ITT I make up law review article/note/whatever ideas Forum

[Businesslady]

Visual Bean References on TLS

[youtube]9LhLjpsstPY[/youtube]

http://www.skepticfiles.org/atheist2/hero.htm

[Businesslady]

"I'm Not Seeing the Connection"

[youtube]gY2s4hJ8kuA[/youtube]

This is an article about making the connection when you're not seeing the connection.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traversal_ ... around_NAT

[Businesslady]

Earnings

[youtube]oRGSoAXt2SU[/youtube]

This is an article about how people still don't really know what money is in 2015. Distributive justice notwithstanding, if you think fiat currency is private property, then it's almost certainly safe to say you didn't build that.

http://www.newyorkfed.org/research/econ ... dri_A8.pdf
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2013/12/18/1 ... nt-part-1/
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1213 ... d-taxpayer
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/ ... aching.pdf

[Businesslady]

Legal Reasoning



This is an article about law school website advice, factor tests, applying law to facts, getting points, and cognitive capitalism. Looks great.

https://www.law.upenn.edu/institutes/ce ... man%29.pdf
http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/03/11/ ... on-jailers

[Businesslady]

The Marketplace of Ideas (Law and Information Economics)

[youtube]PXX5-p6sUwI[/youtube]

This is an article about going on PBS to express skepticism about public funding for the poor and then going on Bloomberg to advocate cross-subsidized media.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sens ... l-poverty/
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2 ... able-logic
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 8108001352

[suralin]

I have never liked anything as much as I like this thread.

I'm not as creative but articles on the following would be kinda cool:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiosyncrasy_credit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MyLifeBits and Black Mirror s1e3
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IKEA_effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s ... ty_theorem
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_design and http://lesswrong.com/lw/k5r/mechanism_d ... ithms_for/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy (is there potential here for economy economy)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry%E2% ... espondence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probably_ ... t_learning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zooko%27s_triangle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluma_Zei ... nik_effect

Also, effective altruism and/or (meta-)meta-charities; insight porn, Gladwell, and TED Talks; memetics as a meme; Newcomb's paradox and CDT; cryonics and moral/legal obligations; Pascal's Mugging; Parfit on personal identity and mission drift; featuritis, simplicity, and self-identity; IOT, functionalism, and the Chinese room; Integrated Information Theory; efficiency, self-improvement, and productivity porn, the Axiom of Choice and the Banach-Tarski paradox; Roko's basilisk, acausal trading, and taking ideas very seriously; computational complexity (http://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/philos.pdf); privacy and ancestor simulations; A/B testing and HCI; the Bayesian prior that this post is mostly Hansonian signaling.

[Businesslady]

Excellent post

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_design and http://lesswrong.com/lw/k5r/mechanism_d ... ithms_for/

I love that LW page. I'll do one about the unified Reny proof of Arrow's / Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem and Whigs.

-----

Accusing Bestselling Author and Mainstream Publication Staple Cass Sunstein of Excessive Abstraction in the Pages of the Harvard Law Review

Nor is this intellectual heritage undermined by the broadside claim that laissez faire is an ad hoc invention that I bring to my interpretation of the Constitution. Not so. This French phase was well established by the 1750s, and was certainly in evidence in such works as Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations and William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law of England, which do not even make a cameo appearance in Sherry’s review of the intellectual history leading up to the Founding Period. There is of course no doubt that this general conceptual commitment did not resolve the particular issues that arose with the massive industrialization of the United States, particularly in the post–Civil War period.

This article is about how I am going to have to write about how property is the same thing as privacy but property is not the same thing as wealth about 50,000 times. People can't seriously appeal to oikos and the night watchman state and then retreat to a Galt's Gulch built of lex, dreamy posters of James Madison, and the ubiquitous institutional presence of state currency-legitimizing institutions. I don't know if I agree with Epstein because I didn't actually read his piece and I heard he's good on public trust. This one argues the reader can pretty much either 1) read Hannah Arendt, or 2) consider that when nation-states fight civil wars, there are generally substantive ideological matters at issue. Sometimes there are even changes in the structure of the public sphere, such that ideas of equity and dignity might take priority over ideas like, say, parsing out archaic phrases and treating the Leviathan interface like a New York Times airport publication word game. I could be wrong. It's not, like, a mathematical proof or anything.

http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/an- ... stitution/
http://frontdeskapparatus.com/files/arendt.pdf

[Businesslady]

Well Actually, While Some of You Fuckboys Were Busy Writing Beta Treatises, Henri de Saint-Simon Was Fighting the American Revolution



This is an article about how if Richard Epstein can argue that laissez-faire being a phrase in 1776 is relevant, then I can write on the utopian socialist Constitution.

