2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- rahulg91
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:30 pm
2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
SOURCE: The American Lawyer
In case anyone cares.
Last edited by rahulg91 on Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- MCFC
- Posts: 9695
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:46 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Gross
3,855
Firm with the lawyer with the most billable hours
Troutman Sanders
- Pokemon
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Holy shit, someone at troutman billed 3,800 hours. That is like 315-320 hours a month on average.
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
My big takeaway is don't work for a firm that sounds fishy.
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Someone has to work at Troutman and know this guy. He is either (1) incredibly overbilling (2) a robot pretending to be human or (3) preparing to jump off a bridge right now
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 8:39 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Does OP have the actual list as well?
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:28 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Sleeping with the trauts.favabeansoup wrote:Someone has to work at Troutman and know this guy. He is either (1) incredibly overbilling (2) a robot pretending to be human or (3) preparing to jump off a bridge right now
... sorry.
-
- Posts: 428461
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
My firm is at the top of PPP, revenue per lawyer, profits per lawyer, etc. yet we were told we need to get our billables up because they're lower than our peer firms. I fucking hate this industry.
-
- Posts: 428461
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
How is Quinn?Anonymous User wrote:My firm is at the top of PPP, revenue per lawyer, profits per lawyer, etc. yet we were told we need to get our billables up because they're lower than our peer firms. I fucking hate this industry.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
If you don't have American Lawyer subscription, you should be able to access it through Lexis (if, of course, you have Lexis access).tireisias05 wrote:Does OP have the actual list as well?
-
- Posts: 428461
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Heh, I'm not a chill litbro who gets to wear FLIP FLOPS.Anonymous User wrote:How is Quinn?Anonymous User wrote:My firm is at the top of PPP, revenue per lawyer, profits per lawyer, etc. yet we were told we need to get our billables up because they're lower than our peer firms. I fucking hate this industry.
- EzraFitz
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:42 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Yeah, billing 10.5 hours a day for an entire year is just... death.favabeansoup wrote:Someone has to work at Troutman and know this guy. He is either (1) incredibly overbilling (2) a robot pretending to be human or (3) preparing to jump off a bridge right now
-
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Can someone just post the list for us lazy people?RaceJudicata wrote:If you don't have American Lawyer subscription, you should be able to access it through Lexis (if, of course, you have Lexis access).tireisias05 wrote:Does OP have the actual list as well?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428461
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
grades?? wrote:Can someone just post the list for us lazy people?RaceJudicata wrote:If you don't have American Lawyer subscription, you should be able to access it through Lexis (if, of course, you have Lexis access).tireisias05 wrote:Does OP have the actual list as well?
http://imgur.com/a/gLU0I
holler if y'all want any other metrics.
-
- Posts: 985
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Is there a full list of just 1-100?Anonymous User wrote:grades?? wrote:Can someone just post the list for us lazy people?RaceJudicata wrote:If you don't have American Lawyer subscription, you should be able to access it through Lexis (if, of course, you have Lexis access).tireisias05 wrote:Does OP have the actual list as well?
http://imgur.com/a/gLU0I
holler if y'all want any other metrics.
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Thanks! Any chance we could get PPL?Anonymous User wrote:grades?? wrote:Can someone just post the list for us lazy people?RaceJudicata wrote:If you don't have American Lawyer subscription, you should be able to access it through Lexis (if, of course, you have Lexis access).tireisias05 wrote:Does OP have the actual list as well?
http://imgur.com/a/gLU0I
holler if y'all want any other metrics.
-
- Posts: 428461
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
1857 seems low for the the highest average billed hours
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
I for one am shocked that Attica, Andersonville, and Birkenau LLP weren't rushing out to volunteer how infrequently their indentures see their families to Amlaw.Anonymous User wrote:1857 seems low for the the highest average billed hours
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
lol at poor "Lewis Brisbois" getting absolutely fucking savaged.
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Those Lawyer/Partner numbers are disgusting at everywhere but Jones Day.
-
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
partners that bill like 400 hours really skew these numbersAnonymous User wrote:1857 seems low for the the highest average billed hours
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
dixiecupdrinking wrote:lol at poor "Lewis Brisbois" getting absolutely fucking savaged.
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
I've been doing 10+ hour days for 2 months now and it's soul wearying. I've managed to get my weekends less crazy at least, but I can't imagine going consistently north of 225, let alone 300 every single month.EzraFitz wrote:Yeah, billing 10.5 hours a day for an entire year is just... death.favabeansoup wrote:Someone has to work at Troutman and know this guy. He is either (1) incredibly overbilling (2) a robot pretending to be human or (3) preparing to jump off a bridge right now
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
The Troutman person probably only got like a 40-50k bonus too.
I think it should be against the law to bill over 3,500k and not get at least a $100k bonus.
I think it should be against the law to bill over 3,500k and not get at least a $100k bonus.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2017 10:27 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
i am a junior attorney considering this firm. i am not too familiar with the chart or how to read it. could you shed some light on why this firm is laughed at?cron1834 wrote:dixiecupdrinking wrote:lol at poor "Lewis Brisbois" getting absolutely fucking savaged.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login