hahaha FUCK that dudeAnonymous User wrote:I have some weekend work here at WH and broached the subject of raises with a partner during a pretty casual catch-up call he and I were having. He was super defensive and said that DC and Boston have no reason to follow NYC firms on raises or bonuses. I left it at that, but jeez, I hope that’s not indicative of broader partner sentiment.
NYC to 200k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:15 am
Re: NYC to 200k
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Anonymous User wrote:NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Wall of Shame for Firms Yet to Announce:
Legend:
Kirkland ($4.70MM PPP, 44.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Davis Polk ($3.70MM PPP, 50.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Weil ($3.64MM PPP, 63.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Weiss ($4.56MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Milbank ($3.46MM PPP, 41.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Simpson ($3.68MM PPP, 38.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fried Frank ($2.94MM PPP, 123.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
SullCrom ($4.27MM PPP, 23.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Skadden ($3.47MM PPP, 32.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Willkie ($2.97MM PPP, 43.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Akin Gump ($2.39MM PPP, 54.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Hastings ($2.91MM PPP, 39.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Latham ($3.25MM PPP, 33.0% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Vinson & Elkins ($2.36MM PPP, 60.6% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
1. Boies ($3.27MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Shearman ($2.32MM PPP, 52.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Quinn ($4.74MM PPP, 6.8% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
King & Spalding ($2.61MM PPP, 31.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cravath ($4.00MM PPP, 14.2% L5Y PPP growth, 4.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Ropes ($2.32MM PPP, 46.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Gibson Dunn ($3.24MM PPP, 15.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Goodwin ($2.15MM PPP, 42.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Dechert ($2.68MM PPP, 27.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)[/s]
WilmerHale ($2.12MM PPP, 44.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cahill ($3.69MM PPP, 3.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Schulte ($2.56MM PPP, 21.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Debevoise ($2.83MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 5.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Proskauer ($2.37MM PPP, 27.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Winston ($2.16MM PPP, 44.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cooley ($2.08MM PPP, 39.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cleary ($3.07MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Wilson Sonsini ($2.21MM PPP, 34.4% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
White & Case ($2.26MM PPP, 32.9% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Sidley ($2.26MM PPP, 25.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Baker Botts ($1.84MM PPP, 35.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Kramer Levin ($2.15MM PPP, 28.5% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
2. Sheppard ($1.71MM PPP, 35.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cadwalader ($2.51MM PPP, 5.3% L5Y PPP decline, 4.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Alston & Bird ($1.93MM PPP, 12.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Mayer Brown ($1.58MM PPP, 37.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
3. Holland & Knight ($1.36MM PPP, 43.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
4. Fragomen ($1.98MM PPP, 31.4% L5Y PPP growth, 4.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
DLA Piper ($1.76MM PPP, 34.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
McDermott ($1.71MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
5. Katten ($1.57MM PPP, 19.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
O'Melveny ($2.01MM PPP, 2.5% L5Y PPP decline, 3.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Orrick ($1.86MM PPP, 14.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Covington ($1.54MM PPP, 22.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
6. Greenberg ($1.63MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
MoFo ($1.74MM PPP, 18.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fenwick ($1.51MM PPP, 31.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
7. Fish & Richardson ($1.63MM PPP, 9.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Jenner ($1.42MM PPP, 4.9% L5Y PPP decline, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Baker McKenzie ($1.30MM PPP, 19.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Morgan Lewis ($1.37MM PPP, 11.7% L5Y PPP decline, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
New York
California
Washington, D.C.
Chicago
Houston
Boston
Atlanta
Philadelphia
Florida
Would love to see this as well and reiterate the appreciation for your list.Any way you could list the next 10 or so firms below your current list (with the same accompanying stats)?
If not, no worries. And thanks for this list. It is interesting to see the firms' financials measured like this side by side--especially the 5 year growth.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
You know how Wachtell hasn't announced anything but no one on here is complaining?Anonymous User wrote:Are they taking into account OCI bids? Maybe it doesn’t matter for Boies, but still...Anonymous User wrote:I can confirm that members of the executive committee are working on revising the formula and are aware of the market move. There is no indication of when they will announce a new scale.Anonymous User wrote:Unless the man himself is following this thread, I can promise you the answer is no.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone give some insight on when we can expect movement from Boies?
You might think the comparison is wrong, but there are definitely partners at BSF who see the firm as "the Wachtell of litigation" and therefore above such pedestrian concerns.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
They know very well the Wachtell of litigation is Munger. And they raised. So BSF can get a grip and get it together! People act like someone at BSF couldn't tweak the compensation formula in a day's work.Anonymous User wrote:You know how Wachtell hasn't announced anything but no one on here is complaining?Anonymous User wrote:Are they taking into account OCI bids? Maybe it doesn’t matter for Boies, but still...Anonymous User wrote:I can confirm that members of the executive committee are working on revising the formula and are aware of the market move. There is no indication of when they will announce a new scale.Anonymous User wrote:Unless the man himself is following this thread, I can promise you the answer is no.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone give some insight on when we can expect movement from Boies?
