Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only available to the creator of each thread. The anonymous posting feature is intended to permit the solicitation of anonymous advice regarding the transfer application process, chances of being accepted, etc. Unacceptable uses include: testing the feature, questions which are clearly fake or hypothetical in nature, harassing other users, etc. Posters should also read and understand the announcements posted at the top of the Transfers forum prior to using the anonymous feature.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428105
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
- Top ~10% 1st semester GPA. 3+ years professional work experience. 171 LSAT. No leadership role at any law student organization.
- No-strings scholarship of $150k over three years. This puts me on track to graduate debt-free.
- Interested in biglaw, but preferably in LA or at least California. No ties, I just like the weather.
- No aspirations for clerkship, academia, or other "unicorn" jobs.
- Reasonably happy at current school; I'm not dying to get out.
1. What schools do I have a realistic chance at?
2. Should I even apply? I am thinking about it because:
(a) Maybe USC will offer me $ to stay (But how likely is that, given that I'm already getting $50k a year?)
(b) A vague concern that years down the road, some client or employer will look at "USC" and think to themselves, "Why hire this person when I can hire a HYS grad?"
(c) What if later on, I want to be in a different location? I imagine transferring up may give me a broader reach if I ever decide I want to leave California.
- No-strings scholarship of $150k over three years. This puts me on track to graduate debt-free.
- Interested in biglaw, but preferably in LA or at least California. No ties, I just like the weather.
- No aspirations for clerkship, academia, or other "unicorn" jobs.
- Reasonably happy at current school; I'm not dying to get out.
1. What schools do I have a realistic chance at?
2. Should I even apply? I am thinking about it because:
(a) Maybe USC will offer me $ to stay (But how likely is that, given that I'm already getting $50k a year?)
(b) A vague concern that years down the road, some client or employer will look at "USC" and think to themselves, "Why hire this person when I can hire a HYS grad?"
(c) What if later on, I want to be in a different location? I imagine transferring up may give me a broader reach if I ever decide I want to leave California.
-
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:15 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Top 10% at USC would get you pretty much any non-HYS T14.
Yes, a T14 degree will have more portability than USC since USC is a regional school. However, the common anecdote on TLS is that after a few years of work, since you are at a Top25 anyway, you could lateral to east coast despite not attending an east coast school. I think regional schools affect most substantially your first job more than later ones. That said, you are in a great position; good chances at Biglaw and debt free. Transferring would mean paying sticker, so graduating with around 100k debt. Your call.
Yes, a T14 degree will have more portability than USC since USC is a regional school. However, the common anecdote on TLS is that after a few years of work, since you are at a Top25 anyway, you could lateral to east coast despite not attending an east coast school. I think regional schools affect most substantially your first job more than later ones. That said, you are in a great position; good chances at Biglaw and debt free. Transferring would mean paying sticker, so graduating with around 100k debt. Your call.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
I'd stay. If you want LA or Cali big law, you need to establish some ties (going to school there is a start) - and jumping ship to nyu, Chicago, Columbia will, imo, be a tougher sell. Prob need slightly better grades for Harvard.Anonymous User wrote:- Top ~10% 1st semester GPA. 3+ years professional work experience. 171 LSAT. No leadership role at any law student organization.
- No-strings scholarship of $150k over three years. This puts me on track to graduate debt-free.
- Interested in biglaw, but preferably in LA or at least California. No ties, I just like the weather.
- No aspirations for clerkship, academia, or other "unicorn" jobs.
- Reasonably happy at current school; I'm not dying to get out.
1. What schools do I have a realistic chance at?
2. Should I even apply? I am thinking about it because:
(a) Maybe USC will offer me $ to stay (But how likely is that, given that I'm already getting $50k a year?)
(b) A vague concern that years down the road, some client or employer will look at "USC" and think to themselves, "Why hire this person when I can hire a HYS grad?"
(c) What if later on, I want to be in a different location? I imagine transferring up may give me a broader reach if I ever decide I want to leave California.
