What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
Read a lot of people on here state that international tax is the place to be in the big 4. However, are there areas someone who is looking to eventually lateral to a law firm/government should avoid (for fear of being seen as undesirable by employers)?
Thanks.
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
I am probably not the best to answer this questions but since no one else has anything to say I'll take a stab at it. I just accepted a position with PwC doing M&A Tax (I am a JD, no LLM). First, I've heard that it is VERY difficult to lateral to law from Big4. I've talked with attorneys at the bigger firms where I live about what they look for in a lateral and they have all said that 1) they would be concerned that I didn't have the legal/drafting experience, but they would look highly at the M&A experience and 2) if they did decide to hire me I would not get credit for every year I was at PwC.
That being said, as for which group within Big4 to join if you decide to go that route... my vote is definitely with M&A. It is likely office/partner specific, but in my office our M&A group did NO compliance work and were typically seen as the top of the food chain. International does have quite a few attorneys as well, but they (in my office) did some compliance work. Many of the International associates wanted to make the jump to M&A but were not able to. I have heard that International does give better exit opportunities, but the work I do in M&A is much more fun to me than what they do in International (though we do often work together on deals.) Hope that helps.
That being said, as for which group within Big4 to join if you decide to go that route... my vote is definitely with M&A. It is likely office/partner specific, but in my office our M&A group did NO compliance work and were typically seen as the top of the food chain. International does have quite a few attorneys as well, but they (in my office) did some compliance work. Many of the International associates wanted to make the jump to M&A but were not able to. I have heard that International does give better exit opportunities, but the work I do in M&A is much more fun to me than what they do in International (though we do often work together on deals.) Hope that helps.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
I'm in M&A and sometimes envy the groups that do compliance. It seems like such a chill way to hit your utilization goals.Anonymous User wrote:I am probably not the best to answer this questions but since no one else has anything to say I'll take a stab at it. I just accepted a position with PwC doing M&A Tax (I am a JD, no LLM). First, I've heard that it is VERY difficult to lateral to law from Big4. I've talked with attorneys at the bigger firms where I live about what they look for in a lateral and they have all said that 1) they would be concerned that I didn't have the legal/drafting experience, but they would look highly at the M&A experience and 2) if they did decide to hire me I would not get credit for every year I was at PwC.
That being said, as for which group within Big4 to join if you decide to go that route... my vote is definitely with M&A. It is likely office/partner specific, but in my office our M&A group did NO compliance work and were typically seen as the top of the food chain. International does have quite a few attorneys as well, but they (in my office) did some compliance work. Many of the International associates wanted to make the jump to M&A but were not able to. I have heard that International does give better exit opportunities, but the work I do in M&A is much more fun to me than what they do in International (though we do often work together on deals.) Hope that helps.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
I'm a tax associate and we regularly interact with the accounting firms. I don't know enough about the particular accounting firm groups to answer your question directly but I can give a general comment. The two negatives we think about accounting firm employees are that, as said above, they are very weak in the drafting and interpretation of agreements and additionally they're overly specialized. To the extent you can avoid these negatives, or at least explain why they don't apply to you in an interview, I think you'll have an easier time transferring to law firm/government.
Drafting/Interpreting Agreements: Accounting firms will provide comments to Purchase Agreements. They clearly know the law and have good insight into structuring and particular, specific concerns about e.g. Section 338 elections. But they aren't great at understanding how a specific provision applies or what it means, which is particularly odd when it's boilerplate or somewhat modified boilerplate. They have trouble getting to what the ultimate result of a provision is because they just don't see nearly as many agreements and don't see nearly as many turns of the same agreement (typically they probably only see the first cut). So they have little insight into "market" terms and how we will start on one end and meet somewhere in the middle in the negotiation dance. Drafting is a whole other deal too. You somewhat regularly have to draft things from scratch and it doesn't have that much to do with knowing the tax law well. I can't imagine trying to pick that up after lateraling over as a 3rd year. You just have to see it done a lot and do it a lot.
Specialization: I'll work on a very detailed and involved partnership tax question in the morning, and then I'll switch gears in the afternoon to marking up a purchase and sale agreement for C corporations and looking at procedural law for a refund case at IRS appeals. Accounting firm employees will become experts in like not just partnership tax but a specific provision in partnership tax like 751(b). That's fantastic and you're hugely valuable. But law firms have few enough employees that you can't be that specialized. The salary of a given employee is too high for them not to be able to cover more ground than that and, maybe more importantly, we don't get enough 751(b) questions to keep you busy whereas EY or whoever does. There's also little advantage to being able to get that granular because ultimately we defer on specific accounting/tax treatment to the accounting firm signing the return. It sounds goofy to say that tax law practiced at a firm is "general" or "broad" but it actually is compared to the accounting firms.
Drafting/Interpreting Agreements: Accounting firms will provide comments to Purchase Agreements. They clearly know the law and have good insight into structuring and particular, specific concerns about e.g. Section 338 elections. But they aren't great at understanding how a specific provision applies or what it means, which is particularly odd when it's boilerplate or somewhat modified boilerplate. They have trouble getting to what the ultimate result of a provision is because they just don't see nearly as many agreements and don't see nearly as many turns of the same agreement (typically they probably only see the first cut). So they have little insight into "market" terms and how we will start on one end and meet somewhere in the middle in the negotiation dance. Drafting is a whole other deal too. You somewhat regularly have to draft things from scratch and it doesn't have that much to do with knowing the tax law well. I can't imagine trying to pick that up after lateraling over as a 3rd year. You just have to see it done a lot and do it a lot.