You might think the comparison is wrong, but there are definitely partners at BSF who see the firm as "the Wachtell of litigation" and therefore above such pedestrian concerns.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I think the other poster meant in comp, not in general caliber. Boies has indisputably been above market until last year (and remains so for most people) whereas Munger is a market paying firm, albeit a super prestigious one.Anonymous User wrote:They know very well the Wachtell of litigation is Munger. And they raised. So BSF can get a grip and get it together! People act like someone at BSF couldn't tweak the compensation formula in a day's work.Anonymous User wrote:You know how Wachtell hasn't announced anything but no one on here is complaining?Anonymous User wrote:Are they taking into account OCI bids? Maybe it doesn’t matter for Boies, but still...Anonymous User wrote:I can confirm that members of the executive committee are working on revising the formula and are aware of the market move. There is no indication of when they will announce a new scale.Anonymous User wrote:Unless the man himself is following this thread, I can promise you the answer is no.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone give some insight on when we can expect movement from Boies?
You might think the comparison is wrong, but there are definitely partners at BSF who see the firm as "the Wachtell of litigation" and therefore above such pedestrian concerns.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Hopefully David is suffering from his shares of Theranos going to zero and can't afford raises. The role he and Heather King and Meredith Dearborn and the rest of their crew played in intimidating employees and otherwise trying to suppress the disclosure of information they knew or should have known to be true is inexcusable. Not to mention Harvey Weinstein. His skill is obviously unmatched, but I have no respect for him or the firm.Anonymous User wrote:You know how Wachtell hasn't announced anything but no one on here is complaining?Anonymous User wrote:Are they taking into account OCI bids? Maybe it doesn’t matter for Boies, but still...Anonymous User wrote:I can confirm that members of the executive committee are working on revising the formula and are aware of the market move. There is no indication of when they will announce a new scale.Anonymous User wrote:Unless the man himself is following this thread, I can promise you the answer is no.Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone give some insight on when we can expect movement from Boies?
You might think the comparison is wrong, but there are definitely partners at BSF who see the firm as "the Wachtell of litigation" and therefore above such pedestrian concerns.
(BTW, I know this isn't the case - they have plenty of money regardless of losing a few million)
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Still nothing from Arnold & Porter?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Nobody is complaining because Wachtell is still well above the new market in total comp. Not sure that's the case for Boies. (Probably also because everyone who works there is too busy to spend time on TLS complaining.)Anonymous User wrote:
You know how Wachtell hasn't announced anything but no one on here is complaining?
You might think the comparison is wrong, but there are definitely partners at BSF who see the firm as "the Wachtell of litigation" and therefore above such pedestrian concerns.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Sheppard just matched the raises, but didn't do bonus. I'll live with it.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Confirmed. Email sent out this morning.Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard just matched the raises, but didn't do bonus. I'll live with it.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Unhappy A&P associate here. Radio silenceAnonymous User wrote:Still nothing from Arnold & Porter?
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
They really should have matched bonuses. Sheppard (a) has a PPP of $1.7M -- similar to that of other California firms like OMM ($2.0M), Orrick ($1.9M), MoFo ($1.7M), and Fenwick ($1.5M); (b) is less levered than all those firms so bonuses should have made less of an impact on partners' wallets; and (c) has been seeing stronger growth than all of those firms. Yet all of those firms matched bonuses.Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard just matched the raises, but didn't do bonus. I'll live with it.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Anon that posted the raise news originally. No question they should have.Anonymous User wrote:They really should have matched bonuses. Sheppard (a) has a PPP of $1.7M -- similar to that of other California firms like OMM ($2.0M), Orrick ($1.9M), MoFo ($1.7M), and Fenwick ($1.5M); (b) is less levered than all those firms so bonuses should have made less of an impact on partners' wallets; and (c) has been seeing stronger growth than all of those firms. Yet all of those firms matched bonuses.Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard just matched the raises, but didn't do bonus. I'll live with it.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
ATL is reporting that many tipsters seem pretty happy with the move, notwithstanding the lack of bonus. You don't seem too mad either. Why? Is your quality of life compared to your friends pretty good?Anonymous User wrote:Anon that posted the raise news originally. No question they should have.Anonymous User wrote:They really should have matched bonuses. Sheppard (a) has a PPP of $1.7M -- similar to that of other California firms like OMM ($2.0M), Orrick ($1.9M), MoFo ($1.7M), and Fenwick ($1.5M); (b) is less levered than all those firms so bonuses should have made less of an impact on partners' wallets; and (c) has been seeing stronger growth than all of those firms. Yet all of those firms matched bonuses.Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard just matched the raises, but didn't do bonus. I'll live with it.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I'm the anon that confirmed that anon. If you know how the firm runs, you'll know that it's run very conservatively with regard to finances (which has its own benefits in the long run). For that reason, I'm appreciative that any raise was given at all.Anonymous User wrote:ATL is reporting that many tipsters seem pretty happy with the move, notwithstanding the lack of bonus. You don't seem too mad either. Why? Is your quality of life compared to your friends pretty good?Anonymous User wrote:Anon that posted the raise news originally. No question they should have.Anonymous User wrote:They really should have matched bonuses. Sheppard (a) has a PPP of $1.7M -- similar to that of other California firms like OMM ($2.0M), Orrick ($1.9M), MoFo ($1.7M), and Fenwick ($1.5M); (b) is less levered than all those firms so bonuses should have made less of an impact on partners' wallets; and (c) has been seeing stronger growth than all of those firms. Yet all of those firms matched bonuses.Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard just matched the raises, but didn't do bonus. I'll live with it.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I'll be right at 2000 hours this year, so I'm not dying but not exactly light either. I don't know, I'm disappointed but not furious. We don't have an up an out model, I'm in a nice location, I like the partners. I think we still are a notch down from Wilson, Cooley, and MoFo, so whatever. We get paid the same salary and get a less in bonus. I'll survive.Anonymous User wrote:ATL is reporting that many tipsters seem pretty happy with the move, notwithstanding the lack of bonus. You don't seem too mad either. Why? Is your quality of life compared to your friends pretty good?Anonymous User wrote:Anon that posted the raise news originally. No question they should have.Anonymous User wrote:They really should have matched bonuses. Sheppard (a) has a PPP of $1.7M -- similar to that of other California firms like OMM ($2.0M), Orrick ($1.9M), MoFo ($1.7M), and Fenwick ($1.5M); (b) is less levered than all those firms so bonuses should have made less of an impact on partners' wallets; and (c) has been seeing stronger growth than all of those firms. Yet all of those firms matched bonuses.Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard just matched the raises, but didn't do bonus. I'll live with it.
- NakedPowerOrgan
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:24 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Updated for AmLaw200 firms with PPP over $1 million.
NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Confirmation that David Boies spent all the firm's money paying Mossad agents to run covert, international spy operations to suppress women raped by Harvey Weinstein.....(ALLEGEDLY):
NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Wall of Shame for Firms Yet to Announce:
Legend:
Kirkland ($4.70MM PPP, 44.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Davis Polk ($3.70MM PPP, 50.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Weil ($3.64MM PPP, 63.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Irell ($3.08MM PPP, 98.0% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Weiss ($4.56MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fried Frank ($2.94MM PPP, 123.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Milbank ($3.46MM PPP, 41.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Simpson ($3.68MM PPP, 38.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Skadden ($3.47MM PPP, 32.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Willkie ($2.97MM PPP, 43.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
SullCrom ($4.27MM PPP, 23.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Hastings ($2.91MM PPP, 39.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Akin Gump ($2.39MM PPP, 54.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Choate Hall ($2.31MM PPP, 56.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Vinson & Elkins ($2.36MM PPP, 60.6% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Latham ($3.25MM PPP, 33.0% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Shearman ($2.32MM PPP, 52.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
1. Boies ($3.27MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
2. BuckleySandler ($2.48MM PPP, 37.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
King & Spalding ($2.61MM PPP, 31.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Quinn ($4.74MM PPP, 6.8% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Ropes ($2.32MM PPP, 46.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cravath ($4.00MM PPP, 14.2% L5Y PPP growth, 4.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
3. Kobre & Kim ($2.49MM PPP, 29.0% L1Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage
Goodwin ($2.15MM PPP, 42.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
WilmerHale ($2.12MM PPP, 44.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)[/s]
Gibson Dunn ($3.24MM PPP, 15.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Schulte ($2.56MM PPP, 21.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Dechert ($2.68MM PPP, 27.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Winston ($2.16MM PPP, 44.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Proskauer ($2.37MM PPP, 27.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Debevoise ($2.83MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 5.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cahill ($3.69MM PPP, 3.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cooley ($2.08MM PPP, 39.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Wilson Sonsini ($2.21MM PPP, 34.4% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cleary ($3.07MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
White & Case ($2.26MM PPP, 32.9% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Sidley ($2.26MM PPP, 25.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Baker Botts ($1.84MM PPP, 35.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Kramer Levin ($2.15MM PPP, 28.5% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Sheppard ($1.71MM PPP, 35.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Alston & Bird ($1.93MM PPP, 12.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Lowenstein Sandler ($1.75MM PPP, 21.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Mayer Brown ($1.58MM PPP, 37.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
4. Holland & Knight ($1.36MM PPP, 43.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
DLA Piper ($1.76MM PPP, 34.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Hogan Lovells ($1.28MM PPP, 17.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
5. Fragomen ($1.98MM PPP, 31.4% L5Y PPP growth, 4.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Stroock ($1.60MM PPP, 32.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
McDermott ($1.71MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
6. Nelson Mullins ($1.09MM PPP, 60.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cadwalader ($2.51MM PPP, 5.3% L5Y PPP decline, 4.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
7. Jeffer Mangels ($1.67MM PPP, 7.5% L5Y PPP growth, .9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
