Can confirm, I'm associate here. You won't see a memo bc MLB does it via VM.Anonymous User wrote:Anybody confirming MLB match?
NYC to 200k Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Can someone confirm that for firms that have raised, associates in the class of 2018 i.e individuals starting out this fall will have starting salaries of 190k?
I'm starting at KE this fall, and I just wanted to confirm because none of the firm memo's mention the class of 2018, they start at 2017. Thanks!
I'm starting at KE this fall, and I just wanted to confirm because none of the firm memo's mention the class of 2018, they start at 2017. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I had a similar question back during the 2016 raises (due to paranoia), but trust me...it's a dumb question. Why would they start incoming associates off at a lower scale than the rest of the entire firm?Anonymous User wrote:Can someone confirm that for firms that have raised, associates in the class of 2018 i.e individuals starting out this fall will have starting salaries of 190k?
I'm starting at KE this fall, and I just wanted to confirm because none of the firm memo's mention the class of 2018, they start at 2017. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
They don't mention it because nobody in c/o 2018 works there...Anonymous User wrote:Can someone confirm that for firms that have raised, associates in the class of 2018 i.e individuals starting out this fall will have starting salaries of 190k?
I'm starting at KE this fall, and I just wanted to confirm because none of the firm memo's mention the class of 2018, they start at 2017. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
I take your point, but Paul Weiss's memo mentions the class of 2018. They felt the need to reassure c/o 2018 even though none of them are working at the firm yet.hoos89 wrote:They don't mention it because nobody in C/O 2018 works there...Anonymous User wrote:Can someone confirm that for firms that have raised, associates in the class of 2018 i.e individuals starting out this fall will have starting salaries of 190k?
I'm starting at KE this fall, and I just wanted to confirm because none of the firm memo's mention the class of 2018, they start at 2017. Thanks!
Still, of course class of 2018 is going to make 190k in a few months. It goes without saying.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Probably waiting for V&E or BB. Not sure what they are waiting for.Anonymous User wrote:Associate at a “second” tier vault Houston based firm here. Assuming we are waiting for a firm like B.B. to match?
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
STB sent out a separate email to incoming associates about it.hoos89 wrote:They don't mention it because nobody in c/o 2018 works there...Anonymous User wrote:Can someone confirm that for firms that have raised, associates in the class of 2018 i.e individuals starting out this fall will have starting salaries of 190k?
I'm starting at KE this fall, and I just wanted to confirm because none of the firm memo's mention the class of 2018, they start at 2017. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Or not...Anonymous User wrote:Covington match with bonus for all US offices.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/oh-hai-covington/
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
TX to $200KAnonymous User wrote:Probably waiting for V&E or BB. Not sure what they are waiting for.Anonymous User wrote:Associate at a “second” tier vault Houston based firm here. Assuming we are waiting for a firm like B.B. to match?
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Come on Uncle Hogan.. you have no choice now!Anonymous User wrote:Covington match with bonus for all US offices.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/oh-hai-covington/
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
There is no Covington email or memo. Fake news. Laaawwwllll ATLAnonymous User wrote:Covington match with bonus for all US offices.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/oh-hai-covington/
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Confirmed fake news. No email to NY or DCAnonymous User wrote:There is no Covington email or memo. Fake news. Laaawwwllll ATLAnonymous User wrote:Covington match with bonus for all US offices.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/oh-hai-covington/
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
The Covington thing is really odd. ATL (at least for now) has it listed on its scorecard, too. https://abovethelaw.com/2018/06/salary- ... ises-2018/
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
WSGR full match + bonus.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
ATL has taken down the Covington post. LOL
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Back to CovingTTTon it isAnonymous User wrote:ATL has taken down the Covington post. LOL
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Well it’s 5 pm in California. For those of us waiting for stragglers to match, see you on Monday.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Was hoping OMM would match by then.Anonymous User wrote:Well it’s 5 pm in California. For those of us waiting for stragglers to match, see you on Monday.
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Thoughts on how a firm with no official hours requirement will implement the summer bonus? Have any firms without an hours cutoff instituted an annualized cutoff solely for purposes of the special bonus?
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2 ... 389-34107/
Looks like we may see a new scale soon. Will other firms match?
Looks like we may see a new scale soon. Will other firms match?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 12:22 pm
Re: NYC to 200k
Can you screenshot? Can't read it.Anonymous User wrote:https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2 ... 389-34107/
Looks like we may see a new scale soon. Will other firms match?
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Are you referring to the Susman guy saying his firm might go above market? If so, I don’t think this moves the ball any. First, keep in mind that what Susman calls (and pays as) first years are all people with at least one previous clerkship. So they’re second years at the very least. So it’s not actually above market when you consider that CSM calls people first years based on years since graduation, not years at the firm. Second, Susman already paid what it calls first years above the 180 scale, and that didn’t move any other firms when Susman made that move.Anonymous User wrote:https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2 ... 389-34107/
Looks like we may see a new scale soon. Will other firms match?
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
just read it in incognito modeestefanchanning wrote:Can you screenshot? Can't read it.Anonymous User wrote:https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2 ... 389-34107/
Looks like we may see a new scale soon. Will other firms match?
anyway, this is just pure trolling by that anon, because the article is just about susman saying they'll probably exceed the scale (they were already at 190 prior to milbank/cravath raising to 190)
no regular firms are going to follow susman
-
- Posts: 428547
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NYC to 200k
Can confirm. But hours requirement for the bonus. Surprising wsgr is the first non-Quinn California firm to match.Anonymous User wrote:WSGR full match + bonus.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login