2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- axel.foley
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:44 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Cravath is another firm with only equity partners - they push this fact pretty hard. Not sure why it isn't included in that part of the graphic.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:15 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
I don't think they got "savaged" but according to the graphic Lewis Brisbois has the lowest total revenue per lawyer among the AmLaw 100. Are things stable over there or has there been some downsizing?hugerez wrote:i am a junior attorney considering this firm. i am not too familiar with the chart or how to read it. could you shed some light on why this firm is laughed at?cron1834 wrote:dixiecupdrinking wrote:lol at poor "Lewis Brisbois" getting absolutely fucking savaged.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
I don't have any idea - they seem like an ordinary firm. Certainly being #100 means you're bigger and more successful than ten-thousand firms that are smaller. They just happen to be last among this particular subset. Don't overthink it.OneTwoThreeFour wrote:I don't think they got "savaged" but according to the graphic Lewis Brisbois has the lowest total revenue per lawyer among the AmLaw 100. Are things stable over there or has there been some downsizing?hugerez wrote:i am a junior attorney considering this firm. i am not too familiar with the chart or how to read it. could you shed some light on why this firm is laughed at?cron1834 wrote:dixiecupdrinking wrote:lol at poor "Lewis Brisbois" getting absolutely fucking savaged.
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:48 pm
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Lewis Brisbois is an insurance firm. The pay is very low relative to the hours you will work.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
John White shifted to non-equity (for conflict reasons) while Mary Jo White was SEC chair. He’s back to equity now.axel.foley wrote:Cravath is another firm with only equity partners - they push this fact pretty hard. Not sure why it isn't included in that part of the graphic.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
I can confirm this firm pays 95K ($5K of that a bonus incentive) starting with 2000 or 2050 billable (depending on your practice group) with bonus built in to the billing requirement. So if you dont meet your hours you get $90K. If you meet your hours you get $95K. Who the fuck would work extra 200 hours for $5K if they had a choice? This isnt optional though. If you dont meet hour hours 2 yrs in a row you get canned. Their bonus structure is retarded.tyroneslothrop1 wrote:Lewis Brisbois is an insurance firm. The pay is very low relative to the hours you will work.
Also no 401K contribution or any other kind of benefit except HMO medical insurance. Overall compensation package is shittier than most midsize firms.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
I just saw this thread today. Do not understand why K&S isn’t listed….their revs are around $1.5B and their PPP is +2.1M.
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
What do you mean by not listed? I think they're number 27 in the Amlaw 100, just not notably high or low enough anywhere to make the illustrative subset lists that are in this threadAnonymous User wrote:I just saw this thread today. Do not understand why K&S isn’t listed….their revs are around $1.5B and their PPP is +2.1M.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Could anyone post the 2018 AmLaw 100 numbers?
I can't get through the paywall.
I can't get through the paywall.
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
https://imgur.com/a/8jwXBH2Anonymous User wrote:Could anyone post the 2018 AmLaw 100 numbers?
I can't get through the paywall.
https://imgur.com/a/cxqiP8H
https://imgur.com/a/bblpgte
-
- Posts: 428122
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2017 AmLaw 100 By The Numbers
Thanks a lot for posting.
Is there any way you can post the full lists? (specifically for gross revenue & profits per partner)
Is there any way you can post the full lists? (specifically for gross revenue & profits per partner)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login