-
- Posts: 428105
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
OP here. Would a CCN acceptance work as a tactic to get more $ from USC?RaceJudicata wrote:I'd stay. If you want LA or Cali big law, you need to establish some ties (going to school there is a start) - and jumping ship to nyu, Chicago, Columbia will, imo, be a tougher sell. Prob need slightly better grades for Harvard.Anonymous User wrote:- Top ~10% 1st semester GPA. 3+ years professional work experience. 171 LSAT. No leadership role at any law student organization.
- No-strings scholarship of $150k over three years. This puts me on track to graduate debt-free.
- Interested in biglaw, but preferably in LA or at least California. No ties, I just like the weather.
- No aspirations for clerkship, academia, or other "unicorn" jobs.
- Reasonably happy at current school; I'm not dying to get out.
1. What schools do I have a realistic chance at?
2. Should I even apply? I am thinking about it because:
(a) Maybe USC will offer me $ to stay (But how likely is that, given that I'm already getting $50k a year?)
(b) A vague concern that years down the road, some client or employer will look at "USC" and think to themselves, "Why hire this person when I can hire a HYS grad?"
(c) What if later on, I want to be in a different location? I imagine transferring up may give me a broader reach if I ever decide I want to leave California.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Could be. Probably worth the cost of the application. Although, some schools won't negotiate for rising 2Ls. Absolutely no clue if USC is one of those schools.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Would a CCN acceptance work as a tactic to get more $ from USC?RaceJudicata wrote:I'd stay. If you want LA or Cali big law, you need to establish some ties (going to school there is a start) - and jumping ship to nyu, Chicago, Columbia will, imo, be a tougher sell. Prob need slightly better grades for Harvard.Anonymous User wrote:- Top ~10% 1st semester GPA. 3+ years professional work experience. 171 LSAT. No leadership role at any law student organization.
- No-strings scholarship of $150k over three years. This puts me on track to graduate debt-free.
- Interested in biglaw, but preferably in LA or at least California. No ties, I just like the weather.
- No aspirations for clerkship, academia, or other "unicorn" jobs.
- Reasonably happy at current school; I'm not dying to get out.
1. What schools do I have a realistic chance at?
2. Should I even apply? I am thinking about it because:
(a) Maybe USC will offer me $ to stay (But how likely is that, given that I'm already getting $50k a year?)
(b) A vague concern that years down the road, some client or employer will look at "USC" and think to themselves, "Why hire this person when I can hire a HYS grad?"
(c) What if later on, I want to be in a different location? I imagine transferring up may give me a broader reach if I ever decide I want to leave California.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:26 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Well within the top 10% a couple years ago and didn't transfer- glad I didn't considering I just wanted LA biglaw
No idea about negotiating with the other acceptances
No idea about negotiating with the other acceptances
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
No reason to transfer since you want LA/Cali biglaw and have great grades from a well-respected California law school. On top of that, you will graduate with a lot less debt at USC than elsewhere. I think this is one of the best examples of when transferring just doesn't make much sense.
-
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Idk whether you should transfer or not, but I would apply to CC and see if you can use that to get more $$$ from USC. Might as well try right?
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:16 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
I'd apply to H and S and hell maybe even Y (for schools that you'd consider going to if you got in).
Then I'd apply to like Columbia, Berk, and NYU (which you probably will get into given you get the same grades) to leverage SC for $$$.
Staying at SC seems appealing to me if I were you.
Then I'd apply to like Columbia, Berk, and NYU (which you probably will get into given you get the same grades) to leverage SC for $$$.
Staying at SC seems appealing to me if I were you.
-
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:00 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
- Clemenceau
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Seems like you're in a pretty much ideal situation. Great position to get biglaw in the market you want, and no debt at graduation. I'd stay put, no question.
- Joscellin
- Posts: 1515
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:40 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
While upbeat is great, this is really quite off as far as chances go.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
H is not as selective as S or Y, true, but I know people in the top 2-3% at T-20s that didn't get in at H, much less top 10%. He's in the ballpark, but to suggest a lock is simply wrong.
Similarly, I wouldn't bother apping to Y if you aren't at least #2 in the class. They very rarely take *anyone* that's not already at a T14, and when they do, it's usually a unicorn that is also #1 in the class.