8. Robins Kaplan ($1.15MM PPP, 42.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Katten ($1.57MM PPP, 19.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Covington ($1.54MM PPP, 22.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
MoFo ($1.74MM PPP, 18.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
9. Greenberg ($1.63MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
10. Troutman Sanders ($1.06MM PPP, 51.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
11. Kasowitz ($1.92MM PPP, 13.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fenwick ($1.51MM PPP, 31.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
12. Fish & Richardson ($1.63MM PPP, 9.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
13. Nixon Peabody ($1.11MM PPP, 43.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
14. Venable ($1.13MM PPP, 34.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
O'Melveny ($2.01MM PPP, 2.5% L5Y PPP decline, 3.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Munger ($1.63MM PPP, 4.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Orrick ($1.86MM PPP, 14.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
15. Winstead ($1.12MM PPP, 33.0% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
16. Loeb & Loeb ($1.68MM PPP, 11.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Patterson Belknap ($1.66MM PPP, 9.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
17. Mintz Levin ($1.29MM PPP, 32.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
18. Morris Manning ($1.17MM PPP, 31.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
19. Pillsbury ($1.28MM PPP, 15.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
20. Honigman Miller ($1.01MM PPP, 29.9% L5Y PPP growth, 0.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
21. Arent Fox ($1.07MM PPP, 25.5% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
22. Manatt Phelps ($1.32MM PPP, 5.6% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
23. Finnegan ($1.28MM PPP, 9.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
24. Crowell & Moring ($1.12MM PPP, 20.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Jenner ($1.42MM PPP, 4.9% L5Y PPP decline, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Baker McKenzie ($1.30MM PPP, 19.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Morgan Lewis ($1.37MM PPP, 11.7% L5Y PPP decline, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
25. Foley & Lardner ($1.17MM PPP, 22.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
27. Foley Hoag ($1.20MM PPP, 16.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Perkins Coie ($1.17MM PPP, 15.6% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
26. Bracewell ($1.31MM PPP, 10.0% L5Y PPP decline, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Brown Rudnick ($1.26MM PPP, 7.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
27. Chapman & Cutler ($1.11MM PPP, 4.8% L5Y PPP growth, 0.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
28. Hunton Andrews Kurth (approx. $1.13MM PPP, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
29. Wiley Rein ($1.16MM PPP, 2.8% L5Y PPP decline, 0.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
30. Reed Smith ($1.18MM PPP, 9.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
31. Arnold & Porter ($1.19MM PPP, 16.4% L5Y PPP decline, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Jones Day ($1.01MM PPP, 10.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
32. Hughes Hubbard ($1.12MM PPP, 35.1% L5Y PPP decline, 3.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
33. Kilpatrick Townsend ($1.01MM PPP, 17.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
34. McGuireWoods ($1.02MM PPP, 7.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
35. Curtis Mallet ($1.08MM PPP, 31.4% L5Y PPP decline, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
36. Baker & Hostetler ($1.00MM PPP, 7.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
New York
California
Washington, D.C.
Chicago
Texas
Boston
Atlanta
Philadelphia
Florida
Other
Last edited by NakedPowerOrgan on Tue Jul 03, 2018 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I'm at Katten. We did a TTT raise today:
The Firm’s Executive Committee has decided to raise salaries for our US associates effective July 1, 2018. In all offices other than Charlotte, the scale will be as follows:
Class Salary
2017 $190,000
2016 $200,000
2015 $220,000
2014 $255,000
2013 $280,000
2012 $305,000
2011+ $325,000
Charlotte associates will receive corresponding increases. To receive the new base salaries, associates must be providing client service up to our standards of quality and efficiency and be on an annualized pace to meet our minimum hours requirements. For those associates who are not currently on pace to meet the hours requirements, but complete the year on or over pace, we will pay a bonus to ensure that all associates on or over pace by the end of the year have the benefit of the higher salary.
Consistent with our previous approach at year-end, the Firm intends to continue to reward our highest performing associates who deliver greater value to our clients and drive client relationships through the quality and efficiency of their work with total compensation equal to, and in many cases in excess of, the total compensation offered by other law firms (taking into account bonuses paid by some of our competitors during the course of the year).
Our Firm has grown and found great success by aligning the interests of our clients with those of our legal talent – attracting, retaining and supporting high quality, productive lawyers who provide the best client service and efficiently deliver solutions to clients’ business problems. We believe our approach outlined above will further assure that alignment.
We thank you for your hard work and dedication to our clients and the Firm.
The Firm’s Executive Committee has decided to raise salaries for our US associates effective July 1, 2018. In all offices other than Charlotte, the scale will be as follows:
Class Salary
2017 $190,000
2016 $200,000
2015 $220,000
2014 $255,000
2013 $280,000
2012 $305,000
2011+ $325,000
Charlotte associates will receive corresponding increases. To receive the new base salaries, associates must be providing client service up to our standards of quality and efficiency and be on an annualized pace to meet our minimum hours requirements. For those associates who are not currently on pace to meet the hours requirements, but complete the year on or over pace, we will pay a bonus to ensure that all associates on or over pace by the end of the year have the benefit of the higher salary.
