Kirkland #1 on AmLaw Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
"Kirkland & Ellis has dethroned Latham & Watkins as the world’s largest law firm by gross revenue after growing its top line by 19 percent last year, to $3.165 billion, according to preliminary data and analysis by ALM." PPP at $4.7M
https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2018 ... y-revenue/
https://www.law.com/americanlawyer/2018 ... y-revenue/
-
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:20 am
-
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 2:29 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
I guess that’s what happens when a first year associate charges like $600 an hour
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 1:11 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
RPL went up a little bit (5%), PPP went up dramatically, and headcount went up dramatically, mostly from beefing up KE's non-Chicago offices. Largest PE dealflow by a mile and the largest 4 chapter 11s. Looks healthy, but I wouldn't blame incoming KE associates from being paranoid they're joining the next Latham & Watkins.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:02 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
Of the larger law firms (can use Am Law 100 or whatever proxy you want), Kirkland is probably the one most run like a business, which means it will certainly cut dead weight when needed while at the same time offering up large sums of money for new lines of business (lateral hires) that lockstep firms are underpaying. I probably drink the koolaid a bit on this, but the numbers don't lie and certainly seem to support it. This isn't necessarily good or bad for associates, but I do think it's one of the safest places to go and guarantee you will get plenty of work for your first few years with a relatively small chance of being forced out early. Notwithstanding the cutting deadweight point, the firm also clearly gets that it's worth spending extra money on associates to keep them around (e.g. large bonuses, biz-dev budget), and doesn't do any of the nonsense like enforcing TTT hours minimums for bonuses - more importantly, they haven't no-offered a summer in years and (anecdotally) whenever they do push people out, it's more of the "please start looking for another job in the next 6 months" variety rather than a swift layoff. All this to say I think they are too concerned about outside perception to do a Lathaming and have the money to not need to even in a bad downturn.Graybrow wrote:RPL went up a little bit (5%), PPP went up dramatically, and headcount went up dramatically, mostly from beefing up KE's non-Chicago offices. Largest PE dealflow by a mile and the largest 4 chapter 11s. Looks healthy, but I wouldn't blame incoming KE associates from being paranoid they're joining the next Latham & Watkins.
Again - I'm a K&E associate so take all of this with a whatever amount of salt you deem necessary.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
I'm a K&E associate as well and think this is generally true, but I think in the next downturn partners will be more interested in protecting PPP than in keeping on associates who don't have enough work, irrespective of the outside perception. I'm no longer convinced it's Dewey, which I was worried about when I lateraled, but I don't think they're going to spend a lot of money to keep people they don't think they need. Probably not a full-on Lathaming of an entire class, but I think there will be layoffs when the music stops.MillllerTime wrote:Of the larger law firms (can use Am Law 100 or whatever proxy you want), Kirkland is probably the one most run like a business, which means it will certainly cut dead weight when needed while at the same time offering up large sums of money for new lines of business (lateral hires) that lockstep firms are underpaying. I probably drink the koolaid a bit on this, but the numbers don't lie and certainly seem to support it. This isn't necessarily good or bad for associates, but I do think it's one of the safest places to go and guarantee you will get plenty of work for your first few years with a relatively small chance of being forced out early. Notwithstanding the cutting deadweight point, the firm also clearly gets that it's worth spending extra money on associates to keep them around (e.g. large bonuses, biz-dev budget), and doesn't do any of the nonsense like enforcing TTT hours minimums for bonuses - more importantly, they haven't no-offered a summer in years and (anecdotally) whenever they do push people out, it's more of the "please start looking for another job in the next 6 months" variety rather than a swift layoff. All this to say I think they are too concerned about outside perception to do a Lathaming and have the money to not need to even in a bad downturn.Graybrow wrote:RPL went up a little bit (5%), PPP went up dramatically, and headcount went up dramatically, mostly from beefing up KE's non-Chicago offices. Largest PE dealflow by a mile and the largest 4 chapter 11s. Looks healthy, but I wouldn't blame incoming KE associates from being paranoid they're joining the next Latham & Watkins.