-
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:00 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Think what you want. I could cite my shitty anecdotal data to shittily refute your shitty anecdotal data, but what's the point?Joscellin wrote:While upbeat is great, this is really quite off as far as chances go.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
H is not as selective as S or Y, true, but I know people in the top 2-3% at T-20s that didn't get in at H, much less top 10%. He's in the ballpark, but to suggest a lock is simply wrong.
Similarly, I wouldn't bother apping to Y if you aren't at least #2 in the class. They very rarely take *anyone* that's not already at a T14, and when they do, it's usually a unicorn that is also #1 in the class.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Way to double down on a pretty piss-poor opinion. OP should apply broadly, but outside of being one of the top 2 students at USC, OP's not getting admitted to Yale.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:Think what you want. I could cite my shitty anecdotal data to shittily refute your shitty anecdotal data, but what's the point?Joscellin wrote:While upbeat is great, this is really quite off as far as chances go.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
H is not as selective as S or Y, true, but I know people in the top 2-3% at T-20s that didn't get in at H, much less top 10%. He's in the ballpark, but to suggest a lock is simply wrong.
Similarly, I wouldn't bother apping to Y if you aren't at least #2 in the class. They very rarely take *anyone* that's not already at a T14, and when they do, it's usually a unicorn that is also #1 in the class.
Also, Harvard rejects applicants in the top 10% from schools in the lower T-14 all the time. The odds are not bad coming from a T-14, but they're far from being a "lock."
You shouldn't really use your transfer into Columbia/NYU as indicative of anything...they routinely take median t-14 students as transfers. It's not surprising they'd take a top 20% T20 student willing to pay sticker
Last edited by runinthefront on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
OP, you should apply to schools with the goal of getting USC to give you more money to stay. Even if they don't give you money, however, you should still stay.
Last edited by runinthefront on Fri Jan 26, 2018 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Joscellin
- Posts: 1515
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:40 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
I mean, sure, talk out your ass more if you want.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:Think what you want. I could cite my shitty anecdotal data to shittily refute your shitty anecdotal data, but what's the point?Joscellin wrote:While upbeat is great, this is really quite off as far as chances go.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
H is not as selective as S or Y, true, but I know people in the top 2-3% at T-20s that didn't get in at H, much less top 10%. He's in the ballpark, but to suggest a lock is simply wrong.
Similarly, I wouldn't bother apping to Y if you aren't at least #2 in the class. They very rarely take *anyone* that's not already at a T14, and when they do, it's usually a unicorn that is also #1 in the class.
My information comes from being a current H transfer from last cycle, from a school in the same band as OP (T20).
He's in the ballpark he needs to be in to make it worth applying, but suggesting that top 10% at USC is a lock at H is simply wrong, and badly so.
As to Yale, lol. Look at their 509's, they simply don't take people from below the T14 unless they're unicorns. Notice that last year, the *only* transfer they took outside T14 was one from Pepperdine, of all places (although they trolled a number of us pretty hard by sending us "Now that you've been accepted, here's your financial aid package" letters - without us actually getting in).
-
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:00 am
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Boom! The ultimate Columbia/NYU burn? (Btw, I'm at Chicago.)runinthefront wrote:Way to double down on a pretty piss-poor opinion. OP should apply broadly, but outside of being one of the top 2 students at USC, OP's not getting admitted to Yale.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:Think what you want. I could cite my shitty anecdotal data to shittily refute your shitty anecdotal data, but what's the point?Joscellin wrote:While upbeat is great, this is really quite off as far as chances go.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
H is not as selective as S or Y, true, but I know people in the top 2-3% at T-20s that didn't get in at H, much less top 10%. He's in the ballpark, but to suggest a lock is simply wrong.
Similarly, I wouldn't bother apping to Y if you aren't at least #2 in the class. They very rarely take *anyone* that's not already at a T14, and when they do, it's usually a unicorn that is also #1 in the class.
Also, Harvard rejects applicants in the top 10% from schools in the lower T-14 all the time. The odds are not bad coming from a T-14, but they're far from being a "lock."
You shouldn't really use your transfer into Columbia/NYU as indicative of anything...they routinely take median t-14 students as transfers. It's not surprising they'd take a top 20% T20 student willing to pay sticker
Anecdotal data is just that. Again, maybe my T20 school had above-average results the year I transferred. And, again, anecdotal-data fights are questionable. But from my school, several went to H, and one went to Y. They were all around the top 5-10% range.