Consistent with our previous approach at year-end, the Firm intends to continue to reward our highest performing associates who deliver greater value to our clients and drive client relationships through the quality and efficiency of their work with total compensation equal to, and in many cases in excess of, the total compensation offered by other law firms (taking into account bonuses paid by some of our competitors during the course of the year).
Our Firm has grown and found great success by aligning the interests of our clients with those of our legal talent – attracting, retaining and supporting high quality, productive lawyers who provide the best client service and efficiently deliver solutions to clients’ business problems. We believe our approach outlined above will further assure that alignment.
We thank you for your hard work and dedication to our clients and the Firm.
- NakedPowerOrgan
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:24 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Some fun facts, maybe useful to law students during OCI:
$1.4 million PPP seems to be around the sweet spot for where it becomes likely that you'll at least see a raise when the market moves. 90 percent of firms in the AmLaw 200 with over $1.36 million PPP have matched salary raises. 85 percent of AmLaw 200 firms at or below that mark have not announced salary matches or have announced they will not match. Zero firms below $1.28 million PPP have announced salary raises and bonuses.
Nearly all firms (approx. 90 percent) above $2.0 million PPP have announced matches to both bonuses and raises. Boies not announcing yet and Cooley denying summer bonuses are the two most prominent exceptions in that group.
Roughly $1.4 million to $2 million PPP seems to be where it gets interesting. Around 75 percent of firms in that range have matched salaries but around half of those firms have refused to supplement those raises with bonuses.
$1.4 million PPP seems to be around the sweet spot for where it becomes likely that you'll at least see a raise when the market moves. 90 percent of firms in the AmLaw 200 with over $1.36 million PPP have matched salary raises. 85 percent of AmLaw 200 firms at or below that mark have not announced salary matches or have announced they will not match. Zero firms below $1.28 million PPP have announced salary raises and bonuses.
Nearly all firms (approx. 90 percent) above $2.0 million PPP have announced matches to both bonuses and raises. Boies not announcing yet and Cooley denying summer bonuses are the two most prominent exceptions in that group.
Roughly $1.4 million to $2 million PPP seems to be where it gets interesting. Around 75 percent of firms in that range have matched salaries but around half of those firms have refused to supplement those raises with bonuses.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Thank you! Some huge firms still out there that haven't raised.NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Updated for AmLaw200 firms with PPP over $1 million.
NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Confirmation that David Boies spent all the firm's money paying Mossad agents to run covert, international spy operations to suppress women raped by Harvey Weinstein.....(ALLEGEDLY):
NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Wall of Shame for Firms Yet to Announce:
Legend:
Kirkland ($4.70MM PPP, 44.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Davis Polk ($3.70MM PPP, 50.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Weil ($3.64MM PPP, 63.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Irell ($3.08MM PPP, 98.0% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Weiss ($4.56MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fried Frank ($2.94MM PPP, 123.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Milbank ($3.46MM PPP, 41.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Simpson ($3.68MM PPP, 38.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Skadden ($3.47MM PPP, 32.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Willkie ($2.97MM PPP, 43.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
SullCrom ($4.27MM PPP, 23.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Hastings ($2.91MM PPP, 39.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Akin Gump ($2.39MM PPP, 54.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Choate Hall ($2.31MM PPP, 56.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Vinson & Elkins ($2.36MM PPP, 60.6% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Latham ($3.25MM PPP, 33.0% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Shearman ($2.32MM PPP, 52.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
1. Boies ($3.27MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
2. BuckleySandler ($2.48MM PPP, 37.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
King & Spalding ($2.61MM PPP, 31.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Quinn ($4.74MM PPP, 6.8% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Ropes ($2.32MM PPP, 46.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cravath ($4.00MM PPP, 14.2% L5Y PPP growth, 4.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
3. Kobre & Kim ($2.49MM PPP, 29.0% L1Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage
Goodwin ($2.15MM PPP, 42.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
WilmerHale ($2.12MM PPP, 44.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)[/s]
Gibson Dunn ($3.24MM PPP, 15.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Schulte ($2.56MM PPP, 21.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Dechert ($2.68MM PPP, 27.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Winston ($2.16MM PPP, 44.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Proskauer ($2.37MM PPP, 27.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Debevoise ($2.83MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 5.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cahill ($3.69MM PPP, 3.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cooley ($2.08MM PPP, 39.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Wilson Sonsini ($2.21MM PPP, 34.4% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cleary ($3.07MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