Again - I'm a K&E associate so take all of this with a whatever amount of salt you deem necessary.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 1:11 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
I mean it makes sense. The fact that RPL went up another 5 percent to over 1.5 million is also a good sign for associates. It means generally speaking you're probably profitable to keep around, even during recessions when that RPL number probably dips by a fair bit.MillllerTime wrote:Of the larger law firms (can use Am Law 100 or whatever proxy you want), Kirkland is probably the one most run like a business, which means it will certainly cut dead weight when needed while at the same time offering up large sums of money for new lines of business (lateral hires) that lockstep firms are underpaying. I probably drink the koolaid a bit on this, but the numbers don't lie and certainly seem to support it. This isn't necessarily good or bad for associates, but I do think it's one of the safest places to go and guarantee you will get plenty of work for your first few years with a relatively small chance of being forced out early. Notwithstanding the cutting deadweight point, the firm also clearly gets that it's worth spending extra money on associates to keep them around (e.g. large bonuses, biz-dev budget), and doesn't do any of the nonsense like enforcing TTT hours minimums for bonuses - more importantly, they haven't no-offered a summer in years and (anecdotally) whenever they do push people out, it's more of the "please start looking for another job in the next 6 months" variety rather than a swift layoff. All this to say I think they are too concerned about outside perception to do a Lathaming and have the money to not need to even in a bad downturn.Graybrow wrote:RPL went up a little bit (5%), PPP went up dramatically, and headcount went up dramatically, mostly from beefing up KE's non-Chicago offices. Largest PE dealflow by a mile and the largest 4 chapter 11s. Looks healthy, but I wouldn't blame incoming KE associates from being paranoid they're joining the next Latham & Watkins.
Again - I'm a K&E associate so take all of this with a whatever amount of salt you deem necessary.
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
Just curious. What is the KE biz dev budget? Considering a lateral offer there (mid level) and that is something I forgot to inquire about
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
Incoming Kirkland associate. Does anyone know if associate bonuses this year reflected the increases in revenue and PPP?
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
Speaking of, can someone already in Kirkland give advice on how to survive the junior years, especially the busiest departments like Restructuring right now? I get that everybody works hard and gets off by working hard, even hard-workers need some guidance swimming in a shark tank. APPRECIATE IT!!
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
Ha of course not, but most people got 1.3-1.5 market, which is pretty nice when plenty of firms don't even guaranty you a bonus.Anonymous User wrote:Incoming Kirkland associate. Does anyone know if associate bonuses this year reflected the increases in revenue and PPP?
Also, not sure why a firm doing incredibly well financially is a sign of being the next Latham. In bad times, people will get laid off, but it's not like the firm is by any means the most aggressive expander.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 2:02 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
The Business Development Budget ranges from $500-$1500 based on associate seniority, but this is just the amount that you don't need partner approval for (e.g. take your friend from undergrad who works at a bank out for cocktails/dinner). Partners can and liberally do approve $ over that if you're going out with the junior people at one of their clients.
The bonus point was a bit of an internal joke: they gave us a big presentation about how successful the firm has been this year and almost made it seem like we would be returning to the days of 3x or 4x market... only to have the punchline be "everyone gets an extra$5k!" - not that I'm complaining about $5k on top of an already 1.4x market bonus, but it certainly didn't reflect the fact that partners were apparently Scrooge-McDucking it in their piles of money last year. I now look at the bonus as a nice touch that shows associates they appreciate (hah) the extra hours and signals financial strength, but it's not enough money at any given class year to keep / bring someone to Kirkland that otherwise prefers another firm.
The bonus point was a bit of an internal joke: they gave us a big presentation about how successful the firm has been this year and almost made it seem like we would be returning to the days of 3x or 4x market... only to have the punchline be "everyone gets an extra$5k!" - not that I'm complaining about $5k on top of an already 1.4x market bonus, but it certainly didn't reflect the fact that partners were apparently Scrooge-McDucking it in their piles of money last year. I now look at the bonus as a nice touch that shows associates they appreciate (hah) the extra hours and signals financial strength, but it's not enough money at any given class year to keep / bring someone to Kirkland that otherwise prefers another firm.
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
Median 1L at a lower t13 here
Does an interest in doing restructuring work help at all with hiring for summer associates at K&E? That and real estate are the areas I'm the most interested in currently.
Does an interest in doing restructuring work help at all with hiring for summer associates at K&E? That and real estate are the areas I'm the most interested in currently.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 8:27 pm
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
what's crazy is how latham has hundreds of more attorneys and still got overtaken. are they just using lower billing model in certain cities?
-
- Posts: 428132
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
K&E should move to $200k starting salaries, with all the money it's making. Especially for the New York office
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: Kirkland #1 on AmLaw
Do you think Kirkland NY associates bill out at higher rates than other offices?Anonymous User wrote:K&E should move to $200k starting salaries, with all the money it's making. Especially for the New York office
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login