Specialization: I'll work on a very detailed and involved partnership tax question in the morning, and then I'll switch gears in the afternoon to marking up a purchase and sale agreement for C corporations and looking at procedural law for a refund case at IRS appeals. Accounting firm employees will become experts in like not just partnership tax but a specific provision in partnership tax like 751(b). That's fantastic and you're hugely valuable. But law firms have few enough employees that you can't be that specialized. The salary of a given employee is too high for them not to be able to cover more ground than that and, maybe more importantly, we don't get enough 751(b) questions to keep you busy whereas EY or whoever does. There's also little advantage to being able to get that granular because ultimately we defer on specific accounting/tax treatment to the accounting firm signing the return. It sounds goofy to say that tax law practiced at a firm is "general" or "broad" but it actually is compared to the accounting firms.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
That's funny because I'm an associate at PwC international tax with an LLM, and I can tell you that we do absolutely zero compliance work as lawyers, though we certainly do have a lot of admin shit to do. I heard the exact opposite about M&A - that it is much less legal than international and have a hard time exiting to decent options (in the legal realm). It's cool to drink the kool-aid, just don't drink it too much bro.Anonymous User wrote:I am probably not the best to answer this questions but since no one else has anything to say I'll take a stab at it. I just accepted a position with PwC doing M&A Tax (I am a JD, no LLM). First, I've heard that it is VERY difficult to lateral to law from Big4. I've talked with attorneys at the bigger firms where I live about what they look for in a lateral and they have all said that 1) they would be concerned that I didn't have the legal/drafting experience, but they would look highly at the M&A experience and 2) if they did decide to hire me I would not get credit for every year I was at PwC.
That being said, as for which group within Big4 to join if you decide to go that route... my vote is definitely with M&A. It is likely office/partner specific, but in my office our M&A group did NO compliance work and were typically seen as the top of the food chain. International does have quite a few attorneys as well, but they (in my office) did some compliance work. Many of the International associates wanted to make the jump to M&A but were not able to. I have heard that International does give better exit opportunities, but the work I do in M&A is much more fun to me than what they do in International (though we do often work together on deals.) Hope that helps.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
Don't do SALT. Don't do Fed Tax. Don't do anything that is overly specialized like R&D, 199, etc.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
That follows exactly what I said about groups being different in different offices. In my office, International folks typically do a bit of compliance, though there may be some that don't get staffed on it. Also, I said, "I have heard that International does give better exit opportunities..." so I'm not sure why you infer that I said otherwise.Anonymous User wrote: That's funny because I'm an associate at PwC international tax with an LLM, and I can tell you that we do absolutely zero compliance work as lawyers, though we certainly do have a lot of admin shit to do. I heard the exact opposite about M&A - that it is much less legal than international and have a hard time exiting to decent options (in the legal realm). It's cool to drink the kool-aid, just don't drink it too much bro.
Anyways, moral of the story is that groups within Big4 vary between offices. As dabigchina said, just don't do SALT, Fed, etc. International or M&A would both be great groups to be in--just find which one you prefer if you decide to go down that route.
Good luck.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 8:16 pm
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
Why not SALT if you mind me asking?dabigchina wrote:Don't do SALT. Don't do Fed Tax. Don't do anything that is overly specialized like R&D, 199, etc.
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
They will probably force a shitload of compliance down your throat. State tax compliance is pretty much the dullest type of compliance too (although compliance is, as a rule, dull).hifromtheotherside wrote:Why not SALT if you mind me asking?dabigchina wrote:Don't do SALT. Don't do Fed Tax. Don't do anything that is overly specialized like R&D, 199, etc.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
dabigchina wrote:They will probably force a shitload of compliance down your throat. State tax compliance is pretty much the dullest type of compliance too (although compliance is, as a rule, dull).hifromtheotherside wrote:Why not SALT if you mind me asking?dabigchina wrote:Don't do SALT. Don't do Fed Tax. Don't do anything that is overly specialized like R&D, 199, etc.
+1. I was in SALT at a big4 and I did a TON of compliance and hated it. With that said...its a good way to learn state taxes I guess. Unless you are in a hyper specialized SALT group like sales&use or credits and incentives, once you are seen as a compliance guy/gal, they staff you on it every year which makes it hard to do any controversy or consulting.
BTW Though one of my friends in SALT became tax counsel for a state taxing agency, exit options are generally a lot more limited for people in the specialized groups (other than international or m&a).
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:16 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
SALT has to be important for regional law firm tax practices don't you think (and state government for that matter)? Maybe because I practice in a capital I see a lot of attorneys doing SALT stuff.dabigchina wrote:Don't do SALT. Don't do Fed Tax. Don't do anything that is overly specialized like R&D, 199, etc.
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
I can't speak to that specifically. My experience is working in Big4 tax and recruiting for biglaw. I did not see too many big SALT groups at market paying firms.foregetaboutdre wrote:SALT has to be important for regional law firm tax practices don't you think (and state government for that matter)? Maybe because I practice in a capital I see a lot of attorneys doing SALT stuff.dabigchina wrote:Don't do SALT. Don't do Fed Tax. Don't do anything that is overly specialized like R&D, 199, etc.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What areas of big 4 should someone looking to move to law firm/government eventually avoid?
Necroing this thread.
Anybody have insights on the trade and customs service line? Particularly interested in the following:
-Quality of work (how "legal" is it?)
-QoL/Hours
-Salary (do they get paid as much as international tax and M&A folks?)
-Exits
Would it be better or worse than international tax in regards to the above?
Anybody have insights on the trade and customs service line? Particularly interested in the following:
-Quality of work (how "legal" is it?)
-QoL/Hours
-Salary (do they get paid as much as international tax and M&A folks?)
-Exits
Would it be better or worse than international tax in regards to the above?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login