White & Case ($2.26MM PPP, 32.9% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Sidley ($2.26MM PPP, 25.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Baker Botts ($1.84MM PPP, 35.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Kramer Levin ($2.15MM PPP, 28.5% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Sheppard ($1.71MM PPP, 35.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Alston & Bird ($1.93MM PPP, 12.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Lowenstein Sandler ($1.75MM PPP, 21.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Mayer Brown ($1.58MM PPP, 37.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
4. Holland & Knight ($1.36MM PPP, 43.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
DLA Piper ($1.76MM PPP, 34.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Hogan Lovells ($1.28MM PPP, 17.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
5. Fragomen ($1.98MM PPP, 31.4% L5Y PPP growth, 4.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Stroock ($1.60MM PPP, 32.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
McDermott ($1.71MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
6. Nelson Mullins ($1.09MM PPP, 60.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cadwalader ($2.51MM PPP, 5.3% L5Y PPP decline, 4.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
7. Jeffer Mangels ($1.67MM PPP, 7.5% L5Y PPP growth, .9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
8. Robins Kaplan ($1.15MM PPP, 42.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Katten ($1.57MM PPP, 19.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Covington ($1.54MM PPP, 22.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
MoFo ($1.74MM PPP, 18.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
9. Greenberg ($1.63MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
10. Troutman Sanders ($1.06MM PPP, 51.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
11. Kasowitz ($1.92MM PPP, 13.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fenwick ($1.51MM PPP, 31.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
12. Fish & Richardson ($1.63MM PPP, 9.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
13. Nixon Peabody ($1.11MM PPP, 43.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
14. Venable ($1.13MM PPP, 34.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
O'Melveny ($2.01MM PPP, 2.5% L5Y PPP decline, 3.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Munger ($1.63MM PPP, 4.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Orrick ($1.86MM PPP, 14.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
15. Winstead ($1.12MM PPP, 33.0% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
16. Loeb & Loeb ($1.68MM PPP, 11.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Patterson Belknap ($1.66MM PPP, 9.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
17. Mintz Levin ($1.29MM PPP, 32.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
18. Morris Manning ($1.17MM PPP, 31.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
19. Pillsbury ($1.28MM PPP, 15.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
20. Honigman Miller ($1.01MM PPP, 29.9% L5Y PPP growth, 0.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
21. Arent Fox ($1.07MM PPP, 25.5% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
22. Manatt Phelps ($1.32MM PPP, 5.6% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
23. Finnegan ($1.28MM PPP, 9.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
24. Crowell & Moring ($1.12MM PPP, 20.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Jenner ($1.42MM PPP, 4.9% L5Y PPP decline, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Baker McKenzie ($1.30MM PPP, 19.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Morgan Lewis ($1.37MM PPP, 11.7% L5Y PPP decline, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
25. Foley & Lardner ($1.17MM PPP, 22.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
27. Foley Hoag ($1.20MM PPP, 16.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Perkins Coie ($1.17MM PPP, 15.6% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
26. Bracewell ($1.31MM PPP, 10.0% L5Y PPP decline, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Brown Rudnick ($1.26MM PPP, 7.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
27. Chapman & Cutler ($1.11MM PPP, 4.8% L5Y PPP growth, 0.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
28. Hunton Andrews Kurth (approx. $1.13MM PPP, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
29. Wiley Rein ($1.16MM PPP, 2.8% L5Y PPP decline, 0.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
30. Reed Smith ($1.18MM PPP, 9.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
31. Arnold & Porter ($1.19MM PPP, 16.4% L5Y PPP decline, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Jones Day ($1.01MM PPP, 10.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
32. Hughes Hubbard ($1.12MM PPP, 35.1% L5Y PPP decline, 3.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
33. Kilpatrick Townsend ($1.01MM PPP, 17.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
34. McGuireWoods ($1.02MM PPP, 7.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
35. Curtis Mallet ($1.08MM PPP, 31.4% L5Y PPP decline, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
36. Baker & Hostetler ($1.00MM PPP, 7.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
New York
California
Washington, D.C.
Chicago
Texas
Boston
Atlanta
Philadelphia
Florida
Other
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
any idea where Eversheds would fall on this list (if at all)?Anonymous User wrote:Thank you! Some huge firms still out there that haven't raised.NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Updated for AmLaw200 firms with PPP over $1 million.
NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Confirmation that David Boies spent all the firm's money paying Mossad agents to run covert, international spy operations to suppress women raped by Harvey Weinstein.....(ALLEGEDLY):
NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Wall of Shame for Firms Yet to Announce:
Legend:
Kirkland ($4.70MM PPP, 44.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Davis Polk ($3.70MM PPP, 50.7% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Weil ($3.64MM PPP, 63.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Irell ($3.08MM PPP, 98.0% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Weiss ($4.56MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fried Frank ($2.94MM PPP, 123.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Milbank ($3.46MM PPP, 41.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Simpson ($3.68MM PPP, 38.2% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Skadden ($3.47MM PPP, 32.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Willkie ($2.97MM PPP, 43.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
SullCrom ($4.27MM PPP, 23.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Paul Hastings ($2.91MM PPP, 39.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Akin Gump ($2.39MM PPP, 54.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Choate Hall ($2.31MM PPP, 56.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Vinson & Elkins ($2.36MM PPP, 60.6% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Latham ($3.25MM PPP, 33.0% L5Y PPP growth, 3.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Shearman ($2.32MM PPP, 52.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
1. Boies ($3.27MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
2. BuckleySandler ($2.48MM PPP, 37.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
King & Spalding ($2.61MM PPP, 31.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Quinn ($4.74MM PPP, 6.8% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Ropes ($2.32MM PPP, 46.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cravath ($4.00MM PPP, 14.2% L5Y PPP growth, 4.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
3. Kobre & Kim ($2.49MM PPP, 29.0% L1Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage
Goodwin ($2.15MM PPP, 42.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
WilmerHale ($2.12MM PPP, 44.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)[/s]
Gibson Dunn ($3.24MM PPP, 15.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Schulte ($2.56MM PPP, 21.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Dechert ($2.68MM PPP, 27.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Winston ($2.16MM PPP, 44.8% L5Y PPP growth, 3.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Proskauer ($2.37MM PPP, 27.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Debevoise ($2.83MM PPP, 36.2% L5Y PPP growth, 5.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cahill ($3.69MM PPP, 3.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cooley ($2.08MM PPP, 39.4% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Wilson Sonsini ($2.21MM PPP, 34.4% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cleary ($3.07MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
White & Case ($2.26MM PPP, 32.9% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Sidley ($2.26MM PPP, 25.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Baker Botts ($1.84MM PPP, 35.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Kramer Levin ($2.15MM PPP, 28.5% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Sheppard ($1.71MM PPP, 35.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Alston & Bird ($1.93MM PPP, 12.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Lowenstein Sandler ($1.75MM PPP, 21.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Mayer Brown ($1.58MM PPP, 37.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
4. Holland & Knight ($1.36MM PPP, 43.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
DLA Piper ($1.76MM PPP, 34.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Hogan Lovells ($1.28MM PPP, 17.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
5. Fragomen ($1.98MM PPP, 31.4% L5Y PPP growth, 4.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Stroock ($1.60MM PPP, 32.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
McDermott ($1.71MM PPP, 17.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
6. Nelson Mullins ($1.09MM PPP, 60.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Cadwalader ($2.51MM PPP, 5.3% L5Y PPP decline, 4.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
7. Jeffer Mangels ($1.67MM PPP, 7.5% L5Y PPP growth, .9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
8. Robins Kaplan ($1.15MM PPP, 42.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Katten ($1.57MM PPP, 19.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Covington ($1.54MM PPP, 22.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
MoFo ($1.74MM PPP, 18.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
9. Greenberg ($1.63MM PPP, 20.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
10. Troutman Sanders ($1.06MM PPP, 51.1% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
11. Kasowitz ($1.92MM PPP, 13.1% L5Y PPP growth, 3.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Fenwick ($1.51MM PPP, 31.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
12. Fish & Richardson ($1.63MM PPP, 9.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
13. Nixon Peabody ($1.11MM PPP, 43.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
14. Venable ($1.13MM PPP, 34.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
O'Melveny ($2.01MM PPP, 2.5% L5Y PPP decline, 3.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Munger ($1.63MM PPP, 4.2% L5Y PPP growth, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Orrick ($1.86MM PPP, 14.3% L5Y PPP growth, 3.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
15. Winstead ($1.12MM PPP, 33.0% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
16. Loeb & Loeb ($1.68MM PPP, 11.9% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Patterson Belknap ($1.66MM PPP, 9.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
17. Mintz Levin ($1.29MM PPP, 32.0% L5Y PPP growth, 2.6 EP:Assoc. leverage)
18. Morris Manning ($1.17MM PPP, 31.7% L5Y PPP growth, 2.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
19. Pillsbury ($1.28MM PPP, 15.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
20. Honigman Miller ($1.01MM PPP, 29.9% L5Y PPP growth, 0.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
21. Arent Fox ($1.07MM PPP, 25.5% L5Y PPP growth, 1.1 EP:Assoc. leverage)
22. Manatt Phelps ($1.32MM PPP, 5.6% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
23. Finnegan ($1.28MM PPP, 9.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
24. Crowell & Moring ($1.12MM PPP, 20.8% L5Y PPP growth, 1.4 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Jenner ($1.42MM PPP, 4.9% L5Y PPP decline, 1.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
Baker McKenzie ($1.30MM PPP, 19.3% L5Y PPP growth, 2.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Morgan Lewis ($1.37MM PPP, 11.7% L5Y PPP decline, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
25. Foley & Lardner ($1.17MM PPP, 22.2% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
27. Foley Hoag ($1.20MM PPP, 16.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.2 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Perkins Coie ($1.17MM PPP, 15.6% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
26. Bracewell ($1.31MM PPP, 10.0% L5Y PPP decline, 1.9 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Brown Rudnick ($1.26MM PPP, 7.4% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
27. Chapman & Cutler ($1.11MM PPP, 4.8% L5Y PPP growth, 0.7 EP:Assoc. leverage)
28. Hunton Andrews Kurth (approx. $1.13MM PPP, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
29. Wiley Rein ($1.16MM PPP, 2.8% L5Y PPP decline, 0.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
30. Reed Smith ($1.18MM PPP, 9.1% L5Y PPP growth, 2.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
31. Arnold & Porter ($1.19MM PPP, 16.4% L5Y PPP decline, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Jones Day ($1.01MM PPP, 10.3% L5Y PPP growth, 1.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)- NO BONUS MATCH
32. Hughes Hubbard ($1.12MM PPP, 35.1% L5Y PPP decline, 3.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
33. Kilpatrick Townsend ($1.01MM PPP, 17.6% L5Y PPP growth, 2.0 EP:Assoc. leverage)
34. McGuireWoods ($1.02MM PPP, 7.9% L5Y PPP growth, 1.8 EP:Assoc. leverage)
35. Curtis Mallet ($1.08MM PPP, 31.4% L5Y PPP decline, 3.5 EP:Assoc. leverage)
36. Baker & Hostetler ($1.00MM PPP, 7.5% L5Y PPP growth, 2.3 EP:Assoc. leverage)
New York
California
Washington, D.C.
