to be really wonderful bosses (I've heard this about Sidney Thomas, Tallman, Bybee, and Lee, but I'm sure there are others).
I cannot say enough good things about Judge Friedland. As brilliant as she is kind. Just terrific in all respects.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:32 pm
by Anonymous User
Any info on Judge Zilly?
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:00 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm
I'd argue Stras Gruender and Colloton have a lot of cache in the prestige-whore conservative legal circles and that's like 30% of the actives on CA8
Agree with the above, and the prior poster that CA1 has Barron. To bring this back somewhat back on track...who are the current "heavy hitters" on CA9 who aren't senior status? (However you might define that. Obviously there's feeders/semi-feeders, but I'm also thinking in terms of general "prestige" to a typical BigLaw hiring audience.)
Ikuta, Friedland, and Bress are probably the three heaviest hitters on CA9 who are not senior. Collins and Owens are also very well-respected, and Bumatay has a lot of credibility in conservative circles, but those are the ones who come to mind. Many of the senior judges (O'Scannlain, Fletcher, Graber, Thomas, McKeown, Bybee, Hurwitz, and potentially others) are also very well-regarded.
This is a good list. I’d add Koh as a ‘heavy hitter’ contender and Miller to the ‘very well-respected’ list.
Also, ranking non-feeder judges is a little silly, but most of the other active judges are well-respected in the circuit and nationwide. The only active judges I’d think twice about clerking for are VanDyke (because of his far-right ideology), Bade (lightweight), and Nguyen (not as far-left as VanDyke is far-right, but would still give me pause).
I agree that most of the judges in the Ninth Circuit are generally well-respected. I think it's also worth thinking about who would be a good boss. Many of the judges in the Ninth Circuit--including both "heavy hitters" and lesser-known judges--are reported to be very tough bosses with difficult personalities. A few are supposed to be really wonderful bosses (I've heard this about Sidney Thomas, Tallman, Bybee, and Lee, but I'm sure there are others).
I would actually invert that, the circuit has more good bosses than bad, although I 100 percent endorse your list of good bosses as those who are *exceptionally* good.
The "difficult personalities" watch list starts with Berzon, Bea, and Wardlaw. Ikuta is awkward and has long hours but I wouldn't consider her a difficult personality in the way those three are. Not sure on the Biden nominees.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:32 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:00 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:27 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2024 12:26 am
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 6:26 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:54 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:30 pm
I'd argue Stras Gruender and Colloton have a lot of cache in the prestige-whore conservative legal circles and that's like 30% of the actives on CA8
Agree with the above, and the prior poster that CA1 has Barron. To bring this back somewhat back on track...who are the current "heavy hitters" on CA9 who aren't senior status? (However you might define that. Obviously there's feeders/semi-feeders, but I'm also thinking in terms of general "prestige" to a typical BigLaw hiring audience.)
Ikuta, Friedland, and Bress are probably the three heaviest hitters on CA9 who are not senior. Collins and Owens are also very well-respected, and Bumatay has a lot of credibility in conservative circles, but those are the ones who come to mind. Many of the senior judges (O'Scannlain, Fletcher, Graber, Thomas, McKeown, Bybee, Hurwitz, and potentially others) are also very well-regarded.
This is a good list. I’d add Koh as a ‘heavy hitter’ contender and Miller to the ‘very well-respected’ list.
Also, ranking non-feeder judges is a little silly, but most of the other active judges are well-respected in the circuit and nationwide. The only active judges I’d think twice about clerking for are VanDyke (because of his far-right ideology), Bade (lightweight), and Nguyen (not as far-left as VanDyke is far-right, but would still give me pause).
I agree that most of the judges in the Ninth Circuit are generally well-respected. I think it's also worth thinking about who would be a good boss. Many of the judges in the Ninth Circuit--including both "heavy hitters" and lesser-known judges--are reported to be very tough bosses with difficult personalities. A few are supposed to be really wonderful bosses (I've heard this about Sidney Thomas, Tallman, Bybee, and Lee, but I'm sure there are others).
I would actually invert that, the circuit has more good bosses than bad, although I 100 percent endorse your list of good bosses as those who are *exceptionally* good.
The "difficult personalities" watch list starts with Berzon, Bea, and Wardlaw. Ikuta is awkward and has long hours but I wouldn't consider her a difficult personality in the way those three are. Not sure on the Biden nominees.
Koh I have heard not great things about as a boss. It’s too bad because I really like her personally based on my interactions with her over the years.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:17 pm
by Anonymous User
What's the deal with Thompson's 7-month and 9-month clerkships? Saw that they expired already, but those are weird (and soon)!
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:38 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:17 pm
What's the deal with Thompson's 7-month and 9-month clerkships? Saw that they expired already, but those are weird (and soon)!
All three of her clerks quit.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:40 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:38 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:17 pm
What's the deal with Thompson's 7-month and 9-month clerkships? Saw that they expired already, but those are weird (and soon)!
All three of her clerks quit.
Oh. That's... concerning. Why?
Edit: Wait, she only ever hired for 1-year clerkships it looks like. Does that mean that the 9-monther (who would have started in August) quit in advance?
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2024 12:13 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:38 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Mar 18, 2024 6:17 pm
What's the deal with Thompson's 7-month and 9-month clerkships? Saw that they expired already, but those are weird (and soon)!
All three of her clerks quit.
Wtf, how bad must that clerkship be? How are chambers even operating?
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:43 am
by Anonymous User
Anyone know anything about how Sanchez is as a boss?
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2024 7:53 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:43 am
Anyone know anything about how Sanchez is as a boss?
I have heard negative things, but no details about why he is a bad boss—but apparently not pleasant. He also recently fired a clerk.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2024 8:34 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 7:53 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:43 am
Anyone know anything about how Sanchez is as a boss?
I have heard negative things, but no details about why he is a bad boss—but apparently not pleasant. He also recently fired a clerk.
Yikes, thanks. Any thoughts on Mendoza or Sung?
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2024 8:47 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 7:53 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:43 am
Anyone know anything about how Sanchez is as a boss?
I have heard negative things, but no details about why he is a bad boss—but apparently not pleasant. He also recently fired a clerk.
Any details on the firing?
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2024 6:31 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 8:47 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 7:53 pm
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:43 am
Anyone know anything about how Sanchez is as a boss?
I have heard negative things, but no details about why he is a bad boss—but apparently not pleasant. He also recently fired a clerk.
Any details on the firing?
I don’t have any. People are expectedly tigh-lipped.
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 8:39 pm
by Anonymous User
What is with WD Wash. judges and requiring an AO78 form and extremely expansive cover letter compared to basically every other judge in the country? I get that you want to filter candidates but I hardly think either gives you more information (which is why no one else does this)
Re: Let's Talk 9th Circuit!
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 9:12 pm
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2024 8:39 pm
What is with WD Wash. judges and requiring an AO78 form and extremely expansive cover letter compared to basically every other judge in the country? I get that you want to filter candidates but I hardly think either gives you more information (which is why no one else does this)
You'll have to fill out an AO78 if you get the job anyway, might as well get it done now.