Case footnotes---binding? Forum
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 8:12 pm
Case footnotes---binding?
Do footnotes of a legal opinion have the same binding effect as the majority opinion?
- mjb447
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:51 am
Re: Case footnotes---binding?
This is great.mjb447 wrote:Indeed. http://www.greenbag.org/v2n3/v2n3_articles_james.pdf
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: Case footnotes---binding?
Glorious.mjb447 wrote:Indeed. http://www.greenbag.org/v2n3/v2n3_articles_james.pdf
OP: Generally, no. Footnotes are almost always going to be dicta, not the binding holding.
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:51 am
Re: Case footnotes---binding?
Counterpoint: some footnotes are "famous" in how important they turned out to be in subsequent decisions.cavalier1138 wrote:Glorious.mjb447 wrote:Indeed. http://www.greenbag.org/v2n3/v2n3_articles_james.pdf
OP: Generally, no. Footnotes are almost always going to be dicta, not the binding holding.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- encore1101
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:13 am
Re: Case footnotes---binding?
Winter is Coming wrote:Counterpoint: some footnotes are "famous" in how important they turned out to be in subsequent decisions.cavalier1138 wrote:Glorious.mjb447 wrote:Indeed. http://www.greenbag.org/v2n3/v2n3_articles_james.pdf
OP: Generally, no. Footnotes are almost always going to be dicta, not the binding holding.
Carolene Products, footnote 4 springs to mind.
- cavalier1138
- Posts: 8007
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:01 pm
Re: Case footnotes---binding?
True. I just wouldn't classify them as "binding" in and of themselves. It's the same as all dicta. Its treatment depends on context.Winter is Coming wrote:Counterpoint: some footnotes are "famous" in how important they turned out to be in subsequent decisions.cavalier1138 wrote:Glorious.mjb447 wrote:Indeed. http://www.greenbag.org/v2n3/v2n3_articles_james.pdf
OP: Generally, no. Footnotes are almost always going to be dicta, not the binding holding.
- mjb447
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:36 am
Re: Case footnotes---binding?
Right, they're not "nonbinding" simply because they're footnotes, but you can still argue that a footnote doesn't announce the "binding" principle of a case, i.e. the holding. Because of the way opinions are drafted, a footnote probably won't ever announce the holding, although you might argue about whether something expressed in a footnote is necessary to the ultimate holding.cavalier1138 wrote:True. I just wouldn't classify them as "binding" in and of themselves. It's the same as all dicta. Its treatment depends on context.Winter is Coming wrote:Counterpoint: some footnotes are "famous" in how important they turned out to be in subsequent decisions.cavalier1138 wrote:Glorious.mjb447 wrote:Indeed. http://www.greenbag.org/v2n3/v2n3_articles_james.pdf
OP: Generally, no. Footnotes are almost always going to be dicta, not the binding holding.
(There are also probably other appropriate reasons to cite footnotes as authority. For example, footnotes are often used to address a noncontroversial principle that doesn't need to be addressed in text, e.g., a footnote following a citation to a certain document saying "This Court may take judicial notice of [whatever document]. [Cite to general rules of judicial notice and maybe a case from 30 years ago]." In that situation, citing the recent footnote in a subsequent case where you're asking to take judicial notice of that kind of document would be fine by me.)
-
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:51 am
Re: Case footnotes---binding?
I think the really helpful ones sometimes are tangents bringing up a hypo and saying "well that's not the case here." If your facts are in line with that hypo, you have a perfect argument you can adapt (even though that footnote is technically the "holding" of the case).