Chicago
Texas
Boston
Atlanta
Philadelphia
Florida
Other
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
This is a very useful post.NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Some fun facts, maybe useful to law students during OCI:
$1.4 million PPP seems to be around the sweet spot for where it becomes likely that you'll at least see a raise when the market moves. 90 percent of firms in the AmLaw 200 with over $1.36 million PPP have matched salary raises. 85 percent of AmLaw 200 firms at or below that mark have not announced salary matches or have announced they will not match. Zero firms below $1.28 million PPP have announced salary raises and bonuses.
Nearly all firms (approx. 90 percent) above $2.0 million PPP have announced matches to both bonuses and raises. Boies not announcing yet and Cooley denying summer bonuses are the two most prominent exceptions in that group.
Roughly $1.4 million to $2 million PPP seems to be where it gets interesting. Around 75 percent of firms in that range have matched salaries but around half of those firms have refused to supplement those raises with bonuses.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Based on this rationale, it seems HB has no chance of matching...
Haynes Boone (approx. $0.957M PPP, 1.84 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Haynes Boone (approx. $0.957M PPP, 1.84 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Anonymous User wrote:This is a very useful post.NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Some fun facts, maybe useful to law students during OCI:
$1.4 million PPP seems to be around the sweet spot for where it becomes likely that you'll at least see a raise when the market moves. 90 percent of firms in the AmLaw 200 with over $1.36 million PPP have matched salary raises. 85 percent of AmLaw 200 firms at or below that mark have not announced salary matches or have announced they will not match. Zero firms below $1.28 million PPP have announced salary raises and bonuses.
Nearly all firms (approx. 90 percent) above $2.0 million PPP have announced matches to both bonuses and raises. Boies not announcing yet and Cooley denying summer bonuses are the two most prominent exceptions in that group.
Roughly $1.4 million to $2 million PPP seems to be where it gets interesting. Around 75 percent of firms in that range have matched salaries but around half of those firms have refused to supplement those raises with bonuses.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
TK has below 1.28M PPP and announced full salary match and bonuses (though bonuses were tied to hours/productivity). Will be interested to see how HB responds. In Texas, if V&E does something, BB has to respond. But then after that, it seems like HB, TK, Fulbright, Bracewell, Locke and Hunton/AK are sort of in the same group in that they don't necessarily have to do what V&E/BB do, but if a majority of that group does something, it seems like the rest have to fall in line. So now that Fulbright and TK have taken very different approaches, will be interesting to see how the respond.Anonymous User wrote:Based on this rationale, it seems HB has no chance of matching...
Haynes Boone (approx. $0.957M PPP, 1.84 EP:Assoc. leverage)
Anonymous User wrote:This is a very useful post.NakedPowerOrgan wrote:Some fun facts, maybe useful to law students during OCI:
$1.4 million PPP seems to be around the sweet spot for where it becomes likely that you'll at least see a raise when the market moves. 90 percent of firms in the AmLaw 200 with over $1.36 million PPP have matched salary raises. 85 percent of AmLaw 200 firms at or below that mark have not announced salary matches or have announced they will not match. Zero firms below $1.28 million PPP have announced salary raises and bonuses.
Nearly all firms (approx. 90 percent) above $2.0 million PPP have announced matches to both bonuses and raises. Boies not announcing yet and Cooley denying summer bonuses are the two most prominent exceptions in that group.
Roughly $1.4 million to $2 million PPP seems to be where it gets interesting. Around 75 percent of firms in that range have matched salaries but around half of those firms have refused to supplement those raises with bonuses.
-
- Posts: 428520
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Still can't believe GT. What a pathetic firm. I would literally go to basically any firm in the Amlaw 75 before them.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login