Aschup has right of first refusal on this one

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Hen ... aint-Simon
http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/an- ... stitution/

[Businesslady]

Frank Michelman: The GZA of Law



Habermas getting heated. Michelman chilling. This is an article speculating as to whether Frank Michelman ever gets tired of being so badass all the time



http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cg ... ontext=tlr

[Businesslady]

the Bayesian prior that this post is mostly Hansonian signaling.

I have a theory that Cass Sunstein just has a list of topics he wants to read about and as an incentive if you write a research paper he'll put his name on it

[suralin]

Pick-up Artists as the New Computer-Human Interaction Experts: Girl You Can't Afford My Affordances Also I Like Your Hair Is It Real

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human%E2% ... nteraction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickup_artist
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordance

[suralin]

As the Number of Words Written on Information Overload Approaches Infinity It's QED All the Way Down

http://firstmonday.org/article/view/519/440
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_overload
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/20/educa ... rvive.html
http://aeon.co/magazine/health/can-we-b ... ssing-out/
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10. ... 1508095781
http://nymag.com/selectall/2016/09/andr ... ed-me.html

[wiz]

Businesslady, do you take requests by any chance? I need to come up with a paper/whatever topic for capital markets/derivatives/financial instruments.

[Businesslady]

Yes. How specific does it need to be and can you do like R and stuff?

[wiz]

Topic choices are basically open ended, so not specific at all. And yes, I can on a pretty basic level, but just need to be able to write ~35 pages on wtv I end up going with.

[lacrossebrother]

Lol at a law student doing econometrics in a comment

[wiz]

Actually yeah, you're right, probs not the best idea for me.

[Businesslady]

On Feudalism

This is an article called "On Feudalism." It is just this image:



http://mitpress.mit.edu/blog/governing-debt

[Businesslady]

Businesslady, do you take requests by any chance? I need to come up with a paper/whatever topic for capital markets/derivatives/financial instruments.

Sorry this took so long. I made this thread to take requests and I was trying to think of a good one.

Maybe why it's a good idea that that fish is regulated under Sarbanes-Oxley because it's an information object and quasi in rem vs. Heidegger res publica
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p8416003

e: Like, it contained information about its size which was destroyed. So maybe end on an administrative equitable flexibility / absurd consequences note
http://www.bookrags.com/criticism/haber ... #gsc.tab=0

e2: And whether the state's ability to bring charges is a contract or something something Posner on Nozick I'm not sure
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... id=2015498

[Businesslady]

Look on My Work, Ye Mighty, and Despair (Another "View" of the Cathedral)

[youtube]FozdJSG4uIg[/youtube]

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.

This is an article about debt. It argues fuck pyramids. Let people go

[J3987]

This thread is amazing.

[FloridaCoastalorbust]

Businesslady, how about something on Nussbaum/Sen's capabilities theory and Mill's harm principle?

[J3987]

The rise of Chinese Hegemony in IP adjudication:
Asian Tigers and Western elephant calves



Exploding Collateral and the Collapse of Custodian Banking -- Gaming the Systems:
A Blueprint for Anarchy



The Golf Course as Sovereign Territory:
The Social Utility Case for Insider Trading

[Businesslady]

http://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/10288/Fried
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/haber ... bTheTruKno
http://www.egs.edu/faculty/donna-harawa ... manifesto/
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... id=1579394
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_reconstruction

[youtube]b7tazcxWUwk[/youtube]

[Businesslady]

Businesslady, how about something on Nussbaum/Sen's capabilities theory and Mill's harm principle?

How Nussbaum's "Hiding from Humanity..." is not as good as Donna Haraway's When Species Meet and Peter Singer's Animal Rights is the highest-order reductionist model of this ethical deduction we have going right now.

Not that I know anything