What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428477
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction
I've seen all of these used to mean basically the same thing. What sounds better to you?
Just wondering.
Just wondering.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 4LTsPointingNorth
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:17 am
Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction
This can't be a serious post, but I will give it a completely serious response.
All three are problematic and should be avoided.
"Cum Laude" to me just screams "not quite smart enough for 'Magna Cum Laude' or 'Summa Cum Laude.'"
"With honors" just screams "Without high honors" to me.
"With distinction" just seems like a made up award for effort.
I think the best bet is to just have a clean listing of the school attended in the attorney bio without any descriptors.
All three are problematic and should be avoided.
"Cum Laude" to me just screams "not quite smart enough for 'Magna Cum Laude' or 'Summa Cum Laude.'"
"With honors" just screams "Without high honors" to me.
"With distinction" just seems like a made up award for effort.
I think the best bet is to just have a clean listing of the school attended in the attorney bio without any descriptors.
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction
Whichever one your school uses.Anonymous User wrote:I've seen all of these used to mean basically the same thing. What sounds better to you?
Just wondering.
(Signed, Nony Mouse, BA cum laude.)
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:56 pm
Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction
I don't think you really have any control over which type of language your school uses. Latin or not ... go with how your school lists it on your diploma. Mine says "with honors" and I'm not going to change it to "cum laude"
-
- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428477
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction
I agree with "Cum Laude" = "not quite smart enough for 'Magna Cum Laude' or 'Summa Cum Laude.'"
"With distinction" sounds like it could be any award, including a pro bono award. Too broad.
"With honors" sounds best, because many folks don't realize/know that "With High Honors" or "With Highest Honors" exist. And "With honors" sounds decently broad to cover all three (honors, high honors and highest honors).
"With distinction" sounds like it could be any award, including a pro bono award. Too broad.
"With honors" sounds best, because many folks don't realize/know that "With High Honors" or "With Highest Honors" exist. And "With honors" sounds decently broad to cover all three (honors, high honors and highest honors).
- poptart123
- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction
Keeper of the Peregrinus tbh
http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/peregrinus/keeper
If I went to UT I would shoot for #4 just for that
http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/peregrinus/keeper
If I went to UT I would shoot for #4 just for that
- KissMyAxe
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:01 pm
Re: What sounds better: cum laude, with honors, with distinction
TITCRpoptart123 wrote:Keeper of the Peregrinus tbh
http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/peregrinus/keeper
If I went to UT I would shoot for #4 just for that