Need Help from a 2L that aced Property. Forum

GeePee · Post by **GeePee** » Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:19 pm

You should probably post the question

Heartford · Post by **Heartford** » Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:31 pm

Yeah. Post the question.

(Not that I aced Property or any class at all

)

bhangra23 · Post by **bhangra23** » Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:57 pm

Kabuo · Post by **Kabuo** » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:11 pm

bhangra23 wrote:I would rather PM b/w someone that did really well, plz PM if u r willing to look at a hypo and you did well in property. Sorry but if u didn't do well, well you know....

Yeah, if you didn't ace the course overall, it's unlikely that you'll be able to answer this super complex hypo he got within the first couple weeks of class.

Heartford · Post by **Heartford** » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:25 pm

Kabuo wrote:
bhangra23 wrote:I would rather PM b/w someone that did really well, plz PM if u r willing to look at a hypo and you did well in property. Sorry but if u didn't do well, well you know....
Yeah, if you didn't ace the course overall, it's unlikely that you'll be able to answer this super complex hypo he got within the first couple weeks of class.

+1. Plus, this hypo is probably so ingenious he needs to keep it close to his chest, lest be preempted by Harv. L. Rev.

Kilpatrick · Post by **Kilpatrick** » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:28 pm

I really want to know what this question is that only someone who aced property can even read it. I only got an A- so clearly I am not worthy of even attempting to help

NYC Law · Post by **NYC Law** » Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:33 pm

You only have 39 posts so surely your anonymity can't be a major issue. You can't just post the question so others can learn?

johndhi · Post by **johndhi** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:43 pm

The answer is something like: property was developed over a long period of time so what you learn in the course seems like, indeed is, a mash-up of a bunch of incongruous doctrines.

Answer may also be, "the implied warranty of habitability," or, more like, "it depends. one could interpret party A's actions to be x, but from the viewpoint of party B, they also appear to be y. Blah blah blah, a judge probably would think they're x."

As you can tell, I aced that shit.

Kabuo · Post by **Kabuo** » Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:50 pm

johndhi wrote:The answer is something like: property was developed over a long period of time so what you learn in the course seems like, indeed is, a mash-up of a bunch of incongruous doctrines.

Answer may also be, "the implied warranty of habitability," or, more like, "it depends. one could interpret party A's actions to be x, but from the viewpoint of party B, they also appear to be y. Blah blah blah, a judge probably would think they're x."

As you can tell, I aced that shit.

This makes me feel a lot better about property; it's exactly how I've felt since classes started. Every other class makes sense, but I have no idea the direction the property prof is trying to take us.

Need Help from a 2L that aced Property. Forum

Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Re: Need Help from a 2L that aced Property.

Register for access!