That's my piece. Pontificate as before.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- CheddarArachnid
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:35 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
Isn't part of the fun of transferring that it is a complete blackbox? It depends on the cycle, applicants and cranky admissions folks... Maybe we should stay away from blanket generalizations. No one is a lock for anything! But I can say that someone... not naming any names is still a little salty over Yale's rejection last cycle.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:Boom! The ultimate Columbia/NYU burn? (Btw, I'm at Chicago.)runinthefront wrote:Way to double down on a pretty piss-poor opinion. OP should apply broadly, but outside of being one of the top 2 students at USC, OP's not getting admitted to Yale.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:Think what you want. I could cite my shitty anecdotal data to shittily refute your shitty anecdotal data, but what's the point?Joscellin wrote:While upbeat is great, this is really quite off as far as chances go.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
H is not as selective as S or Y, true, but I know people in the top 2-3% at T-20s that didn't get in at H, much less top 10%. He's in the ballpark, but to suggest a lock is simply wrong.
Similarly, I wouldn't bother apping to Y if you aren't at least #2 in the class. They very rarely take *anyone* that's not already at a T14, and when they do, it's usually a unicorn that is also #1 in the class.
Also, Harvard rejects applicants in the top 10% from schools in the lower T-14 all the time. The odds are not bad coming from a T-14, but they're far from being a "lock."
You shouldn't really use your transfer into Columbia/NYU as indicative of anything...they routinely take median t-14 students as transfers. It's not surprising they'd take a top 20% T20 student willing to pay sticker
Anecdotal data is just that. Again, maybe my T20 school had above-average results the year I transferred. And, again, anecdotal-data fights are questionable. But from my school, several went to H, and one went to Y. They were all around the top 5-10% range.
That's my piece. Pontificate as before.
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:23 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
you're trying to frame everyone else's argument as "my anecdata is better than your anecdata." Nobody is saying that. Everyone is just pointing out that NOBODY is a lock for H at just top 10% in a 15-20 school, DESPITE the little bit of anecdata that might suggest otherwise. If anything, you're the one trying to get the most mileage out of your anecdotal evidence. hthn1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:Boom! The ultimate Columbia/NYU burn? (Btw, I'm at Chicago.)runinthefront wrote:Way to double down on a pretty piss-poor opinion. OP should apply broadly, but outside of being one of the top 2 students at USC, OP's not getting admitted to Yale.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:Think what you want. I could cite my shitty anecdotal data to shittily refute your shitty anecdotal data, but what's the point?Joscellin wrote:While upbeat is great, this is really quite off as far as chances go.n1o2c3a4c5h6e7t wrote:I think you're a lock everywhere except Y/S; H isn't that selective. I also wouldn't be surprised if you got Y, S, or both. I'd be shocked if you didn't get CCN. I transferred into CCN from a T20 with substantially worse grades than you (top ~20%).
H is not as selective as S or Y, true, but I know people in the top 2-3% at T-20s that didn't get in at H, much less top 10%. He's in the ballpark, but to suggest a lock is simply wrong.
Similarly, I wouldn't bother apping to Y if you aren't at least #2 in the class. They very rarely take *anyone* that's not already at a T14, and when they do, it's usually a unicorn that is also #1 in the class.
Also, Harvard rejects applicants in the top 10% from schools in the lower T-14 all the time. The odds are not bad coming from a T-14, but they're far from being a "lock."
You shouldn't really use your transfer into Columbia/NYU as indicative of anything...they routinely take median t-14 students as transfers. It's not surprising they'd take a top 20% T20 student willing to pay sticker
Anecdotal data is just that. Again, maybe my T20 school had above-average results the year I transferred. And, again, anecdotal-data fights are questionable. But from my school, several went to H, and one went to Y. They were all around the top 5-10% range.
That's my piece. Pontificate as before.
- Mr_Chukes
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: Top 10% at USC - Chances? Good idea?
This honestly no reason to transfer.runinthefront wrote:OP, you should apply to schools with the goal of getting USC to give you more money to stay. Even if they don't give you money, however, you should still stay.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login